Welcome to the Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. first quarter 2020 investors conference call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode until the question and answer session. At that time, to ask a question, please press star followed by the one on your phone. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. Now I would like to turn the call over to Brandon Burke with Investor Relations. Mr. Burke, you may begin the call.

Thank you, and welcome to Invesco Mortgage Capital’s first quarter 2020 earnings call. The management team and I are delighted you’ve joined us, and we look forward to sharing with you our prepared remarks and conducting a question and answer session. Before turning the call over to our CEO, John Anzalone, I wanted to provide a reminder that statements made in this conference call and the related presentation may include forward-looking statements which reflect management’s expectations about future events and our overall plans and performance. These forward-looking statements are made as of today and are not guarantees. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. For a discussion of these risks and uncertainties, please see the risks described in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and subsequent filings with the SEC. Invesco makes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement. We may also discuss non-GAAP financial measures during today’s call. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures may be found at the end of our earnings presentation. To view the slide presentation today, you may access our website at invescomortgagecapital.com and click on the Q1 2020 Earnings Presentation link under Investor Relations. Again, welcome and thank you for joining us today. I’ll now turn the call over to John Anzalone. John?

Good morning and welcome to Invesco Mortgage Capital’s first quarter earnings call. I will give some brief comments before turning the call over to our President and Head of Commercial Credit, Kevin Collins, who will provide greater detail on our current portfolio, and our Chief Investment Officer, Brian Norris, who will expand on our go-forward strategy. Before getting started, I’d like to acknowledge the entire team at Invesco who have put in countless hours managing through this crisis and doing it with the added difficulty of working remotely. There is no way that we would be in the position we are in today without their efforts, so thank you to the entire team. I’d also like to acknowledge the support of both our Board of Directors and the senior management at Invesco who have provided all of the resources necessary to get through this crisis. Towards the end of the first quarter, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the economic shutdown left in its wake caused unprecedented volatility and dislocation throughout the financial markets. Even with rates rallying significantly, prepaid protected specified pool agency mortgage-backed securities significantly underperformed as agency paper was being sold for cash settle at levels below TBA prices. The structured securities and credit markets were hit particularly hard as liquidity was severely impacted and valuations became distressed. Despite IVR’s relatively strong liquidity position coming into the crisis, we sold assets as margin calls accelerated across all of our asset classes. In late March, we decided to discontinue selling our holdings into a deeply distressed market to meet margin calls, so we suspended margin payments and entered forbearance negotiations with our lenders. Ultimately, we were able to capitalize on improving market conditions to pay off our repo counterparties rather than entering into an onerous comprehensive forbearance…

Thanks John, and thanks to everyone on the line for your interest in Invesco Mortgage Capital. As John noted, our portfolio is now largely comprised of mortgage-backed credit investments, so that’s about 92% comprised of commercial mortgage credit and about 7% that’s comprised of residential credit. The COVID-19 pandemic and related decline in economic activity has made it pretty difficult for many borrowers to meet their financial obligations, so not surprisingly lodging and retail property markets have been impacted the most just due to travel restrictions, as well as the slowdown in retail activity. So, looking ahead, we do expect many tenants to continue to forego rent payments or seek relief, but despite our expectations for fundamental weakness, we do believe that bonds at the top or near the top of the capital structure offer attractive value, as they’ve been impacted by the lack of liquidity just as much as heightened concerns regarding COVID-19. We ultimately believe that non mark-to-market term financing via the term asset-backed securities loan facility, which is a New York Fed program known as TALF, should really continue to assist in creating renewed investor interest in these bonds. Roughly 9% of our bonds, our CMBS bonds would be eligible for TALF financing if they were purchased today; however, I do want to note that we expect a much larger portion of our portfolio to benefit indirectly as many of the investments sit just beneath these bonds in the capital structure which makes them, we think, very well positioned to benefit from any future credit curve flattening. To quantify, I’d ask you take a look at the chart by credit ratings embedded on Slide 7, and as of /5/31 you’ll see that about 85% of our credit investments were rated single-A or higher and about 90% of our commercial mortgage credit was rated single-A or higher. Further, over 75% of our CMBS portfolio was rated double-A or higher. On Slide 7 in the chart to your right, we’ve also illustrated that significant subordination levels are available to help absorb the expected increase cumulative collateral losses. Nearly 90% of our CMBS benefits from 15 or more points of subordination and positively roughly 93% have subordination levels in excess of those [indiscernible] cumulative collateral losses. We think that’s worth noting because, not surprisingly, loans originated in ’07 have experienced notable losses just given that they’ve had to endure the global financial crisis and they don’t benefit from recently improved underwriting. I’ll now turn the presentation over to Brian to discuss our strategic outlook for the portfolio.

Thanks Kevin, and good morning to everyone listening to the call. As John mentioned, the latter half of the first quarter and extending well into the second quarter proved to be a tremendously challenging environment for the company. Our team worked extremely hard towards the goal of reducing the company’s reliance on short-term mark-to-market financing for our credit assets as well as overall company leverage. To that end, by early May we successfully reduced our reliance on credit repo to zero with current overall company leverage below 0.8 times debt to equity. With over $1 billion of equity, we believe we are well positioned to reconstruct a portfolio that can offer investors compelling returns and dividend income. We have reengaged agency RMBS repo and interest rate swap counterparties to build the necessary capacity to prudently invest proceeds from a further reduction in credit exposure as our credit assets continue to recover from the liquidity-induced sell-off in the first quarter. Given current and past Fed support and the enduring availability of agency RMBS repo through multiple crises in the financial markets, moving forward we anticipate the asset class will the primary use of capital to achieve the company’s longstanding goals of providing attractive dividend income and book value stability. We believe we can reliably achieve low double-digit ROEs with a mixture of agency RMBS specified pools in addition to a modest allocation to TBA securities. Fed intervention has fostered an attractive investment environment. While we plan to transition from the current portfolio which is almost exclusively credit investments to an agency-focused strategy in the coming quarters, we will continue to evaluate opportunities to achieve targeted returns on credit investments without reliance on short-term mark-to-market funding. Lastly, our external manager, Invesco remains committed to devoting the necessary resources to the company. Invesco enjoys a long history of managing the agency RMBS asset class and many of our team members have supported the trading and management of the agency RMBS allocation in IVR since the IPO in June 2009. Combined, our team members have over 80 years of experience managing the asset class through multiple market cycles and crises with over $23 billion of agency RMBS assets under management as of 12/31/2019. That ends our prepared remarks, and now we will open the line for Q&A.

[Operator instructions] Our first question will come from Eric Hagen from KBW. Your line is now open.

Thanks, good morning guys. Hope you’re doing well. On the asset sales to wind down the FHLB line, which assets do you think you might sell in order to accomplish that? Would they come from more of the triple-A, double-A category, or something in the positions that are lower rated than that? Then on the CMBS portfolio, the stuff that’s remaining, what’s the level of unrealized losses that are sitting in that portfolio, and what’s the unlevered yield in the CMBS portfolio now?

I’ll start with the home loan. The bonds underlying the home loan advances are double-A and triple-A predominantly, so those are the ones that would be sold to pay down that line. Again, as we anticipate the top of the capital structure improving as the TALF starts to get underway, we expect that to be relatively soon. I’ll let Kevin answer the second part.

Yes Eric, to give you a sense for where we’re seeing things trade today and putting into context to what we currently own in our portfolio, I guess I’d start at the top of the capital structure for us, which is, I believe, about 30% of our portfolio that’s currently in triple-A CMBS. Those are--excuse me, 38% of our CMBS portfolio is triple-A. Those are largely junior triple-A rated positions, so in terms of where they’re trading, again it’s very dependent on transactions, but I’d call it around 160 basis points, double-A rated paper, anywhere from 250 to as wide as 400 basis points, and single-A paper around 450 basis points on a spreaded level, and triple-B looks more like 800 to anywhere 1,300 over in terms of current yields.

Great, that’s helpful color. Maybe I can press you on the unrealized losses that are sitting in the portfolio today. We can see where it was at the end of the quarter, but based on the sales that have taken place since then, just what the market is on the overall portfolio and how much of that is in unrealized loss position. I’ll just ask my second question today. Just how much leverage do you think you might run in the agency RMBS portfolio as you transition back to that strategy?

Yes, so I don’t have those specific numbers in front of me, Eric, but what I can tell you is, to kind of go back to what I walked you through, if you think through the junior triple-A rated positions, what is largely junior triple-As, as I mentioned, about 9% are [indiscernible], so those would be more senior positions. But at 5/31, those were around 250 basis points on a spread level. That looks more like 160 today. For the double-A positions at 5/31, that was 400 basis points, it looks more like 250. For single-A rated, 650 at 5/31, looks more like 450 today, and 5/31 for triple B, 1,300, looks more like 800, so that should provide some context in terms of what we see in the way of improvement. Just continue to see slowly increasing demand in the CMBS sector since TALF has come online - that’s certainly helped, and -- as the economy begins to slowly restart here, we’ve seen some new entrants into the space or crossover investors, so I think that’s helped as well.

Eric, I’ll take the leverage question. We anticipate--you know, the transition from our current portfolio to a predominantly agency only portfolio will likely take one or two quarters, so it’s going to take us a while to build up to this number, but it’s likely to be in the seven to eight times debt to equity on agency investments.

Got it. All right, thank you very much.

Our next question will come from Doug Harter with Credit Suisse. Your line is now open.

Thanks. Can you just talk about how you’re thinking of the capital structure - you know, preferreds are a very big part of your total equity base, and your thoughts around that?

Yes, thanks Doug. We are looking at opportunities obviously to raise capital that makes sense for shareholders, and over time we are looking to get the preferred to common ratio back in line, so I think post this call, post the filing of our Q, we’re going to start evaluating the best path forward in terms of capital structure. But yes, we realize that the preferred to common ratio is clearly not where it was, and we would prefer to get it back to more in line with historical averages.

Okay. Is there anything around the REIT rules and hold pool tests that would cause you to need to accelerate the transition back to agency, or do you have flexibility around that?

There’s some flexibility around timing, so we have a number of quarters to get back into hold pool compliance. But given the leverage on agencies, it wouldn’t take that long to get back up to 55% hold pools, so we do anticipate getting there relatively quickly.

Great, thank you.

Our next question will come from Trevor Cranston from JMP Securities. Your line is now open.

Great, thank you. A follow-up question on the FHLB financing which remains in place. Can you say if when you choose to pay that off, are there any frictional costs associated with that in terms of make-whole payments or termination fees?

No, no. We are free to prepay those as we sell assets, so there’s no penalties or anything like that.

Okay, got you. A follow-up on the question about unrealized losses. It sounded like you were suggesting that spreads have tightened pretty meaningfully in June. Is there any chance you can sort of estimate what that means in terms of your book value estimate, relative to where it was at May 31?

Yes, book value since 5/31 is up, I would say modestly. We have seen some valuation increases. It’s up a bit.

Okay. Then it sounded like there were some extraordinary costs that might have been in the G&A line in the first quarter relative to everything that happened in March. Can you say where you expect the G&A level to run going forward?

Yes Dave, do you have an estimate on that?

Yes Trevor, we don’t expect it to change dramatically. We do--there are some additional costs incurred in association with navigating the COVID-19 crisis that we’ll see come through in Q1 and Q2, but beyond that we don’t expect really a dramatic change in G&A from historical levels within a reasonable band.

With the exception of the management fees - this is Lee Phegley. The management fee will be coming down since it’s based on the NAV of the portfolio. Dave’s correct - there were some costs associated with the advisory work that you’ll see this quarter and in the second quarter, but those were not material numbers. But you will see the management fee come down.

Okay, got it. Then just to clarify, when you mentioned the low double-digit ROEs on the agency strategy, was that a gross ROE estimate or is that net of expenses and everything?

That was gross.

Okay, appreciate it. Thank you.

Our next question will come from Jason Stewart with Jones Trading. Your line is now open.

Hey, good morning. All my questions have been answered. Thanks a lot.

I’m currently showing that was our last question for today. I’d like to now turn it back over.

Okay, well again, I’d like to thank everybody for your interest in Invesco Mortgage Capital, and we look forward to talking to you next quarter. Thank you.

This concludes today’s conference. All participants may disconnect at this time. Thank you for your participation on today’s call.