Thanks, Mark, and good morning to everyone. Net loans outstanding as of December 31, 2016 totaled $420 million. This is a $3 million increase from our March 31, 2015 total of $417 million in net loans and flat compared to December 31, as Mark mentioned previously. Our commercial banking team continues to focus on prospecting and expanding both new and existing high quality banking relationships. Non-performing loans, which primarily consist of loans greater than 90 days past due, totaled $2.7 million or 0.64% of gross loans as of December 31, 2016. This compares to a level of 0.51% as of year-end 2015 and represents a decline from the year earlier level of $5.9 million or 1.40% as of March 31, 2015. The increase this year-end primarily represents one loan that entered into the foreclosure process in the first quarter of this year. Our credit risk and collection efforts continue to be focused on reducing these totals. Another indicator we monitor is part of our credit risk management efforts, is our level of loans past due 30 to 89 days. The level of past due loans between 30 and 89 days still accruing interest as of March 31, 2016 totaled $957,000 or 0.22% of gross loans. This is a decline from 0.33% of gross loans as of December 31, 2015. We continue to monitor delinquency trends carefully in all loan categories. Our balance and other assets real estate owned totaled $310,000 as of March 31, a decline from $1 million at year-end 2015. The other real estate owned balances have declined as a result of efforts to move problem loans through the collection process towards resolution. We continue to market for sale properties held in real estate owned. We recorded net loan charge-offs of $103,000 during the first quarter of 2016. This compares to net loan recoveries of $1.5 million in the first quarter of 2015. The significant recovery in 2015 has mentioned previously, it was a result of ongoing collection efforts on a construction loan that it’s previously been charged-off in 2010 and 2011. We continue to maintain a diversified mix in the loan portfolio in both loan types and geography across the state. On a consolidated basis the resulting Landmark loan portfolio gross totals approximately $433 million as of March 31, 2016. In terms of exposure to credit concentrations, we maintain a heightened focus on our portfolio management of commercial real estate and construction and land relationships. Recent regulatory publications have emphasized increased emphasis of these portfolio categories. As part of our comprehensive credit risk management process, we review construction land and commercial real estate for loan type, and geographic concentration issues on a quarterly basis. As of March 31, 2016, our construction and land loan portfolio balances totaled $15.3 million or 3.6% of our total loan portfolio. Outstanding loan balances in our commercial real estate portfolio totaled $118.5 million, representing 28.2% of our total loan portfolio, which is a slight decline from year-end 2015. Landmark loan portfolio and the construction land category ended March 31, 2016 at 17.5% of risk based capital, well below the regulatory guideline of 100%, a level where regulators could view the total as a concentration requiring heightened risk management practices. Our commercial real estate portfolio was at 153% of risk based capital which if far below the 300% regulatory guideline in that category. Mortgage one-to-four family loan portfolio represents just under 32% of the portfolio at $132.3 million for March 31, 2016, compared to $131.9 million or just under 31% as of the year-end 2015. The broader residential real estate economy across the state showed stable to increasing sales activity for the past year. The 2016 forecast according to the WSU Center for real estate is for sales across Kansas dry icing more than 8% in 2016. The performance of this segment of our portfolio remains strong to-date, with low levels of delinquency and collections issues. With regard to our agricultural loan portfolio, total balances were $73.2 million or 17.4% of our total loan portfolio as of March 31, 2016, which represents an increase from $63.3 million or 15% of the portfolio one year ago on March 31, 2015. The growth has come from an expansion of our Ag portfolio base in both Southeast and Southwest Kansas, as well as decelerating repayments from Ag borrowers impacted by lower commodity prices. The agriculture outlook appears to be challenging primarily due to continued depressed commodity prices. Livestock feeders are operating with shrinking margins compared to prior years, although appear to have stabilized in the past few months. Row crop producers will face a challenging year looking forward due to lower commodity prices combined with relatively flat input costs. Farmland prices have declined modestly in the past couple of quarters across kicking into this with more softness in certain land use categories and others. Our exposure in the farmland lending segment remains limited, as the majority of our agricultural loans are tied with the production cycle. We're operating with an increased focus on our agricultural loan portfolio as that sector enters potentially its most challenging environment in the past several years. Risk trends in that portfolio are not showing signs of material deterioration at this time and we remain confident in our credit risk practices. Our agriculture lending staff has made out with some of the most seasoned and qualified Ag bankers in the state most of whom have experienced multiple downward cycles in this sector. Commercial and industrial loans were $59.4 million as of March 31, 2016, just over 14% of the current portfolio. The total is down slightly from year end 2015 at a total of $61.3 million. The current macroeconomic landscape in Kansas remains stable. The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for Kansas as of March was 3.9% versus a 5.0% [national rate according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. A noted area of escalated risk at this time is the energy sector. The bank’s direct exposure to this industry represents less than 1% of risk-based capital and a very small fractional percentage of the entire loan portfolio. There may be limited instances of indirect exposure in certain industries or geographies, but we believe the bank's exposure to the recent weakness in the energy sector is immaterial. We will continue to carefully monitor the many factors impacting our credit portfolios going forward and we will remain diligent and disciplined in applying the same high-quality underwriting and risk management practices that have supported our continued profitability these past several quarters. Thanks again and with that, I'll hand it back over to Michael.