Good morning and welcome to Kelly Services' Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call. All parties will be in a listen-only mode until the question-and-answer session of the call. Today's call is being recorded at the request of Kelly Services. If anyone has any objections, you may disconnect at this time. A second quarter webcast presentation is also available on Kelly's website for this morning's call. I would now like to turn the meeting over to your host, Mr. Peter Quigley, President and CEO. Please, go ahead.

Thank you, Lois. Hello, everyone, and welcome to Kelly's second quarter conference call. Before we begin, I'll walk you through our safe harbor language, which can be found in our presentation materials. As a reminder, any comments made during this call, including the Q&A may include forward-looking statements about our expectations for future performance. Actual results could differ materially from those suggested by our comments and we have no obligation to update the statements made on this call. Please refer to our SEC filings for a description of the risk factors that could influence the company's actual future performance. In addition, during the call, certain data will be discussed on a reported and on an adjusted basis. Discussion of items on an adjusted basis are non-GAAP financial measures designed to give insight into certain trends in our operations. References to organic growth in our discussion today exclude the impact of the 2022 sale of our Russian operations. Finally, the slide deck we are using on today's call is available on our website. We have a lot to cover today. So, let's get started. In a moment, I'll invite Olivier Thirot, our Chief Financial Officer to provide details on our financial results for the second quarter. We'll spend the rest of our time providing an update on the transformation initiative I announced in May that is designed to significantly improve Kelly's EBITDA margin and accelerate profitable growth. Specifically, we will review the aggressive actions we've taken, their immediate impact on our EBITDA margin, and our expectations for margin improvement going forward. With that, I will turn the call over to Olivier.

Thank you, Peter, and good morning, everybody. For the second quarter of 2023, revenue totaled 1.2 billion, down 3.9% from the prior year including 60 basis points of favorable currency impact. So revenues for the quarter were down 4.5% in constant currency. Included in that decrease is a 230 basis points of unfavorable impact resulting from the 2022 sale of our operations in Russia. So our revenue overall was down 2.2% year-over-year on an organic constant currency basis. As we look at the second quarter revenue by segment, our education segment continues to report significant year-over-year growth, up 33% due to our net new customer wins, strong demand from existing customers, and improved fill rates. PTS also continues to perform well, as we anniversary the acquisition in the quarter. Overall continued double-digit revenue growth demonstrates that our education business is a significant growth engine even as broader economic trends soften. In the SET segment, revenue was down by 7%. During the second quarter, we saw a continuation of the deterioration of demand for our specialty staffing, as well as a slower revenue growth in some outcome-based specialties. Permanent placement fees were also impacted by a continued deterioration in market demand and declined 48%. In our OCG segment, year-over-year revenue declined 9% on a reported basis and 8% in constant currency. The declines were primarily in RPO and PPO, while MSP revenues were nearly flat. Revenue in our Professional and Industrial segment declined 9% year-over-year in the quarter. Revenue from our staffing product declined by 16%, reflecting the impact of economic headwinds, which are more noticeable in this segment. The segment's outcome-based business delivered again solid revenue growth of 15% as the market continues to be strong for these value-added solutions. Placement fees declined 55% and was impacted by lower demand…

Thanks for those details, Olivier. In a moment, I'll invite Olivier to provide our outlook for the second half of 2023. It's important to note that our second-half expectations reflect the impact of aggressive actions we've taken to date as part of our transformation. These actions amount to more than a cost-out exercise and they differ fundamentally from the cost management actions we reported in the first quarter, which we implemented in response to near-term demand trends. The recent steps we've taken represent a structural shift to the work we do within Kelly and how we do it, marking a necessary step forward on our journey to accelerate profitable growth and they are already producing results. For more details on our expectations for the balance of the year, I'll turn it back to Olivier.

Thank you, Peter. Our expectations for the rest of 2023 for the second half of the current year, assume a continuation of current market conditions. For the second half of 2023, we expect nominal revenue to be flat to up 50 basis points year-over-year. We expect to maintain our GP rate above 20% because of the benefit of our structural business mix improvement, but continued softness in demand for full-time hiring, we will continue to compress permanent placement fees and ARPU. All in, we expect our second half 2023 GP rate to be down by about 30 basis points, 20.1%. We expect second-half adjusted SG&A to be down 5% to 6% lower than the same period of last year. This reflects the actions we have taken throughout the year to align expenses with topline trends, the impact of transformation-related workforce reduction actions taken in July, and additional cost optimization actions we expect to complete this year. Given the timing of these actions, we expect adjusted EBITDA margin in the second half of the year to be 2.3% to 2.5%, reflecting a 2023 exit rate of about 3%. For additional perspective with the benefit of a full year of expected transformation-related savings and our Q1 topline expectations, we would expect to reach a normalized adjusted EBITDA margin on a full-year basis in the range of 3.3% to 3.5%. And I now turn it back over to Peter for additional comments.

Thanks for those insights, Olivier. To put our expectations into context, consider that Kelly's average EBITDA margin has been approximately 2% for a very long time and adjusted EBITDA margin improvement of 130 to 150 basis points at between 3.3% and 3.5% will mark a significant improvement in our ability to convert revenue and gross profit to earnings. And as Olivier mentioned, our expectations assume no change to the current macroeconomic environment. They are driven entirely by the substantial progress we've made on multiple initiatives to drive sustained efficiency and accelerate profitable growth. In July, we announced strategic restructuring actions that further optimize the company's operating model to enhance organizational efficiency and effectiveness. These actions follow the comprehensive review of our business and functional operations, led by our transformation management office with support from a world-class transformation consultant. As part of the restructuring, we streamlined our organizational structure to reduce complexity and increase agility. We renegotiated supplier agreements and real estate contracts to secure terms that match our needs going forward. We revamped our performance management process to drive behaviors that will sustain these structural improvements, and we made the difficult decision to implement a workforce reduction plan to align our resources with our new ways of working. These actions among others are on track to deliver a 3% EBITDA margin exit rate in 2023. We're committed to sustaining these efficiencies having established rigorous controls that provide clear visibility into resources and expenses across the enterprise. These measures are designed to ensure the longevity of the structural changes we've made and serve as the foundation for further EBITDA margin expansion going forward. With our efficiency actions creating the necessary financial headroom to invest in our future, we are quickly switching gears to the next phase of our transformation driving growth.…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Kartik Mehta from Northcoast Research. Please go ahead.

Just trying on the transformation side. I'd be interested in just timing of normalized EBITDA margins. When you do expect to achieve that? I know you said the exit rate coming out at the end of this year will be 3. So are you assuming that you can achieve your normalized EBITDA margins by sometime in 2024?

Yes, I mean it's early 2024. And again to make it clear the improvement we have laid out especially on a full-year basis 3.3 to 3.5 is assuming the current top-line trends based on the current economic environment. The GP rate we are in now and the full-year impact of this transformation. So - and it does not include anything about the Phase 2 of this transformation, which is about growth, right? It's really the pure impact of the efficiency initiatives that Peter was talking about and that should be basically our starting point for 2024.

Yes. Obviously, you've talked about businesses that you'd like to accelerate growth. But are there any businesses that you might de-emphasize as a result of all these initiatives?

Well, we are continuously reviewing our portfolio to ensure that were - have opportunity to create value. There is no specific business line that we've identified as a result of the transformation activities. But we have identified ways to improve the operational efficiency in each of our businesses and we expect to see the benefits of that starting immediately.

And then one last question, Olivier. Trends in July, maybe what you saw kind of how they differ - more different than June if they were?

Well, I would say, when I look at the Q2 exit rate in term of revenue and what we start to see in the beginning of Q3, I would say, no real big change. No improvement, I would say, which is not a surprise, because I think the market conditions are pretty similar to what they were in Q2. So, I would say, we have started Q3 with pretty similar situation than in Q2. The only thing that I would like to mention is all about education seasonality, you know that basically Q3, specifically Q3 is a low quarter because of the school year. And that of course is something you need to consider when you look at Q3 because of the seasonality with of course high and the peak season again in Q4.

And then just, I apologize, from an FX standpoint, would you expect FX to be neutral in the second half of this year?

Well, when I was talking about nominal revenue H2 flat of 0.5, expectation now based on what we have seen so far is a positive FX impact between let's say 100, 120 basis points.

Thank you very much. I appreciate it.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. And the next question is from Joe Gomes from Noble Capital. Please, go ahead.

Good morning, Joe.

Good morning.

So, I just trying to wrap my head around the whole program. I was looking in your - excuse me, pardon me, in the presentation from this morning and on Page 16 you've got the chart there, the operating model aligns to be specialties, redesigned operating model to drive profitable growth in our chosen specialties. And then I went back and I'm looking at some of your older presentations and basically, it's the same chart or the same graph, each one of the different segments and the revenues and says everything exactly the same. I'm really trying to figure out what is really going to be different here? I mean, kind of relatedly talk about doing more tech investments. You've done a lot of tech investment over the past two years or so, what more tech investment needs to get done in order to really drive what you're looking to accomplish?

Well, Joe, I'd say the - while the structure hasn't changed in terms of the number of our business units, the way in which we're both going to market, but also the changes we made as part of the transformation that I announced in May and then affected in July. We're structurally taking complexity out of the way we work reducing spans and layers that slow decision making we have stopped. Non-core nice to have initiatives and we've moved targeted resources and decision-making closer to the business. So we not only achieve substantial expense savings, but we also have improved the - or optimized the operating model. The technology is going to be an ongoing, we have to continue to make investments in technology, whether it's AI driven, digital tools or other advances that in order to not only stay competitive, but to create market differentiation. Our Helix solution in our OCG practice has been game changing in terms of customers' reception and we will continue to invest in state-of-the-art solutions like that. That require investment in technology.

Okay, thanks for that. On the tech side again, your last quarter we talked about your new digital workers program and you said at that point, you're getting some positive feedback. I was wondering, maybe give a little quick update on how that program is unfolding?

I would say, it's still early, but the number of customers that have expressed interest in understanding how it would work in their operations, continues to increase and it's generating a lot of I would say ancillary benefit, because we can help customers review how they're getting work done and that provides opportunities if it's not the digital worker then it's potentially our outcome based business that could benefit from the conversation with customers around the future of their work.

Okay. And one last one from me, if I may. You might stab in the quarter again on the buybacks, I think, Olivier you said you're about $42 million now was a $50 million program. How does the buyback - and I understand the Board has approved that stuff. But how does that kind of fit into - to the new model? Is that something that you would think should continue or would you be looking at, hi, maybe those dollars are better invested in unfolding our new model?

Yes. Joe. I'll let Olivier update the - where we are, but the share repurchase is part of our capital deployment conversations with - that we have with the Board regularly. We're going to finish it, the share repurchase program we announced last November to the extent we're able to and will included as part of future conversations with the Board.

Yes, I mean, when you think about where we are $43 million, almost $43 million program to date. I think when you look at that we're on track, I think to complete this program as we anniversary this program in November. If you combine it with what we have done in Q1 of last year with the Persol Cross shareholding, we have bought about $4.3 million of shares for a total amount of $70 million. So it has a meaningful impact on our EPS because of the reduction of the number of shares. But as Peter was saying, we're going to need to reflect a little bit on what are the next steps and this is something that, as Peter mentioned, we are discussing with the Board on a regular basis. But again $50 million out of our overall capital allocation, we always said and I think that's the reality that it does not impact our focus on growth, whether it's organic or inorganic. Because it is $50 million is meaningful, but not something where we can say, we do it and it is detrimental to our core focus which is putting our capital toward growth.

Okay, thanks for that. I'll get back in queue. Thank you.

Thanks Joe.

Thank you. Our next question is from Kevin Steinke from Barrington Research. Please go ahead.

Hi, Kevin. Good morning.

Good morning. Just wanted to get a sense for the revenue expectations for 2024 as much as you can speak to it. You talked about the 3.3% to 3.5% EBITDA margin goal for 2024, assuming current economic conditions, it just directionally should we think about a slight or modest organic constant currency revenue declines in 2024 similar to what you're expecting for the second half of 2023 or flattish and just you had directionally, what are you incorporating into that 2024 margin outlook?

Yes. To make it clear, the 3.3% to 3.5% is not a 2024 outlook, right? It is more to say, we - current trends with no change, whether it's revenue or margin or gross margin, if you think about the full-year impact of our current transformation, we would go for 3.3% to 3.5%. But again, it is not an outlook for 2024, it is more assuming well, if this environment continues and basically, the current trend - we have the current revenue, we have as well as gross margin rate are similar in the future. The full-year impact of this transformation would lead us to move from 2% EBITDA margin to 3.3% to 3.5%. Now thinking about 2024, it's probably too early to call and what is going to happen where we are actively working is not just waiting for a better economic environment. As Peter was saying we have on top of efficiency, a lot of growth initiatives that should help us to gain market share without assuming any specific change in the current economic and market environment.

Okay. Just I mean presumably you'd have to bake some sort of revenue expectation into that margin, that was the only thing I was getting at, but I understand you weren't providing a specific.

Yes, to make it very clear. I mean the 3.3% to 3.5%, Kevin. Basically, what we did was to take our expectation for the second half of the year of 2023, get it annualized, keeping the GP margin I was talking about and then basically adjusting our SG&A based on the full year impact of the transformation. Okay. And if you do that, basically you're going to get the 3.3 to 3.5.

Okay, perfect. That's very helpful. Thank you. And just talking more about the transformation here laying a foundation for future EBITDA margin expansion. Is it assumed then that when revenue does start growing again that expenses in the future will grow more slowly than they have in the past, us being able to accelerate your trajectory of margin expansion. I mean, specifically in what your slide on Page 14, you talk about establishing controls to provide clear visibility in a resource and expenses. I'm just wondering, if something has changed with this transformation where you are going to maybe control or monitor expenses more closely as revenue is growing and get more leverage out of that growth in the future?

Yes, definitely. That's a primary outcome from the transformation initiatives and the work we've done with our outside consultant to create a governance process to manage and control expenses going forward. It is a fundamental part of the transformation to ensure that our growth in the future is advantaged by the significant and aggressive actions we make and made on the expense line and ensuring that those expenses don't come back. Of course, we're in a business where - when we're growing quickly, we need to add resources. We are adding resources for example in education, because it's growing right now. But we are going to be managing certainly any other kind of no-revenue GP producing expenses very tightly and making sure that even with the other resources that we bring back, we're doing so in a very disciplined with strong governance.

I would just add back to a sustainable transformation. One of the criteria on the KPI we are going to continue to use and expect to improve significantly is what is called incremental conversion rate. How much of GP growth we can convert to revenue. Historically, our conversion rate was about 15%. Part of the transformation is to make sure that our incremental conversion rates in the future is significantly better than the 15% we have seen in the past.

Okay, great. That's very helpful. Just thinking about the current environment here in terms of the slowdown you've been seeing. Is it more weighted towards existing customers cutting back or if you also seeing the new business pipeline slowdown, provide kind of that mix that you're seeing in terms of, what's the demand trends?

Yes, Kevin, I would say in both cases, it's not necessarily a significant impact on demand or the pipeline as much as it is a cautiousness in decision making, the volume that people are planning for, and just the overall cautiousness that leads to customers and the pipeline taking longer to develop. And that's what we're seeing, of course you have fluctuations depending on industry among our customers and the pipeline. But I would just say overall, there is some headwinds that people are feeling reflect - is reflected in their demand and hiring decisions.

Okay, thank you. Just lastly, I'll jump back in the queue. Is there kind of a cadence of the quarterly progression that we should think about in the second half in terms of just the growth and margin or is - would you expect them to be relatively similar in terms of the growth rates in margins?

Well, I think the first gate at least financially speaking is going to be this exit rate of EBITDA margin at 3%, leaving 2023. But as Peter was saying, we are going to continue to inform you on the progress we are making beyond the outcome, which should be significant and quick improvement of EBITDA margin. And as Peter mentioned, in November, we are going to spend much more time on the growth path of this transformation.

Okay. So when you say exit rate for 3%, does that imply like 3% for the full fourth quarter?

Yes, it's Q4. I would not use December to do it, because December is a specific month. So exit rate is going to be really for the entire Q4.

All right, great, thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you, Kevin.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from Mitra Ramgopal from Sidoti. Please go ahead.

Yes, hi, good morning. Thanks for taking the questions.

Good morning.

Hi, good morning. Olivier, first a couple of questions for you. I think in 2Q your restructuring charge was about $8 million. Just how should we think about it for the second half of the year as we - Q3, Q4 and do you expect even additional charges heading into '24?

On, you mean restructuring charges plus transformation charges.

Yes.

Yes. I mean, if you are seeing, but - you know already because that's something we have disclosed in July that we have this event at the far end of July. That will create 7.5 million to 8.5 million of cost. But of course, as I said in my comments, we have further initiatives underway that would trigger additional restructuring costs of transformation costs in the course of Q3 and Q4 and potentially in the first half of next year.

Yes. Okay, thanks. And in terms of the tax rate, I know you had a tax benefit this quarter, but how should we think about that for the remainder of the year?

Yes, it's - our tax rate, I mean, effective tax rate is really I would say explainable, but some time a little bit difficult to forecast. I would say on a normalized basis, we are keen on mid-teens to high teens. And of course, we have a lot of events that are impacting our effective tax rate. If I take the example of Q2, why basically we've got a benefit inside of the charge and effective tax rate of 32.5, is basically because of our MSP program, where we have basically - technically some investment through some insurance program. There are basically tax deductible and when market conditions are good and the MSP program is providing some upside. Basically, we've got a benefit on our income tax and that's the main reason why in Q2 our tax rate basically was - basically a credit. But I would say on a more normalized basis, until suggesting something between 15% to 19% effective tax rate.

Okay, now that's great. And Peter, you mentioned inorganic opportunities something you continue to look at, but is that more of a medium, longer term vision in light of the extensive transformation that you're doing in the near term?

Well, we'll continue to develop a pipeline of opportunities, the market right now is - that current term little cautious, there's not as many high-quality assets companies on the market right now or that are willing to come off the sidelines based on proactive inquiries. But we think that in the areas that we've identified inside our Science, Engineering, and Technology business unit, inside Education, inside OCG. We will continue to look for high-quality, high-margin, high-growth, assets that we can add to the portfolio to complement the organic growth initiatives that we're undertaking.

Okay. Thanks for taking the questions.

Thank you.

Thank you.

And we do have a follow-up question from Kevin Steinke. Please go ahead.

Yes, thank you. Just one follow-up. Continuing on with the question about inorganic opportunities, you mentioned that is - you're working on strategic initiatives related to inorganic opportunities. I mean, as part of the transformation, do you expect to be even more aggressive in seeking acquisitions or is it more about the types of businesses you're targeting? As you think about what might have changed with this transformation initiative?

Well, as Olivier commented, Kevin. We have ample capacity and I don't think I would describe it as more aggressive, we're already comparatively we're already acting more aggressively than we have in the past few years. We've acquired a number of companies and we're pleased with the progress we're continuing to look for properties that will contribute. Again, high-margin, high growth to the Kelly portfolio. I don't - but I don't - we're acting with urgency and a great deal of excitement, but we're not going to overspend and we're not going to settle for properties that don't satisfy the attributes that I mentioned.

Okay. That's perfect. Thank you very much.

Thanks, Kevin.

Thank you.

And at this time there are no further questions in queue. Please continue.

Lois, if there are no further questions, I think we can end the call.

Thank you. And ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude your conference for today. Thank you for your participation and for using AT&T Teleconference. You may now disconnect.