Good day and welcome to Kingsway Third Quarter 2022 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants have been placed in a listen-only mode and the floor will be open for question-and-comments after the presentation. If you are listeners in the webcast you will need to dial-in to the number listed in the press release to ask a question or email the address in the press release. With me on the call are J.T. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer and Kent Hansen, Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I want to remind everyone that today's conference call may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding the future, including expected revenue, operating margins, expenses and future business outlook. Actual results or trends could materially differ from those contemplated by those forward-looking statements. For discussion of such risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements please see risk factors detailed in the company's annual report on form 10-K contained in the subsequent fields reports on Form 10-Q as well as another reports that the company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Please note too, that today's call may include the use of non-GAAP numbers that management utilizes to analyze the company's performance. A reconciliation of such non-GAAP numbers to the most comparable GAAP measures is available in our most recent press release, as well as in our periodic filings with the SEC. Now I'd like to turn the call over to J.T. Fitzgerald, CEO of Kingsway. J.T. please proceed.

Thank you, operator. Good day everyone and welcome to Kingsway financial services Q3 2022 conference call. This is our first quarterly call in many years. It's our aim to make these calls a permanent feature of our quarterly reporting going forward. Today, I'd like to focus on a quick recap of our quarter, and then move on to what I hope will be a robust and engaging question and answer session. We had a lot of great activity during the quarter and subsequent quarter end, so I expect there will be a lot to talk about. Our results for the third quarter highlight the strength of our operating model and the progress we were making towards our stated organizational priorities. In each of my annual shareholder letters, I have reiterated the strategic priorities of the company. In the past several months we've made significant headway on advancing these goals. One key priority is a focus on strategic capital allocation to create long term value for our shareholders. There are three pillars to this objective. First, we aim to grow our portfolio of cash flow positive operating companies. During the quarter we sold PWSC for $51.2 million in cash with net proceeds to Kingsway of $37.2 million. While this may seem contradictory to our goal of growing our portfolio of great companies, we feel it was a prudent capital allocation exercise. We sold a great asset for a nice price. We can now to redeploy that capital in the pursuit of acquiring other great businesses, as well as reducing our debt, which we will talk a little later on. Subsequent to quarter end, we acquired CSuite financial partners in an all cash transaction for $8.5 million. However, we believe we will be able to recapitalize the loan we took out for…

Thank you JT. As management we focus on the following key metrics; net income, non-GAAP adjusted net income, operating income and non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA. As you may know that legacy investments and debt create complexity in our financial statements. Therefore, we use these non-GAAP metrics to help focus on the economic drivers of our business. Our net income was $37.6 million for the third quarter. This compares to a net loss of $226,000 in the year ago quarter, and a net loss of $2.4 million in the second quarter. Non-GAAP adjusted net income was $2.6 million for the third quarter compared to non-GAAP adjusted net income of $2.1 million in both the year ago quarter and in the second quarter. Significant items impacting the 2022 third quarter were the following; $26.4 million related to the sale of PWSC after taking into account transaction costs that are included in operating expenses and taxes arising from the sale. A $13.5 million unrealized gain on the value of our TruPs options, which we hold on our balance sheet as an asset of $15.8 million. These options are considered to be derivative instruments for accounting purposes and we are required to mark these the fair value. A $2.5 million loss on disposal of discontinued operations net of taxes. When we sold Mendota in 2018, we provided certain indemnities for claims outstanding as of June 30, 2018. Based on new information provided during the third quarter, we concluded that the maximum amount under the indemnity was probable. Any cash required to be paid is currently held as restricted cash and no payments are due under the indemnity until late first quarter 2023 Also $1.8 million loss on change in fair value of debt. We hold our TruPs debt at fair value on our balance sheet.…

. We do have questioners. Our first comes from Adam Patinkin from David Capital Partners, LLC.

Hi, JT and Kent, how are you today?

Hey, Adam.

Great, Adam. Thank you.

Great. Thank you.

Outstanding. Well, first, I want to congratulate you guys on all the progress with Kingsway, and especially in the simplification of the business. I think this is absolutely the right strategy. And I congratulate you, I know there's a lot more to go. But, I congratulate you guys on all the progress so far. And I also want to start off by congratulating you on your first earnings call. I think it's great that you're sharing the Kingsway story and for shareholders like myself, the transparency and the proactive f communicating is really appreciated. So I just wanted to start off by thanking you guys for that.

Thanks, Adam.

Thanks, Adam. Yes, you bet. Look, I like to say if the roles were reversed, and you were the manager and I was the shareholder, I would expect the same. So I think having a consistent forum for our wonderful supportive shareholders to come together and ask questions to management is really important.

Yes, that's great. And I agree, 100%. And thank you for it. So let's see. So I have three questions that I wanted to ask. And I'm going to ask them one at a time if that's all right. So, my first question is on your business acquisition strategy. So when I speak with other shareholders about the company or prospective investors, oftentimes the first question that I received is, what do these businesses have in common? You've got warranty businesses. You've got Ravix. Why did they go together? So, maybe it's my first question, would you mind sharing what the commonalities are between the businesses that you're seeking to acquire and already have acquired? Maybe what the business characteristics are that you're looking for? And what your approach is in deciding which businesses to include in Kingsway's portfolio?

Yes, sure, absolutely. Maybe a little bit of history. When I first came to Kingsway, I came because I was very interested in the extended warranty industry, not because I knew anything about extended warranty or had any experience in there. But I liked the fundamental attributes of the businesses, the unit -- and the unit economics and the industry. So that's I came with an opportunity to Kingsway business that we ended up acquiring, and I eventually came to Kingsway to help build out the extended warranty segment. And what I liked about it, and what we also liked about the businesses that we're buying within the Search Xcelerator are kind of a handful of things. And I've outlined these in some of those shareholder letters in the past. First, from an industry perspective, we're focused on companies and industries that are large, sort of like greater than a billion or $2 billion of addressable market, growing, and by that we mean, at sort of greater than two times GDP, and are fragmented. When by fragmented, I think we mean, lots of competitive areas to hide, lots of niches, and potentially lots of acquisition targets. So and then, within those industries, we're looking for companies that have a set of attributes. The first would be sort of strong profile of recurring or reoccurring revenue at high margin and low capital intensity, which is all of that sort of shorthand for saying businesses with what we deemed to be sort of predictably high returns on tangible capital. And so, if you look at the acquisitions we've done, in warranty, but also within the Search Xcelerator segment we're looking for businesses and large and growing industries that meet those attributes, sticky customer base, low customer concentration, recurring revenue, high margin, and low or no capital intensity.

That's great. And that's really helpful. And that makes sense in terms of maybe why some of these businesses would all fit in the portfolio. So let's move to my next question, which is about how you think about Kingsway's profitability. So, if I just take your adjusted pro forma EBITDA from warranty plus Ravix plus the CSuite acquisition, I'm kind of getting into the high-teens millions per year, maybe somewhere between $16 million and $17 million. So you take the $3.6 million of pro forma adjusted EBITDA. You multiply that by four, it's $14.4 million. You add CSuite to that with $1.8 million of EBITDA and you're getting to kind of between that $16 million to $17 million range on an annualized basis. And then hopefully, there's opportunities for organic and inorganic growth from there. Is that the right number to use? Or are there further adjustments that you think that I should be making? And just in general, how do you think about the runway profitability of your operating businesses?

Yes, definitely. Right. So EBITDA sort of the internal metric that we use. Some people call EBITDA bullshit metric. I think that's true. We're in businesses where there is some capital intensity. In our case, to depreciate -- there's very little depreciation and A, all amortization. It all comes from purchase accounting. It's not the wasting of an asset. So I think EBITDA is a very good proxy for pre tax cash flow. In our case, because of our NOLS also after tax cash flow. So we use EBITDA as a proxy for cash flow. In the warranty businesses, we use something internally called modified cash EBITDA. And it's a little different than what you would see in our financial statements. And we're not permitted to disclose it, because it deviates from accepted revenue recognition rules under GAAP. But we think that it is a better proxy for economic value added in the period in a business where there is significant deferred revenue. You can find the method for calculating that in our CIBC loan agreement, which was filed as an exhibit to our 2020 Form 10-K and what I believe I can say, Adam, is that at warranty holdings, our total outstanding senior debt under the CIBC facility at quarter end was $16. 7 million. And our senior leverage ratio under that loan agreement was 1.39 times. So you can do the math, that's sort of where we are on warranty. That's how we think about it. Right. That's all I probably can say. Ravix does not have deferred revenue. And so GAAP EBITDA works for our internal purposes. And the same will be true of CSuite.

Got it. That makes sense. So if I'm doing the math, that's a little bit more than $12 million on the warranty side plus call it five or six from Ravix plus CSuite. So if I'm thinking about kind of this proxy for economic cash flow, maybe it's a little bit higher than I'd suggested something like $17 million or $18 million, and then hopefully, you'll be able to grow it from there. Is that fair?

I think that's fair. Yes.

Okay. That makes sense. Great. And then, my last question here, is maybe more a qualitative questions. So, it really feels like you're building a flywheel where you're continuing to add these wonderful operating businesses, you're generating a lot of cash, that cash allows you to get more of the operating businesses. And one leads into the other and the flywheel kind of runs faster and faster. Can you maybe share a little bit about the opportunity that you have to deploy that capital? So maybe walk through what your strategy is, for growing the operating profitability of your businesses, which again, I think is the key metric to look at. And maybe talk to you a little bit of what the key competitive advantages are, that allow you to continue executing on transactions, like you have in the past; your warranty transactions, Ravix, CSuite? What allows you to do that, where maybe sellers would find it more attractive to partner with you, relative to others?

Yes. Okay. So I'll break that kind of into two parts. The first is sort of the flywheel effect, and how can we --what's the size of the opportunity set to continue to redeploy the capital? So I agree, there is a flywheel effect here, right. And as we grow, obviously, right now, we're focused on getting out from under the TruPs debt and things and -- but as we grow a combination of the delevering of the businesses we own, and the internal cash flow that they generate, auto provide all of the capital that we need to continue to do more acquisitions, right? And so that, I think that's the flywheel that you were speaking to, right. So the business continue to grow organically and the acquisition without needing any additional capital. And, so why do we think that we can differ? Or how can we differentiate to be successful with that and what do we think the scale of that looks like? So right now, we have three entrepreneurs in our Kingsway Search Xcelerator program actively looking for new acquisition opportunities. We hope to add to that. I'd say kind of, at any given time, we would expect to probably have more like four or five people actively searching for new acquisitions. And that would probably translate into two to three acquisitions of lower middle market businesses that fit our criteria. That if history is a tell, would sort of be generating in that $1.5 million to $3 million of EBITDA range. And then I think like the final part is how do we differentiate? Why do we think that we can be successful competing in what is a very competitive market for buying great businesses. Right. And I think that comes back to Adam, just sort…

Great, thank you guys. I'll leave it there. And I'll let the next folk to ask questions. Thank you.

Thanks, Adam.

Our next questioner is Richard Gatward from Freedom Capital Markets.

Hello, guys. Firstly, Adams actually, Adam asked three questions which touched on a number of topics that I wanted to bring up. So thank you for clarifying those things. And I do absolutely want to reiterate as the transparency that you are showing in terms of having these earnings calls is very helpful and will ultimately I think grow the value of your enterprise over the long term. So very glad to see that. Just a couple of questions around the Xcelerator. And you highlighted that you have three entrepreneurs that are looking at opportunities. How are these opportunities coming to you? Are you guys proactively going out and looking for them? Or do you have small investment banks or individual business owners actually approaching you with these opportunities?

Yes. I mean, I guess the quick answer is yes. But really both, right? And so -- we sort of run a two pronged business development approach. So each one of the entrepreneurs has identified a handful of industries that meet our criteria. And then, we use subscriptions to databases of private companies to mine for contacts, high level contacts at those companies and we run a proprietary outbound search campaign in target industries. And that starts with outbound emails that show our criteria and our interest in the industry, snail mail, follow up a phone call. So there's a very kind of time consuming and robust effort to make direct contact with business owners in an industry, whether or not they're for sale in a way to try to engage with that owner in a non processed situation. But we also have a database of 3000, maybe 4000 intermediaries, everything from brokers and investment bankers to private wealth management, accountants, law firms that we do sort of a drip marketing campaign with that continue to stay on top of their radar if they have an opportunity that fits our criteria. So we kind of run it both ways.

Okay. And just a couple of questions on the retirement. Firstly, deleveraging the balance sheet I think is obvious. I mean, stating the bleed and obvious. But that's key to success going forward for you guys. So, I just want to be clear. So you have effectively retired five of the six props at an average cost of $0.65 on $1, including deferred interest, is that accurate?

Generally accurate. Let me just maybe just kind of nitpick a little bit. We have options to retire the TruPs debt on five of the six series for between 63% and 63.75%, of the cumulative sort of outstanding principal and the interest that was deferred up until August 2nd, which is slightly less than what is showing as deferred on our balance sheet at 9/30.

Okay. And the in terms of the real estate assets, have the non-recourse debt on your balance sheet is there? What is the process for executing a sale of those? Is that in process? Is that something you're thinking about? Is that something that you've engaged with potential buyers out?

I guess, Richard, maybe all I can say right now is that we're working on our strategies to achieve the best return we can, right. Yes.

Alright. I understand that. And just finally, do you feel that you're in the position,I mean, I know that you guys are focused on running your business. But the fact that you guys are having the first conference call and discussing your results for the first time in quite a while, I think it give you the opportunity to talk about your story more to investors, and you guys have a pretty narrow shareholder base. Do you see that as a priority in terms of getting out and talking to your story engaging with IR firm? Or are you really just focused on growing the business first?

No. It's a great question, Richard. And I know we talked about this a little bit a month or so ago. We recently switched IR firms. James is on the call now. And so, we are at the point now in addition to doing these quarterly earnings calls, where, like you said, we want to expand the group of high quality shareholders at Kingsway. And by high quality, I mean, both long term, not focused on the short term, but really in it for the long haul. And very engaged. Do their work, understand the company come to the calls with great questions. And so, we're in the process of developing a campaign, if you will, to try to get out and tell our story to what we believe would be a high quality shareholder.

Okay, JT. All right. I appreciate the answers on that. Thank you very much.

Yes. Richard, I just wanted to clarify. We haven't repurchased any debt under the options yet, and those options expire May 2nd, so we have until that time to execute repurchase.

Okay, yes. Okay, thank you.

Our next question comes from Christian Solberg from Sun Mountain Partners.

Hey, JT, hey, Ken, how are you?

Christian great.

Thank you.

Excellent. First question. Churn is a really important metric. Obviously, it has many different definitions, ways to look at it. Are you able to provide any color on churn for your various businesses, the best way to look at it? What rough levels of churn are for those businesses?

Yes. So for everyone else listening, when you buy a recurring revenue business, one of the things that you want to focus on is how recurring is it and do you have a leaky bucket or not. And so we think about churn a lot. We don't publish it, because there's a lot of different definitions for churn. And so, we kind of look at it three ways. The first is just sort of logo churn. And by that we mean like what's the number of your total customers that you lost in any given year, as a percentage of the total number of customers you started the year with. And we kind of look at this at the individual company level. But we also like -- I'll kind of walk through that real quickly for you. Company like IWS, which has long standing relation, like 15 year relationships with credit union customers that are both exclusive and contractual, they have basically no logo churn, like 1% a year, they might lose one credit union, a year kind of thing, where they switch or getting acquired. And kind of the result of that is kind of the next type of churn. We look at gross revenue churn, which is just sort of the revenue dollars that are lost from a lost customer as a percentage of the total revenue. And at IWS basically have, even though they may lose 1% of customers, that customer, usually a small one. And so you have essentially no gross revenue churn. And then I will stick on IWS, just kind of walk through it. And then we look at net revenue churn, which is sort of the revenue from your -- the customers you maintained or kept as a percentage of their prior year…

That's great. That's really helpful. Thanks for breaking it down like that. How about for businesses like Ravix and CSuite?

Yes. So Ravix about 20% logo churn. Their gross revenue churn is about 6.8%. So I guess that just speaks to the logos that churn out are typically smaller. And then again, at Ravix this year, the net revenue churn is actually negative 8.5% to 9%. So the customers that they retained are growing. I don't -- we haven't been able to do the full deep dive to dissect this the way that we like at CSuite, but I will report back.

Right, well, it sounds like a similar type of business. So, that will definitely -

I would expect similar.

Yes. Excellent. I've got two more quick ones. First is, how do you think about your internal hurdle rates when you're thinking about where to invest the incremental dollar or cash. So if you want to invest in the Search Xcelerator in a new deal, or in redeeming the TruPS or share repurchases? How do you think about that hurdle rate?

Yes. So, going all the way back to some of the first sort of goals we set internally, we set this sort of big, hairy, audacious goal of compounding capital at 20% per year for 20 years, right. That would be kind of a 50x type of thing. That's not a forecast. That's a audacious goal. But I think it informs how we think about our internal hurdle rate. And so, when we're looking at investments, I like to think about an unlevered return on invested capital. And we use a 20% hurdle. And so, not surprisingly, the calculated IRR on our TruPS repurchase 20%, which is how one of the ways that we arrived at the percentage we were willing to pay as a discount, right. And when we're buying operating businesses, just kind of quick math, if you're buying a business with no growth and we don't have leakage for tax, then we would be willing to pay five times cash flow to hit that 20% unlevered target. We would be willing to pay more for a growing business. And then within the Search Xcelerator, we also look at it come through an LBO model and look at a sort of a minimum 35% IRR target as well.

And so that, in the Search Xcelerator model, we're talking 35% hurdle, because those are levered returns.

I look at it both ways. I want a 20% unlevered. And that ought to equate to a 35% levered.

Yes, okay, great. And final one here. How did the buyer of PWSC look at the earnings in the business? Was it that modified cash EBITDA metric that you mentioned earlier?

Yes. And then they also, like, what -- PWSC we sold it for $51.2 million, which you guys see coming through the income statement, kind of TTM at the time we sold, it was probably around $2.2 million of EBITDA -- GAAP basis EBITDA, it looks like we sold over 25 times kind of thing, right? TTM to us modified cash was higher about 3.3, 3.4. And then the buyer then -- so then, so $51.2 million on $3.3 million trailing, still a very juicy multiple. The buyer gave us credits pro forma for run rate new business that we had acquired, that we expected to come on, had already come on, and then kind of annualized that. So, I would say that they were thinking about paying 12 times to 13 times forward.

That's incredible. Are you seeing multiples in that arena with private transactions remaining that high in this environment? Are you starting to see them comparable transactions starting to tick down?

I don't have any tangible evidence yet. I would -- and so -- and what I'm hearing is that there's a great sorting out going on. So deals that we're about to get closed or maybe on pause. I don't know that things have reset yet. I would say that there's going to be some movement that said, for really high quality assets like in the MGA space, like PWSC, there's still a lot of capital out there looking to be deployed. And so, I don't -- obviously, it's part of -- it's a function of the availability of leverage, but, and the pricing of that leverage, but high quality assets, I think are still going to be pretty dear to people, and there's still a lot of capital out looking for them. So I hope they reset in warranty so that we have some opportunities to buy good assets at prices we would be willing to pay, but haven't seen it yet.

Got it. Very, very helpful. And it seems like it was a rational decision to sell PWSC and potentially, hopefully. But put those proceeds into redeeming the TruPS. So yes, great work and thanks for putting together this call. I'll jump back.

Yes, thank. Yes. we were sad to see PWSC go. We had an amazing relationship with Tyler. He was really sort of the test case for the Search Xcelerator segment. He was our first sort of entrepreneur, young talented guy that we brought into a business that he didn't know to transition out management and run it and grow it. And so, our motivations were probably threefold. One, was demonstrate the power of the model. Two, take advantage of some pretty aggressive inbound interest. And then three, we had an immediate use for that capital at returns in excess of our internal hurdle rate.

We now turn to James who has questions from email.

Hey, guys. So we did have some questions coming in on email. First one looks like a two-part. Can you talk about the synergies between Ravix and CSuite? And do you envision additional acquisitions over time for the Ravix team?

Yes. Sure. So synergies, first of all, I hate that word, often paid for rarely materialized. So we definitely didn't go into the deal with synergies in mind. But that said, I think that they're very complementary businesses. Maybe start with how they're different. As most of you know, Ravix provides outsourced accounting, HR services, including fractional CFOs. But a lot of additional accounting support at lower levels from controller all the way down to bookkeeper. And their customers are predominantly portfolio companies and venture capital firms. And Ravix often can't find CFO talent when a customer or prospect is looking for an interim CFO or permanent CFO resource. On the other hand, CSuite offers only interim CFO services and CFO placement. And they refer out all of the lower level accounting, from controller level on down and HR work at their clients to other firms, competitors of Ravix. And CSuites customers are often portfolio companies of private equity firms. So the combination of these two businesses is very complementary in that each one of them can now provide a very comprehensive service offering across each one of their sort of industry verticals, venture capital and private equity. And so, any historical leakage from CSuite's lower level accounting and HR referral work that they used to refer to other competitors will come to Ravix. And then likewise, in return, the CFO placement opportunities that Ravix has been referring to other outside staffing firms can be referred to CSuite. So that's sort of the complimentary service and sort of product and revenue opportunity. On the cost side, Timi will be running both businesses. So I think that sort of eliminates one redundancy, but we don't really model cost synergies and approach the acquisition as if it was a standalone. And then, James, I think part two was additional acquisitions for Ravix. So did I get that right?

Yes. That's correct.

Okay. Yes. I think that's reasonable to expect. I mean, we don't have any view on timing. I think the first order of business here is to do a really good job of bringing CSuite into the Kingsway family of companies and making sure that transition goes very smoothly and Timi gets his arms around that group of folks and executes their growth plan. And several months out, to a year out, after some delevering we can look at other inorganic opportunities. I know Timi and Arthur, the former owner have identified north of 200 potential acquisition targets. So it's certainly something they're thinking about. But in my experience, businesses often more often than not die of indigestion, not starvation. So you got to get through the one that you just took down and then -- and be prudent and patient. That's all. I'll leave it there.

Great. The next question is your press release mentioned how Ravix has achieved most of their earn-out from this acquisition. Can you provide more color on how the earn-out works? And when the money is due to the seller what targets do they have to meet?

Yes. So I think it's different. I think it's important to distinguish between achieved and accrued. So the earn-out doesn't actually -- well, there was one xcelerators. Two accelerated payment timelines where a portion of your net can be actually achieved. The first one happened at the end of September, and we paid the first accelerated payment of $750,000 at the end of October. And so -- but just coming back to accrued versus achieved. We have accrued through the third quarter, about $4 million of a $4.5 million earn-out liability. And the earn-out is based upon the achievement of cumulative gross profit in excess of a hurdle over the three years after closing with the maximum payout cap at $4.5 million and it there's some math and a multiplier and things like that. But think about that, the gross profit that the company delivers in excess of a hurdle and that hurdle was based on management's projections at the time of closing. So it would be paying for outsized growth in excess of what they were projecting. Like I said, there are two intermediate accelerated payment dates; the first one was paid $750. The next one is next October. And the sellers have an opportunity to earn an extra $375,000 if we're still in excess of the hurdle at that point. And then the final one is in October of 2024. And at that time, whatever the maximum they were able to earn would be 4.5 million minus whatever was paid in any accelerated payments. I don't know if I did -- if I fully answered the question there or not, James, but do you think it captured the email question? I kind of lost the thread there.

Yes. No. It was a three-part there. You hit them all. The next one says, Timi, the CEO of Ravix was the first search CEO. How was the CSuite deal sourced? How did it end up with Ravix and not a standalone company?

That's an interesting question. Yes, it's actually sourced by another searcher on the Search Xcelerator platform, Charles Mokuolu, who I think we introduced at the shareholder day last year, and I think maybe speaks to the power of the Search Xcelerator model to find new opportunities for portfolio companies that we already have. Charles found this opportunity, developed a relationship with Arthur, the seller. And after digging in into CSuite, the opportunity became pretty evident that this would be a really great fit for Ravix. And Charles handled that relationship with Arthur over to Timi, and Timi and Arthur hit it off and continue to progress towards the closing and now post closing and working together. So, but it was originally sourced through one of our other search entrepreneurs. It's an interesting question.

Right. And the next one is, as Kingsway grows, do you think the existing CEOs like Timi at Ravix will continue to make potential additional acquisitions in addition to the new search entrepreneurs?

Yes. I mean, obviously, the Ravix one is evidence of that. More broadly, I think that each one of the acquisitions we do under the Search Xcelerator has the potential to be a platform for follow on acquisitions tuck-ins. Again, right, that it would have to be part of the original investment thesis, if it's a high growth business that can use all of its capital to grow at really high rates of return. I think we would from a capital allocators standpoint, we would continue to allocate that capital to that business to maximize its organic growth. But generally, there's often inorganic growth thesis to a lot of these acquisitions. So yes, I think that's right. Like I said in the answer to an earlier question, our general feeling is that a new CEO should get into the business, learn the company and the industry, delever, and also work on that organic growth before they start looking for new acquisitions. And that might take a year or more even two years and they hit that flywheel point where through the combination of deleveraging and internally generated cash flow, they have now the resources to do a follow on acquisition with no additional capital required. So that's kind of the model.

Got it. Okay. And then the next one is, can you talk about how Kingsway uses its NOLs against taxable income of the subsidiary companies?

Well. This is like cash flow plumbing among all of our complicated structure. I'll flip that over to Kent. Do you want to -- how do we use our NOLs for our .

I give JT a break here to have a sip of waters since so, Yes. So usually when we talk about our NOLs it's federal NOLs. We have just under 800 million available as of the end of September. And what we do is when we look at each of our individual companies that we own, we view each of those as sort of standalone entities for federal tax purposes. And so what we'll do is we'll calculate their federal tax to as if they were their own standalone company. And so that way, even though we do a consolidated return for Kingsway at the end of the day, we start with calculating tax at each of the subs. And so, in that regard, we're much like IRS for our companies. Because if they owe money as a result of that, then they'll pay that up to the holding company. But if they have some sort of tax benefits, then we'll remit that back. But by way of sort of remitting that capital up to holdco it's sort of burning off those NOLs and monetizing those and then as a side benefit is providing an additional cash flow stream for the holding company.

Great.

I would just add that those payments for the consumption of NOLs and the cashback to Kingsway is allowed under our credit agreement. So it's a way to be air quote receiving distributions from our operating businesses as well as being compliant with our bank agreement. So -

Because if it had been a standalone entity with a bank loan, they would have been paying that money to the IRS instead of just paying it to the parent co, right.

Got it. Okay. And then the next one looks like a follow up. But please remind us how long the NOLs last before they expire?

Yes. So much of the NOLs originated in the late 2000s and early 2010s. And so, at that time, they had a 20 year life to them. So, we actually have a schedule in our 10 -- if you look at our last 10-K, we do schedule those out, so people can see those. But I think it might be note 15 or somewhere around there. But they begin to expire in 2027. But 2029 is the big year where we have almost 500 million of NOLs expiring in that year. And then in 2030, and the following years, there's just various amounts that expire in each of those years through I think it's about 2037, I believe.

Great. Thank you. And looks like there's just three more here. The first of the last three is the search entrepreneur so far has very strong educational credentials. Can you talk about how you are identifying these candidates? And what gives you confidence that you can continue to find qualified professionals?

Yes. Well, I hope we can continue to find them. Hope is not a strategy, obviously. I think the way that we source them is probably several different ways. First of all, the ETA Entrepreneurship Through Acquisition, which I mentioned earlier. Community and ecosystem is pretty close knit. And we remain active in that ecosystem, not only through the Search Xcelerator, but through our Argo partners, our sort of investment management firm that makes investments in search funds. So we are sort of plugged in to that universe, so to speak. And there's a lot of word of mouth and information sharing there. We also actively recruit on the campuses of the top tier business school. So we recently did a lunch and learn at HBS, Universe Chicago, Northwestern, Wharton. And we've done that at Stanford and hope to do one here this spring. And we post the sort of the operator and residents job description on their internal job board. So we get a lot of sort of inbound interest through those lunch and learns and presentations and through the job postings. And then there's just a lot of overlap in people's personal networks. So we get a lot of referrals from our existing OIRs. So, Drew came to us through Tyler. They were both went to West Point. They both went to HBS. Prospective searchers, people that are interested in doing Entrepreneurship Through Acquisition often reach out to people that have a shared background and have been successful in ETA to get the lowdown. And that often ends up in being referral into our program. And I think we've got something that is a little bit differentiated within the broader universe of ETA, it doesn't mean we're better. But I think we're unique and for the right person, I think Kingsway is a really good model. And so people tend to gravitate towards it. And there's just a lot of interest in ETA on business school, campuses these days. It's become kind of a real thing that people want to do postgraduate school early in their career.

Great. And last two here. First of which is a multi part. Can you talk about the process for financing the search business? What multiple leverage do you hope to place? And what is the condition of those lenders? Are the lenders open for business? And are they being competitive on their terms?

Okay. So a three part here. So generally, we're targeting a 50/50 debt-to-equity capital structure. And we feel like this is the right balance. On the one hand, you make your equity sweat, the discipline through debt, while on the other hand -- and also enhancing your equity returns through leverage, while on the other hand, not introducing the risk of insolvency. And so we think that's the right balance of discipline through debt and enhancing equity returns without somehow adding capital structure risk to the equity. And so what that means is, we're typically given the multiples we're paying, looking for like two and a half to three turns of leverage. And thus far up in through what we're working on with Ravix, we've been able to get those kinds of terms from traditional senior lenders on pretty attractive terms and pricing. We have in our sort of Rolodex, if you will, although no one uses anymore. Several lenders that work with or are familiar with us and/ or the ETA space more broadly. And so, we've got a handful of firms that we go out to and solicit term sheets. And so, I guess the third part is open for business and being competitive. I think, yes, I think they're open for business. And I think the terms are competitive. The pricing is changing, obviously, with a rising interest rate environment. But for now, anyway, I can't predict what the future will hold, but they seem to be open for business.

Great. And the final question here is, can you talk about your pipeline for potential additional acquisitions?

Yes. Maybe break that apart into extended warranty, and then the Search Xcelerator. I think I've touched on this a couple times here through the questions, but I'll be a little bit more extensive. So within extended warranty as I said before, the universe of attractive candidates is actually pretty small. It's a large and fragmented industry, lots of companies, but the number of high quality companies in my view is actually quite small. And we do see opportunities including several this year that Kent and I really spent a lot of time on. But they've either been not a great fit for us in terms of distribution channel, or the product set that they're providing service contracts on or probably more importantly, they're selling for valuations that are just a lot higher than what we would be comfortable with. So that said, I suspect given some of the new macro backdrop that I was talking about Christian in the higher interest rate environment that there may be a period of sorting out here, and then things may sort of trade at better multiples, which get us sort of interested in excited and be able to hit our internal IRR targets. But in any event, given the smaller universe of high quality assets I think it will always be somewhat episodic. Contrast that with the Search Xcelerator, each one of our -- we call them a searchers, we call them OIRs operators and residents, but so each one of OIRs maintains a very active pipeline of opportunities. And we are at any given time at various stages with dozens of potential acquisitions. It's sort of like the 100 to one principle where if you want to end up with one great acquisition you need to start with 100 opportunities at the top of the funnel. And so, when Richard was talking about how you do the outreach, we're constantly talking to business owners, constantly reaching out to brokers and bankers and other intermediaries and fill in that pipeline and are at any given time I don't know how many NDAs? Kent, what do you think? Probably NDA with 30 companies at a time kind of thing it feels like?

A lot.

Yes, a lot. With the goal of there are no called strikes and investing. We're going to be disciplined wait for a fat pitch, and but we got to see a lot of pitches in order to see the fat one.

Excellent. Thank you so much. Operator?

There appear to be no further questions in the queue. Do you have any closing thoughts at this time?

No. I really appreciate everyone that took the time out of their day to come in and listen and for those of you ask questions, that was really great and really engaging. Hopefully, you learn more. And like I said at the outset, we're really excited to make this a permanent feature of our quarterly investor communication going forward and really encourage a great dialogue with our supportive shareholders. If anyone wants to follow up with questions from either me or Kent directly, happy to answer those and just reach out to me via my email, which I believe is on the website or our filings. So sometimes people will shy about asking a question in front of a group. So if you want to talk to me directly, don't hesitate.

This does conclude today's conference. Thank you for your participation and you may disconnect your lines at this time. Have a good day.