Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining us for today's KBR's First Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Drew, and I'll be the operator today. During today’s call, after the prepared remark’s, there will be a Q&A session. [Operator Instructions] It's now my pleasure to hand over to Jamie DuBray to begin. Please go ahead when you're ready.

Thank you. Good afternoon, and welcome to KBR's first quarter fiscal 2025 earnings call. Joining me are Stuart Bradie, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Mark Sopp, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Stuart and Mark will provide highlights from the quarter and then open the call for your questions. Today's earnings presentation is available on the Investors section of our website at kbr.com. This discussion includes forward-looking statements reflecting KBR's views about future events and their potential impact on performance as outlined on slide 2. These matters involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ significantly from these forward-looking statements as discussed in our most recent Form 10-K available on our website. This discussion also includes non-GAAP financial measures that the company believes to be useful metrics for investors. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the nearest GAAP measure is included at the end of our earnings presentation. I will now turn the call over to Stuart.

Thank you, Jamie, and good morning, everyone. I will pick up on slide 4. Before discussing our financial performance in the quarter, we'll take a moment dedicated to Zero Harm. Today, we are highlighting our industry-leading safety performance in 2024. At KBR, we are focused on maintaining the highest levels of safety, and we are constantly looking for ways to improve and to ensure that our people can work safely each and every day. Our total recordable incident rate for 2024 was a record low at 0.05. That's notably lower than the national average of 0.37, and representing our third consecutive year of improvement. In 2024, we also set three new safety records. We achieved 26.8 million consecutive safe work hours. Secondly, we had a consecutive run of 101 days without a safety incident. And thirdly, we attained 94% Zero Harm days. We're doing even better thus far this year at 98% Zero Harm day rate. I thank all of our 38,000 global employees for the consistent dedication to safety every single day. And as I often say, good safety is good business. Now on to slide 5. Today, we have five key messages. First, we delivered strong performance in the first quarter, including revenues of $2.1 billion and adjusted EBITDA of $243 million, both representing double-digit growth. Through our strong execution and focus, we generated an adjusted EBITDA margin of 11.8%, and that's up 40 basis points year-on-year. Second, we continue to successfully and methodically execute our growth strategy. The LinQuest acquisition continues to contribute. We are increasing our bid volumes, and we are agile and well-aligned to our markets and our customers across the world. Third, our business is balanced, resilient and well-positioned to perform in today's environment and we are taking proactive steps to ensure we remain…

Great. Thank you, Stuart. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us. I'll start on Slide 10, covering our Q1 financial performance. Revenues in the quarter were $2.1 billion, up 13% versus the prior year, driven by growth across both segments as well as the LinQuest acquisition we made in the third quarter of last year. Organic growth was 5% in Q1. Adjusted EBITDA was $243 million. That's up 17% over last year with margins at 11.8%, an increase of 40 basis points against last year. This improvement came from STS performance, and I'll cover that here in a moment. Adjusted EPS was $0.98 in the quarter, up 27%. This exceeded the adjusted EBITDA growth rate driven primarily by a lower share count on repurchases that we've made over the last year, which we substantially increased this past quarter. As you can see in the release, below-the-line items were flat year-over-year, so it increased operating profit, this contributed to EPS growth as well. Operating cash flow was $98 million, an increase of 8% versus the prior year. As you might note, Q1 is typically a lower cash flow quarter seasonally so pace should increase going forward, and we remain on track to meet our full year guide. Now on to Slide 11 and our segment performance. As we previewed in January, our operating segments are now Mission Technology Solutions, or MTS and Sustainable Technology Solutions, or STS. So I'll use those acronyms going forward. Starting with MTS revenues of $1.5 billion were up 14% versus the prior year with adjusted EBITDA of $145 million, up 11%. Margins were slightly lower at 9.6% and consistent with our expectations due primarily to the ramp-up in HomeSafe. By business unit, Defense and Intelligence generated strong growth of 22%, Readiness and Sustainment was up 10%,…

Thanks a lot, great job as always. I'm on Slide 14 with some key takeaways. We delivered strong financial performance in the first quarter with double-digit revenue and EBITDA growth. Our people continue to deliver with excellence. We continue to successfully and methodically execute our growth strategy, increasing our bid volumes and winning new contracts. We have a balanced and resilient business portfolio offering multiple pathways to growth. We are preparing proactively amid macro uncertainty. We are controlling the controllable being prudent on cost and remaining agile. We are maintaining a disciplined approach to capital allocation, acting on our share buyback authorization and returning capital to shareholders as Mark described earlier. Finally, we remain confident in our outlook for 2025 and are progressing well towards our 2027 objectives. With that, we're happy to take questions, and I'll hand the call back to the operator. Thank you.

Thank you. We will now start today’s Q&A session [Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from Andy Kaplowitz from Citigroup. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, everyone.

Good morning, Andy.

Hi, Andy.

Mark, good morning. Book-to-bill of 1.1 times in STS was good, and I think you sound confident of continued backlog growth. But can you give more color into what you're seeing? It doesn't seem like you're seeing any sort of energy transition type delays. But could you comment on that? And do you still expect the primary regions of strength in your business to be the Middle East and the US?

Thanks, Andy. I think we have discussed this previously. We are seeing in certain geographies and move away from energy transition or sustainable projects and more into energy security. And that is a thematic, I think, that's happening globally predominantly due to affordability issues. But in some regions, Europe, in particular, we're still seeing energy transition high on the agenda, and we continue to work across both segments, if you like, both markets. So it's we've got to be agile as we said on the call, we're very global, as we said on the call, and we have intimate relationship with customers, depending on their needs and depending on what's happening geopolitically in their environment. So yes, we are very confident looking forward with the STS portfolio. And I think we've got a very balanced outlook in the way we look at energy transition and energy security.

Helpful, Stuart. And maybe like kind of a similar question on the MTS side. I know I think you've dialed in like mid-single-digit organic growth for the year, ex-HomeSafe and LinQuest. Given what you see out there, I mean, obviously, the new President's budget just came out emphasizes defense, as you know, maybe deemphasized NASA a little bit. So how confident are you of that mid-single-digit growth? Is the growth drivers changing at all? Or is it still very much your defense business is going to lead growth? And how do you think about sort of the NASA business now?

So correct, there is a $1 trillion defense budget with $150 billion we can, certainly in package, in motion, as you are well aware. Our initial look at this is kind of hot off the press, as investment priorities look like being things like Golden Dome, for the missile defense agencies, munitions, shipbuilding, nuclear deterrence, space dominance and of course, border security, many of these areas, of course, are well aligned to what we do today. And increases in funding are expected to flow into RDT&E, where we're very strong and in procurement. And so overall, I believe we're very well positioned, opposite these budget priorities. And in terms of NASA, it appears there's increased funding to human space exploration and whether that's to Moon and Mars missions, we'll find out later. But that's very much aligned to our differentiated capabilities as we talked about many times. We are a leader in human space flight and that seems to be where the focus is. And I think the recommitment to fund the International Space Station through 2030 is also a good point, and we'll have a role as they transition to commercial replacement. So all up, I think it's a very strong alignment with where KBR sits and where we've positioned the business going forward, and we feel confident that we're in the right places.

Our next question comes from Steven Fisher from UBS. Your line is now open. Please proceed.

Thanks. Good morning. Just wanted to follow-up on the mission technology discussion. And sorry if I missed this, there was some overlapping calls before, but if you could just give us a status of, I think you cited a $2 billion of awards under protest. I think that was up from maybe $1.5 billion last quarter. You can correct me if I'm wrong. What sort of the -- what's moving in and out of that, kind of what's progressing, what isn't? And generally, just the potential to see bookings activity pick up in the mission technology segment for the next couple of quarters?

Thanks, Steve. Unfortunately, it is trend in government awards that are [indiscernible] almost in every major award. We are flat quarter-to-quarter. It was circa $1.8 billion -- so $2 billion this quarter. And there is a process that one has to go through. There's a number of days that the government has to respond to these protests. And we said in the prepared remarks, we expect these to be resolved going into the second half of the year.

Okay. That's helpful. And then, again, not sure if I missed this, but in terms of HomeSafe, just how would you characterize the scope of the work that you're going to be capturing during the peak moving season here? And how much that could still shift around as the next few months unfold?

Good question, Steve. It is seasonal, as you're aware. We said in our prepared remarks, we expect volumes in Q2 to be kind of similar to Q1 with increases going into Q3 and again into Q4. We are very happy with the performance on HomeSafe. Again, we covered that in our prepared remarks, the customer satisfaction rates are up. And remember, that's the primary objective is to improve the move experience for the service men and women. The second objective is to save the taxpayers money, and we are achieving that also. So we're very happy with how things are going. The relationship with Transcom is excellent and we look forward to progressing with what is a fantastic transformational program deploying IT at scale, using a lot of digital tools and really transforming an industry to be more efficient and more accountable as we go forward. So feeling really good about where HomeSafe sits today.

Our next question today comes from Michael Dudas from Vertical Research. Your line is now open. Please proceed.

Good morning, Jamie, Stuart, Mark.

Good morning, Mark.

Good morning, Mike.

Stuart, some positive news certainly from Plaquemines and certainly on Lake Charles. What's your thoughts on additional capacity for us with such incoming opportunities for the industry in general. I'm sure KBR, in particular, of capacity and how you want to structure any additional type contracts in LNG? And maybe also the Brown & Root discussion that Mark shared was pretty interesting. Any kind of flow business activity insight that you could share that kind of supports where many people are thinking about whether in that business or around energy and industrials in the U.S?

I will answer the LNG question first -- the LNG activity has increased over the past couple of quarters, as you would expect. The -- I think the performance in Plaquemines has been a true demonstration of our capability and our delivery excellence in that market, but also demonstrates our commercial discipline. And we would not be entering into any contract in the future that had any levels of -- some EPC or any massinations that were like that. So, we'll keep our commercial discipline. But today, we have LNG, obviously, in the U.S. We've started work on a program in Indonesia. We're working a program in Oman, with project managing in Abu Dhabi. Quite a large LNG development there. So, the activity levels are high across the world. It's a very global business, LNG and energy in general, as you're well aware. So, we're feeling pretty good about the outlook for that. In terms of the Brown & Root joint venture, Mark was quite right. We haven't really talked much about Brown & Root joint venture as it doesn't really impact our revenue line. But that business over the past since COVID has really recovered extremely well. They did well during COVID, but obviously had activity levels down like most businesses. And since then has really picked up pace. It's got a fantastic reputation, particularly in the southern states. It's delivering on its promises to customers and winning more work as a consequence and has grown nicely to the $1.3 billion, $1.4 billion revenue that Mark cited with typical margins for that venture. And we see as new facilities, particularly moving into areas like LNG and into the broader refining and chemicals markets. It's quite an exciting area for that business to move into. So, it really helps us as well in terms of having a strong footprint in the operational side, so the OpEx side of the spend, and we couldn't be happier with the performance.

That's one reason I brought it up, Mike, is I think a real key skill set company has is managing risk and tapping opportunity through joint venture relationships like Brown & Root and others, Aspire, Blackman [ph], et cetera. And so as Stuart mentioned, having access to the OpEx market, particularly as we go through the cycles is a healthy way to achieve multiple paths. One of the things that Stuart talked about in his prepared remarks and just enabling as many opportunities as we can to lever the strengths of our legacy in this case. The fruitful benefits has really been great to see.

Well said. Thank you.

Our next question today comes from Mariana Perez Mora from BofA. Your line is now open, please go ahead.

Hi, this is Samantha Stiroh on for Mariana. Good morning. I was wondering -- I know you talked a little bit about the energy transition and energy security dynamics internationally. I was wondering if you could touch a little more on the international side, particularly as it relates to MTS?

So, MTS for KBR is really in two countries in the main, it's in the U.K. and in Australia. The business performance in the U.K. is underpinned by very, very long-term contracts. Aspire, we've talked about many times, it runs out to 2041. The U.K. has come through elections recently. As you're well aware, they are announcing they're coming out with their defense review on the 8th of May, actually. And so we'll have more clarity into the strategic spend priorities of the UK government as it moves forward. But what has been public is the increase in spending, opposite, GDP up to 2.5%, which I think is a good indicator of increased spending in the MTS arena internationally in the UK. In Australia, we continue to do extremely well. That business has outperformed in truth and continues to book very solid long-term contracts, multiyear contracts in attractive areas related to digitalization, and mission IT and also in the areas of sustainment and things like satellite communications. So it's a very good business in both countries, and we expect the margins are attractive in these countries also being a little bit less regulated. And we continue to perform really well in both the UK and Australia, and we're excited about their future.

Thank you. And then switching gears a little bit. I was wondering if you could discuss the M&A environment and where some of these bolt-on acquisitions, what kind of technologies you're looking at?

So we are very clear about our strategic priorities and the strategic vectors that we wish to grow into. We do not do anything for bulk or anything like that we acquire to strategically accelerate in the growth vectors that we've identified. And those strategic vectors, our expansion internationally in the government arena, into more areas where we're probably not as present as we could be, in intelligence community, in areas like that would be attractive to us. And we're always looking in the STS portfolio for additional technologies and innovative and entrepreneurial ways to tap into emerging technologies, and we've done so with plastics recycling, as you're aware with sustainable aviation fuel. And more recently with our pure lithium offering, which is taking waste water and being able to extract lithium, which could be a very, very attractive technology of the future given how much wastewater there is around the world, particularly in the energy market. So we continue to look for those and trying to be as innovative and creative as we can be as we look to what will be in demand in the future as well as what's in demand today.

Great. Thank you.

Our next question today comes from Jerry Revich from Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Yes. Hi, good morning, everyone.

Hi, Jerry.

Hi. Stuart, can you just expand on the progress that you folks are making on HomeSafe? You mentioned improving customer satisfaction scores. Can you just quantify how that's trending? And also, can you just give us an update, please, on vendor sign-ups? How is that going relative to plan and relative to the ultimate target of moves on a multiyear basis?

Customer satisfaction has increased to just under 90%, is the number we've achieved to date and -- but it has increased markedly over week -- over the past several weeks. The main reason for that is the adoption of the technology. We put a lot of effort into training drivers and as well as the companies who utilize the technology. And as a consequence of that, our adoption by suppliers is increasing. At the same time, we've really put a lot of effort into our customer care service and increased the level of staffing and training from our side into that capability, and that's proving a real winner with the service men and women. We have not computers or robots that answer the phone, but real people that help them with whatever issue they may have. And the other part to this is that there are always issues in moving. Anyone who's at all moved on this call, I'm sure. And there's always issues, but we have settled 100% of all of the claims on time, as it relates to any discontent or anything that's been damaged, et cetera, by the movers themselves. So I think all up, I think that's what's driving the performance and customer satisfaction. We put a lot of effort, Jerry, into synchronizing moves with Transcom and really making sure that we don't impact service members, making sure we've got the supply chain to actually execute the moves and our capacity continues to increase. And as we head into the peak season, or the busy season, or summer season as some call it, there are different dynamics during that season, and we're working daily with Transcom to make sure the right decisions are made by this for the service members. That's our priority. So I think we are very much lockstep with Transcom. Transcom went to Congress and the HSM Service Committee [ph] recently and reaffirmed their commitment to the program and have done so publicly and politically, and we are absolutely in lockstep with them in that commitment. And as I said in my other statement, we are very confident in the future of this program.

Super. Yeah, I think many of us would sign up for 90% customer satisfaction and our personal moves. In terms of on the LNG side, can we just expand on that? Thank you for the update on the offtake on Lake Charles, but when are you expecting final investment at this point? And then any particular time lines on additional potential projects that you folks are bidding on any time lines that you might be able to share with us in terms of other opportunities for sizable LNG work?

Thanks, Jerry. It's actually Energy Transfer's Earnings Day today. So I would point you to that call, if you want a real update from, I guess, the horses mouth on their thinking and their view of the timing and the progress on the project. Rather than us do that for them, I would point you to their earnings, which fortunately is the same as ours today. In terms of the future LNG and timings, most of the projects are at the other than the big project in Abu Dhabi, we're project managing, which is in the execute phase. So we've got a few years of project managing that to conclusion. The work in Indonesia is early stages. The work in Oman is just completing the front-end design, so that will move into the execute phase later this year. And so they're all at different stages. Jerry, which is a good fact pattern because you get in early, and therefore, you can move resources and capability where the needs are, not everything is hitting at once. So I think it's a good fact partner for us to really. It's a good question because it allows us to make that statement that we're very well-placed to cater for these projects as we move through these different phases.

Our next question on today's call comes from Sangita Jain from KeyBanc. Your line is now open. Please proceed.

Hi, good morning. I just have a couple of brief follow-ups. On HomeSafe, should we think of the ramp as something that is entirely, as you improve your customer satisfaction and does increase moves? Or does -- is Transcom looking for some kind of a metric before they unlock more capacity for you?

I believe we have performed -- we have performed really strongly in terms of the tech and the interface with TRANSCOM's tech. I think we've proven that, that works. We've proven the operation can deliver not just in terms of technology but customer satisfaction. And we've proven we can educate and train the supply chain in the way that they need to be adopters of the technology. All that is a good platform in terms of moving forward with the program and attracting more of the supply chain as we move into the rest of this year. There is no real metric that TRANSCOM lay down, but customer satisfaction is a key area they look at because their mission is to improve like ours, the move experience of the servicemen and women. So that would be the one metric they look at. I think the level of synchronization we have with TRANSCOM today is really improving our ability to respond, our ability to pick up on time, deliver on time, and that all flows down to the customer satisfaction reports, of course. So there's no real one metric or one key thing. I think it's just proving that we're committed and we're executing and that we're growing the supply chain. And as that grows, we'll do more moves.

Got it. And just one on DOGE, hasn't come up in a while, and it doesn't look like that was an impact on your 1Q. So just trying to see if there is if that is still an overhang on how things are being done in Washington?

In our prepared remarks, we're very clear. We've not seen any impact to date from government efficiency initiatives. That work, I'm assuming in Washington is not yet done. So who knows what the future holds. But we do -- I think the key part is really looking about where our business is sort of pointed and the areas that are aligned with the skinny budget that's been put forward, we're very well placed. So far, no real impact from government efficiency.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Jean Veliz from D.A. Davidson. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning, and thank you for the time.\

Good morning.

Good morning.

For my first question, regarding LinQuest, are we still expecting about a $400 million contribution for 2025?

Sorry, was talking to Jamie for a moment. Jean, could you repeat that question, please? Its Mark.

Yes. No, no problem. Just regarding LinQuest. Are we still expecting somewhat $400 million contribution for this year for 2025?

From an inorganic perspective, yes. So there was just short of $200 million last year and it's a 600-ish business, give or take, so you're close. That's not the total business. That's just the inorganic piece, if that's what you're looking for.

Yes. Definitely. Thank you. And could you provide some color around the ammonia industry? And perhaps what type of projects are you seeing in your pipeline currently?

We stated in our prepared remarks, the ammonia market remains strong. We have a number of pursuits that are in our pipeline today. Many of which are really driven more to the fertilizer usage, I would say, rather than hydrogen usage just given what's changed in the markets recently. But there's still -- is still a very attractive part of our business going forward.

Perfect. Thank you. Appreciate the time.

Perfect. We have no further questions in the queue at this time. So that does conclude today's Q&A session. I'll now hand back over to Stuart Bradie for closing remarks.

Thank you very much. Thank you all for taking the time to listen in. I know this has been a busy day for earnings on the state. So thank you for your time and your questions and your interest. So really, the key takeaways for me and the investment thesis for KBR really. We remain excited about the path for KBR in 2025 and beyond. And we're confident in our ability to continue creating value for our shareholders. We have completed a multiyear transformation, and you've had a ring seat for that to become a leader in providing differentiated innovative upmarket science and technology, and engineering solutions with large scale and global reach. We serve diverse attractive end markets aligned with strong secular growth trends, as we've presented. And I truly believe we have top talent combining deep domain expertise, proprietary technologies and an unwavering focus on execution that really has delivered fantastic results on an enduring basis. We are excellent partners, as Mark said. We're operating in dynamic teams to solve our customers' most complex challenges, which has resulted in recurring long-term engagements. We have many long-term contracts to underpin future earnings and over $20.5 billion in backlog in options. Our diversification, our global footprint, our asset-light model and disciplined capital allocation generate stable, predictable cash flows and compelling shareholder returns. We have growth in margin expansion plans in flight. Finally, we remain alert and agile monitoring the current dynamic environment, as you would expect, and taking precautionary and proactive actions to ensure KBR remains very well positioned to deliver for our employees, our customers and, of course, our shareholders. I'd like to extend my sincere thanks to our 38,000 employees all around the world for their hard work and dedication in delivering solutions for our customers each and every day. They do a terrific job. So thank you again for joining today's call and for your interest in KBR, and we look forward to updating you again next quarter. Thank you.

That concludes today's call. You may now disconnect your lines.