Antoine Maillet-Mezeray
Analyst
Thank you, Jeremy. Hello everyone. We are now on page 14. In parallel, we're driving usage and consumer adoption of our platform. We seek to monetize this usage and transactional activity in a gradual manner. Marketplace revenue increased in Q4 2019 by 50% year-over-year, primarily driven by increased usage of our platform and our efforts to build and monetize a suite of relevant services to our platform participants. Gross profit rose 64% year-over-year to €24.8 million, with our gross profit margin rising to 8.2% of GMV, up 336 bps in 12 months. We are very pleased with the material step-up in gross profit, as this is partly a result of the enhanced promotional discipline we enforced, as well as the rebalancing of our business mix towards margin-accretive business. Let's now take a closer look at our various Marketplace revenue streams on Slide 15. Commissions, which are fees charged to our sellers, increased by 62% year-over-year. Commissions growth outpaced GMV growth, as a result of an increase in the share of product categories with higher average commission rates, notably fashion and beauty as well as enhanced promotional discipline and reduced deployment of consumer incentives, some of which are accounted for as deduction from commission revenue. Fulfillment, which comprises delivery fees charged to consumers, increased by 52% year-over-year, in parallel with order growth. Changes in the packages mix, notably an increased proportion of packages shipped from overseas sellers and increased deliveries outside priority cities contributed to the increase in the fulfillment revenue. We saw double-digit gains in value-added services revenue, which include services provided to our sellers around logistics, packaging and content creation. As we move into 2019, we further expanded the fourth leg of our monetization strategy with marketing and advertising services, which represented 9% of our Marketplace revenue in Q4 2019. Marketing and advertising revenue more than doubled year-over-year in Q4 2019. Let's now move on to the progress on cost efficiencies. As a reminder, we have three main costs in our P&L. Fulfillment costs, which is largely variable; sales and advertising expense, which is discretionary to a certain extent; and general and administrative expense. Let's start with fulfillment expense Slide 17. We are pleased to report that our gross profit after fulfillment expense was positive in Q4 2019, reaching €1 million compared to a loss of €2.1 million in Q4 2018. If you look at our fulfillment expense in absolute terms, in Q4 2019 compared to Q4 2018, we see an increase of 38%, which is below our order volume growth. It is worth noting that the fulfillment expense is influenced by a number of factors, such as the original package, its destination as well as the type of goodwill shipping and its size. When we deep dive at the level of a given logistics route – I am now on Slide 18, we see that volume increases drive fulfillment cost efficiencies. On this page, we are taking the example of the logistics route, serving Nairobi addresses for small- and medium-sized packages. Our freight and shipping cost per package decreased by 24% in the course of 2019. This was largely a result of a triple-digit increase in packages volume, which allowed us to increase the number of third-party logistics partners on the route and drive more competition amongst them. This of course, helps us negotiate better rates on the cost per package. So the fulfillment cost is very much a scale game and our effort to drive usage and higher purchase frequency are key to extracting volume-driven savings on the variable costs and operating leverage on the cost of the physical infrastructure. Our second main cost component is sales and advertising. I am now on Slide 19. Sales and advertising expense increased by 14% in Q4 2019, while we grew orders active consumers and GMV across most categories much faster. Our sales and advertising expense per annual active consumer in 2019 decreased by 21% from €11.6 in 2018 to €9.2 in 2019. We've been very disciplined with our marketing budget and sought to increase returns on our marketing investments by increasing the share of traffic on the app which helps reduce reengagement costs. Finally, our third major cost area is Technology and G&A. I am now on slide 20. Our technology and content expense increased by 18% on a yearly basis as we continued investing in our tech infrastructure. G&A is an area where we've seen an uplift in our cost base in the course of 2019 compared to 2018, as we set up the infrastructure to operate as a listed company. While G&A, excluding SBC, increased by 45% in the first nine months of 2019 compared to same period in 2018, the rate of yield increase significantly decreased in the fourth quarter of 2019 reaching 80%. We incurred €2.2 million of restructuring expenses as part of our portfolio optimization and headcount rationalization initiatives, and we expect to see the benefits of these initiatives over the coming quarters. I'd like to give you more color on what is included in this €31.7 million of G&A, excluding SBC and restructuring expenses. The largest component is staff costs, which is 31% of the total or €10 million in the fourth quarter of 2019. This is the main area where we expect the savings from the actions we took in Q4 2019 to materialize; then approximately 25% coming from depreciation and amortization provision and other non-cash expenses; followed by 23% coming from professional fees and subcontracts, which include expenses related to legal and audit services; and another 21% of other G&A, which includes office and infrastructure costs. As a result of increased usage, increased monetization and cost efficiencies, our unit economics are improving. I am now on slide 21. Our adjusted EBITDA, excluding restructuring expenses increased slightly in absolute terms from €48.6 million in Q4 2018 to €51.2 million in Q4 2019. The business mix rebalancing we undertook, had a clear impact on our unit economics in Q4 2019. We have smaller sized but more profitable orders. On the table on the right-hand side, you can see that while our average order value decreased by 35% from €56.2 to €36.4, the order contribution or gross profit minus fulfillment expense on a per order basis turned positive to €0.12 per order. Our cost efficiencies drove a 24% decrease in OpEx per order leading to a 29% decrease in EBITDA loss per order. This is what we have in mind when we think about profitable growth i.e. growth that positively contributes to our bottom line while supporting the long-term usage of our platform. Moving on to page 22, our path to profitability is further supported by our asset-light business model. CapEx during the full year 2019 was €5.7 million, which is less than 1% of GMV. We operate Jumia Logistics as a platform with very limited CapEx requirements. Net change in working capital resulted in an outflow of €11 million over the full year 2019, which is approximately 1% of GMV. As a result of these features, our adjusted EBITDA is a close proxy for cash utilization and the delta between operating cash flow and adjusted EBITDA is less than 1.5% for the full year 2019. Finally, at December 31, 2019, we had €232 million of cash available, including €170 million of cash and cash equivalents and €62 million of term deposits which are cash balances placed on a nine-month deposit basis. With that, I'll hand the call back over to Sacha.