Good morning, and welcome to the Lithia & Driveway First Quarter 2023 Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the call over to Amit Marwaha, Director of Investor Relations. Please begin.

Thank you. With me today are Bryan DeBoer, President and CEO; Chris Holzshu, Executive Vice President and COO; Tina Miller, Senior Vice President and CFO; and Chuck Lietz, Senior Vice President of Driveway Finance. Today’s discussion may include statements about future events, financial projections and expectations about the company’s products, markets and growth. Such statements are forward-looking and subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to materially differ from the statements made. We disclose those risks and uncertainties we deem to be material in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We urge you to carefully consider these disclosures and not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We undertake no duty to update any forward-looking statements, which are made as of the date of this release. Our results discussed today include references to non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to the text of today’s press release for a reconciliation to comparable GAAP measures. We have also posted an updated Investor Presentation on our website investors.driveway.com, highlighting our first quarter results. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Bryan DeBoer, President and CEO.

Thanks, Amit. Good morning and welcome to our first quarter earnings call. We appreciate everyone joining us today and the opportunities to update you on our business strategy, growth and progress towards our 2025 plan. In Q1, Lithia & Driveway grew revenues to $7 billion, up 4% from 2022, resulting in adjusted diluted earnings per share of $8.44. Sequentially, GPUs were more resilient than expected across new and used and F&I, and we continue to focus on profitability, driving high-performance and improved efficiency. Our model and vehicle operations allowed our stores to be nimble while offering customers a variety of products and services to fit all budgets. By managing a wide variety of channels to interact with our customers, our responsiveness and adaptable model delivers the best experiences for our customers wherever, whenever and however they desire. Our store teams continue to proactively respond to the varying climate in each of our regions. Our captive finance operations, Driveway Finance Corporation or DFC, continues to grow at a balance pace with nearly $630 million in originations in loans in the quarter, with the weighted average rate of 9%. Our focus remains on selectively growing the portfolio and increasing our net margin as we continue to invest in this adjacency. DFC continues to mature with near-term performance, reflecting the investment related to CECL reserves for a growing portfolio. We have a clear line of sight to how DFC will meaningfully increase our profitability over time. I'll let Chris and Chuck provide more details on the results of both vehicle and financing operations later in the call. Acquisitions are the foundation to how we build convenient proximity to our consumers and fundamental to our strategy. Our target of being within a 100 miles of consumers allows us to leverage our physical infrastructure for…

Thank you, Bryan. Good morning. I want to start by acknowledging our operational team's continued focus on executing our plan with a disciplined and pragmatic approach to deliver our customer-centric omnichannel operating model. There is no doubt our associates will continue to execute at a high level as we march towards achievement of our $50 billion in revenue and $55 plus EPS milestone. We recently gathered in person with our top performing operators to share best practices and gain insights into the steps we need to continue to reinforce to ensure success. We left our time together confident in our ability to drive results at the local market level and live our culture of high performance under our mission of growth powered by people for Lithia and Driveway. Now as it relates to the quarter; overall results were as expected as we continue to see a rebalancing of supply and demand in the new vehicle market, coupled with affordabilities associated with rising interest rates. Consistent with last quarter, there was a disproportionate number of fleet vehicles being transacted outside the retail network as national fleet was up 60%, which significantly impact comparability with several of our OEMs when considering the total US versus retail. As a result, overall customer incentives remain limited. Consequently, while inventory availability is improving, several OEMs have not invested in additional consumer incentives to meet the retail demand. We expect incentives to increase throughout the year, which should have a positive impact on new car volumes. Varying regional performance continues to impact where we operate. For example, our west and north central regions, which we refer to as regions one, two and three, continue to see a negative growth trend in the quarter as total same store new vehicle sales fell 6% compared to our Eastern…

Thanks Chris. DFC had another consistent quarter and continued his Lithia & Driveway as number one lender. This is a testament to the entire DFC team, which delivers its superior value proposition to our dealerships as a captive finance company, balanced against managing portfolio risk. Our near term objectives continue to be growing the portfolio of high credit quality paper, creating a systemic and scalable capital structure and providing accretive financial returns. In Q1, the portfolio grew to over $2.4 billion, driven by the quarterly originations of $629 million, which equated to a 14% penetration rate. We originated contracts with a weighted average FICO of 731 and were able to achieve this while continuing to increase average yield, which ended at 9%. For the quarter, our financing operations achieved a net interest margin of $16 million with a loss of $21 million. Though DFC is a drag to earnings today, as Bryan mentioned, this investment drives our future profitability as each loan is three times more profitable at full maturity, which more than offsets the upfront $26 million provision accruals included in our loss. From a portfolio performance management perspective, DFC continues to leverage the positive impact of moving upmarket in terms of credit quality. The portfolio average FICO scores increased to 713 from 679 a year ago. We also reduced front end LTVs for four consecutive quarters with Q1 originations at 95.9%, a 130 basis point reduction sequentially and an over 800 basis point reduction from Q1 2022. At the end of March, our allowance for loan losses as a percentage of managed receivables remained at 3.1%. Overall, delinquency rates improved in the first quarter as our 30-day plus delinquency fell approximately 40 basis points to 3.7%. This was driven by a combination of DFC's improved credit quality, investments…

Thanks Chuck and thank you, everyone for joining us today. In the first quarter, we reported adjusted EBITDA of $406 million down 26% from last year. This result was driven by normalizing GPUs, impact of higher flooring interest costs driven by both rate and increasing inventory levels and continued investments associated with growing our adjacencies. We ended the quarter with net leverage, excluding the floor plan and debt related to DFC at 1.6 times, essentially unchanged from last quarter. During the quarter, we generated free cash flow of $323 million and remain committed to our capital allocation strategy of 65% of our free cash flows targeted to acquisitions, 25% for internal investment, including capital expenditures and 10% for shareholder return in the form of dividends and share purchases when they are opportunistic. The acquisitions completed in the first quarter were funded through a combination of using free cash flows and working capital facilities. Additionally, we increased our dividend 19% to $0.50 per share for the quarter. We're committed to achieving an investment grade rating over time with a prioritization of growth and acquisitions in the near term. During our growth, our goal is to maintain financial discipline was leveraged below three times. After reviewing feedback from our investors, we decided to simplify our reporting prospectively flowing through all activity tied to DFC through the financing operations income loss line, ultimately making it easier for investors to compare results between our peers. We've added a slide with information on this topic in the appendix of our investor presentation. For 2023, we expect a loss of $40 million from financing operations. This compares to a total $47 million loss in 2022, which was presented as a $4 million financing operations loss that excluded $43 million in expense for net charge-offs presented as part of SG&A. Additionally, we reaffirm the expected DFC future state contribution of $650 million at a fully mature portfolio on a $50 billion base of revenue. We are confident we are positioned with sufficient liquidity to achieve our 2025 plan. We focus on continued acquisition growth, while preserving the quality of the balance sheet and achieving profitability in our maturing adjacencies. As we work toward achieving $55 to $60 in earnings per share as part of our 2025 plan and driving further profitability in the long term, we are committed to growing our company and generating value for our shareholders. This concludes our prepared remarks. With that, I'll turn the call over to the audience for questions. Operator?

[Operator instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Daniel Imbro with Stephens. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, good morning, everybody. Thanks for taking our questions. I actually - I had two questions. And if I could start over in the UK, I wanted to ask about the flow-through that you'd expect there. Brian, you mentioned, overall maybe a $1.10, $1.20 for every $1 billion in revenue, but given that it's a new market, and given that I think historically the UK carries higher expenses, should we maybe anticipate a lower flow-through in the near term as you ramp up Jardine? And then how quickly would you expect to add scale over there as you're just kind of learning the market and getting your feet wet over there? And I do have a follow up.

Great, Daniel. This is Bryan. I think most importantly, this is planting seeds into Western Europe. Our primary focus is still domestically in the United States and we'll have a good year of acquisitions here as well. Remember also that Jardine is a lot of premium luxury, a lot of Porsche, a lot of Mercedes, lot of Audi and some other - even higher luxury brands like Ferrari and stuff. So their margins historically, even pre-COVID, were at pretty high levels and we do not see any differentiation between it and what we see in the United States. Most importantly, the economics on what we paid were about 40% discount off of the same type of franchises that we're typically seeing in the United States. And Neil and his team are a great cultural fit and we think that have all the abilities to be able to exemplify what our beliefs are in people and what our offerings are to our consumers.

Great. That's really helpful color, Bryan. And then maybe just one on DFC, the most common kind of investor questions today focused around kind of the DFC outlook. If I look at the slides, next year dropped a little over I think a $100 million in earnings. Could we just dig into what the assumptions are? The KPIs look similar, 2.5% losses, normalized spreads in future, but obviously substantially lower earnings. Penetration looks like it's going down, so that shouldn't be a headwind anymore. So can we kind of just walk through what the changes were between the $105 million and maybe the $1 million next year in DFC earnings, if loss expectations are the same and everything else feels more similar, what changed?

Thanks, Daniel. This is Chuck. Thanks for your question. Essentially as we look out, you have to remember first of all, the Lithia & Driveway is going to continue to grow. And so a lot of this, as we look forward to next year, is the incremental notional originations that still is going to require a larger CECL reserve to take the provision accrual for future expected losses. So when we sort of break out that next year number, profitability will go down as a result of that headwind, but then, as that portfolio starts to amortize and starts to generate positive returns and normalizes out those CECL reserves, it should be accretive as - on a forward-looking basis.

There's been no change to what you think like the core loss expectation of your customer would be given the macro changes. Chuck, sorry to squeeze one more in there.

Yeah, I think from forward-looking perspective, we're fairly conservative in how we're managing forward-looking rev. First, our primary strategy has been to move up market. We still feel very confident that that's the right strategy. And when we look at sort of the core fundamentals in terms of the FICO score, as well as our structure, and that's really borne out by the lower delinquency rates that we're really starting to experience. And so, we already have a little bit of conservatism and over provisioning versus what our models are saying, and we feel that that's prudence both today and on a go-forward basis.

Great. I appreciate all the color and best of luck.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of John Murphy with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning, guys. I just had a question around Bryan, you're sort of opening - in your kind of opening statement, you sort of seem to voice some frustration with a lack of incentives and it sounded like you expect more to come, but also expect, it sounded like you were pushing for those a little bit as well to help move the metal to some degree. So I'm just curious, what your take is if incentives don't step up, what it means for pricing and grosses and why you think they really should just give them what's going on in a reasonably tight market.

John, I'm going to -- why don't I let Chris handle that? He has a pretty good grasp on that and some different reference points with some of the domestics as well.

Yeah. Hey John, good morning. It's Chris. I think kind of looking back a little bit historically where incentives were at, looking back to 2021, lease incentives are probably in line with where we've been historically. They're still about 10% off of where we've been, leasing only about 20% of our overall mix and really focused more on our luxury brands, right? But when you look at finance incentives, they're still 50% of what they worked two years ago. And when you see that we have inventory on the ground right now, especially in the domestic lines that is not moving, it's starting, it - we're -- our day supply is building and you look at this fleet business, which was up 60% in the quarter, you start to see that there's a timing of when incentives are definitely going to have to flow back to the consumers, which is going to help us drive more retail. And I think we feel like that's going to continue to improve throughout the year just based on looking at historical trends and just the discussions that we have in local markets. The other big thing that we've seen when we talk about the Western region is one thing, but when we talk about our North Central region, which is basically Michigan, you're starting to see a lot of domestic manufacturers come back or all three domestic manufacturers coming back with their employee programs. And John, as you know, every single resident in Michigan seems to be an employee or an affiliated employee of an OEM, a domestic OEM.

Just to follow-up to that, do you think there's an expectation, I mean, UAW strike in September is almost a foregone conclusion at this point. Do you think there's any view that they are building inventory in front of that to prep for it, because if you have a one or two month strike, you're down 30 days to 60 days of inventory in a very quick period of time. So, is there any view that you have that that may be what's going on and why they're not coming back in with aggressive incentives right now?

John, I think your line of sight on that is probably better than ours. I just know at the ground level, in the network, we definitely have inventory that can move and we're starting to see incentives come back. So it's hard for me to answer that question directly.

Chris also shared with me that the pipeline for the fleets are finally starting to fill as well. So we had actually seen in some of the domestic manufacturers that in the Western region, 60% of their mix was actually fleet, when the rest of the country was sitting at 25% to 28%, showing that there's a little weakness in the Western region, but also, we're thinking that once we get the data in from April, that hopefully that's come down again, which means that the log jam a little bit with some of the domestics is starting to loosen up. It could be beneficial on the strikes. I guess we have less insights of that and ultimately, we have one goal retail cars.

Okay. Bryan, just one follow up to that. And when we looked to 2010 and 2011, fleet was really the driver of the recovery and then retail came after. Do you kind of think that that may be what's going on right now in the cycle because if fleet activity is picking up, that means commercial activity is picking up, which should drive the economy and which should drive the retail sales? Do you kind of envision that maybe what's going on right here?

No, I think that that is a 100% accurate and I think there's been a lot of noise and chatter around the idea of moving back to incentives and being able to control inventories that I think is something that's making it even more of a future vision that let's avoid the price and finance incentives because they're less visible to the consumer okay. And for the time being, let's work on lease incentives like Chris said.

Okay, thank you very much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ryan Sigdahl with Craig-Hallum. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning. Thanks for taking our questions. Want to start with driveway.com? I don't believe you quantified the loss in the quarter. Are you willing to do that or at least state if it was higher or lower than the past few?

Sure. Ryan, this is Bryan. You can actually get there. We gave you the SG&A of 60% without Driveway and we gave you the SG&A with Driveway at 62.7%. So what we're seeing in Driveway today, which equates to $32 million approximately in SG&A costs. On a positive note, our burn rate month-over-month in March we're finally gaining some traction, was actually down 25% month-over-month, big change and the volume was up 75% year-over-year in March. So, and was up about 25% month-over-month in March, just so you're comparing apples-to-apples to that burn rate, which is good signs and it's about -- it's about 10% in actual SG&A savings and it's about a 10%, 15% in improvement in gross.

And then you expect DFC to inflect profitably in 2024. I guess. Are you -- do you have any commentary on driveway.com on when that could potentially inflect positively to profitability?

Well, in terms of DFC, we still are looking towards the end of 2024 profitability. Okay. And I think as Chuck mentioned, we did have a faster growth rate in DFC because of those two factors. Obviously our overall growth as an organization, but our penetration rate was forecasted internally at 12% and we were at 14% and the primary reason was because there was better economics in what we saw looking forward. As Chuck mentioned, the delinquencies were down and looked good and I think that the fundamental driving factor is at three times more profit over the life of that loan, it's an annuity that we're really paying for, that even though it may hurt the quarter a little bit, it is the right answer, especially since we use the same or better buying decisioning and the criteria is more selective and that's why we share with you both the loan to values as well as our FICO scores. So you can definitely see that and I think as we continue to mature DFC, it's a lot easier to be able to make those structural changes that are best for the long game rather than just what happens in the quarter.

Great. If I can sneak one more quick one in just a slight change in wording around the 2025 plan. You said the word goals, I don't believe you previously referred to it that way. I guess is your confidence changed in achieving those targets on that timeline by 2025 or am I just kind of overreading into that?

Oh, that's probably just vernacular. I would say this, I have very little doubt in our ability to achieve the $50 billion in revenue. You can look at our slide deck, we did tweak some of the channels a little bit in terms what their contributions are and you can see that in the idea of getting to $55 plus in EPS is still -- we're very confident in that strategy. Most importantly, it's important to remember that though it may have -- it may appear to be a little bit tougher quarter, the things in our ability to execute are quite strong as an organization because we're building the foundation to do something that no one has really been able to do. And that's constructively improve our margin formula as well as our cost formula to drive to the $2 of EPS beyond the 2025 plan. Over the coming quarters, again we'll be able to share more information, but we all know that what DFC can do, okay. We've just went through the biggest downdraft in interest rates that we probably could ever feel and are standing here stronger than ever in that part of the organization. We're curbing our burn rates in Driveway, which allows us the ability to touch 50 times more customer than our traditional store network touches and we've got a pretty good game plan on our -- on our green car strategies, as sustainability continues to gain market share in mobility. So we're pretty excited of what's happening and look forward to continued growth as an organization.

Very good. Best of luck guys. Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question has come from the line of Rajat Gupta with JPMorgan. Please proceed with your questions.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Just had one quick clarification on DFC. The change in the 2023 guidance, from $10 million profit to the $40 million loss, is that all just the change in reporting or is there an assumption of higher charge of there as well?

Hi, this is Tina. There's a couple things. It's mainly driven by the change in presentation as we've taken the investor feedback and really appreciated all of that so that we clearly are combining what's related to DFC to give clear line of sight of that business. So most of that is net charge off reclassification, which in the investor deck we do have a slide that articulates and sort of demonstrates what that looks like. That's a majority of it. The other thing is we did update the modelling, what just, what the actual loans are looking like. So with the rising interest rates, there's been a little bit of net interest margin compression. And so in the forecasting we've actually rolled that through as well as we have clear line of sight as to what the loan would look like in its build to date. So that -- those are the two main factors that are driving the change in the outlook.

Got it. And for 2024, or just to follow up on Daniel's question earlier, is there a combination of the restatement there as well, or is that more purely fundamentals?

I think for 2024 we see more stabilization of both DFC in terms of our fundamentals in our growth rate seems to be consistent on a notional basis with 2023. So, I think it is, again, primarily, as I stated earlier, primarily just the organic growth or notional growth as Lithia & Driveway continues to grow, we're just going to see higher originations on a notional basis, and that's just really going to drag down the overall profitability in 2024.

Understood. and maybe, just to follow up on the guidance you had provided on the prior earnings call, you'd given us some high level puts and takes across, different businesses for the year, including like SG&A and to gross in the 61% to 64% range. Wondering if there's any update to that just so feel comfortable with those ranges, including SG&A to gross and the $1 billion free cash flow, any updated color you can give us on that would be helpful.

Rajat, we're very comfortable with the previous guidance in that 61% to 64%, and the other relative guidance that we've given. We keep our head down and continue to execute on the plan and not a lot's changed other than GPUs are still planning on normalizing, and they were actually a little stronger than what we actually had expected. We were expecting about a $200 decline in new vehicle grosses. Now that was offset by some stabilization in the used vehicles as well, but very comfortable with where we sit and what we're guiding.

And the 61% to 64%, is that slightly better than previously just because some of the SG&A is now moving into the DFC line, or are you still like maintaining that range irrespective of the reported change?

Sure, Ragat, Bryan again, if you go back a few quarters or even a few years, we did take a couple 100 basis points out of our costs structure in terms of personnel, but the most important driver, and we'll be able to give you more insights into this is that our network is way cleaner than it was pre-COVID. I mean, we were doing 64% to 65% SG&A as a percentage of gross in mid-2014, 2015, 2016. If you go back and look at any of our filings, okay and today, our average store size, and that's why Chris spoke to this idea of bigger stores have better leverage on their cost structures, that we believe there's somewhere between 300 basis points and 500 basis points in improved SG&A that are coming from a cleaner network, meaning we have less stores that are achieving SG&A of 80% plus because we sold off 30 stores to 35 stores and we bought things what we would call in the three strongest regions, which is regions four, five, and six, primarily five and six. Okay or excuse me, four and six, which is the South Central and the Southeast, where if you remember back in '14 and '15, we had zero presence in the most profitable automotive retail markets in the country, which is in regions four and six.

Got it. That's helpful. Just one last one, on the new vehicle same-store number, the minus 6%, when we look at like the overall industry, even excluding fleet it still seems to be a few 100 basis points below the industry average. Is that just because of your regional presence or within the regions, metro versus non-metro locations, where that disconnect is coming from? Just curious like, because you mentioned you were gaining market share, so it is hard to reconcile with your overall industry numbers. So any clarification on that would be helpful.

Yeah, Rajat, this is Chris. So what we're saying exactly is, we're seeing the Western region have an outsized proportion of a declining sales volume on the new vehicle side right now, but at the same time, our market effectiveness or our representation of the brands that we represent actually gain share. So we're getting a bigger piece of a smaller pie, which is exactly what we expect our operators to do when they focus on new vehicles. And then the expectation after that is to focus on obviously used vehicles and our after sales business and leverage the expenses to bring more net to the bottom line, which helps us drive that SG&A number Bryan was referring to.

Got it. Great. Thanks. Thanks for all the color.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from the line of Bret Jordan with Jefferies. Please proceed with your questions.

Hey, good morning guys. You talked a couple times about sort of normalized GPU environment and maybe GPU is a bit better than expected now. What is -- could you sort of give us a ballpark for what a normal GPU is expected to look like? I think in the third quarter call last year, you talked about maybe back to pre-COVID levels, but what's your expectation now?

Yeah, we've definitely indicated that we believe that normalized levels could be $300 to $500 better between both F&I and the vehicle gross profit, which would put us into the four -- low fours with F&I. So, we still believe that that can probably hold true. Okay and it may be on a lower base of business, but we also know that there's still about 20% lift in the current SAAR environment, in the new car side, and there's about a 12% lift in the used car side to get back to normal volumes and we'll see what that looks like. But it sure looks like we've structurally changed some of the things in the industry to realize a normalized level that's a little higher than where we were going into COVID. Now, I will say this, we're not modelling a lot of that into our assumptions for 2025 and beyond because we don't know that yet. And I think ultimately we need to see those that structural change occur before we actually start to model that.

Okay. And then a quick question on the cadence of used ASPs. They've been declining -- they had that popped or the Manheim did in February. What do you see sort of the balance of '23 outlook unused ASPs? Is there a real downside or is the lack of new car supply going to support them?

Yeah, this is Chris, I think ASPs are going to continue to moderate throughout the year, especially based on where credit quality is with consumers. It's a market-driven phenomenon when interest rates go up, affordability issues get constrained and it flips the market a little bit and as you saw, and we talked about coming outta Q4, we saw some inventory issues that we had to work through and looking on a same store basis right now, we had, I think 26% of our inventory was aged over 60 days, coming into Q1 and that number's down to about 12%. So we've had a lot of work to do to kind of right size the inventory based on kind of the market adjustments that you see. But yeah, if interest rates kind of stabilize where they're at, I think ASPs can moderate, especially with the lack of what we lose four million units in production over the last three years because of chip shortages and other issues that's going to create that demand on overall use car values.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from the line and of Chris Bottiglieri with BNP Paribas. Please proceed with your questions.

Hey guys. Thanks for your questions. Quick, clear one up front, what was the APR on originations this quarter?

Sorry, Chris, APR on originations? The APR was just over 9%.

Okay. So I think last quarter you guided DFC income as 8.5% to 10% of accounts receivables. It seems like you reiterate that again this quarter. I would think at a 9% when I look at some of your peers, they're a lot higher than that with similar, albeit slightly lower FICO scores. So I think there's an ability to kind of move that up, that portfolio average up. Like how do you, how do you think of the cadence from here in terms of how fast you're willing to raise your APR and what that means to your weighted average portfolio yield over the balance of '23?

Yeah, thanks. Thanks, Chris. This is Chuck. Great question. We definitely are laser focused on our yields and making sure that as we originate loans that number one, we look at each individual contract to make sure it's accretive using the current models for our cost of funds, risk adjusted sort of basis. And so yeah, the second thing is that we are the closest or one of the closest to the market in terms of the amount of information that we see and we put that all into how we look at originations to make sure that we can increase yields as quickly as possible without damaging the overall franchise. So we expect our yields to push up though probably still in that 8% to 10% range. We're now over 9% and that it'll probably be a gradual process just to make sure that we don't damage the ability for our dealerships, as Chris mentioned to finance customers, but balance that against the economic returns for DFC.

Got you. Okay. That's really helpful and then just a second and final unrelated question. I would imagine that you are one of the top three largest dealers of Asian imports in the country. Hopefully some pretty good communication with those OEMs. Like what's your sense on their production plans? At what point do you foresee them getting new vehicle production inventory day is up to where the domestics are because that to me, like you have more exposure to those relative to the publics, and I think once the Nissans and the Hondas of the world get production about thick incentives normalized, that's probably what it takes. It could be my view, but curious to see how you're thinking about that.

Yeah. Hey, Chris. This is Chris again. You're right, 42% of our overall sales come from the import brand. So obviously, heavily weighted towards imports, which has been great. Phenomenal product, low day supply and awesome margins still in this environment. As far as line of sight, it seems to depend on the month where, the production cycle that we get allocation off of is probably 60 days out at best and so line of sight on that is tough. I think that things are going to continue to improve though throughout the year on the import side, like they have already for domestics and luxury. So we expected to improve throughout the back half of the year; big deal, one coming.

Thank you. Our next question is come from the line of Adam Jonas with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your questions.

Hey, thanks everybody. Good morning. Just wanted to go back to the DFC, just one fine point of the $100 million reduction for fiscal '24; obviously, you had some prior assumption for CECL reserves there, and I understand the accounting change, but I'm just curious, isolating the reserves, what can you -- it's hard for me to tell whether you made a change from 4Q to 1Q, irrespective of the accounting change and to tell us what that level, what that provision is right now. Is it 27 on the whole book?

The provision rate, Adam thanks for your question. This is Chuck. The provision rate is 3.1% of the book. So that's where we're at. We feel that in our internal models would actually indicate something a little lower than that. But from a conservatism perspective, we want a little bit of cushion in there. Relative to the first part of your question, which had to do with 2024, yes, obviously there are some adjustments relative to the spread rate compression that Tina mentioned earlier in her comments. We adjusted that in. We factored in clearly some of the impacts of what's happened to our cost of funds with regards to sort of the capital markets, but again the preponderance of what that change is in 2024 is again, the moving of the CECL reserves back into DFC profitability as Tina mentioned.

Got it. I appreciate that. And just as a follow up, the size of the book reduction from to $4 billion from $6 billion, if you addressed it, I'm sorry if I missed it, if it was addressed earlier, why the $2 billion reduction in the size of the outstanding balance? Thanks.

Adam, this is Chuck again. Part of that is a function of our prepayments, given that we're in a higher credit quality class of contracts. Our prepayment rates are a little higher than what we would've projected with the prior credit quality mix that we are originating and so that's one of the reasons and then we have moderated, our percentage originations of the total Lithia & Driveway book. So, we were saying going up to 15%, now we're moderating that back more in the 13% to 14% range.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from the line of Colin Langan with Wells Fargo. Please proceed with your questions.

Hey guys, this is Costa [ph] filling in for Colin Langan. My first question following the Silicon Bank situation, there's been some issues getting ABS funding and just general volatility in credit markets. So, I wanted to see if you guys can frame for us the impact that it's had on DFC?

So thanks. This is Chuck again. First I'd point you to our issuance, and I know its pre-Silicon Valley Bank, but our first quarter issuance; that deal was incredibly over-subscribed, six times over-subscribed on certain tranches and I think that's really a testament to sort of the DFC value proposition and just sort of where we sit in terms of the economics as a fairly new issuer, the loss curves that we're assigned from the credit ratings tend to be very conservative. And so from a risk return perspective, our paper on a notional, apples-to-apples basis looks far more attractive than other, more seasoned issuers that have a very tight spread rate. So we feel very confident even with the sort of frothiness in the current capital markets that the DFC value proposition being a true captive lender, as well as some of the technical considerations of our portfolio will continue to allow when we go to the term market a significant amount of demand for our paper going forward.

Thanks. My second -- my last question is, I think you guys guided SG&A to 61% to 64% in '23, you guys are in that range and then 50% in '25. I think last quarter you highlight an opportunity to reset the cost structure…

50% in '25. 50% in the future. 60% in '25, yeah. Just to clarify, keep going.

Fair, thanks. Yeah, so last quarter you had highlighted an opportunity to reset the cost structure to get offset of 50% of lost gross profit, driven by commissions. I think it's been lower last several quarters. So what was the cadence of kind of getting at offset for the rest of the year in 2024?

Yeah, Colin, this is Chris. We've been heavily focused on kind of this rightsizing in certain pockets that had drove up our SG&A in a declining GPU environment and sales environment that we had to adapt to and since we last spoken off of coming of Q4's call, we've eliminated about a 1,000 positions in the field and have rightsized a lot of pay plans, kind of getting folks ready for this new environment that helps us leverage the gross and the net. And so, March actually, we saw a lot of that come through the bottom line and we're anticipating additional strength coming into Q2 which we hope to share with you in July.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. With that, this does conclude today's teleconference. We appreciate your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Enjoy the rest of your day.