Welcome to the Jazz Pharmaceuticals Second Quarter 2020 Earnings Conference Call. Following an introduction from the company, we will open up the call to your questions. I will now turn the call over to Kathy Littrell, Head of Investor Relations at Jazz Pharmaceuticals.

Thank you, Chris, and thanks to those of you joining our investor call. Today, we reported our second quarter 2020 financial results and updated our financial guidance for 2020. The press release and the slide presentation accompanying this call are available in the Investors section of our website. On the call today are Bruce Cozadd, CEO; Dan Swisher, President; Renee Gala, CFO; and Rob Iannone, Executive Vice President, R&D. Joining for our Q&A session are Kim Sablich, Executive Vice President, General Manager of North America; Phil Jockelson, Sweep and Neuroscience Therapeutic Head; Ann Borgman, Hematology and Oncology Therapeutic Head; Sam Pearce, Senior Vice President, Europe and International; Shawn Mindus, Senior Vice President of Strategy and Finance; and Jed Black, our Senior [indiscernible] Neuroscience. I'd like to remind you that today's call includes forward-looking statements, such as those related to our future financial and operating results and which involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events, performance, and results to differ materially. We encourage you to review the statements contained in today's press release and our latest SEC disclosure documents, which identify certain factors that may cause the company's actual results to differ materially from those projected. We undertake no duty or obligation to update our forward-looking statements. On this call, we discuss non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures discussed on this call are included in today's press release and slide presentation available on our website. I'll now turn the call over to Bruce.

Thank you, Kathy. Good afternoon everyone and thank you for joining us. I’ll start by providing an update on the significant progress made this quarter demonstrating the strength and value of our underlying business. Renee will then provide a financial update, Dan will provide an overview of our commercial performance in neuroscience and oncology, and finally Rob will provide an update on our R&D programs. I'm proud of the strong financial and operational results we delivered in the second quarter. While COVID-19 brought continued challenges, our employees never lost focus, and we've continued to advance our strategy, including two product launches in May and July. Our successes in the quarter align nicely with the important goals and milestones we set for the company at the start of the year, aimed at further transforming our business. Despite COVID-19, we made substantial progress across our regulatory, commercial and R&D operations positioning us to demonstrate commercialization excellence and agility with the execution of up to five product launches in 2020 and 2021. With FDA approval of Xywav, for the treatment of cataplexy and EDS in narcolepsy, we continue to demonstrate the durability of our oxybate franchise. We have been working for nearly a decade to develop this novel formulation, which has a 92% reduction in sodium compared to Xyrem. The Xywav label, unlike Xyrem, carries no sodium content warning, and offers a significant benefit for narcolepsy patients who would otherwise shoulder the burden of lifelong exposure to high sodium intake. Xywav is the first treatment exclusively developed from concept through clinical research to production by Jazz, and underscores the transformation of the company's research and development capabilities. Xyrem is an important scientific advance in the treatment of narcolepsy and reflects our deep commitment to improving the lives of people living with sleep disorders.…

Thank you, Bruce. Our strong operational and financial performance in the second quarter reflects the resilience of our business despite COVID-19 and focused efforts towards our most important value drivers. In the second quarter, our total revenues were $562 million, an increase of 5% over the same period last year, and led by our neuroscience products, which contributed double-digit growth of 10%. Our oncology portfolio experienced a low single digit decline due primarily to lower demand related to the impact of COVID-19, a trend that reversed towards the end of the second quarter. Turning to operating expenses, during the second quarter, our adjusted SG&A expenses increased 10% to $170 million and adjusted R&D expenses increased 26% to $71 million over the same period last year, reflecting increased spend towards both our commercial launch activities, as well as advancing our pipeline. It's important to note that our second quarter combined adjusted SG&A and R&D expenses decreased by 10% relative to the first quarter as we further prioritized our investments in response to the pandemic. Adjusted net income for the quarter was $207 million or 26 million lower than the same period last year, primarily impacted by certain tax related expenses recognized in the current quarter. Our adjusted net income for the first six months of the year was $233 million, reflecting a decrease of $164 million, compared to the prior year. I'll remind you that we incurred a $200 million upfront payment related to Zepzelca in the first quarter, and that starting this year, we no longer exclude upfront and milestone payments from our adjusted net income. Turning to guidance, we are increasing our total 2020 revenue guidance to a range of $2.225 billion to $2.325 billion, which represents an increase from our prior guidance of $85 million at the midpoint.…

Thanks, Renee. Recently we achieved multiple key objectives across our commercial, regulatory and R&D organizations, including two FDA approvals and product launches, as well as the advancement of our key clinical programs. We're pleased with the agility of the team, as they quickly pivoted to virtual engagements with physicians and payers, mitigated challenges with conducting clinical studies and regulatory reviews, and successfully implemented a fully virtual commercial product launch in Germany. Our strong operational performance this quarter reflects the innovation of our team and the durability and resilience of our products. In the second quarter, Xyrem volume increased 5%, compared to the same period in 2019, reflecting strong patient persistence, compliance, and continued patient growth, with the average number of active Xyrem patients increasing 3% to 15,075. While the average number of patients on therapy increased, new patient diagnoses and enrollments were impacted by COVID-19. New patient enrollments began to decline late in the first quarter of 2020, but they trended upward in the latter half of the second quarter. There were no meaningful shifts in the payer mix during the second quarter. However, we did observe an increase in demand for patient assistance programs. We believe new patient enrollment levels may continue to be impacted by COVID-19 during the second half of the year, but will gradually improve as more sleep centers reopen and learn to accommodate patient flow. We're very pleased with the timely approval of Xywav and we look forward to launching this important new low sodium treatment option for the management of narcolepsy patients in the fourth quarter, following the joint Xywav, Xyrem brands implementation. We believe that Xywav represents a significant advance for patients and will become the oxybate treatment of choice. Launch activities will initially focus on reaching the top 1,500 Xyrem prescribers, accounting…

Thank you, Dan. Over the past few years, we've transformed our R&D capabilities by adding depth to our research and development expertise, partnering with external collaborators on innovative approaches to drug development, building clinical development expertise in our key therapeutic areas, enhancing our regulatory affairs function, and supporting robust evidence generation plans for our key brands with our global [medical affairs team]. Our goal is to continue to advance new and highly differentiated treatment options to patients in a productive and timely manner. During the quarter, we made progress against our pipeline as we continue to focus our key priorities and mitigating the impact of COVID-19 on our R&D programs. Our progress is building towards multiple pipeline catalysts in the second half, and demonstrates our R&D productivity as we deliver key clinical data from our studies of Xywav and idiopathic hypersomnia, Defitelio for the prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease, and our planned BLA submission of JCP-458 as early as year-end based on our pivotal Phase 2/3 study. I’ll begin our neuroscience development activities with Xywav. We achieved a major milestone last month, with FDA approval of Xywav for patients seven years of age and older, for the treatment of cataplexy and EDS in narcolepsy. We are pleased with the data included in the label, which we believe provides physicians with important information for initiating treatment for newly diagnosed narcolepsy patients, as well as for patients transitioning from existing narcolepsy therapies, including Xyrem. Xywav treatment is initiated at the same dose and regimen as sodium oxybate, and the label allows for flexible dosing, including using [indiscernible] first and second doses. Importantly, unlike Xyrem the Xywav does not include a warning to prescribers to monitor patients sensitive to sodium intake, including patients with heart failure, hypertension or renal impairment. We look forward…

Thanks, Rob. In closing, I'm proud of our team's exceptional efforts, which produce strong financial and operational results this year despite the unprecedented global health crisis. With three major regulatory approvals, two product launches, and continued advancements in our development pipeline we have made significant progress toward our 2020 objectives and are well-positioned for the future. Importantly, as we look to our next phase of growth, we view our emerging portfolio of Sunosi, Zepzelca, Xywav, and JZP-458 as representing billions of dollars of revenue potential for the company, and a meaningful opportunity to improve and transform lives of patients. Thank you for joining us on the call today. I'll now turn the call back over to Kathy, for Q&A.

Thanks, Bruce. We kindly request that you limit yourself to one question during this call. We're going to be looking and we're going to be listening to the one, so that everyone has an opportunity to have questions today. So, we will gladly address any additional questions after the call or you can always re-enter the queue. So with that said, operator, please open the line for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Brandon Folkes with Cantor Fitzgerald. Your line is now open.

Hi, thanks for taking my question and congratulations on all the progress this year and in the quarter. And I'm going to ask on Zepzelca. Can you talk about your expectations for the Atlantis trial? And what are your range of threshold for successful outcomes there? I know in the past, you've talked about this [trough serving] as a confirmatory trial, even if it's not that big. Can you just elaborate a little bit more around that scenario? And then if Atlantis is not confirmatory, how soon should we expect you to begin a true confirmatory trial of the monotherapy? Thank you.

Okay, maybe Rob, I'll ask you to comment on this from a regulatory perspective, and then Kim, if you want to jump in with any implications for commercial that would be great. Bob?

Yes. Thank you, Bruce. As I've said in the past, the Atlantis trial actually predated the decision to move forward with a single-arm monotherapy Zepzelca approval and second line. It was designed based on some preliminary Phase 1/2 data in combination with doc showing promising results. And that Phase 3 was initiated on its own. Once our partner PharmaMar engaged the FDA about the possibility of approval – accelerated approval based on single or monotherapy data, there was a discussion about whether Atlantis could serve as a confirmatory trial, even though it wasn't designed such. And the guidance, we've gotten is that it potentially could and ultimately depends on what we observed there. And we maintain that it doesn't necessarily need to be a [stat fig result], but just needs to be confirming of what we observed in the monotherapy trial. If somehow that's not ultimately confirmatory then we would plan to initiate a confirmatory trial. And the exact timing and details of that will be subject to regulatory interaction.

Thanks, Rob. And I'll just say to people, our excitement about Zepzelca and the launch, and our early uptake is really revolving around its strong profile as a monotherapy, and Kim maybe you can talk a little bit about why we're excited about that.

Sure, great. So early weeks here, we're seeing very positive customer responses and very encouraging sales. We're seeing strong sales, both in academic and community settings. And another very positive signal that is over 20%, 40% of accounts who ordered in the first two weeks have already placed a second order. While we're certainly facing challenges getting face-to-face access with our customers due to COVID, the news about Zepzelca’s availability and the inclusion in the NCCN guidelines is generating a lot of physician and account interest. And we're very confident that access and effectiveness of our outreach to customers is going to increase with our full sales team, including our existing representatives, and a new group of sale hires just completing training, most of whom have prior experience in the small cell lung cancer space and bring with them existing customer relationships. So, while it's too early to know, the real world experience our customers are seeing with Zepzelca it is clear to us that physicians and patients are both very eager for a new treatment option, and particularly one with the type of clinical profile demonstrated in our clinical study.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Umer Raffat with Evercore. Your line is now open.

Hi, thanks so much for taking my question. I actually wanted to continue on the [indiscernible] for a second. Bruce, it seems like this trial Atlantis has been wrapped up for a few months now. So, just trying to understand the pushes and pulls behind the data disclosure, why it's not out. And not only is it the Quinn trials that suggest it's been wrapped up, it's also in the FDA review where someone submitted documents that yes the trial was done by February. So, I'm trying to understand just the timing, because it sounds odd that it’s been done, but it's not out. And on that same note, there was also provisions in the Jazz PharmaMar agreement whereby, for FDA approval, certain analyses on Atlantis have to be done, could you walk us through what that specifically was and where there components of Atlantis that were already used for the FDA approval that came early? Thank you.

Yeah, so, an opening comment, remember that we're partnered with this product with PharmaMar, who was overseeing the prosecution of the NDA and the Atlanta trial, so I'm not going to, you know, say much more than PharmaMar have said, but Rob, do you want to generally address timing of completion of Atlantis? And I'm not sure we're going to say anything about the impact on the monotherapy approval since that approval did come through early. Rob?

Yeah. So, we'll just reiterate that this trial is being run by PharmaMar, our collaborators. It's an event driven trial. And so, the overall survival events needed to accumulate and then trial went into a Phase of cleaning data and ultimately top line results. And we understand that that should be expected in the second half of this year.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Gary Nachman with BMO Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Hi, good afternoon. On Xywav, and congrats on that approval. How do you expect payers will handle the two products with pricing at parity? Have you been preparing payers for this transition from Xyrem? And what pre-launch activities are you planning on doing on the low sodium benefits to help facilitate uptake and to try and get to the majority of that switch by 2023 that Dan talked about? Thank you.

So maybe I'll ask Kim to start and then Dan, if you want to jump in feel free.

Sure. So, as Dan mentioned earlier, we are very focused on ensuring in a broad and timely coverage with our commercial payers. We basically want to remove product access as an issue and allowing prescribers to [indiscernible] Xywav for either their existing or the new narcolepsy patients and we're out there today already engaging with payers in preparation for the launch, and we've been out there prior to that in terms of educating and disease wise to set ourselves up for the launch. So, again, we've launched Xywav to parody pricing to Xyrem, and we're feeling very confident that that's going to help us achieve our access goals pretty rapidly.

Thanks. Thanks, Kevin. This is Dan. Just adding on to that as many of you will remember, as we were launching Sunosi, we started to engage with payers and establish contracts in relationships with them, both for Sunosi, but also for Xyrem, and so it's very natural now for us within the portfolio to transition to Xywav, which we believe is the treatment of choice, and at [parody access] should be readily taken up in a timely way.

Okay, and other pre-launch activities, and if you could comment on that in terms of low sodium benefits.

Yeah, we're going to get into more detail obviously in our webcast in October, but you know, we're turning our field medical market access teams fully over to, you know, focused on Xywav and we've obviously been presenting and publishing a lot of data on Xywav and sort of the background as comorbidities and the burden of disease for narcolepsy patients. So, it's really just pushing on those efforts. And as we get closer to Q4 with the REMS implementation, you'll see much more and we'll go into that detail in Q4.

I'll just add on, Gary that, you know, as Dan pointed out, the couple months it takes to get to a full REMS implementation gives us an unusual period of time where we have an approved label, and we know exactly what we can educate around. And so, we're going to do our best to do that, including through some partnerships we have with other organizations who care about the long-term health, cardiovascular, cardiovascular metabolic health of narcolepsy patients and other populations. So more to come over the upcoming months.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of David Amsellem with Piper Sandler. Your line is now open.

Thanks. So on Xywav, I just wanted to get more of a window into your thought process regarding pricing with the market over the long-term becoming more varied and do have, you know, authorized generics coming. There's the Avadel product, there's Wakix, there's Sunosi, I was just wondering if that would have made sense to price Xywav that something of a discount to Xyrem, but I wanted to get your thought process as to why you chose parody pricing and why you think that's going to be a winning strategy? Thanks.

Dan, do you want to take that?

Yeah, sure. Yeah, no, our overall objective is, of course, we're delivering value in a significant advance and treatment options relative to what's on the market today, in particular, relative to Xyrem and other agents. And so, we believe this strategy will get us broad and timely coverage and then really establishing the low sodium benefit for patients, and we get the physician education to support both the adoption of Xyrem patients over to Xywav patients who could have been candidates for oxybate therapy, but because of the sodium concern, didn't go on to Xyrem now available for Xywav, and then really to be, you know, top of mind for treatment of choice on newly diagnosed patients. And we believe the parody pricing at launch gets us there.

Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Ami Fadia with SVB Leerink. Your line is now open.

Hi, good evening. Congrats on the nice quarter. My question is on Xywav, but on idiopathic hypersomnia the primary endpoint in the study that you have ongoing is excessive sleepiness score, and I think that the baseline score for those patients was about above 11, what level of change do you believe would be clinically meaningful for those patients? And if you can share with us any details around powering of the study, that would be helpful. And just as a follow up to the earlier questions on Xywav, maybe if you can just give us a sense of do you expect the gross to net for Xywav to be higher than that for Xyrem? And if you can quantify the number of patients that couldn't get Xyrem because of the high sodium involved? Thank you.

Well Ami you get credit for a multi-part question. So, let's first go to IH, Jed, do you want to comment a little bit on the trial?

Sure. The IH trial was run similar through the most recent Xywav trial in narcolepsy, that is to say, following the screening period, patients were in an open label fashion titrated up to efficacy and tolerability, and then a stable dose period and then went through randomized withdrawal period, active versus placebo drug for a two week period. And you're correct in the primary assessment in IH study as the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. And studies are – with respect to clinical relevance, with respect to your question suggests that a 2.2, somewhere between a 2.2 to 2.75 point change in the ESS is [clinically meaningful]. With respect to what we've been anticipating with IH, given the data that we have so far in the K-series and the single cases, as well as clinical experience we’ve anticipated change well within or beyond that range, and with respect to your question about powering the study, the study was powered for a 90% powering. And so we do, we are excited about the opportunity for using Xywav in this patient population and anticipate good solid efficacy.

Dan maybe over to you on the gross to net and then the additional opportunity for patients who felt the existing salt load of Xyrem might be too high.

Yeah, no, good question. So, on the gross net, obviously we're early in the discussions with the payers, but given where we landed with Xyrem and the advance we feel we've got with Xywav and where we are starting. We would expect to be roughly in the same ballpark and will have more detail as those contracts actually get finalized. With regard to patients who could be candidates for oxidate therapy, but because of the sodium concern, or not going on sodium oxybate, and what could be available for us to access over time, for Xywav we continued to triangulate on about 20% of the narcolepsy patients. And that's both market research we've been conducting, as well as doing some, you know, close examination of claims data on patients who have cardiovascular risk. What that looks like in the general narcolepsy population, and what we see with Xyrem patients today.

And I'm just going to edit Dan, just a little bit. We weren't saying 20% of all narcolepsy patients. 20% of patients that doctors would have considered for oxybate don't get it because of this cause alone. So a slightly different statistic.

That's very helpful. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Akash Tewari with Wolfe Research. Your line is now open.

Hi. This is Andrew Newton on for Akash. You guys have published data in the past showing that in one year over 50% of patients discontinue their Xyrem regimen, how do you think this kind of high discontinuation rate is going to affect the 258 launch and which proportion of these discontinuations are real versus just patients cycling on and off? And then secondly, you guys noted that new products are going to represent about half of 2022 revenue and that's not in consensus models right now, which products is consensus most under appreciating? Thanks.

Hi Andrew, good questions. On discontinuation, you know we do see discontinuation often when people are starting oxybate therapy, particularly over that titration period over the first few months. Remember, here we're talking about the potential for patients to move from Xyrem directly to 258. These are oxidate experienced patients, and we certainly saw that in some of the data we released at World Sleep Congress in September of last year, in terms of the part of our trial that had patients move over dose for dose easily. So, I think it is a very different prospect there. For naive patients, who maybe have never been on Xyrem, I would expect some discontinuation rate over that early period. We found that over time, it's important that doctors set the right expectations for patients in terms of what they'll experience at [I trade up on dose], both in terms of [indiscernible] answer. You're right to point out that we do get cycling of some patients back on to – back onto the time to time. And in terms of our confidence [indiscernible] revenue potential for our new product launches, you know, our market, our forecast that we see published, vary considerably about how they take into account, not only Xywav, but whether they credit for idiopathic hypersomnia JZP-458 is in everyone's model. So, you know, these are all significant opportunities Xywav, Zepzelca, for this year's launches and idiopathic hypersomnia, and four, five, eight or potential 2021 launches. And then of course, we're excited about Sunosi’s potential as well.

Awesome. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Greg Gilbert with SunTrust. Your line is now open.

Thank you. It's truest at this point. Looks like [Xywav] kicks us off to a decent start, Bruce, according to [S1], I'm curious if you or your teammates had any updated thoughts on where or how that product is being used and do you see the potential addition of cataplexy to its label should that occur as a meaningful change to the competitive profile? Thank you.

Yeah, Greg and I was going to point out the name change, congratulations on that. And we'll get that right from now on. Dan, over to you.

Yeah, now, as all of you know, oxybate therapies Xyrem in particular spend standard of care and really for a certain type of patient that's gone through a number of other therapies, you know, the only approved therapy for both EDS and cataplexy, and so despite [indiscernible], it's been on the market. And you know, they've said in their own S1 70% payer coverage and definitely a strong promotional push. Yeah, we haven't seen any impact to our business and you know, up through COVID. So, we take COVID out of the equation. We really were on the same baseline of PE’s and refills and the base business. And of course, we've got broad and good coverage with payers. So, yeah, we think the products really exist in different continuum for patient care, and we're very confident with both – what we've got to offer for EDS with Sunosi for narcolepsy, which is, you know, done very well and we've had really nice refills through COVID because the product is working well for those patients. And then for those who need strong cataplexy therapy in addition to EDS benefit, now transitioning over to Xywav, so we feel good about the product offering.

Thanks and Bruce no hard feelings about the name, you have a lot of new names to keep up with.

No problem. And just as a reminder, we did take up revenue guidance in sleep neuro on this call. So, we do feel that business is doing very well.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Balaji Prasad with Barclays. Your line is now open.

Thanks for taking the questions. So, Bruce just going back to something [indiscernible] free cash flow duration continues to be very strong. It's a great problem to have, which will also beget the question on what will you be planning to do with it and still ensure that returns profile is healthy, and just as an [acronym] to that [Technical Difficulty] acquisitions built into this [indiscernible]? Thanks.

Yeah, maybe I'll hand that one over to Rene.

Sure, yeah. And if I could ask you to repeat the second part of your question, I didn't hear the second part. You cut out after the free cash flow generation part.

Got it. Just to clarify the outlook for 2022 revenues [indiscernible] new launches was 2019, [indiscernible] there are no actions built into this product.

So with – I'll answer that question first. With respect to 2022 and looking at our projected revenue, that is based on our current profile of products. Our current portfolio with the products launched from 2019 forward, making up approximately 50% of that. So that would be Sunosi, Xywav and 458 as well as Zepzelca. And then in terms of corporate development, and how we leverage our cash flow, you know, clearly as we look at broadening and enhancing our portfolio, we look at both our internal innovation in terms of programs we can invest in, but also importantly, external opportunities. With the cash balance, the leverage capacity we have, we do have the opportunity to do more meaningful corporate development transactions. We have the opportunity to think about leveraging up quite a bit given our current leverage profile for the right transaction. Of course, transactions that have the opportunity to be more transformational in nature are fewer and far between, but that's certainly an important part of our strategy, which is leveraging that cash flow, investing in the internal portfolio, looking for great opportunities for external innovation, such as Zepzelca, which was not an acquisition, but a great opportunity to bring in a late stage near market asset to be able to put that into our portfolio and very quickly be ready to launch.

Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Ronny Gal with Bernstein. Your line is now open.

Good afternoon, everybody and congratulations on a nice quarter. Question on 385, now that you seem to have kind of got your heads around the next trial, can you just give us a little bit of feel for what that trial would look like in terms of science endpoints and more importantly, timing to completion? And will it be a trial you could potentially submit on?

Let me hand that over to Rob.

Yeah, thank you. So, we have had the opportunity to get feedback from the FDA and we do believe that this Phase 2b trial will contribute to the registration package along with additional data on safety. As you know, we are developing a new formulation for once daily administration. And that's any testing as of this month in healthy volunteers. And we haven't said any details yet about the exact design of the trial as to this point. We're still finalizing some of that.

Thank you.

You broke up. Just a little bit there to make sure I answer your question.

Operator, I think we're ready for another question.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Annabel Samimy with Stifel. Your line is now open.

Hi, thanks for taking my question. Congratulations on a good quarter. Just in oncology area, mighty have a couple questions there on Zepzelca. There was clearly a lot of excitement among KOL so we spoken to, to get their hands on the drug, and admittedly, you know, one thing they did say that it was not as well known in the community setting. So, can you just talk about some of the educational efforts you might have for the community setting? And is that already starting to be taken care of with NCCN guidelines? And then quickly on 458, can you just remind us the timing of the interim analysis for that program? And is there any kind of potential for halting the trial early and filing that? Thanks.

Kim, do you want to talk a little bit about our efforts around Zepzelca?

Yeah, sure. So it's all hands on deck right now. Given that we're in the COVID environment, our team has been very active in both the digital space outreaching through email have had some good responses back in terms of appointments. We're getting out face-to-face in areas that we can due to COVID where we’re welcomed in and we had a nice launch cast last week. So, really happy with the progress there. As I said before, both in the community setting, as well as in the academic we're kind of seeing sales come in, in the proportion that we expected there. So, performing well in both.

And Rob on 468?

As we mentioned in the opening remarks, we've been able to open nearly all the sites for 458 despite the COVID-19 pandemic and the trial is enrolling well. Based on that, we have the objective of submitting the BLA as early as the end of this year.

Okay. Thanks.

Thank you. And our next question comes from a line of Randall Stanicky with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Great, thanks. Bruce, on the assumption that your goal is to maximize the uptake of Xywav, how do we think about the timing and impact of the triggered generics that would likely occur? And then just looking at this, why wouldn't this be a case for a hard switch? You're going to be settled selling two products that are effectively the same, one safer than the other. It just seems to me that there's probably not a need for Xyrem if this is the case. Is that something you guys have considered? I know you've been asking for. Thanks.

Yeah, thanks, Randall for the good questions. On the first one, you know, our goal is to make Xywav a big success. We think this is a great product for patients currently on Xyrem. We think it's a great product for patients who may not have been on Xyrem historically, great product for patients newly diagnosed with narcolepsy. I am pending the results of our idiopathic hypersomnia trial, you know, a great new product for patients who’ve not had an approved agent before. So, we're really excited about making it a success. We are not going to hold off on that to avoid any possibility of triggering a market decline, which I'll remind you, would be a very, very substantial drop in Xyrem sales. You know, my view is, if we've hit that, we've probably been more successful than most of you have modeled in your models. You know, in terms of how we think about Xywav and Xyrem, you know, we need to continue supporting our existing Xyrem patients. That that transition is not going to happen on the same day for all patients, for lots of different reasons, but we are going to be focusing our efforts on making sure people understand the benefits of Xywav, particularly in light of a chronic, lifelong therapy for these patients in a group that's known to have higher cardiovascular risk than the general population.

Great, thanks.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of David Risinger with Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.

Yes, thanks very much, and congrats on all of the updates on the call. So, with respect to the idiopathic hypersomnia trial, given the overlap of IH with severe daytime sleepiness aren't physicians already prescribing Xyrem for such patients, it would seem that it would be obvious to them as a patient presented with idiopathic hypersomnia that they would be aware of Xyrem and its efficacy in severe daytime sleepiness and thus prescribe it to such patients? Thanks so much.

Yeah, I'll – let me take the first part of that, which is, you know, there's been no approved treatment for idiopathic hypersomnia, and you know, we think the ability to get out and educate about the diagnosis of IH, and the potential treatment of IH could go a long way in helping to uncover IH, maybe beyond what's currently recognized and treated. So, I think, you know, before we talk about what's happening with existing patients, you know, I think it's more than that in terms of the market opportunity, but maybe I'll let Dan handle, what happens today if a doctor wants to treat an IH patient with Xyrem?

Yeah, no, and I’d just add to what Bruce is saying is that, you know, no one's been focused on this market, and it's been hard for us to actually triangulate down to what the prevalence is in the U.S., and we continue to think that's well under represented for what the true opportunity could be. You know, I always feel encouraged when I see a clinical study with a fairly tight inclusion exclusion criteria enrolled ahead of schedule. So, we know there's a market need out there that we want to address. You know, in terms of Xyrem working in this patient population, you know, we do have historical case series, including in the U.S., you know, we're anecdotally on a patient by patient in some of the published case series that Rob mentioned, but unfortunately, as you know, PBMs were more and more concerned about specialty pricing and putting further payer restrictions and authorization, you know, we only get market reimbursement at this point for true bona fide narcolepsy patients. And so that's why it's so critical to get this on label indication for Xywav.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Graig Suvannavejh with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.

Great, thanks so much for taking my questions. My question just has to do with the revised guidance, and in terms of what your outlook is, with respect to how COVID is evolving, can you just remind us and you might have said it in the beginning part of the call your assumptions on the Jazz business for the second half in-light of the uncertainty with COVID-19, and whether not only is there a risk for upward revisions and guidance based on that, but also downward revisions? Thanks.

Yeah, Renee, do you want to take that one?

Sure. Yeah, I'd be happy to. So, as we mentioned in the script, clearly through our second quarter results, our organization was able to navigate COVID-19 quite well in terms of using innovative approaches to ensure that we switched very quickly from in-person to virtual digital ways to connect with physicians and healthcare providers. So, part of our outlook in terms of thinking about the second half is driven by our ability to pivot well in the second quarter, and to be able to then actually see some of those trends reversing. The other thing that we saw within our oncology area, of course, we saw in the second quarter a change with respect to delays in the in-stem cell transplants, a switch for some period of time to oral oncolytics, as we've mentioned in the script, that trend tended to reverse towards the end of the second quarter. So that underlying assumption then drives forward with respect to health care providers, finding ways to continue to provide health care to patients that are non-COVID patients to be able to navigate the pandemic through the rest of the year. With respect to our medicines in general, we've talked about the durability of the products given the chronic life saving and/or life changing nature of the treatments. So, while we do expect to continue to have to navigate through the pandemic in different ways, including and how we launched Zepzelca and how we launched Xywav at the end of the year, we do anticipate being able to continue to work that through our commercial organizations to be able to feel confident in raising the guidance across neuroscience, oncology, and then also down to the bottom line in EPS. Now with that being said, of course, there's uncertainty. We don't expect life to go back to normal. We're more focused on the assumption that the ability to treat patients and provide health care throughout the pandemic will continue.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Ashwani Verma with Bank of America. Your line is now open.

Hey guys, this is Jason, actually. Quick question, I just want to make clear on [indiscernible]. So, we've heard anecdotally I guess the second line small cell lung, the volume of patients is down, they're older, they're more, you know, compromised, they’re pretty fragile. Are you saying that you took the – that's returned to normal, the flow patient from what you're seeing in terms of some of the more near term metrics and then on corp dev, I just wanted to come back to this. So, you know you play in oncology. It seems the main area, both amongst all solid tumors for potential M&A transaction, get valuations have really stepped up and there's been a strong IPO cycle for private. So, I'm just curious, is there a willingness to step outside your core therapeutic area focus? Thanks.

Yeah, maybe I'll ask Rob and/or Kim to just comment on what's going on with treatment of second line patients right now. And then Rene, maybe back over you in terms of what we're looking at in terms of potential areas of focus for corp dev?

I can start with that Bruce. This is Rob. I would just say that before Zepzelca’s approval, there was very little in the way of therapeutic options for patients and in second line, so often patients weren't offered anything or they are offered just supportive care or first line therapy with continued, you know longer than you'd expect, and so now with a more effective therapy that's better tolerated we expect, you know, patients to be treated, you know, potentially even earlier or greater proportion of patients to be treated. And with that greater efficacy, I think ultimately there’ll be better uptake, especially given the tolerability profile.

And, Rob, I'll just add to that, while we've seen the impact of COVID vary across our business, certainly, launches in the industry are at risk, in small cell lung cancer given to the very serious nature of it, we really have seen that patient treatment rates have been minimally affected and therefore we see rapid embracing of our therapy and can expect that to continue through the pandemic.

And then maybe I'll hop in with respect to corporate development and how we think about that. I mean, clearly to be able to leverage our commercial organization, looking at potential opportunities with the neuroscience and oncology makes a lot of sense for us. With respect to commercial, with respect to growing and expanding expertise, not only in hematology, but now with [indiscernible] and solid tumors, we have, of course, looked at opportunities outside our therapeutic area. And if we were to look at something more closely in that area and consider it more seriously, I would think it would need to be something that would be, you know, late to near on market, to be able to leverage commercial capabilities that were already in place so that we would have the opportunity to build. Our primary focus however, is leveraging our two existing therapeutic areas. Our expertise, as well as our current infrastructure, and then importantly, ensuring that whatever products we're adding to the portfolio, that we're interested in that those are durable products that can have a meaningful impact for patients that can have a meaningful impact to expanding our revenue base over time and ensuring that we're able to achieve good returns for our shareholders.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Ken Cacciatore with Cowen & Company. Your line is open.

Thanks, guys. Bruce I was wondering if I had asked business development question a little bit differently, we're often used to you buying single product assets, I was wondering, would you at all be interested or think of a company that has a portfolio of products instead of a single asset, and maybe a company that you will view as mismanaged spending, so you can take your operating excellence and kind of put it to a company like that. So as we look into the future, could we be thinking about business development a little bit differently or could we expect business development a little bit differently than the past? Thank you.

Yeah, Ken, really great insightful question. You know, it does so happen that a number of deals over the last few years have been primarily focused around a one asset, in some cases entirely focused around one asset, but we clearly are interested in collaborations and potential acquisitions that would be more portfolio based. You've seen some of our development oriented transactions be around a basket of targets for that reason, but I think you're asking a different question, which is, you know, up to an including a commercial business with multiple assets and absolutely, that is of interest to us as well.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you. And our last question comes from the line of Jacob Hughes with Wells Fargo Securities. Your line is now open.

Hey, thanks for fitting me in. On Xywav, I think you said you're supposed to launch in fourth quarter falling rents implementation, is that rent implementation taking longer than you would have thought and what's causing the delay there if there is one? And also, if you could just give to what percent enrollment you're at currently on the 458 trial? Thanks.

Yeah, Jacob, Bruce, I’ll take those questions. We're not going to give specific enrollment percentage other than I'll reiterate Rob's comments from earlier that our trial is enrolling well. On Xyrem in the REMS implementation, actually we have a goal of doing it faster than we've done it before. You know last time we needed to implement a REMS, you know, updated REMS was for the pediatric launch. We think we can do it a little bit faster this time, but we want to make sure we're ready to go and the patients will get the right treatment. They'll get the right counseling. They'll understand how to use the medication safely. They'll understand, you know, how the system works, that will have different forms for the two products. So, we do have some work to do there, but we're right on track to launch on the timeline we had laid out. And maybe I can just end, since I think that was our last question before I turn it back over to Kathy to say, you know, we're excited that we reported good results and to raise guidance on both the top and bottom line, but I think we're even more excited about the future with Xywav launch upcoming, our progress on JZP-458, our upcoming data in a potential launch next year on idiopathic hypersomnia, and our opportunities on the corp dev side, and I want to end by thanking our employees for their continued focus during this unprecedented time on making sure we take good care of patients. So, Kathy with that back over to you.

Thank you, Bruce, and thanks, Chris, for your help today. Thanks to all of you for joining us today. We will be participating in the upcoming Morgan Stanley, Cantor, and BOA Healthcare Conferences, and hope to speak with many of you during these events. This now ends our call.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.