Good morning and welcome to the KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc Second Quarter 2019 Financial Results Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today’s presentation there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Michael Shapiro. Mr. Shapiro, please go ahead.

Thank you. Welcome to the KKR Real Estate Finance Trust earnings call for the second quarter of 2019. I'm joined today by Chris Lee and Matt Salem, our co-CEOs; Patrick Mattson, our COO; and Mostafa Nagaty, our CFO. Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures on the call, which are reconciled to GAAP figures in our earnings release and in the supplementary presentation, both of which are available on the Investor Relations portion of our website. This call will also contain forward-looking statements, which do not guarantee future events or performance. Please refer to our most recently filed 10-K for cautionary factors related to these statements. Before I turn it over to Chris, I'll provide a quick recap of our results. For the second quarter 2019, our GAAP net income was $17.4 million, or $0.30 per share. Net core earnings were $20.5 million, or $0.36 per share. Book value per share as of June 30, 2019, was $19.54. As we had discussed on our Q1 earnings call, GAAP net income, net core earnings and book value were impacted by the timing of significant late quarter capital deployment. In addition, our GAAP net income and book value was impacted by $2.2 million or $0.04 per share of unrealized loss in our CMBS portfolio. In July, we paid a dividend of $0.43 cents per share with respect to the second quarter. Based on July 31st closing price of $20.03, the dividend reflects an annualized yield of 8.6%. Our Board is scheduled to meet in mid-September to discuss the third quarter dividend and we'll make an announcement shortly thereafter. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Chris.

Thank you, Michael. Good morning, and thank you for joining us for our second quarter earnings call. This quarter marked a record origination quarter, where we closed six loans totaling $1.6 billion. Through July, we have originated approximately $2 billion of loans year-to-date, resulting in a funded portfolio of approximately $5.1 billion, a 23% increase since the end of 2018. Over the last 12 months ended July 31, we have originated $3.5 billion, a 30% increase over our 2018 calendar year record origination volume. In addition, we have built a robust pipeline of another $267 million of loans, currently under exclusivity that we expect to close within the quarter subject to customary closing conditions. Matt will provide more detail on recent investment activity in his remarks. The economic backdrop is favorable for our business. Real estate fundamentals in capital markets have remained strong, driven by a healthy economy, strong job market and robust equity and debt capital flows into real estate. Despite a competitive lending environment, we continue to focus on capital preservation in creating a defensive investment portfolio. We continue to see the best risk-adjusted opportunities in lending on large transitional assets in the most liquid markets owned by the most experienced sponsors. This deliberate strategy has led to a 30% increase in our average loan size in the last 12 months ended June 30 to $182 million versus the same period ended June 30, 2018. Consistent with our asset strategy, we continue to find ways to improve our liabilities and create a durable, attractively priced liability structure. In collaboration with our partners in KKR Capital Markets, we increased our corporate revolving credit facility by $110 million to $250 million and added incremental capacity to both our repo facility and asset-specific financing facility. Additionally, as Patrick will discuss, we entered into a new $900 million non mark-to-market term lending agreement with a third-party lender. As of quarter end, 73% of our outstanding borrowings were non mark-to-market compared to 33% as of June 30, 2018. In summary, we continue to believe that our risk-adjusted return on equity in this rate environment is attractive. We are encouraged by the quality and performance of our portfolio, the strength of our relationships and borrower base and the depth of our pipeline. We are confident in our ability to continue to deliver attractive risk-adjusted returns to our shareholders. With that, I'll turn the call over to Matt.

Thank you, Chris, and good morning, everyone. I'll start by providing more detail on our recent investment activity. Our second quarter loan originations demonstrate our conservative investment strategy of lending on institutional quality real estate owned by the highest quality sponsors in the most liquid real estate markets. In the second quarter, we originated six floating rate senior loans totaling $1.6 billion. The weighted average LTV and coupon for these loans are 67% and LIBOR plus 2.7%, respectively. And on a levered basis, the loans had a weighted average underwritten IRR of 11.5% at spot LIBOR, which is consistent with our existing portfolio. In order to highlight our differentiated conservative lending strategy, I'm going to provide some additional details on our origination this quarter. So please bear with me. First, in April, we made an approximately $183 million loan secured by a four-building, 711,000 square foot, predominantly office, mixed use portfolio in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The sponsor is a global investment bank with a market cap of approximately $80 billion. Two of the buildings recently went through renovations and have begun their lease-up. The sponsor's business plan includes capital improvements to complete the third asset's renovation, while also upgrading amenities across the portfolio with the goal of increasing occupancy from 62% to 90% at post-renovation rents. In May, we made our largest loan to date, a $386 million whole loan on a recently constructed 857 unit two building, luxury multifamily asset located in Brooklyn, New York. The sponsor is a family owned investment and development firm founded in 1950s and had approximately $240 million of cash equity invested in the property at closing. Post closing, the sponsor has commenced completion of the remaining 8% of development including interiors, common areas and amenity space. Given the recent development, the property has 45%…

Thank you, Matt. And good morning everyone. As previously mentioned, timing of deployment over the quarter was back- end weighted with a significant portion of closings occurring in mid- to late June. The timing, therefore, had a negative impact on our net income for the quarter. By way of example, had the five loans which closed after May 1st all closed at the beginning of May, net core earnings per share would have benefited by approximately $0.06 per share. Our portfolio which totaled $5 billion at the end of the quarter has a weighted average risk rating of 2.8% on a 5-point scale, consistent with the risk rating in the prior quarter. And we have no loans with a rating above A3. Given some of the recent legislative changes impacting certain New York multifamily assets, let me spend a minute on our exposure to that market. We have 6 multifamily loans with outstanding balance of $874 million secured by 1,800 units across seven properties. Our portfolio was carefully reviewed with respect to the New York City Housing Stability and Tenant Protections Act. And at this time, we believe the act has no material impact on the underwritten cash flows or the value of the assets backing our New York City multifamily portfolio. I would further note that none of the sponsors' business plans on any of these properties was related to changing the status of stabilized units to market rate units. The weighted average risk rating across our New York City multifamily loans is 2.6, with none rated 4 or 5. As of quarter end, 99% of the portfolio was invested in LIBOR-based floating rate loans. More than 90% of the loan portfolio features a LIBOR floor of at least 50 basis points, providing rate protection in a declining rate…

[Operator Instructions] The first question today comes from Jade Rahmani with KBW. Please go ahead.

Thanks very much. Appreciate the color you gave on the loans originated in the quarter. Just on timing and earnings ramp or the cadence in the second half of the year. You mentioned that core EPS would have benefited by $0.06 based on timing of loans closed had they closed earlier in the quarter. But you also mentioned that in the second half of the year, I believe repayments in aggregate should match the $900 million you've received thus far through the second quarter. So how do you think about the trajectory of earnings in the second half of the year? Do you anticipate core earnings exceeding the dividend in each of the next two quarters?

Hey Jade. Good morning it’s Chris. I’ll take that. I think there are really a couple of things. Number one, we mentioned that we now have – we sized up our corporate revolver. So I think that, that will allow us to manage our liquidity a little bit better and originate into more consistent repayments. I think, number two, we're evaluating some liquidity management tools on the asset side of the balance sheet that we think can help bridge any scenarios where we see a little bit more of a lumpier repayment in advance of loans that are already under exclusivity closing because effectively, that's what happened in this last quarter. We had a significant pipeline. We had already committed to these loans. We liked what we had on the balance sheet and they just ended up closing a little bit later. And we thought that it created a quarterly hole from an earnings perspective. So we do feel good about the second half of this year from an earnings perspective. We're going to have a full second half of the year for all of these loans that we recently added to the portfolio. And we – if we make a couple of these tweaks around the revolver and liquidity management, we think that it will have a pretty meaningful impact on the earnings trajectory of the business on a go forward.

Can you say whether for the combined third and fourth quarter you expect core earnings to – net core earnings to meet or exceed the dividend?

We can't – we don't give guidance. But I think based on what we closed last quarter, I think we feel good about the second half of the year.

Okay. In terms of having the balance sheet be fully invested, a couple of your peers have acquired CMBS securities, in particular CLOs. I think it's a wise strategy in terms of optimizing capital deployment, increasing NII and making sure that you mitigate the impact of repayments. Is this something you would consider? Considering the management team's experience with securities, I think it's something worth exploring?

Hey, Jade. It’s Matt. I think we're going to look at a number of different options, specifically as it relates to what Chris was discussing around just kind of liquidity management and kind of balance the timing of repayment versus origination. So that will definitely be one of the things that we're considering.

Okay. And then just lastly, in terms of leverage, can you remind us what your leverage targets are, given the decline in leverage following the repayments that you've experienced?

Hi Jade, Patrick. So we generally are targeting, as we said, 3 to 4 times on assets, depending on the type of financing. And so as we've ramped up the non mark-to- market financing, you've seen our leverage increase up to 4 times on an asset basis. But I think when you look at the company today, both in terms of the debt to equity and where we are in terms of a total leverage or a look-through leverage, I think we're kind of at a point where we expect to sort of maintain. This feels like the right level.

Okay. Thanks very much.

Next question comes from Don Fandetti with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Hi Chris. Can you talk a little bit about the – how you won the Brooklyn multifamily loan? And what your competitive edge was? Was there other bidders? Also, can you talk a bit about the market overall in terms of – we're seeing banks continue to be careful in commercial real estate lending. I'm talking about nonbanks being aggressive. Can you talk a little bit about how the market dynamic is right now?

Hi Don, thanks for the question. It’s Matt. I'll tackle that one. Let's just start with the market overall. I think the market is competitive. I think it's been a pretty consistent level of competitiveness over the last few quarters and that's demonstrated by, I think, relatively stable spreads or yields on the loans that we're quoting. I think the market is disciplined. The firms that we're competing against are all balance sheet lenders of substantial size with a lot of experience. So the market feels competitive, but disciplined. I would also add that our borrowers are not pushing leverage at this point in time. I think many of them continue to remember what happened to the last crisis and some actually have structural features within their vehicles that limit the amount of leverage they can put on a fund or an individual asset. So the market still feels healthy, but it feels relatively efficient as well. Specifically on the Brooklyn transaction, it was an interesting setup in that. Really, there were just two of us looking at that particular opportunity. There was the incumbent lender and ourselves. There was a broker involved, but again, only really two of us in the room trying to provide that loan. So – and that's not too unusual. There's only really a handful of lenders that can focus on these larger loans in the transitional lending space, which is one of the reasons why we like gravitating up in size or up in average loan size. The other reason is just quality of real estate, quality of sponsorship and market. But in that particular case, it was just two of us and we were able to secure the loan just through our relationship with – not only with the broker, but developing a relationship with this borrower.

Thanks, Matt.

Yep.

The next question comes from Dan Occhionero with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Good morning. So I just wanted to ask about your growth plans in the second half of the year and the mix of financing that with debt as opposed to equity, given where the stock is trading and the prospects of potentially funding it with equity when it's trading below book?

Okay, hey, Dan. Good morning. It's Chris. As we've discussed before, we will be very, very prudent about how we think about adding capital to the balance sheet and increasing share count. As I mentioned earlier in the call, we're very focused on earnings and particularly earnings per share in the near term. And over the long-term, we're focused on adding capital to the balance sheet in an accretive manner. We have several ways to add capital to the balance sheet. If we don't see the opportunity from a common perspective, but our view is that our common will trade better in the second half of the year, number one. And number two, we also believe that our ATM and the combination of our revolver and some of these kind of new liquidity management processes we've put in place are pretty – are going to be pretty helpful in terms of managing the liquidity in the growth more on a just-in-time basis. So we're very focused on it, but we feel like right now we have enough capital to continue to execute on our pipeline and we'll be judicious about how we would grow the company on a go forward.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Michael Shapiro for any closing remarks.

Thank you everybody for joining us today. I hope you have a good weekend. And if there's any follow up questions, please feel free to reach out. Thank you.

This conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.