J. J. Charhon
Analyst · Stifel. You may begin
Thank you, Eilif. Before we go through our results for the quarter, I would like to highlight that even though our financials have been recast for Discontinued Operations, the seasonality of the business remains largely unchanged. The first and third quarter represent the main intake cycles, and the second and fourth quarters are seasonally strong from a P&L perspective as classes are in session during those periods. Additionally, as discussed during last quarter's earnings call, the phasing of our quarterly revenue has been further impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This resulted in moving a number of classes from earlier in the year to the third quarter. In light of that, we believe that our year-to-date results may be more representative of our current operating performance. With that context in mind, let me now cover the financial results starting on Page 8. Revenue in the third quarter was $244 million and adjusted EBITDA was $50 million. Results for the third quarter included approximately $20 million of revenue associated with classes that were deferred from earlier in the year. On a comparable basis and at constant currency, revenue for Q3 declined by 4% while adjusted EBITDA was up by double digits. Moving now to year-to-date September results. When combined with the first half results, still on a comparable basis and at constant currency, our overall performance year-to-date resulted in a decrease in revenue by 7%. However, adjusted EBITDA was up 27%, showing continued margin expansion following cost and efficiency actions that we have undertaken this year across all operating segments and at corporate. Let me now provide some additional color on the performance of our two remaining operating segments, Mexico and Peru, starting with Page 11. Please note that all indicators we will discuss are on an organic and constant currency basis. Let's start with Mexico, where our main intake cycle was completed and enrolled 63,000 new students. Though this represents a 7% decline versus prior year. These results were broadly in line with our expectation given the continued impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Total enrollment shows a similar trend with a decline of 7% versus prior year. Revenue trends followed the decline in enrollments with year-to-date revenue down 7% as compared to the same period a year ago. Adjusted EBITDA through year-to-date September is down 14% mostly due to revenue deferrals into Q4. In Peru, the main intake cycle occurred earlier this year. However, in that market, we do have a smaller secondary intake which occurs during the third quarter. The results in Peru also continue to be impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and as a result, the secondary intake for Q3 was down 22% versus prior year. The impact on total enrollment was more limited, to being down only 13% as compared to the same period last year, aided by the better performance of our primary intake in March. If we look at our performance by institution, we continue to see what we experienced in the second quarter. The enrollment at our value brand institution, UPN in Peru, like UNITEC in Mexico, has been more affected given that their target market is made up of students whose income has been disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 crisis. Revenue in the third quarter for Peru is benefiting from the deferral of classes from prior periods. Year-to-date September, revenue was down 7% versus prior year, following lower enrollment trends, but was partially offset by positive mix shift. Similarly, Adjusted EBITDA in the third quarter is benefiting from the deferral of classes from prior periods, whereas adjusted EBITDA on year-to-date basis is essentially flat versus prior year. Turning now to our corporate G&A segment on Page 13. Throughout 2020, we have continued to right size our corporate G&A infrastructure and already decreased our expense run rate by nearly $40 million. Looking forward, assuming Mexico and Peru are the only two countries left, we believe that the corporate infrastructure can be a small fraction of what it is today. Our current view is that once all of our announced asset sales have closed, the level of corporate G&A needed should $25 million or a 70% to 80% reduction of what our run rate is today. Let's now move to guidance, starting on Page 14. On a comparable basis, our full year guidance remains unchanged and is as follows: For Continuing Operations, total enrollment is estimated to be approximately 325,000 students. Revenue is estimated to be between $1 billion, and $1.2 billion. Adjusted EBITDA, estimated to be $185 million and $195 million. This is comprised of approximately of approximately $100 million of corporate G&A expenses, and between $285 million and $295 million of adjusted EBITDA from Mexico and Peru on a combined basis. For our consolidated operations, free cash flow is estimated to be between $150 million and $170 million. Finally, as it is typically the case after we have just announced asset sales, our current debt position and level of corporate G&A do not yet reflect the financial profile we expect once all the announced divestitures have been completed. Please refer to Page 17, which outlines how to think about adjusting for those two items using our 2020 full year guidance as the baseline. First, on the G&A front, as discussed earlier, we expect to reduce our run rate by 70% to 80%. This alone, assuming everything is similar to our current year guidance would bring our adjusted EBITDA margin to 26% which is 400 basis points ahead of the target we had originally set for ourselves in 2020. The business would also be much more cash accretive with an unlevered free cash flow margin of 14% of revenue. Second, the balance sheet, which today is in a net debt position of $803 million, would move to a net cash position of $1.8 billion following the receipt of about $2.6 billion net proceeds from the pending asset sales. Please note that of the $2.6 billion expected, $650 million was already received this week from the close of the sale of our businesses in Australia and New Zealand. Let me now close out my prepared remarks by providing some guidance on the use of our excess liquidities. Our capital allocation strategy remains unchanged: first, support our business operations; second, repay our debt only if needed; finally, return excess capital to shareholders in the most tax-efficient manner possible. On Slide 19, we have laid out a straw-man for how we are thinking about doing that. Today, we are taking the first step by announcing an authorization for a new share repurchase program up to $300 million. Eilif that concludes my remarks. Now back to you for the wrap-up.