Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated Second Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call. For your information, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Grace Chang, Managing Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, and welcome to our second quarter 2017 conference call for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated. Earlier this morning, we issued our earnings release which is available on the Investor Relations section of our website jll.com, along with a slide presentation intended to supplement our prepared remarks. During the call, we will reference certain non-GAAP financial measures which we believe provide useful information for investors. We include reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures where appropriate to GAAP in our earnings release and supplemental slides. As a reminder, today's call is being webcast live and recorded. A transcript of this conference call will also be posted on our website. Any statements made about future results and performance or about plans, expectations and objectives are forward-looking statements. Actual results and performance may differ from those forward-looking statements as a result of factors discussed in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and in other reports filed with the SEC. The company disclaims any undertaking to publicly update or revise any forward-looking comment. And with that, I would like to turn the call over to Christian Ulbrich, our Chief Executive Officer for opening remarks.

Thank you, Grace, and hello to everyone joining the review of our second quarter and first half results. Our CFO, Christie Kelly, is with us on today's call and she will provide details of our performance in a few minutes. To start, I will summarize our results. We recorded double-digit revenue growth across all three geographical regions for both the quarter and first half. In the second quarter, total revenue was up 14% in U.S. dollars to $1.8 billion compared with the second quarter year ago. Fee revenue also increased by 14% to $1.5 billion. The quarter's revenue growth was led by strong Leasing and Capital Markets contributions. As we continue to integrate recent acquisitions, we also saw expansion in our Corporate Solutions business. And LaSalle continued to deliver strong annuity revenue. For the first half of the year, revenue increased year-on-year to $3.5 billion. Fee revenue was also up 17% to $2.9 billion. Adjusted net income was $83 million for the quarter compared with $88 million a year ago. For the first half, adjusted net income totaled $104 million compared with $125 million last year. Adjusted diluted earnings per share totaled $1.82 for the quarter compared with $1.93 in the second quarter of 2016. For the first half, adjusted diluted earnings were $2.27 a share compared with $2.75 for the same period in 2016. Our focus on managing working capital continued to strengthen operating cash flows during the quarter. And, further reinforcing our balance sheet and financial flexibility, we issued €350 million of fixed rate unsecured notes to extend our debt maturity profile at favorable rates. Finally, in July, we launched JLL Spark, a new global business which will extend our progress in delivering innovative technology-driven real estate services to the firm and our clients. From a macro perspective,…

Thank you, Christian, and welcome to everyone on our call. Christian provided the headline summary of our results for the quarter and year-to-date, so I will move directly to the details of our performance. Revenue growth occurred across all geographic segments, reflecting expansion of both transaction and annuity businesses, with strong organic gains for both the quarter and year-to-date. Organic revenue increases for both the quarter and year-to-date accounted for 43% of Real Estate Services fee revenue growth, with the balance coming from acquisitions completed after the second quarter of 2016. All service lines grew organically, with the most notable growth in Leasing. Total JLL Leasing revenue grew 15% for the quarter and 17% year-to-date, nearly all organic, and fueled by strong U.S. market and Corporate Solutions performance. Total JLL Capital Markets fee revenue grew 5% for the quarter and 8% year-to-date in U.S. dollars, most of which was organic, highlighting particularly strong transaction execution by our teams in the U.S., Germany, and Greater China. Our Property & Facility Management fee revenue grew at nearly 50% for both the quarter and year-to-date, driven by the acquisition of Integral UK, plus organic growth of 7%. Project & Development Services grew 14% for the second quarter and 16% for the year, primarily driven by organic growth. Advisory and Consulting grew nearly 25% for both the quarter and year-to-date as a result of the acquisition of our Valuation Services and Technology Solutions businesses in the U.S. We have provided additional information on our margins on page 7 of our supplemental slides. Adjusted EBITDA margin, calculated on a fee revenue basis, was 10% for the quarter and 7.7% year-to-date, a decline of 190 basis points and 220 basis points, respectively, on a constant currency basis. For the second quarter, we had positive organic accretion…

Thank you, Christie. Slide 21 offers a few of our recent business wins across service lines and geographies. As I said earlier, our Capital Markets and Leasing business continued to record major wins. In our Corporate Services business, we won 95 new assignments during the first half, expanded existing relationships with another 42 clients, and renewed 23 contracts. These 160 wins total 393 million square feet across all regions and reflect an overall 73% win rate. Our recent investments in technology and data contributed to a number of these wins. Consider BRG, for example, a third quarter 2016 acquisition which has made us the global industry leader in Integrated Workplace Management Systems. In the second quarter of this year, BRG helped us win a major assignment from a Fortune 100 energy company. And we leveraged an existing BRG relationship to win a multiple service assignment from a leading global technology company. Another 2016 acquisition, ATG, brought us a range of technology products focused on the special needs of healthcare real estate. In the second quarter this year, this helped us win new or expanded technology from 12 healthcare clients. LaSalle's assets under management remained steady at $57.6 billion as of June 30. As I mentioned at the beginning of my remarks, LaSalle continued to deliver healthy annuity revenue. Looking forward, our researchers see the weight of capital targeting real estate investments continuing to increase through the year. We see investment transaction volumes remaining on par with 2016 levels, at about $650 billion. This will also work to the benefit of LaSalle's investment management. We predict that global Leasing volumes will match 2016 levels, with volumes slightly higher than last year in the U.S., stable in Europe, and slightly lower in APAC. As we look ahead, the combination of stable market…

Operator, do we have any questions at this time?

Our first question comes from Brandon Dobell with William Blair. Your line is now open. Brandon B. Dobell - William Blair & Co. LLC: Thanks. Good morning. Maybe either...

Hi, there, Brandon. Brandon B. Dobell - William Blair & Co. LLC: How are you? I want to focus on the organic growth for a second. Within the different regions, maybe some color on the organic growth and how that compared to what first quarter rates were. And I guess, I'm just trying to get a little bit more color as we think about how to model out the back half of the year, especially I would say, laps some of these acquisitions, what the underlying kind of regional organic story is?

Sure, Brandon. So, just to break it down a little bit, when we take a look at the second quarter year-to-date organic growth, overall organic growth came in at a very healthy 9%. When we break it down by product, Leasing was primarily all driven year-over-year (27:02-27:18) growth associated with the services due to the valuation business, that is primarily driven by M&A too. So, all in all, strong organic growth story. Brandon B. Dobell - William Blair & Co. LLC: Yeah. That's still helpful. Thank you. Within Corporate Services, I guess particularly in the wins that you've announced year-to-date, are those mostly coming from existing, I must call it, verticals or property types or customer types, or is there a way to think about – if we were to compare year-to-date versus last year first half, what kinds of new customers or new property types you're having success with?

So, Brandon, a couple of things. I think if you take a look at the new wins which Christian had outlined on our supplemental slides as well as in his comments, we had some really strong performance associated with the cross-sell in our Americas business, for example, between our markets business and our Corporate Solutions business, some very healthy performance in that regard. And then when you take a look at the organic growth that we've had, 9% year-to-date year-over-year, that is really two nice results of cross-sell between the previous M&A that we've done over the past couple of years coupled with the integration, the successful integration of those transaction to really help drive that healthy organic growth. Brandon B. Dobell - William Blair & Co. LLC: Okay. And then final one for me. The detail you gave in margin breakdown or margin bridge slide, the 70 basis points from the technology and investments, 100 bps from M&A in the second quarter. Are those good numbers to use when we think about the year-on-year impact in Q3 and Q4 this year, recognizing the Integral now loops into the organic mix, but are the scale of those impacts going to be similar the next couple quarters as to what they've been in the past couple quarters?

I think when you take a look at LaSalle, Brandon, yes, you can see that from a year-on-year perspective as we discussed and given. The other piece of that is that you're going to see technology curtail a bit as we strike a balance between the build and spend that we've had over the past couple of years and that will start to moderate year-over-year for the quarter. But remember though that we have a really exciting platform transformation going on and see some of those cost built slightly, but for the most part, I think that you can see that curtail. When you take a look at overall service mix, yes, you will see the impact of Integral move in to our service mix from M&A after completing that transaction for a year. Brandon B. Dobell - William Blair & Co. LLC: Okay. Great. Thanks a lot. Appreciate it.

You bet.

Our next question comes from Mitch Germain with JMP Securities. Your line is now open.

Hi, Mitch.

Hi. Good morning. How are you?

Hi. Good. Good. Thanks. How are you?

I'm great. I'm great. So, want to just talk on the balance sheet. Two times now obviously creeping lower after expanding from the two years of allotted deals. Is there a kind of a balance? Is there a target in your mind where you may look to get a little more aggressive again from a M&A front? Obviously, we're hearing the pricing environments become a bit more rational today.

Mitch, I'll address the piece of that first. I think that from a balance sheet perspective, we're really managing our balance sheet from overall strategic perspective to net debt to EBITDA of 2 or under. And as it relates to M&A, our teams are always looking for opportunities, as we mentioned previously, but we're really starting to drive the overall integration of the M&A spend that we've already done and really working then to drive the overall return on invested capital above the 10% that we're tracking to for deals that we've done as of second quarter 2016 to get to that point where we're upwards towards the 13% that we had communicated for the first tranche of transactions. So, from that perspective, we remain focused on opportunities, but to that point, we are really focused on driving integration and also looking at investments in technology as we drive the technology services-related opportunities that we see out there in the real estate services space.

Great. I'm curious, and I think this is probably more for the Corporate Solutions group. If there are, A, any pressure on fees; and B, are you seeing a strategic shift to more incentive-based fee structures?

Mitch, can you repeat that question one more time?

Just in terms of your outsourcing platform, we're hearing: A, are there any pressure on fees; and B, is there any real shift to more incentive-based structure of fees versus a more annuity-based structure?

Yeah. I think a couple of things, Mitch. It is getting competitive out there as it relates to some of the transactions that we've seen. But as we reported previously, our team over the past couple of years has really worked on the pricing discipline associated with the Corporate Solutions base such that we are focused on, first of all, betting those transactions and to that point the deals that we've decided not to pursue have gone significantly up such that we're tracking towards the 30%, 35% range. And of the population of transactions that we decided to go after, we are very focused on the tradeoffs, the pricing, the overall long-term benefit of those opportunities such that we see as we talk the ability to drive from 1x to 2x to 3x in those opportunities. And as it relates to the incentive-based structures, we're not seeing anything out of the norm from the perspective. We have executed a number of very large wins in our Corporate Solutions business in the Americas. And while it is competitive out there, we're not seeing anything significant from an incentive perspective.

That's it for me. Thanks.

Thanks, Mitch.

Our next question comes from Anthony Paolone with JPMorgan. Your line is now open.

Thank you, and good morning.

Hi, Anthony.

Hi. So, my first question is just on the full year sort of revenue guidance. It implies the second half of the year top line growth rate of about 3% to 4%. Can you give a sense as to what that drag is? It sounds like it's the incentive income, but I don't know if that's all of it.

Yeah. A couple of things, Anthony, that if you take a look at, for example, our first half performance, which was exceedingly strong in the Americas, a couple of things. First of all, the first half 2017, our average transaction size in the Americas was over 20% larger than the first half of 2016. And the other thing too is, we saw a really nice pickup in large transaction activity in our Corporate Solutions space, some of which Christian had noted in his remarks. The second thing I just want to make sure that everybody remembers is that we completed the Integral transaction in August of 2016. And to that point, Integral has contributed approximately $200 million of revenues in the first half of 2017. And that total fee revenue growth in the first half is 17% year-over-year. And excluding Integral, our first half revenue growth would have been around 9%, as we had talked about in terms of organic growth. So, that incremental impact from Integral will go away in the second half of the year. So, that's part of what's driving that result. And as you can imagine, we've been talking with our teams, we've been focused on what that business outlook means to our overall business. And as Christian said, we remain confident, but to that point, we are comfortable with the range that we put out, for the reasons I mentioned.

Right. Understand. And that's helpful. But if I think about the 9% organic growth in the first half, is that something that you think is achievable in the second half, when we take out the impact from Integral and the drag from incentive fees on that top line picture?

Yes. So you're going to see the incentive fees, yes, moderate, Anthony. And the other thing too is, when you take a look at what's happening from a Leasing perspective, that large transaction pickup that I mentioned, we're not expecting that to repeat during the second half of 2017.

Okay. And on Leasing, was that outsized gain in share? It sounds like that was mainly transaction size and just some bigger stuff hitting, or do you see an appreciable impact from just recruiting or other factors?

We had some nice impact and pickup from a revenue per head perspective, from a productivity viewpoint. We did increase our Leasing head count around the globe, and we also saw some very nice pickup in terms of revenue per head, upwards towards the 4% to 5%. But the other piece of that too is we had some very notable wins, as I had in my remarks, in various geographies throughout the U.S., together with larger-than-average transaction size.

Okay. And you talked a little bit about the cross-selling and the opportunities there. If you can, how much of your Leasing revenue, and perhaps maybe, your Leasing revenue combined with Consulting services at this point, is coming from your outsourcing clients?

Anthony, we'd have to take a closer look at that. So, if you just give that to us and we'll dig through, from a client perspective, what we see there, as best we're able to, and come back to you and the rest of our analysts on that, potentially for the third quarter, if that's of interest.

Sure. That'd be great. And then, your Advising and Consulting revenue in the Americas popped up pretty nicely. Was that also just a factor something hitting, or is that something you think we can extrapolate forward?

Anthony, that was as a result of our U.S. Valuations acquisition that we did together with BRG, which contributed handsomely.

Okay. So that does sound like something that'll continue. And then, just last question for me. In LaSalle, you mentioned pretty steady AUM. Can you talk about, just looking out over the intermediate term, what initiatives are in place to kind of drive that up over the next couple of years, and just anything you're doing on that front to push that business ahead?

Yes, during...

Well, can you hear me? It's Christian.

Yeah.

We will focus very much on LaSalle going forward. They have built up a very strong team to raise further equity in for their different products, and they have shown tremendous success over the last couple of quarters, which will then result, obviously, in an increasing business going forward. Over and above that, they are also very focused on streamlining their product range, and put more emphasis on the major products, which will again help us to drive that business forward, grow it, and also increase margins on that business going forward.

Okay. Thank you, and very nice quarter.

Thanks, Anthony.

Our next question is from David Ridley-Lane with Bank of America. Your line is now open.

Sure. JLL's market forecast for EMEA Capital Markets activity improved a bit. I'm wondering if there're specific markets you would highlight and also how the number of assignments within JLL's own EMEA Capital Markets business is trending.

Well, overall, the Capital Markets business in Europe is very strong particularly on the continent. And you will see especially in Germany probably a new record on transaction volumes for the whole year. But overall, the interest in getting into products on the continent is very high from across the globe. We have probably the highest pipeline ever in our history on the continent. And so, that trend will probably continue going forward at least for the next couple of quarters. The UK is still slightly different. Still that concern around the Brexit. Interest is still high considering the potential implications coming from the Brexit, but that just shows the resilience and the attractiveness of the UK as investment destination so that many investors are actually not getting overly concerned about the political implications of the Brexit.

Okay. And then just a quick numbers question. Given the new debt placement, what's kind of the rate in run rate for interest expense?

I think, David, that we came in with the euro deal effectively 10-year notes were at 1.96% and the 12-year notes were at 2.21%, which effectively brought us nicely a little bit below our line of credit rate. And so, you can effectively take the second quarter and just extrapolate that for third and fourth quarter.

Got it. Thank you very much.

You bet, David.

And our next question comes from Jade Rahmani with KBW. Your line is now open. Ryan Tomasello - Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.: Good morning. This is actually Ryan Tomasello on for Jade. In the investment sales...

Hi, Ryan. Ryan Tomasello - Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.: Good morning. In the investment sales, how would you characterize the tone from investors and did you see any changes in deal flow throughout the quarter? For example, are you seeing a pickup in acquisition activity from investors who had previously hoped for a pullback in the market and maybe are now behind on their capital deployment goals for the year?

That's a very specific question. I'm not quite sure whether I can provide you with that specific detail on it. We have overall, as I said, still a very healthy interest to get into the market and that's not only in Europe, that's across the world. But people are very professional and quite clear about what they accept and what they won't accept. So, it takes all a bit longer than it has taken in 2015 and early 2016. So, there's still a healthy kind of group of buyers on every product which we put to market, but people are not going over the top. And so, I cannot say that there is anything what you just said that people are worried that they weren't early enough in and then now coming back and get a little bit more loose on their investment criteria. I think that we are in a very disciplined market which obviously we like because that will help to keep that market going and we have been in a pretty long upward swing already. Ryan Tomasello - Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.: And based on your conversations with your brokers and institutional clients, do you expect CRE Capital Markets activity to remain elevated into 2018? And if so, what would be the drivers of that?

Yeah. The answer is, yes. We do expect that market to continue. The driver is still that that real estate as an investment class is incredibly attractive in comparison to all other investment classes. There's a pretty good global economy. And then within that global economy, the economy is even better in the main investment destinations in the gateway cities of the world and that's where most of that focus is going to. And so, for the time being, we cannot see that this fundamental situation which is supporting the investment case is changing. And we have seen quite a lot of political turmoil in the world and it hasn't impacted that trend. That doesn't mean it will not in the future, but for the time being, I think we have enough reason to believe that the underlying positive tone will continue way into 2018. Ryan Tomasello - Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.: And can you comment on Oak Grove's performance? For example, the volume of originations, how that trended year-over-year and what your expectations are for GSE volumes into the second half and 2018?

Well, overall, Oak Grove's performance has been absolutely excellent, I can say that. Especially as I wasn't involved in the acquisition, I'm even better suited to comment on the excellence. Again, you have seen that the multifamily rent growth has softened a little bit in 2017. But overall, there is still a very healthy trend line. And I would see that softening again as just a sign of discipline in the market. And so, we believe that that business will continue to do really well overall in the market, and I think particularly well for us because we believe that we still have quite a run rate to increase our market share. Ryan Tomasello - Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.: And can you say how volumes trended year-over-year?

I don't have any numbers at hand, sorry.

Yeah. Overall, volumes year-over-year are solid, trending up and as well as we look at the GSEs and the caps, et cetera, that are out there, outlook still remains strong and every indication is that the GSEs will reach their cap. So, we're really pleased with the performance of the business and looking forward to the second half of the year. Ryan Tomasello - Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.: Great. Thanks for taking my questions.

Thanks, Ryan.

And I'm showing no further questions.

Okay. With no further questions, we will end today's call. Thank you for joining Christie and me and for your continued interest in JLL. And we look forward to speaking to you again following the third quarter. Thanks a lot.

Thanks all our participants for joining us today. We hope you found this webcast presentation informative. This concludes our webcast. You may now disconnect. Have a good day.