Yes. I mean, I think just to get a little more granular on that three asset portfolio, the property that I mentioned earlier in Colorado, Colorado Springs, we bought on our own balance sheet. And the other two were done in partnership ventures, one with a new partner that has great capacity. I would say almost always, in our apartment acquisitions, there's some component of value add, whether that's upgrade that one in Tempe Arizona will be one where we're upgrading amenities, and doing unit turns. And so we never -- generally never buy these with kind of a status quo in mind. And the whole idea over time as we're implementing our rehabs of the amenities -- so on is to obviously grow the NOI. And I think a very good example of that is, and I would say the last thing, too, is that the company has always had a history of mind to get into these markets where we think there are growth opportunities on the multifamily space, and then developing enough of a major beachhead that we can have scale. And so when you think about Boise, Idaho, for example, or Salt Lake City, little bog down the dates, but we probably started in Boise, five or six years ago, we started in Seattle 16 or 17 years ago, and today, we're one of the largest multifamily owners both in the market rate and the affordable and senior platform. And in Salt Lake City, we probably started it up there close to 10 years ago, and we've got a great portfolio that allows you to have better management teams, better management focus. And the other thing we've also learned is that getting into these markets early before other people are there, it allows you to think about the first Boise asset that we bought; it was, very, very, very fired property that we implemented a very big overhaul of. And today, based on our cost structure, and our acquisition price, and what we spent on the rehab, our cap rate on that asset is well over 10% might even be higher, closer to 15%. And so the key is to get an upscale in these markets, and to more directly answer your question about these very urban markets, we made a decision, many years ago to say, for example, avoid places like Center City, San Francisco, downtown Los Angeles. Those were markets that we just we saw an awful lot of product being built. And we felt that long term the rent structures that people were going to have to achieve, based on the cost to build were just not sustainable. So it's proven to be the case. And so it wasn't that we had a strategy to diversify away from those markets. We just didn't like the overall economics of what we thought was going on in these centers, city markets. And I would say Mary is kind of the opposite Ireland. Would you say?