Hello everyone and welcome to the Kinetik First Quarter 2022 Earnings Call. My name is Sam and I will be operator for the call today. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the floor over to Maddie to begin. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning everyone, and welcome to Kinetik's first quarter 2022 earnings conference call. Here with me is our President and CEO Jamie Welch as well as Matt Wall our COO, and Annie Psencik, our Chief Strategy Officer; Steve Stellato, our CAO; Todd Carpenter, our GC; Trevor Howard, our VP of Finance and Kris Kindrick and Tyler Milam, our VPs of Commercial. The press release we issued yesterday, the slide presentation and access to the webcast for today's call are available at our website www.kinetik.com. Before we begin, I would like to remind all listeners that, our remarks including the question-and-answer section, will provide forward-looking statements and actual results could differ from what is described in these statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve a number of risks and assumptions. We may also provide certain performance measures that do not conform to U.S. GAAP. We've provided schedules that reconcile these non-GAAP measures as part of our earnings press release. After our prepared remarks, we will open the call to Q&A. With that, I will turn the call over to Jamie.

Thank you, Mattie. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us. Thank you for your continued support of and interest in Kinetik. I'm pleased to be here this morning to review our first quarter 2022 achievements. This call today is important and an important milestone for us as it marks Kinetik inaugural results as a combined publicly traded company, following the Altus and BCP business combination in February. We reported our first quarter 2022 results yesterday afternoon, and are pleased to share them with you this morning. It is worth highlighting that many of the figures today will be reported on a pro forma basis, assuming the business combination closed on January 1st of this year. We believe that is more effective of our actual results and provides our investors and others with more meaningful information and helps to reconcile our 2022 full year guidance. On Slide 3, let's start with a few highlights. We reported pro forma EBITDA of $191 million for the first quarter. This represents a 17% increase year over year, normalized for winter storm Uri, driven by increased volumes across both the midstream logistics and pipeline transportation segments, as well as higher commodity prices. Processed gas volumes increased 9% year-over-year averaging 1.11 Bcf per day this quarter. In April, we announced the PHP capacity expansion Open Season, and anticipate an upcoming similar announcement on Gulf Coast Express. Both pipeline expansions are highly capital efficient, and will help to address the near-term natural gas takeaway constraints facing the Permian Basin. We're excited to work with Kinder Morgan and our other partners to be a part of this solution on behalf of our E&P customers. We had a successful quarter executing our capital allocation priorities outlined back in February. During the first quarter, we redeemed approximately 25% of the…

Thank you, Jamie. Sam, would you please open the lines for Q&A?

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Spiro Dounis from Credit Suisse.

Jamie, I want to start with the Cryo expansion, if we could. So it looks you guys are surprised by the acceleration there, so were we just given all that latent capacity you all have. And even if I look at Slide 7, there’s just still a lot of capacity and they're left to fill. So curious how we should be reading the decision to expand so quickly, curious what your commercial team is telling you about what's remaining from here.

So let me explain. I think we knew that the Diamond Cryo expansion was the single largest potential expansion across our entire processing fleet. It’s relatively modest cost. We have a lot of commercial activity, I think we surprised ourselves. When you sell out almost half your latent processing capacity in two months following the closing of the merger, what it tells you is you better have additional processing capacity on hand. Because the level of activity and the number of conversations we've got going with customers and others with respect to that capacity, could see it all filled up on a much more accelerated timeframe, which we thought originally this will take us three to five years. We could be sitting here in 12 to 18 months from now and we could be fully sold out. So I think we want to be ready. It's really important to be ready. The long lead times, we think that continued supply chain disruptions makes -- extenuate the timeframes already we know that the long lead items have gone from about 26 weeks to 40 weeks today, that increases you're looking at a year just to get on incremental revenue, --sales compression. And so we thought for $12 million it’s better to be safe than sorry in the current environment. Because I think our success is the fact that our conversations are driven by the fact that we have all this excess capacity, and others just don’t. And so we want to capitalize on that. And we think that that's going to create tremendous value for all of our stakeholders.

Switching gears a bit and just thinking about funding a lot of this new growth coming forward, it sounds like this Cryo project very sort of achievable on a $12 million cost. So that's fine. But I guess you also have the two Permian gas pipelines potentially coming and then maybe any sort of associated gathering that goes along with this processing. So curious, as you look forward, you're obviously in the middle of refinancing now, how you are thinking about funding some of this growth?

I think as it relates to the pipeline transportation segment, it's a little different than obviously on the Gathering and Processing side. So weekly FID, PHP and GCX, there will be a period of 15 to 18 months that obviously we have got the spend related to that particular investment. Those projects -- I think on the pipeline transportation side, it's fair to say, our blended multiple around 5.5x is what you sort of be looking at. So, when you think about it against our long range forecast, you have only got two multiple points relative to our overall leverage threshold that we are now talking about. And so, I think as you and I have discussed before, I think there are multiple means and approaches to get that incremental equity out, whether it's in the form of thinking about the drip into 2023, whether it's thinking about an at the money program for some modest amount, because we want this equity overtime to be in lockstep with the ratable spend. And I think that's going to be ideally suited to something that obviously can continue to keep step with those -- that obvious spending profile. As it relates to the Gathering side, I think we are in the midst of evaluating what the incremental amounts are, whether we have some aid in construction. We have some aid in construct benefit from some customers, which basically give us capital. We have some other elements of our overall Gathering & Processing growth capital that is interchangeable. So, we actually will focus on the capital resolving from the connection for one of these new contracts. And we can defer some of the other capital that we have planned, because the emphasis will be on this particular area as opposed to another particular area. So, it's always dynamic and I don't think we are going to see a significant increase in the overall spend. The most important thing for the audience, the biggest spend on our G&P business is processing. And we have got that in spades. So these incremental well connects, short laterals and connections really don't amount to a significant amount of capital to be deployed.

Our next question comes from Gabe Moreen from Mizuho. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everyone. Jamie, if I can start off with the guidance raise. Without the guidance raise, if I determine maybe as such, can you just talk about what sort of factors are, I guess you are hesitant to raise guidance right now, officially and only do so after 2Q in terms of adjusting guidance? Just sort of the give and takes about maybe some items you are looking for visibility before you do that.

Sure. So I think, Gabe, it's a multitude of factors. It is -- first off, we want to get the PHP and GCX, FIDs done, right? They are pretty significant, particularly given that we own majority control of PHP. That -- of its size at 650 million cubic feet a day, you are going to be dealing with something that is probably close to $450 million, $500 million of total spend. So, that's a big one. And how that actually is going to be spent and over the timeframe and exactly what that looks like as far as the shape of spending, that's important. GCX would also fall within that category. The next thing is we want to get the refinancing done, right? Next thing is with the refinancing, we are planning to put in place a hedging program in the context of making sure that we've got things locked down as we look at the overall commodity price curve. And where we see opportunities and where we like the overall pricing picture in front of us on the commodity side. We have some other things on the commercial side that have been worked on. We wanted to take all of this into the second quarter and say, okay, now we know all the precincts have reported, this is everything we can possibly know -- there will still be things going on, but that magnitude of what we're dealing with will be like no other. So rather than saying, well, here's a guy raise, and then coming back the next quarter and saying, “oh, and by the way, we just FIDed GCX and PHP, and there's some other things we've been working on”. We wanted to do it on the basis of the second quarter, because by then we think everything we will know, we will have, we'll be able to do it, we'll be able to do it thoughtfully. And we'll be able to make sure that we effectively communicate it to the market.

And then maybe if I could just follow-up on PHP. Can you just talk within the broader context of making sure your customers kind of have that residue takeaway capacity, your confidence in all these processing, additional contracts that your customers do need to have that egress? And then will Kinetik itself, I guess be taking any capacity either on PHP or GCX, I guess to facilitate customers getting out of the basin?

So let me start with your last question first. And yes, we, as you already know, we're an anchor-shipper on PHP today. We will continue to make sure that we take up additional capacity with the expansion. On GCX, we are not a shipper today, but our intention is that we will be a shipper pro forma the expansion. So we are working through that. It is incredibly important, particularly as we look at diff going out and the magnitude of the diff going out into 2023, that we have that egress. And I think we can categorically say that we do have the egress capacity for our customers that makes our service offering we think more unique than others. It differentiates what we provide versus competitors. So I think we've got that and we'll continue to have more of it going forward with multiple players, GCX and PHP.

And if I could just squeeze in one last one. Given I guess, better growth than you expected going on, I'm just wondering where the Grand Prix potential dropdown kind of fits in your order of priorities at this point, whether that's changed it all in the last couple of months?

No, I don't think it's changed at all. I think it's a conversation topic that is ongoing with Blackstone, they obviously have to make a decision as to when they think is the right time to potentially harvest that investment. It has been a great investment. And from our standpoint, they know that we're dealing with a lot of things right now. So I think, it's a conversation that's ideally suited to the back half of the year.

Our next question comes from Neal Mitra from Bank of America.

I wanted to understand the cadence of growth for the 360 million cubic feet a day agreement. Where are we starting from in late '22 and at what point do you expect to fully ramp to the full 360? And then just as a follow on to that, are there other reasons for the Diamond expansion such as a Shin Oak interconnection that would give you better team FPs versus what you're getting from other interconnects from the legacy EU cross systems?

So, Neil, good morning, thank you for the question. So, the short answer is the actual shape of the new contracts that we announced, the two new large cap investment grade counterparties, they actually start I would say about 85% of the 360. Starts almost immediately at the end of this year, fourth quarter 2022 and then it hits 360 by mid next year. So it starts high and just goes higher. As far as Shin Oak is concerned, look, we have we have Lonestar, we have Grand Prix, we have Shin Oak. Shin Oak is connected to Diamond. And, we -- obviously we've got the ability to move volumes on Shin Oak, we own a third of it now, which obviously, is attractive given the ramp. So I think the -- that to us is just another outlet and another option, an alternative for customers versus everything else.

And then I wanted to switch to the pipeline section. You know that you're an anchor shipper on PHP, and wanted to understand a little bit more detail around that. Do you plan to hold the capacity and kind of play the marketing game, because it seems we have Permian blowouts kind of every two years or the plan to sleeved that to customers? And then what percentage of the pipe are you holding?

So on the original pipeline -- 400 million cubic feet a day, we had sleeved/assigned/syndicated, however you'd like to -- whatever word you'd like to use, to our various customers. And we had actually -- so we reached back in to our customers, and each of them have been allocated either on a basket or an outright assignment of some of the capacity. So that is available for all of our customers whether it is [Caetera], whether it is EOG, whether it is Diamondback, whether it's Colgate, all of them have this available to them. And that's where we find ourselves today. It's still too early to talk about the expansion since we're on the binding Open Season. But as I said, we're intending to in fact, take up some of the expansion capacity and make sure that we continue to keep available access downstream, particularly as we now have more and more volume on our system and more and more customer desire and need for egress to Gulf Coast markets.

Got it. So just so I understand, you typically want to sleeve the capacity to customers, but do you want to hold some of it to yourself so you can push some equity barrels from Midwest to the Gulf Coast when spreads widen?

With our equity gas, that being gas associated with the small component of PHP contracts, yes. We treat ourselves on our equity, with our equity gas, the same way as we treat all of the other customers in the basket of PHP. Those people that want Gulf Coast pricing as part of their weighted average sales price for revenue, we treat ourselves the exact same way. We don't -- we are not looking to capitalize or make this. It's not a marketing business from our standpoint, this is a customer directed segment of our business.

Got it. And if I can just squeeze one more in, is there any update on P3? It seems like these expansion projects will be a band-aid and will need Greenfield projects pretty soon. So, update on timing of FID in that project and whether you will participate at all in the first place.

Short answer on P3 is, I think you have got to get through PHP and the GCX expansions, that will bring 1.2 Bcf a day of capacity to the Permian by the second half of 2023. As it relates to P3 or whether it relates to energy transfers, 42 inch pipeline or enterprises, potential pipeline or then any number of other projects out there, I think there is room for several, not just one, all of which obviously just need to be commercialized. I personally think that we will be talking about commercialization of these projects towards the end of next year as opposed to any time in between. Because you need some large anchor customers to get it done, and I think we need to see -- people need to get a better handle. And I suppose we need to see value for money from a rate standpoint relative to the build cost today, which is obviously far greater than it was back in 2017 when we saw GCX get announced and 2018, when you saw PHP and then Whistler get announced.

[Operator Instructions] We have no further questions on the call, so I will hand the floor back to Maddie.

Thank you. Thanks everyone for joining us this morning. That will conclude our call.

Thank you all for joining the Kinetik’s first quarter 2022 earnings call. You may now disconnect your lines.