Good day, everyone, and welcome to the Itron Q4 and Yearend 2014 Earnings Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. For opening remarks, I would like to turn the call over to Barbara Doyle. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Robert, and good afternoon and welcome to Itron's Fourth Quarter 2014 Earnings Conference Call. We issued a press release earlier today announcing our results. The press release includes replay information for today's call. We have also prepared presentation slides to accompany our remarks on this call. The presentation is available to the webcast and to our corporate website under the Investor Relations tab. On the call today, we have Philip Mezey, Itron's President and Chief Executive Officer and Mark Schmitz, Itron's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Following our prepared marks, we will open up the call to take questions using the process that the operator described. Before I turn the call over to Philip, please let me remind you of our non-GAAP financial presentation and our Safe Harbor statement. Our earnings release and financial presentation include a non-GAAP financial information that we believe enhances of the overall understanding of our current and future performance. Reconciliations of differences between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures are available in our earnings release and on our Investor Relations website. We will be making statements during this call today that are forward-looking. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from these expectations because of factors discussed in today's earnings release and the comments made during this conference call and in the Risk Factors section under our Form 10-Q and other reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statements. Now please let me turn the call over to our CEO, Philip Mezey.

Thank you, Barbara and good afternoon to everyone. I'll begin today's call with a look at sales, bookings and backlog and the overall health of the business, Mark will review our fourth quarter financials and provide our financial guidance for 2015. I'll add some closing comments including my focus areas going forward. Then we'll open up the call to take some questions. For the fourth quarter, we reported $0.36 of non-GAAP EPS which was even with last year on revenues of $510 million. As you can see on Slide 4, adjusting for $25 million of currency impacts, Itron's revenues increased by 2% when compared with last year with gross in each business segment. Mark will cover our business segment performance in more detail. I will say that although currency impacted our revenues, strong sales execution in the quarter delivered revenue growth in constant currency and significant growth in our bookings and backlog, which is important to our future. Bookings and backlog performance is shown on Slides 5 and 6. Total bookings in Q4 of $648 million reflected a 1.27 book-to-bill ratio driven by a record quarter for gas bookings. Gas bookings of $348 million included $82 million of our contract with GrDF for the first trench of the gas power smart meters and more than $200 million of gas bookings in North America. For the full year, gas bookings increased more than 35% compared with 2013. We had other notable bookings in the quarter including the 120,000 end point smart water solution with the Jordan Water Company and new orders for ongoing projects at Tucson Electric Power Company and Consumers Energy. 12 month backlog of $747 million grew by 36% year-over-year. Our 12 month backlog increased sequentially in each quarter in 2014 and this trend helps to strengthen our confidence…

Thank you, Philip. Our business recorded mixed results in quarter four although electricity in particular gained solid traction, increasing our confidence that we are in the right path towards improved performance and results. While we had a strong quarter for gas bookings and revenue growth in constant currency, we were disappointed with the margin results in gas, particularly in EMEA. However, we understand the reasons for downward pressure in margins and corrective actions are underway. Our water business remained strong with continued steady growth. Margins contracted somewhat in the fourth quarter, partly related to factors that are temporary in nature. Slide 7 summarizes consolidated company results for the fourth quarter of 2014, compared with the fourth quarter last year. Let me first address the currency impacts on our quarterly results. The strengthening of the dollar that began in the middle of 2014 has been pervasive affecting nearly all currencies that impact our business. Currency translation impacts our earnings to a lesser degree than revenues, while currency negatively impacted our topline by $25 million. It impacted non-GAAP EPS by only $0.01 in the quarter. In addition to translation effects, currency can impact our gross margins due to electronic components, procured in U.S. dollars and sole outside the U.S. In the fourth quarter favorable pricing on other commodities including copper, brass and aluminum offset the electronics impact. We expect these largely offsetting trends to continue in 2015. Total gross margin of 30.3% in the fourth quarter decreased by 120 basis points. Improved gross margin in electricity partially the impact of less favorable gross margins in gas and water, non-GAAP operating margin of 5.7% increased by 160 basis points. Adjusted EBITDA margin of 7.7% declined by 190 basis points. Total non-GAAP operating expenses declined slightly compared to last year. However, this was not…

Thanks Mark, for the financial update. I would like to close the call with my focus areas for 2015; business execution, innovation and growth. My first area of focus is continued solid business execution. Our competitor position is strong. We're winning more deals. Our bookings in 2014 were $2.4 billion up 23% from 2013, overall we are executing better today than we were 12 or 18 months ago, but we have more work to do. We will continue to drive for consistent improvement in every business segment. As we entered 2014, improving our operational efficiencies and performance especially in our electricity business was a top priority. We set a goal to improve the segment's profitability from breakeven adjusted EBITDA margin in fiscal year 2013 to a high single digit EBITDA margin. In November we announced a restructuring plan to streamline electricity’s operations and product portfolio, consolidate certain facilities and rebalance our global workforce to support a more focused and profitable business. These efforts will better align Itron’s resources with the target markets, where we can provide true business insights and outcomes to our customers and do so profitably. Although we still have work to do, we're executing our plans and starting to see results. Driving efficiencies within the organization is not limited to our electricity business line. We have and will continue to aggressively pursue business efficiencies companywide including in water and gas. In parallel with these efforts, we are pursuing strategic opportunities to further strengthen our product portfolios and grow these businesses. The path to our company goal of mid teens EBITDA will not be a straight-line always pointing up into the right. However, we are making progress and we will achieve our goal. You can see a good indication of the operating improvement we are creating in the…

[Operator Instructions] And we will take our first question from Patrick Jobin of Credit Suisse.

Hi and good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question and good work on the bookings.

Thanks Patrick.

First question, just going back to the gas gross margin for a second, just help me understand maybe your expectations of that margin trend over the next few quarters. Is it structural to that market, that customer that that's ramping up or how should we think about margin on smart gas offerings in EMEA? Thank you.

Sure, Mark covered a number of the issues here. The first is something we saw in North America, which is that prior to smart deployments we see somewhat of a volume decline of our standard meters. So we’re in the process of adjusting capacity to deal with that situation. As Mark commented we’ve introduced some smart products that have not yet been cost optimized. We expect cost reductions to be in place for the second half of the year. So margin improvement is a result of that and then -- so those are EMEA focused comments. We’ll say that North America as we’ve said before it is just going along very, very strongly both in terms of revenue growth and it’s very strong profitability and although we have increased the metrology component there and so that mix has shifted someone. We expect to see strong recovery of the gas gross margin.

Thanks and then just one follow-up here. Can you talk more towards your M&A appetite to broaden out your product offering, just how you would evaluate the M&A opportunities out there? And then, just a housekeeping item, the $2 million charge in electricity segment, is that the same project, BC Hydro, that you reserved for the $11 million charge in Q3 or -- just any more context on that charge? Thanks.

Great. Okay got that. So the first question on M&A color as I've discussed before, two categories, one is great opportunity to extend our electricity gas and water segments with adjacencies. Other points under the network, where we continue to look at -- get it moving up the network for the pressure sensing and corrosion and vehicles and lighting and all these sorts of things that extend our networks. And then the other areas that I’ve talked about software and services, building upon our $100 million to $200 million worth of software and services business expanding that both organically and inorganically, where we see tremendous opportunity from the data that we’re already collecting on behalf of our customers. In terms of the $2 million charge and I’ll hand this to Mark if I miss this. Yes, it is the same BC Hydro adjustment that we made in the third quarter and this was just a finalization as we signed the final Memorandum of Understanding with the customer, so was the change in some estimates.

Thank you.

And we’ll take our next question from Noah Kaye of Northland Capital Markets.

Good afternoon. Just to touch on your last comments, you mentioned software and services as a $100 million to $200 million business today. Obviously you’re seeing a lot of growth potential there. What are your expectations for how big that business will be over the next one to two years?

Thanks, great. Thank you for asking. So one of the comments that I made was the hiring of Bruce Douglas, to head that business up, because we really see my target is $500 million business over time there of really taking that $100 million to $200 million. And increasing it both organically and inorganically through the expansion of managed services that we’re offering to our customers and data analysis that we’re able to provide in order to really move beyond the revenue cycle that Itron has historically focused on to this other area that I mentioned at the end of my remarks, really about wasting those numbers where just North America this $39 billion a year of waste whether just tremendous optimization opportunities for us and looking at that data both in North America and around the world.

Okay, great. Second question the booking numbers for this quarter in gas. Can you tell us a little bit about the cadence of how that gets recognized over the next couple of years? And what the margin impacts could be in 2016?

So there are two elements of this record gas bookings. One the $82 million that we booked on GrDF and I would point out that that is the first tranche of the GrDF contract, which is substantially larger, but given contract structure that was the element that we were able to book using our stringent criteria. So that represents business that’s going to come on line in 2016 later 16 and then 2017. So there will be benefit from that booking specifically. The North American bookings are nice long-term duration deals that really secure the level of business that we have done in somewhat metering, but largely in communications over five to seven year periods. And so these are long duration contracts very healthy gross margins that really just continue to secure our very strong North American market share in communications.

Okay, great. Thank you so much nice job in the quarter.

Thank you.

And we will take our next question from Tyler Frank of Robert Baird.

Hi guys. Thanks for taking the question. I was wondering if you can just comment on I realize the numbers that you threw out for 2016 wasn’t official guidance. But can you comment on a little bit more if that was including upcoming tenders that you plan to win and can you give us just a little bit of information on what you're thinking about the upcoming tenders and where we should be looking in terms of the markets that those are going to be in?

So yes the 2016 this double-digit revenue growth potential for us in '16 is somewhat based upon those tenders, although I will say it is firmly anchored in our official backlog and as we mentioned before, a couple of deals that are signed contracts, but have not yet been recognized into the backlog. Is substantial part of that outlook and then there is further tendering activity, in which these are well qualified deals in which Itron is actively engaged and has expectation of wining strong share. These deals are both U.S. or geographic guidance, there are really nice opportunities in North America. We commented on the growth of smart metering and smart grid opportunities in places like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana at the North East that have now received strong regulatory support and which we see this North American market continuing to grow. And as well as opportunities in Europe that we discussed in the past particularly and areas like Italy which is implementing of smart gas solution that, they were participating and but continues to expand and the UK where that market has made a commitment to move ahead and we should see strong activity in 2015 with implementations beyond that. And then there are attractive markets for us in Asia pacific region active market there is being Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Singapore where we are actively engaged.

Great, thanks and then just quick follow up on the margin questions and how should we think about the gas margins? Is this a short term effect of having the lower margins year-over-year?

Yeah, here is the way we think about it. We encourage you to think about at this well. Gas margins are affected by our first generation somewhat sub-optimized smart meter products that are being sold in some of the key European markets. We're taking action right now to collect those product cost issues. It's not product performance issues, but product cost issues that affect both the cost and product itself and the manufacturing efficiencies. These problems will be corrected -- it's probably going to take us well into the second quarter, perhaps the second half of the year before we see those improvements taking place and affecting the margins. And at the same time, be aware that and Phil probably mentioned this, but I’ll say it again that we got some counteracting effects going on due to strong, our strong North American market for gas products, where we're seeing very attractive margin and backlog and that is going to continue to benefit margins. So I’m going to say look towards improving recovering gas margins in the second half of 2015.

Okay, perfect. Thanks guys.

And we will take our next question from Andrew Hughes of Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Hi guys thanks for taking my question. On the, the North American projects that are not yet in the backlog, can you talk a little bit about when you expect those to come in and may be some of the specific create to those projects that will signal when they can come into backlog.

Sure. The example that we’ve talked about before Andrew has been Duke Power and which we executed a blanket contract for up to 4 million points and which Duke standardized on Itron’s smart grid architecture. And the intense there is for a deployment in Indiana as one of the first large territorial expansions and that is in for regulatory approval and we expect that sometime and that approval which will allow us to actually book the contract sometime in the second quarter of 2015, so that’s an example of the criteria necessary for us in order to put something in backlog, a contract in place with a proof funding management approval on regulatory support so if we’re missing one of the components, we would not put it into backlog.

Understood, and then product development expenditures have been pretty flat the last three years with the renewed focus on software services, is that an area of operating expense that we should see increase or you can manage that new focus while keeping those expenses flat.

Yeah, great question. It is our goal to try to manage them flat. What we have talked about is this right now John Holleran has had a very, very strong focus on R&D spending. We have evaluated our projects very comparatively, internally and have decide to transition some of the development to lower cost countries specifically India and then even at this flat level that we currency have, we have some duplication of cost where we've not yet been able to release certain R&D resources in advance of moving the work to India and these restructuring activities and discussions with the works council will allow us to continue to work that cost downward. So we have more room to go there on efficiencies in the R&D budget even as we look at the opportunity in the software and services.

All right. Great, thank you.

And we will take our next question from Sean Hannan of Needham & Company.

Yes, thanks so getting back into margins, I actually as well as mix trying to understand, what all is assumed in your guidance for this year? Have you explicatively assumed that the inefficiencies you talked about within gas as well as that elevated R&D spend that coming down. Is that’s fully baked into the guidance that you provided for this year or is there some conservatism that you have may be that accounts for if you don’t ramp down or address that as quickly also if we can talk about mixed assumptions then within water as well so I think that would have moved against you as well. Thanks.

Sure. Well first of all we don’t feel we’ve got excessive conservatism based on the numbers. We’re going to see improvements in gross margins throughout the year, probably more so in the second half or the first half. Remember that the restructuring program that we announced in November doesn’t have much of an effect on 2015 until late in the year. The product cost issues that we talked about in gas will take some time into the second half of the year to get fully resolved although we're working hard on that and we’d like to get it done faster obviously. Same comments with regard to R&D expense which you mention I think that there is going to be some temporary overlap and our backend loaded with efficiencies in R&D throughout 2015 and then in specifically with regard to water, there is really two components to the water compression in margins just on the fourth quarter. One is would call transitory excess cost experienced on some largest service contracts in North America both mobilization costs and some trailing costs and we think we’ll see those excess cost go away. The other component which is less in magnitude in water is that water is growing and it’s growing nicely and in the fourth quarter we saw some diminution in gross margins due to contracts that were begin in later in 2014 and we still attractive gross margins but a little bit lower than the average for the business. So we accept that and stride and I think we we’re happy to see the growth in the business on a attractive margins but you did see a little bit of compression due to next there and that probably is going to continue.

Sean to your in answer does the guidance capture the comments to markets made? Yes, we feel that the guidance accurately reflects these factors.

Okay, thanks and then a follow-up to you in terms of electric and I believe that the exit of that 50 million-ish in revenue, is that is neutral to earnings or is it actually going to create a lift due to negative margins within those segments, I’m sorry within those geographies sorry about that.

Yeah, it will create some lift to margin. Some of this business was unprofitable. So it was a very low margin and we’re replacing that business. If you look at the electric segment, the prospects for electric segment in 2015, its actually growing after you take into account that exit of the low margin, low profit products. So we’re actually very optimistic about the continued trajectory that the electric businesses on.

Great, thanks for taking the question.

You're welcome.

And we will take our next question from Sven Eenmaa of Stifel.

Yes, thanks for taking my questions. Just two quick ones, first on electricity margins, I wanted to clarify whether your expectation is for relatively flat margin performance relative to the fourth quarter margins achieved in electricity until the resolution of the working council issue or do you expect improvement there in the year?

Yes. Well, electricity, we had a great quarter and I love to tell you that that’s going to continue to accrete going forward I doubt that it will actually. It would actually be to just see it stay flat until the benefits of the current November announced restructuring plan start to take hold. Maybe that will happen, but I would tell you that more than likely it’s not going to get straight line improvement. Its carrying -- electricity is carrying good momentum right now. But we were a bit above trend line with those fourth quarter results so concurrent with that.

I do yeah. I think these comments about the shape of 2015 or that as we start shipping more of the backlog projects that we have talked about in North America and those are projects like Duquesne the continued shipment of Duke DP of course these other contracts has volume strengthen in 2015, and 2016, we expect accretive margins as a result of that increased volume.

Got it, that’s very helpful. And the second question I had is obviously you’re involved in a pretty active high competition for the EGRF and GDRF businesses. Now that the currency has moved lower how do you margins on those projects and what offsets do you have on the cost structure side on the FX impact?

So and yeah that’s a great question Sven because our primary currency exposure is translation risk and it is not this execution issue on for those contracts we’re manufacturing in facilities that operate in Euros and where we’re exposed to euro cost. So the change -- the change in currency does not affect our level of competitiveness in those contracts Mark, did make some comments about supply chain cost, which are to the extent that we’re using electronic components those are largely dollar denominated. However, we have a bit of an offsetting activity going on in which a basic material prices have come down and we continue to seek purchasing efficiencies and so we feel that we’re going to be able to offset those other supply chain cost did that answer your question.

Yes it did. Thank you very much.

And we will take our next question from Jeff Osborne of Cowen and Company.

Hi good afternoon guys. I just had two questions. One on the French situation, I was wondering if you can just touch on at what point you’ll think you’ll have a bit more to share on the negotiations with the works council I think in reviewing the French press. There certainly been some challenges and protest and what not, which maybe you were expecting, but I just want to get a better sense on when you I understand your firms the cost and timeline of the restructuring, but you also have letting it early in the stage. When do you think you’ll have a bit more clarity on the whole process there?

So what first of all we have clarity our ability to communicate on that is limited the timeline on the current process has the works council consultation process completing sometime in late April or early May. And once that process is complete then we’ll be at liberty to have a somewhat more detailed discussion. However, so far everything is on track and to the point that you’ve monitored these things that it was expected that there would be some level of press and publicity and we’re prepared for that.

Okay, great to hear that. Along the same line with the French situation my understanding is you’ll shift the manufacturing for ERDF outside of France. Do you have to go through a requalification of that meter and is there any risk to what you’ve already been awarded or would the production outside of France be proposed for future awards associated with the $35 million?

We have not -- no we’re not, we’re producing the ERDF Linky meter in France, so there is no requalification.

That would be the intent, though, for all $35 million meters over the course of the next decade?

We’re not commenting on the next decades plan. We’re simply saying that so far we have committed to the Linky meters and they’re being made in France.

Got you. And the last question I had, Philip, was just -- can you talk about reflecting back on 2014 and your expectations for 2015, just what was overall pricing on a like for like meter in particular with electricity down 5% or 10% more or less?

No, no Jeff, it’s not actually. The selling prices in the meters in which we’re actively engaged that remained have remained reasonably healthy. There are examples of 5ish percent decline, but those were things that we where we accounted on improvements in our total manufacturing costs and so we’ve been able through efficiencies to offset margin pressure in a number of those markets. The more important issue that we really looked at in 2014, are we in the right markets, where we see that continued strong price and differentiation. So this selective exists that we announced in 2014, with that ongoing 15 million 50 million in exit. Are to keep us focused on those markets where we see strong price in competitive differentiation.

Got it. Thanks for the detail there.

You’re welcome.

And we will take our next question from Andrew Weisel of Macquarie Capital.

Hi everyone. I actually want to ask two questions about below-the-line items. First is on the tax rate. You are guiding to 37%. Can you just high-level walk through what's driving the year-over-year increase and if that's what we should think of as a new normal run rate for the taxes?

Okay. Well it’s that’s a difficult question. I’ll tell there's lot of moving pieces in our tax rate. So if you want to boil it down you probably -- I would probably say that biggest factor that it influences the rate year-over-year is that we’re not assuming extension of the U.S. R&D tax credit in 2015. But of course that may well occur, but we’re being on the cautious side there. And then the second part of your question is that the new run rate I’d say no it’s not. Our tax rate has been on an upward trend, but it’s also been quite volatile. It’s going to remain volatile for a while going forward because of the geographical mix of earnings and the impact of valuation allowances on our overall effective tax rate. If we have losses incurred in jurisdictions where we have valuation allowances in effect it increases our effective tax rate. The same token think in terms of what happens after some of those jurisdictions turn around to begin making profits and we have the justification for releasing those valuation allowances that will significantly reduce our effective tax rate. And obviously we plan to see that happen in the foreseeable future. So it’s going to be -- the tax rate is going to be volatile. I would not poll the new normal no.

Okay, great. Then my other question is on repurchases. You finished the authorization in January. Why not have a new authorization? Why not continue to repurchase the shares, especially since it's trading below where it had been in January or the fourth quarter?

Well this is it’s just a question of timing frankly, because the timing of this call and earning release precedes or believe to have Board action done Board authorization done for any further round of share repurchases. But keep in mind also and something that we didn’t comment very deeply on this call. But capital requirements in the business in 2015 will be larger than they were in 2014. The cash requirements related to restructuring, which is an investment -- a significant investment we’re making in improved operating performance of the business are substantial. In addition, we expect to see continued high-levels of investment in product development and an increase in CapEx. So we -- as always, we’re going to be very careful in balancing our internal priorities with fair shareholder returns, and we do have plenty of liquidity. It’s not an issue, but we need to be able to careful about not overpromising in terms of share repurchases in the year ahead.

Okay. Thank you very much.

[Operator Instructions] And this does conclude today's Q&A session. I'll turn the call back to Barbara Doyle for closing remarks.

All right. Thanks Robert and thank you, everyone. Before we end the call, Philip, are there any final comments?

Thank you, yes, just a couple. I want to be very, very clear about something that question that Jeff raised. We're absolutely committed to the manufacture of the G1 meters in France. There are upcoming bids that we'll consider. Our strategy there is still open. Operationally, we had a very strong fourth quarter. We're very, very pleased with the performance of the electricity business and the efforts that have been put in there in order to optimize that business. The progress that we've made on the restructuring announcement, we're on top of the issues that we've discussed particularly in the gas business and I want to emphasize again the strength of the overall market environment increase in bookings and backlog and the activity that we see in 2015 really building in the second half of the year, with this very strong outlook into 2016 of low double-digit growth with earnings growing faster than that. We have better visibility and a clear path here for continued operational and quarter-to-quarter improvement. Thanks everyone.

All right. Thanks everyone for joining. Operator, we will conclude the call.