Welcome to Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.’s third quarter 2020 investor conference call. All participants will be a in a listen-only mode until the question and answer session. At that time, to ask a question please press star followed by the one on your telephone. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. Now I would like to turn the call over to Jack Bateman, Investor Relations. Mr. Bateman, you may begin the call. Thank you.

Thank you and welcome to the Invesco Mortgage Capital third quarter 2020 earnings call. The management team and I are delighted you’ve joined us and we look forward to sharing with your our prepared remarks and conducting a question and answer session. Before turning the call over to our CEO, John Anzalone, I wanted to provide a reminder that statements made in this conference call and the related presentation may include forward-looking statements which reflect management’s expectations about future events and our overall plans and performance. These forward-looking statements are made as of today and are not guarantees. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumption, and there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. For a discussion of these risks and uncertainties, please see the risks described in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and subsequent filings with the SEC. Invesco makes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. We may also discuss non-GAAP financial measure during today’s call. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures may be found at the end of our earnings presentation. The view the slide presentation today, you may access our website at invescomortgagecapital.com and click on the Q3 2020 Earnings Presentation link under Investor Relations. Again, welcome and thank you for joining us today. I’ll now turn the call over to John Anzalone.

Good morning and welcome to Invesco Mortgage Capital’s third quarter earnings call. I’ll give some brief comments before turning the call over to our Chief Investment Officer, Brian Norris to discuss the current portfolio in more detail. After a tumultuous start to the year brought on by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the financial markets continued to recover during the third quarter. At IVR, we have made tremendous progress in implementing our agency MBS focused strategy and opportunistically reducing our exposure to credit assets. For the quarter, core earnings came in at $0.06 per share, exceeding our recently increased dividend of $0.05. Book value was $3.47 at quarter end, which represents an increase of about 9.5% for the quarter. The combination of the increased dividend and our book value appreciation produced an economic return of 11% for the quarter. The improvement in book value has continued since quarter end as we estimate that book value is up approximately 6% since quarter end through last Friday. The results of our activity can be seen on Slide 3 of our presentation. During the quarter, we purchased $5.6 billion in specified pool agencies and invested an additional $900 million in agency TBAs. This brought our allocation to agency mortgages up to 93% of assets and 60% of equity. We also reduced our credit exposure significantly, selling $1.1 billion of credit assets while repaying the remaining balance of our secured loans that were collateralized by credit. This leaves us with a notably smaller credit portfolio that is completely unencumbered. As we look out over the next several quarters, our outlook is quite constructive. We have continued to make progress in reallocating the portfolio during October as additional credit sales combined with agency investments will continue to improve our earnings power. We remain positive on agency mortgages as we expect demand from the Federal Reserve and commercial banks to remain strong. While the economic outlook remains uncertain, we expect the Fed to remain supportive by continuing large scale asset purchases and by keeping short term interest rates low for the foreseeable future. Post election, we expect interest rate volatility to remain subdued, which is also supportive of agency mortgage assets. Increased levels of prepayments remain a potential headwind, but our focus on purchasing specified pool collateral helps to mitigate that risk. I’ll stop here and let Brian go through the portfolio.

Thanks John, and good morning. Thank you to everyone listening to the call. I’ll begin on Slide 4, which summarizes our agency RMBS assets and trading activity during third quarter. Consistent with the strategic transition we’ve communicated since June, we purchased $5.6 billion of agency RMBS specified pools during the quarter. The strong demand for our credit assets provided opportunities for dispositions at attractive prices, freeing up capital for allocation to the agency focused strategy. As detailed on the chart on the top left, we were able to source attractively priced new issue collateral stories, including loan balance, low FICO, high LTV and GEO pools which consist exclusively of borrowers in slower paying states, such as New York, Florida and Texas. We also focused a significant portion of our purchases on new production pools originated and serviced exclusively by banks in order to mitigate our exposure to pay-up premiums while benefiting from improved prepayment protection relative to non-bank originators and servicers. While pay-ups under specified pool holdings ranged from less than a quarter point to up to four points, the weighted average pay-up on our portfolio is approximately 1.25 points, representing approximately $70 million of market value at quarter end. We believe low mortgage rates and historically fast prepayment speeds should continue to keep pay-up premiums near current levels as strong demand for prepayment protection supports valuations. All purchases in the quarter consisted of 30-year collateral with coupons ranging from 1.5 to 3%, with the majority in 2% and 2.5% as indicated in the chart on the bottom left. Given our expectation for continued pressure on prepayment speeds as mortgage rates fell to all-time lows, we focused our purchases on lower coupon pools which typically experience slower prepayments due to lower mortgage rates on the underlying loans and benefit from…

Our first question will come Doug Harter with Credit Suisse. Your line is now open.

Thanks. Hoping you could just give a little more color behind the fourth quarter book value, how you would see that between credit and agency, and then just also directionally--you know, obviously some big moves yesterday, if that was a further positive to book value.

Hey Doug, this is Brian. I can start with that one. I think for the month of October and here in the first, call it nine days of November, agency, particularly lower coupon agency mortgages have performed pretty well, so we do think that a good portion of the increase that John mentioned, the up 6% through Friday, is related to mortgages, agency mortgages. But our credit investments continued to trade pretty well and hang in there, so I think there could be a small bit of tightening in those as well. As we reduce that credit portfolio, it becomes less of an impact on the portfolio, obviously. Yesterday, mortgages actually held in really well, so we don’t have a number for that quite yet but we believe that given that mortgages performed pretty well into yesterday’s back-up and they’re performing pretty well this morning as well, so we don’t think that that number would change dramatically.

This is Kevin. For additional context, as you pointed out, the positive news of a vaccine has certainly reenergized interest in our sector, so we saw some positive price action in CMBX and not cash bonds, to be clear. A little too early to forecast the magnitude in cash bonds since the news is so fresh, but just early indications is basically we’re seeing, call it double-A CMBS 5 to 15 tighter, single-As maybe 20 to 30 tighter, and triple-Bs somewhere around 40 to 75 basis points tighter. But again, that’s all based on very limited data since the news really just hit.

Then if those were to be--if those were to translate to cash prices, how might that influence your timing for the disposition of the remainder of the credit portfolio and rotation into agency?

This is Brian again. I’ll cover that, Kevin. Feel free to chime in there. Our portfolio of credit assets now is just a little over $300 million through the end of October, so our goal is to continue to reduce that. We don’t have any liquidity reasons to do that immediately, so we’re going to take a measured pace and see where things shake out. Like Kevin said, it’s a little too early to really translate these recent moves into price performance for CMBS assets, but our goal over the next few months is to continue to reduce those assets at the pace that we’ve seen over the last month or so.

Great, thank you.

Our next question will come from Trevor Cranston with JMP Securities. Your line is now open.

Hey, thanks. You guys mentioned briefly in the prepared remarks that the yield on new pools you bought was benefiting from very low CPRs as they’re still pretty early in the seasoning ramp. Can you say where you would expect that yield to shake out once those are fully ramped and over six months old, relative to the 1.91 yield you show on Slide 4? Thanks.

Sure Trevor, this is Brian. Good morning. Yes, the portfolio paid 5 CPR last month, so we have started to see that ramp up. The yield to maturities on the bonds that we’re buying have been in the 1.5% range, so we would expect that 1.9 to come down. But again, that’s assuming obviously a static portfolio and at the rate levels that we purchased them at, so things obviously will be changing as we move forward here. I would call it around 1.5% currently on new purchase for yield to maturities.

Okay, got it. Then thinking about the earnings impact of the portfolio rotation and the agency purchases in 3Q, looking at Slide 6, it looks like there’s a decent increase in repo in September. Does that imply that a significant amount of the agency MBS purchases in 3Q occurred in September or is there a timing difference between when the assets were bought and when the repo settled?

So Slide 6 on the financing and hedging--I’m sorry, you said that the repo--?

Yes, the increase in the repo balances from August to September, I was wondering if that also implied that a lot of the agency purchases occurred in September.

Oh, sure. Yes, so I believe last quarter, we had updated through July and we had made a decent amount of progress through the end of July of a couple billion, so the other--you know, we were at $5.5 billion, so the other $3.5 billion were purchased in August and September. I believe that a decent amount of that was in September as August was a little bit more quiet, but we’ve been pretty consistent. The timing of our agency purchases tends to correlate with the timing of our credit asset sales, so as we find opportunities to sell those assets, that’s when we redeploy that proceeds into agencies.

Got it. Okay, that helps. Then last question, last quarter we talked a little bit about you guys exploring ways to optimize the capital structure. Can you give any update on that and if you continue to evaluate things like preferred share exchanges or preferred buybacks, and how you’re thinking about that currently? Thanks.

This is John. We’re continuing to evaluate that. I think our goal was to first reallocate the portfolio and get a more normalized earnings stream and have a little bit more clarity for investors in terms of where our dividends are going to be. I think we’re well on the path there, so we continue to evaluate either exchanges more likely or buybacks, and I think as we’ve seen book value improvement, obviously as book value improves and hopefully commensurate with that will be an improvement in the price to book, that gives us a lot more flexibility on the capital side - you know, the better we’re trading, the more flexibility. Yes, so we continue to evaluate that, and that’s going to be a focus in the next couple quarters.

Okay, appreciate the comments. Thank you.

As a reminder, if you’d like to ask a question, you may press star, one. Our next question will come from Jason Stewart from JonesTrading. Your line is now open.

Thanks, good morning. Can you give us an update on the way you allocate between spec pools and TBA, and if there’s a limitation on the whole pool requirement still that’s keeping you from allocating more towards TBA?

Good morning Jason, it’s Brian. We’re well past the requirement for whole pools. The vast majority of our purchases since the beginning of July have been whole pools, so the 55% test, we’re well beyond that. The limitation on TBA is not related to that. It’s more we expect it to be in this 15% to 20% range of total assets, and it’s more because of the attractiveness of TBA tends to be a little bit more transitory. We don’t want to depend too much on drop income to drive our earnings for any particular quarter.

Okay, that makes sense. Then you have one commercial loan I think is fair valued at about $22 million. Could you give us the par amount? I think it matures in early 2021, maybe February, and what your plans are slash discussions there with regard to that loan?

Yes, this is Kevin. I don’t have the financials with the exact amount in front of me now, but it’s around $20 million and should be in our financials.

Okay, and I’m guessing extensions are on the table as that comes up? I don’t know if you can give any details on the particulars of the loan. It would be helpful.

That particular loan is a commercial real estate mezzanine loan that has been extended to a hotel property. At this point, interest payments on the loan are current and obviously given the backdrop with COVID-19, it’s an asset that we’re monitoring closely but feel really good about the sponsorship and the long term viability of the asset.

Okay, that’s incredibly helpful. Thank you.

Just as a reminder, if you’d like to ask a question, you may press star, one. Again, to ask a question, star, one. One moment please to see if we get additional questions. Thank you. I’m currently showing that our next question will be from Derek Hewett with Bank of America. Your line is now open.

Good morning everyone. Does yesterday’s vaccine announcement impact the pace of credit asset sales and then redeploying that capital into the agency focused strategy at this point?

Hey, good morning. This is Brian. We think that--you know, as Kevin mentioned, we did see CMBX tighten quite a bit yesterday. We haven’t seen a lot of color yet on cash bonds and where they’re trading. I think that certainly news of a vaccine is positive and we do expect spread tightening to occur off of that positive news, but our pace of selling will likely continue at its current level, or at least near where we sold in October, over the near term. It kind of just depends on what we’re seeing in the market as available transaction logos. I don’t know, Kevin, if you had any other thoughts on that?

No. I think the only thing that I would add is that it certainly creates a more favorable backdrop and I think open the options that we have, so at this point we will take a look and do some additional price discovery and ultimately decide if we think there’s additional room for improvement, or if there’s opportunities to make dispositions, we’ll certainly look to do that as well. But yes, really encouraged by that news, and I think regardless of near term headlines, we believe our bonds are well positioned for long term incremental spread tightening, just given notable subordination and limited bond supply, and increased investor demand not just because of this news but because we have seen a lot of investors that are looking to put capital to work, and this is a sector that by and large has lagged the corporate bond market price appreciation, and you have a backdrop where new issuance has slowed as loan originations have declined notably. Although it may not be directly benefiting bonds that we own, the continuation of the Federal Reserve’s term asset backed securities loan facility that is in place and provides non mark-to-market term financing to those senior bonds in the capital structure, we think is a positive and helps create stability in the market and really benefits the entire capital structure.

That’s it for me, thank you.

That was our last question for today’s conference.

Okay, well I’d like to thank everyone for joining us, and we look forward to meeting again next quarter. Thanks.

This concludes today’s conference. Thank you for joining today’s call.