Yes, Brent, I appreciate the question. So as we look at All Other, which you referenced there, I mean, there's a few components in the All Other. It is our Energy Services that we've talked about. It is corporate support, so our administrative functions. And then it's a South region, our Texas operations. And just remember, I mean, the reason that we have these in All Other is just relative to their size with the other segments. They're still an important and integral part of our company. So to the revision, as you asked about, I mean, as I shared in the prepared remarks, the Energy Services business, what we're recommending there is to normalize that from the outstanding year that they're having. And they're having an outstanding year.
For corporate support, we've had a partial year of separation costs. There were recommending annualizing for a full year of separation costs. And then, of course, we've talked about the upside in Texas, particularly as it relates to Honey Creek. So really taking these factors into account, Brent, what we're recommending there is normalizing them for the run rate for forward modeling purposes on your base rate and a reduction of $30 million.
To say it another way, I mean, we've shared with you that we've got a guidance of $400 million to $430 million for adjusted EBITDA this year. So if you pick the midpoint -- for a discussion, if you pick the midpoint of that at $415 million, and you take into account these pieces that we're talking about, that $30 million, you'd be looking at a base rate or run rate for modeling purposes of $385 million of adjusted EBITDA.