Good morning, everyone and welcome to KBR’s Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Emily and I will be coordinating your call today. After the presentation there will be the opportunity for you to ask any questions. [Operator Instructions] I will now turn the call over to our host, Jamie DuBray, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, Jamie.

Thank you, Emily. Good morning and welcome to KBR’s third quarter fiscal 2024 earnings call. Joining me are Stuart Bradie, President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as Mark Sopp, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Stuart and Mark will provide highlights from the quarter and then open the call for your questions. Today's earnings presentation is available on the Investor section of our website at KBR.com. This discussion includes forward-looking statements reflecting KBR's views about future events and their potential impact on performance as outlined on Slide 2. These matters involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ significantly from these forward-looking statements as discussed in our most recent Form 10-K available on our website. This discussion also includes non-GAAP financial measures that the company believes to be useful metrics for investors. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the nearest GAAP measure is included at the end of our earnings presentation. I will now turn the call over to Stuart.

Thank you, Jamie, and welcome to our third quarter earnings presentation. I would like to start on Slide 4 if I may. Now we show that on every earnings presentation, so no surprise. It lays us at Zero Harm program and the pillars both environmental and social that underpin that program. The progress we’ve made in each of these pillars is highlighted in our Annual Sustainability Report which takes me nicely on to Slide 5. So this month, we issued our 2023 Sustainability Report. I mean, the team does an amazing job in showcasing all that we are doing across these pillars. We’ve shown only a few highlights on the slide here and I'll pick up on a few. Our health and safety performance is once again top quintile. I think really demonstrating our commitment to really looking after our people. 37% - % 37% of KBR Group ‘23 revenue actually, over $2.5 billion is directly linked to sustainability. And I think thus shows clear alignment with shareholder value, which we talk about before is a clear differentiator for KBR. The result from our people survey, which is run by an independent company and done anonymously resulted in KBR being classified as a great place to work in multiple countries. Now the survey showed us a couple of things, I think the first, our focus on people is truly making a difference and secondly, but of course, we are not perfect and we still have lot to do. On the side of the slide, you will see our continued commitment to strong governance. And we continue to make progress in I&D advancing our agenda on multiple fronts. Our maturity and commitment and delivery of sustainability has been externally scored by various agencies and you see that that before. MSCI we…

Terrific. Thank you, Stuart. And good day, everyone. I'll pick it up on Slide 9. So, as you've heard from Stuart already, the results for Q3 were really good across the board with every single metric you see here up double-digits over last year. Margins and cash flow were the particular highlights with profitability running consistently in the mid-11% range all year. And cash flow super strong at $422 million on a year-to-date basis. DSOs, days sales outstanding continued to run at the lowest levels we have ever seen at KBR averaging about 60 days through this year so far. And as you know, low DSOs reflect high customer satisfaction and also importantly superb teamwork, across our operations, our functions and customer touch points. Let me just here quickly go on to Slide 10 on results of the segments. Over on the left, as you see STS is humming along with continued good momentum and superb profit growth, consistently above the 20% margin level. As I said before, this team does remarkable job delivering intellectual property capabilities to customers all around the world, while continuing to grow its services platform also a very attractive overall margins. This is attributed to specialized domain expertise, scarce skill sets in a very cost, competitive delivery mechanism. On the right, Government Solutions had an excellent quarter as well with revenues up 11% and profit up 14% on improved margins. A particular importance we saw increased award decisions in the US, many of which came in our favor as towards said after experiencing delays in the first half. Our win rate on award decisions was well over 50%. So it's really a testament to the great team effort there. And as Stuart said, the government book-to-bill was 1.3x in the quarter, all the while international…

Thanks Mark. Terrific job as always, I will finish off on Slide 13 with some key takeaways. So as Mark and myself have said, earlier, outstanding third quarter performance with double-digit year-over-year growth across all key metrics, revenue profit and operating cash flow. Absolutely terrific. On LinQuest, really performed well since closing, it’s won over $60 million of new work and really delivered solid strong September results. But more importantly, integration is progressing really, really well and with revenue synergy opportunities crystallizing, it's a very exciting acquisition indeed. As a result of our strong year-to-date performance, and of course the addition of LinQuest, we're raising guidance as Mark just talked about on revenue, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EPS. And finally on bookings, 1.2 times book-to-bill at the Group level together with our attractive pipeline sets us up nicely for the remainder of this year of course, but more importantly gives momentum going into 2025. So thank you again for joining us on today's call. And I'll now pass it back to Emily, who will open the call for questions. Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Andy Kaplowitz with Citi. Please go ahead Andy.

Hey, good morning, everyone. Good morning everyone.

Hi Andy.

Stuart or Mark, I know it's a bit early to talk. Good morning. I know it’s a bit early to talk too much about ‘25, but could you give us a little more color into visibility and particularly in STS growing in line with that algorithm you gave us earlier this year the 11% to 15% revenue growth as it looks like as you said, trailing 12 month book-to-bill reaccelerated a bit in Q3, I know you talked about the strong expected Q4. Last quarter I think you talked about some delays in energy transition projects. Are you still seeing those delays and how do you think about the sustainability, the one times book-to-bill that you recorded in Q3 moving forward?

So lots of - lots of questions in one there Andy?

I like pretty good at leaving them together, Stuart.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's good. I would say that, it's still quite early we are in obviously started our budgets for next year. I think that we're confident that we're aligned with our 11% to 15% growth expectations in STS going into next year. Our book-to-bill obviously picked up in Q3 and it’s looking strong in Q4 to underpin that. The margin performance continues to be very strong. I think energy transition projects we are seeing more activity in the Middle East in particular around market share, around ammonia and the gas green hydrogen. But I think in general a lot will depend on the election results and in terms of the speed in the US. But overall, the energy security market, combined with a growing energy transition albeit probably slower than we expected a still growing market really gives us good confidence that will be aligned with what was presented at Investor Day in terms of STS targets. Hopefully that helps.

It does Stuart. And then, Mark, just I want to ask you about the guidance, just on the context of LinQuest obviously you put in four months, you mentioned that sort of the offset is HomeSafe. I guess if I just look at the sort of guidance raise, it seems like is there anything else that's a little slower than you thought I guess because LinQuest I think would be pretty sizable if not more than the EBITDA change in the guidance.

Yeah. Thanks, Andy. Just one clarification if you will is while HomeSafe is an offset to LinQuest on revenues, we did not really factor in profits for HomeSafe as Stuart said. So that's not a reason for contributing to your question relative to Q4 and the guide. So that is as expected for the year from a profit perspective on HomeSafe. But we do have interest expense coming in for LinQuest. So we have good news is that three full months of LinQuest but we have three full months of interest. So we have that occurring, as good as of a job, our treasurer has done with minimizing the impact of that. LinQuest is accretive, but it's like a couple of pennies. So we didn't think that warranted a big bump. And we just moved up the midpoint by taking up the floor. We do have some seasonality that does kicking in the fourth quarter, a little bit on things like just the efficiency of our labor coming into the fourth quarter with holidays and things like that as a little off pace for parts of government and parts of STS. So we're being conservative on our outlook there. And that's about it. So not trying to get too fancy. Where we're adding some to the guide here, but cautiously so heading into the fourth quarter and really in context capping off a brilliant year of growth on all metrics and doing out or above a week set out to do at the beginning of the year.

And I think just to finish off and I think the original question was on EBITDA guide. I mean, we think that the LinQuest revenue is about a $175 million that’s coming in at double-digits. That's about a $17 million EBITDA return and that's actually the raise that we've put into the announcement, Andy, so completely consistent.

Our next question comes from the line of Tobey Sommer with Truist Securities. Tobey, please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, everyone. This is Jasper Bibb on for Tobey. It sounds like a lot of the exciting wins in STS just kind of curious like how do you think mix in some of these LNG recycling wins ramping up might impact the segment margins over the next couple of years, maybe relative to the flattish margin you outlined at your Investor Day this spring? Thank you.

I think we - I think having margins in the circa 20% range with a business that's growing a 11% to 15%, I think is the targets we set out and that's the targets we're going to hold to. And maybe obviously mix volatility around margins mostly growing as we've seen. We've achieved ‘21 ‘22 in second quarters depending on mix. But I think our overall guidance stands in our long-term targets over time particularly through the ‘27 stands. So I don't think there's going to be much change.

Thanks. And then the another follow up on HomeSafe. Good to hear no impact to your targets for a little bit of a total spike there. Just to clarify, do you think it’s still on plan with the, I guess, underlying ‘25 assumptions for HomeSafe revenue from the Investor Day? Or is that maybe a little bit below plan now, and that's the offset by other wins across the portfolio or LinQuest?

No, it's very much in on target. As I said in my prepared remarks, we took a quite a conservative view through ’25, ‘26 and ‘27. In fact, in terms of the way the program ramps up, and certainly now we've kind of opened the aperture if you like, but the systems testing to really progress the domestic moves, I think if there's any surprise that I think there's opportunity to the upside. That is a new program however. But I do feel that we've got the right sort of numbers on a conservative basis within the ‘25 long-term target guide that we gave at Investor Day. And obviously, more will come out as we guide for ‘25 and ‘27.

Our next question comes from Michael Dudas with Vertical Research. Michael, please go ahead.

Hi, Mike.

Morning, Mike.

So with the positive progress, you mentioned with the energy projects in the Middle East in Saudi in particular, maybe you could – like what type of workforce, how is it being staffed towards has been maybe in 24? And how that may ramp in 2025? And I assume that's going to be used throughout many of your offices globally. And you - given some of the opportunities that you have in your current opportunity could you see further, on contractor bookings over the next 12 to 18 months in some of these other LNG or related opportunities there?

Yeah, I mean, that's a really good question, Mike. We, so for LTC program, that will be led out to the Houston Office, supported by predominantly the Saudi office. As you can expect as things move into Saudi Arabia the work on the gas developments offshore as we led from our Leatherhead office again supported by Saudi on Chennai in particular. The LNG projects that we are looking at are actually again led either out of particularly out of Houston or Leatherhead, but predominantly in that case supported at Chennai in our India office. And so it really is a global impact and allows us to derisk concentration. I would also say that in terms of the opportunity when we are doing front end design then obviously the follow-on opportunity is clear depending on where you are in the world. And I think if it's in the Middle East that will like maybe, maybe a broader packages, but really in the project management realm. If it’s in places that are not in the Middle East but different contract vehicles that pursue our risk profile. So, but in all Occasions, I think being involved early in the project performing well, often means that you actually have a role going forward. So, that's why we put a lot of emphasis and in explaining to the market where we sit and sort of pre front end’s concepts and front end designs because it really positions us not only for broader rules but also around understanding technology opportunities and things like that, so. Hopefully that helps.

It does Stuart. And my follow-up is that, you mentioned in your prepared remarks about some of the energy transition opportunities, maybe more uncertain because of US elections, maybe turning to the government side, any change into your thoughts on what you said given your significant business units in Government Solutions relative to what you're seeing out of the Pentagon or what anticipated change could occur and anything that would cause them any move in minor change your thoughts given how things looks like to turning out?

No, I don't think materially, Mike, I think that the strong bipartisan support around military spending and the Department of Defense budgets as we’ve seen in the past, I think that it is where we've positioned the business, whether that be in military space or in the Pacific or looking at hypersonics or cyber or even civil space with NASA, are going to be strongly supported regardless of how the elections turn out. So we are feeling pretty good at that. There is usually a question on what happens in Europe on low cap, but we feel that that’s moving more to or move more to a sustainment type solution depending on what happens with Russia and the Ukraine. But obviously that’s not a near term resolution we see. But you never know. But I don’t think there is going to be a material change in where are the priority spending is going to be and I think that we will guide appropriately is it going to ’25 and we are pretty confident of our targets of growth that we are going present at Investor Day.

The next question comes from Steven Fisher with UBS. Please go ahead, Steven.

Thanks a lot. Stuart you mentioned, potential election impact on Lake Charles. I'm just curious what are some of the scenarios that could play out with that project based on the elections and kind of what was the timing implications be for those various scenarios? And I don't want to put words in your mouth, but it sounded like the answer to Andy's question was that, maybe in the – that Lakes Charles as they delayed by a longer period of time, say a couple of years. You still think you could have enough work in STS to hit those 11% to 15% targets. I don’t want to put words in your mouth, but just clarifying that that’s what you are messaging?

- : In terms of our ability to look further field for and looking at our pipeline and the way that we will perform, I think there is absolute credibility in the numbers we put forward regardless of timing of Lake Charles. And so, it's just we had one particular analyst who raised the fact that it would be difficult in an LNG market to replace what we are doing in Plaquemines moves announced for the associated LNG projects in one quarter. And so, I really want to be strong on that point, and you can see that the opportunity set that’s been, been realized in a very short order. So I think there's got to be more opportunity not less. And certainly energy demand is not reducing, it’s increasing particularly in the global side. So that’s really my answer to the question, Steven. Unless Mark you want to see something further?

I think you covered it beautifully well, Stuart.

Okay. Thank you.

Okay. Terrific, and then, maybe just on the Saudi side, just curious if you have a sense of how fluid, that situation is with their programs there, like, can we take this now, to take this PMC contract to the bank if you will or could it still change either to the upside or the downside and then you're talking to due to about some other opportunities? But I am just wondering is this thing now kind of locked in?

Well, they, they will make a final investment decision, I believe, Steve, when the EPC pricing comes in after the front-end designs are completed. But obviously, we are at pre-FEED and FEED and it will take a couple of years to come through that exercise. Right now Aramco is committed and so we feel very strongly that this is a very solid set of bookings. But we won’t book it into backlog until such times as we reach the various milestone gates and but it was really to give you an indication of our rule on LTC. The fact that Aramco view us as really a very strong capability and we have very strong relationship of course and we got that broader CPMC rule which actually is bringing a whole set of different skill sets, but have never really delivered under a PMC environment before and KBR was chosen to do that. So, I think ultimately it’s a future tick it’s a really positive news. We are trying to give you a sense of the scale. It’s a multi-year program. So really underpins a long lead targets and, yeah we are feeling really good about it.

The next question comes from Jerry Revich with Goldman Sachs. Jerry, please go ahead.

Yes, hi, good morning, everyone. Stuart, if we just take a – hi, if we just take a step back, maybe 5, 6 years ago, the risk terms on a lot of these LNG projects and other large-scale energy projects weren’t very attractive to you folks. Now the win rates have been really attractive for you folks including Lake Charles LNG. Can you just talk about, what's changed over that time frame in terms of industry discipline and that's enabled the opportunity for you folks to have such a high win rate with acceptable and attractive risk terms for KBR?

Yeah, I mean, that we've been very clear. We're not taking lump sum EPC risk and we don't take instructions we call out. And we've been very true to that. We're not going back to the future if you like and what we're doing here. So, I think the – that particularly with VG and the success of Venture Global and their first phase and in Plaquemines, I think there are certainly new models that are, that new customers, new developers are looking at because it allows them to carry the continuity and manage the risk directly and also allows them to be heavily engaged in the decision-making. And, and that doesn't suit all customers. There's still lump sum EPCs out there. Many of them you'll know about, and we're not interested in them whatsoever. So I just think the market is realizing that there could be a different way. It doesn't suit everyone, but it does suit some and where it sits on we are actively engaged. In the Middle East, where there's a project management, a contract or front-end design with PMC's where, of course, that's fits our model very, very well. And we'll continue to chase those types of opportunities. But I think if the, I think the two things, I think really the, I guess the intent of your question is there is a market for the risk profile that that we are - we have appetite for, absolutely. And I think we've proven that. And secondly are we positioned well enough globally to take advantage of that? I think the answer and we've demonstrated that put me on our bone in Q3 in particular is absolutely yes.

Super, and can I ask you on the Heritage Tech pipeline, could you just talk about what you expect to book over the next couple of quarters in areas like ammonia and plastic recycling? I know there's a pretty strong visibility on the pipeline and when you expect bookings to play out, can you just expand on what that looks like over the next couple of quarters?

Yeah, we don't - I mean, I think the, we are very excited obviously with - and plastics recycling as we start to look at the pipeline of opportunities and where the markets are going for those. I think, as I said in my prepared remarks, the catalyst for change in terms of active a final investment decisions on the dozen or so licenses we’ve already sold for Hydro PRT, they're really down to the performance of what happens at Wilton or in Korea or in Japan. And so, I think we'll update the market more on that as these start to produce product, at year end and slightly into ‘25. So, very excited about that. I think the bookings will come later in the year associated that with that, Jerry just given the timing. But very, very strong pipeline there. In terms of ammonia, I mean, it continues to be an attractive market. The ammonia pricing came down as through the coast of the year. But there's still a lot of interest in actually moving forward particularly in the Middle East around the fact they’ve got very attractive gas prices. They're looking at market share. Theirs is also growing demand for fertilizers, as well as commitment around positioning for hydrogen as we move forward. So, I think, as we go into ‘25, we expect to see continued buoyancy in the ammonia market. The exact timing is very difficult to tell, and but I think the market itself remains very attractive.

The next question comes from Sangita Jain with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. If I can ask one on the LTC project that you said was suspended by Aramco. If Aramco changes its priorities to move more investment to other parts of Asia, would you be able to follow them there for similar projects?

I mean, I think, I mean, it depends on the contractual structure, but yes if it's a front-end design PMC of course, we can uh and we've got offices in Asia that could support that depending on where it is. I think, historically they've, done more in China and increasingly looking at India. They've used SABIC as really their overseas investment vehicle. Remember that Aramco owns the majority of SABIC at least 50% if not more. So I think yes, in theory, but I don't suspect that's going to happen because I think that as I said, the reason I said what I said in my prepared remarks was that, they are looking to decarbonize in the kingdom. They're trying to use gas to produce power which at the moment they burn crude and the utilization of crude into petrochemicals is value-add over time and that's where they are pointing the investment dollars. So, I don't think it's just an investment in liquid to chemicals globally. I think there is a strategic and a sustainability play inside itself that’s driving these investments.

Got it. And I know you've referenced the long-term guidance a couple times but I think this project was in your long-term risk-adjusted guidance that you gave us at your Analyst Day. So I just want to know how you're thinking about that long-term guidance without this project?

I'm sorry, I'm confused.

On your Analyst Day, you gave us long-term guidance right, which included this LTC project on a risk-adjusted basis?

Yeah, it does. But remember, we've got a very prominent role on LTC, which is the coordinating PMC which I said would be $70 to $100 million through pre-FEED and several times that value through execution which is aligned to our multi-year project, so it’s our long-term target. So we've got a very prominent role in LTC. That's why I spend quite a bit of time talking to that particular project. We have going to a bit of a blackbox up to date and apologies for that but we are not allowed to say anything about the customer, but now we can.

The next question comes from Gautam Khanna with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Well hey, good morning, guys. I curious on LinQuest. There was some language in the briefing about small business awards. I was curious do they have a lot of small business set aside work? If so can you quantify how much and how that runs through or runs us?

Yeah, they don't really have any small business set aside. We obviously go out to stop through the acquisition. So it's no such feature at all, Gautam.

I'll just expand the work we refer to as SBIR 3. So that is not restricted to small business. It reflects initially was perhaps under that set aside type of construct, but now it's preferential type of contract vehicle. It can put money to work quickly. It is fully available to large businesses and it largely is done on the sole source basis to progress and commercialize the technologies that are at play that started off small and have become something bigger. So it's really an attractive type of vehicle for not only LinQuest, but part of the KBR Group, as well.

Well, thank you. That’s helpful. And just last one for me on - you may have addressed it but I joined late. CR, the budget CR, I mean, what is your expectation for bookings over the next couple quarters if in fact the CR extends?

I mean, I think, we've got enough in flight being looked at. We've got a number and that will be awarded on the protest, but we don’t talk about them until the protest is resolved and quite sizable. So we - I mean, assuming they come in our favor, and you never of course, Gautam, the way the protest go, but I think bookings will remain pretty strong as a consequence of what’s in flight. And obviously there will be some delays with CR, but we don’t expect it to in any way change what we think we will guide to for next year aligned with our long leads targets.

At this time we have no further questions. And so I’ll hand the call back to Stuart Bradie for final remarks

Thank you, Emily. And thank you again for listening and thank you for your interest as always in KBR. I think another terrific quarter. A double-digit growth across all key metrics, really it’s not just revenue, it’s actually delivering that revenue into greater profit with enhanced margins. So really a terrific effort by our people all across the world. So, yeah, thank you again and I am sure we’ll be on calls later today and tomorrow and through the course of the next little while. So, thank you very much.

Thank you, everyone for joining us today. This concludes our call and you may now disconnect your lines.