Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Gartner’s Earnings Conference Call for Q3 2011. A replay of this call will be available through December 2nd, 2011. The replay can be accessed by dialing 888-286-8010 for domestic calls, and 617-801-6888 for international calls; and by entering the passcode 44261278. This call is being simultaneously webcast and will be available on Gartner’s website at www.gartner.com for approximately 90 days. I will now turn the conference over to Brian Shipman, Gartner’s Group Vice President of Investor Relations for opening remarks and introductions. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Gartner’s Q3 2011 Earnings Conference Call. With me today is our Chief Executive Officer Gene Hall and our Chief Financial Officer Chris Lafond. This call will begin with a discussion of the quarterly financial results disclosed in today’s press release as well as an update of our increased revenue guidance, followed by an opportunity for you to ask questions. I’d like to remind everyone that the press release is available on our website, and that web address is www.gartner.com. Before we begin we need to remind you that certain statements made on this call may constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can vary materially from actual results and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those contained in the company’s 2010 annual report on Form 10(k) and quarterly reports on Form 10(q), as well as in other filings with the SEC. I would encourage all of you to review the risk factors listed in these documents. The company undertakes no obligation to update any of its forward-looking statements. With that I would like to hand the call over to Gartner’s Chief Executive Officer, Gene Hall. Gene?

Good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us. Our Q3 results for 2011 continued the growth trend that we’ve delivered through the successful and consistent execution of our long-term strategy. As you’ve heard me say before, the fundamentals for our strategy have been and remain to create extraordinary research insight, to build strong sales capability, to deliver high-value differentiated offerings, to provide world-class service, and to continuously improve our operational effectiveness. This strategy has been successful across our lines of business and across all geographies. In Q3 2011, research contract value continued to demonstrate strong growth. We achieved 15% contract value growth excluding the impact of foreign exchange, and ended the quarter at the highest level ever reported in Gartner’s history. The 15% year-over-year increase in research contract value was driven by both strong Q3 new business as well as strong client and wallet retention. New business was the highest of any Q3 in Gartner’s history, and wallet retention was 100% the second quarter in a row. Our events business remains strong. In Q3 revenue growth of 12% excluding the impact of foreign exchange was above our long-term target of 5% to 10%. For our events held this quarter, attendees were up 12% and exhibitors were up 14%. We also added two new events and we continue to optimize our events portfolio for maximum value. In consulting, the solid pipeline we told you about on last quarter’s call drove revenue growth of 4% excluding the impact of foreign exchange, a notable improvement from the first half results we reported previously. The overall momentum in our business has been driven by the success of our initiatives to improve sales force productivity, drive higher client retention, grow share of wallet among existing customers, and penetrate net new opportunities. Information technology continues to grow…

Thanks, Gene, and good morning everyone. We ended Q3 with double-digit growth in revenue, earnings and cash flow. Our results again demonstrate the continued successful execution of our strategy, our ability to consistently deliver on the long-term financial objectives we communicated over the past several years, and our overall importance on the strategic IT initiatives of our clients. I’ll start today with a review of our business segment results for Q3 and finish with a discussion of our outlook for the remainder of 2011. Starting with research, Q3 research revenue was up 19% as reported, and 15% excluding the impact of foreign exchange. The gross margin in this segment increased over two points year-over-year to 68%, as our strong execution continues to deliver on the operating leverage (inaudible). All of our key research business metrics remained very strong in Q3. Contract value grew to a record level of $1.36 billion, a growth of 15% year-over-year excluding the impact of foreign exchange. New business again increased year-over-year, continuing the trend we’ve seen since late 2009. The new business mix was balanced between sales to new clients and sales of additional services and upgrades to existing clients. While our contract value growth continues to benefit from our discipline of annual price increases and no discounting, approximately 75% of our contract value growth came from volume versus pricing. This volume growth reflects our success at continuing to grow the business by penetrating our vast market opportunity with both new and existing clients. As a result, we ended the quarter with 11,770 client organizations, up 6% year-over-year. This year-over-year growth is particularly notable given the uncertain economic environment, and we expect to increase our price list by3% to 6% per year on an annual basis. Our client retention rate ended the quarter at 82%,…

Thank you. (Operator Instructions.) Your first question comes from the line of Peter Appert with Piper Jaffray. Please proceed. Peter Appert – Piper Jaffray: Thanks, good morning. So Gene, the consulting backlog is down a little bit on a year-over-year basis. Do you view that as an indication of sort of flow through from the weaker macro environment? And then just more broadly on that question, what are you hearing back from the sales force in terms of what the customers are telling you about spending plans going forward?

Hey, Peter. Our consulting backlog we aim to be in the three- to four-months’ revenue range, and that’s exactly where we are with it now. If you have it less than three months that’s a little tight; if you have it more than four months then what happens is clients get a little anxious because when they commission work they want to go ahead and get started on it. So we’re kind of right in the sweet spot of where we want with that business. If you look at our business we’re seeing really robust growth in research, really robust growth in events because that’s really where we’re focusing, where we focus the majority of our effort. So consulting’s exactly where we want it to be. It doesn’t really reflect the macroeconomic situation at all. Peter Appert – Piper Jaffray: Okay. How about just in terms of, for the overall research business, things like sales cycle, average order size – anything that might indicate tone of business, better/worse in the context of the macro environment?

The selling cycle remains about the same. There’s no measurable change. We’re seeing things looking very solid, very good and no change on that. Peter Appert – Piper Jaffray: Got it. And then the last thing: sales productivity, you’ve accelerated the sales force growth in the current quarter. Just talk a little bit about the productivity experience in terms of new sales associates. Is it similar to what you’ve been seeing, etc.?

We track our sales productivity as you know very closely, and one of the things that we’re very focused on is sales productivity of our new people. If we look at sales productivity of our new hires over the last period of time, that productivity has been increasing and it’s been because of a focus on it. And so we feel very comfortable accelerating the amount of our new hires because we’ve seen this increasing productivity of the new hires that we get. Peter Appert – Piper Jaffray: Got it. Great, thanks Gene.

Your next question comes from the line of Dave Lewis with JP Morgan. Please proceed. Dave Lewis – JP Morgan: Hey guys, good morning. First question is, Gene, you touched on supply chain in your open commentary and I was just hoping you could just give us an update. It might be more anecdotal on the AMR business and strategically your latest thoughts on that building out over time.

So the AMR business, well, we call it supply chain. The supply chain business we’re doing very well. We had a supply chain conference this year in Phoenix and it was literally sold out it was so busy. In fact, we’re looking for a different venue in the future perhaps because of the growth we expect there. We also held a conference in Europe which was equally successful. AMR had not had conferences in Europe and we had one last year and then we had one this year. The one this year had huge growth over the previous year and we were very successful there. We’ve expanded the number of salespeople selling supply chain and again are seeing very good bookings in that business. So we’re very happy with the supply chain business. Dave Lewis – JP Morgan: Thanks, Gene, that’s great. And then just if you can just touch on Europe, if you’re seeing any regionally… It sounds like from the information you provided on the Barcelona conference, it doesn’t sound like there’s any softness there but regionally is there any outperformance from one region to the other?

Yeah, so as Chris said, I’ll start with the events since you mentioned that. Our Barcelona conference, we’re seeing as strong as the Orlando conference. And by the way, that one starts on Sunday so we have a pretty good handle of what it’s going to be like. If we look at the other ones that we have rolling out in the other geographies, they look very strong as well. In terms of our research business in Europe and our consulting business in Europe, I’d say that it’s pretty much the same as everywhere else. You see growth slightly faster in Asia, slightly slower in Europe but not to any large degree.

It’s Chris, just to give you a little more color there on the growth: I think if you look across, whether it’s geographic, whether it’s industry, whether it’s client-side – we still continue to deliver very balanced results actually in all three of the segments. So no matter how you look at our performance, whether it’s geographically or otherwise, really good, solid growth coming from pretty much everywhere across the business. Dave Lewis – JP Morgan: That’s great, thanks guys. I’ll hop off.

Your next question comes from the line of William Bird with Lazard. Please proceed. William Bird – Lazard Capital Markets: Yeah, Gene, I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about just what you heard from CIOs at symposium. And second, your full-year guidance range seems to imply a fairly wide range of growth for Q4. Just wondering if you’re trying to communicate uncertainty; has there been any real change in the tone of business? Maybe you could comment on it. Thank you.

Yeah, great question about symposium. It was actually very exciting, being down there with so many CIOs and there was a really common theme, which is IT is central to everything they do in their institutions and in their business. And they’re very cognizant of that and it’s traditional things like implementing CRM systems, data center consolidation, implementing virtualization; but also there’s a whole new set of things, on things like mobile computing and how does Cloud impact their business and things like that. And so we’re sort of seeing a tremendous amount of interest in those issues, and then also looking to Gartner to help with those issues. And it was really fun seeing all the excitement and enthusiasm that was down there. And I’ll turn it over to Chris for the second question.

Hey, Bill. Thanks for the question. Just in terms of our guidance and outlook, a couple things that I’ll share. First, we’ve not made any assumptions in our guidance for foreign exchange movement, so that’s the first thing we should understand which is there’s been a lot of variability there but we essentially have assumed that foreign exchange will stay where it is today. So if that moves that could change ultimately where we end, so we’re not in the business of trying to predict foreign exchange. If you go through each of the segments in terms of our revenue guidance, I think the research revenue was pretty tight - $15 million on $1 billion revenue number – so we feel pretty confident as you can imagine. Given it’s a subscription business we pretty much know where that will come in, give or take a little bit. Consulting, at the $305 million to $320 million range, as we talked about in the past we have a contract optimization business that does have some variability and it’s a little less predictable in terms of forward pipeline. And those deals can come in relatively quickly and that’s why we have a little bit of a wide range there, and again, still relatively small given it’s a $300 million consulting business with a $15 million range. And then finally events we increased. We have great visibility into what we’re seeing now at symposium; good visibility in the forward-looking bookings for all of the events happening in Q4 so we feel pretty confident there. So what I would tell you is in no way does our guidance range mean to imply that there’s any uncertainty or anything else in our business. We’re very confident with where we are and very comfortable with the ranges that we’ve established. William Bird – Lazard Capital Markets: Thanks. And Gene, just a follow-up on productivity: it looked like your dollar growth in contract value per salesperson just dipped a little bit in Q3. I would think there’s some dilutive effect from onboarding; I was just wondering if you could comment a little bit on productivity from Q3.

Yeah, great question. So the productivity in Q3, as you mentioned we had a richer mix of new people who have less productivity than people who have been here a longer period of time, and obviously that’s going to have a little bit of an impact on productivity. But again as I said earlier, while the mix was richer the actual productivity we’re seeing out of new people has been increasing over time. William Bird – Lazard Capital Markets: Great, thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Manav Patnaik with Barclays Capital. Please proceed. Manav Pataik – Barclays Capital: Hi, good morning gentlemen. On deferred revenue, I guess on the contract value rather, I mean given what you’re already seeing in Q4 should we expect the growth rate to accelerate like it did last quarter or how should we try and model that?

When you look at the full-year revenue guidance, essentially you can back that into what we expect Q4 to be. It’ll be pretty consistent in terms of growth rates that we’ve seen in the early part of the year. Obviously the ending contract values we get through Q4 will be what will drive 2012 and that we’ll talk about as we get through Q4 and into Q1 when we do our earnings call there. So I would expect to see research continue to be strong; we’ve seen good, solid performance all year. It’s been very consistently delivering those results and we expect research to end the year between 16% and 17% revenue growth. Manav Pataik – Barclays Capital: Got it. And based on your commentary, and just sort of trying to get an early read on 2012, it seems like there’s no reason to believe at least now that the growth or the contract value growth or the continued increase in backlog is going to show any signs of slowdown. Is that fair?

It’s a little too early to be talking about 2012. We obviously need to finish out 2011 first but it is our objective as we’ve continued to talk about and continued to remain confident in, of growing research at 15% to 20%, growing consulting 3% to 8% and events 5% to 10%. And obviously we’ve been doing much better than that on the events business. All of our metrics continue to be in those ranges and so at this point we feel very comfortable that our business continues to perform in those ranges today and into the future. Manav Pataik – Barclays Capital: Got it, and one final one just on the variance on the EPS guidance range. Assuming the FX doesn’t really move from where it is today, based on your model are we on the higher end of that range?

We feel very confident in that range. We generally don’t provide color around where we are in the range so we feel very confident that we’re going to be in that range that we’ve given. Manav Pataik – Barclays Capital: Okay, fair enough. Thanks, guys.

Your next question comes from the line of Robert Riggs with William Blair. Please proceed. Robert Riggs – William Blair: Good morning, thanks for taking my question. Just in the consulting business, are there any notable trends in the types of engagements that clients are looking for maybe versus cost savings versus growth strategy going forward – anything to note there?

Yeah, it’s Gene. No, I don’t think so. I think basically the mix of business, the mix of the kinds of engagements we’re doing has been pretty much constant over time, other than where we’ve purposefully changed it. So we have some areas we think might be a little higher growth and might focus in on those areas, but it’s on the margin as opposed to any major change. Robert Riggs – William Blair: Okay. And then Chris, you mentioned the switch or the continued transition to more of the managing partner approach in consulting. How far along are we with that process there?

We are probably kind of three-quarters, two-thirds to three-quarters of the way through. We’ve been working on that over the past few years and as you know, what we’ve been trying to do there is make that investment while also managing improvements in the overall productivity and profitability of the consulting business, which I think we’ve done a good job of over the past few years. So I think we’ll still be on that task for a couple more years as we continue to ramp up and get a full managing partner capacity. Robert Riggs – William Blair: Great, thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Bill Southerland with Northland Capital. Please proceed. Bill Southerland – Northland Capital: Thanks for taking the question. Most have been asked, actually, but I was wondering about headcount plans at this point in consulting.

Hey Bill, good to hear you again. From a consulting perspective, as we’ve talked about over time what our objective there is, is to hire at capacity to deliver as we see the pipeline and backlog grow. So what you saw in the earlier part of the year was our backlog was flat to slightly down and so our headcount’s been flat to slightly down in the last couple of quarters. As that continues to build and grow we will add capacity appropriately. We still believe that the utilization of our consultants has some room for improvement so we can drive incremental revenue growth without adding capacity in some areas, but as we grow over time if we expect the consulting business to grow 3% to 8% you will expect over time the headcount growth to be in that range as we continue to move ahead. Bill Southerland – Northland Capital: And so the utilization number for the quarter, I know it’s a tricky quarter just in terms of time off and so forth. Any other thoughts on that number for the quarter?

Yeah, a couple things. Q3 is seasonally lower because of the summer holiday period, so if you look back at time it is a seasonally lower utilization figure for consulting. We have been higher in the past and I would say that our long-term target continues to be 70%, so we’re continuing to drive efforts to get the business to be at that level consistently over time. Bill Southerland – Northland Capital: Okay, and then last one – the three groups within consulting, are they pretty much tracking kind of in the same course?

Yeah, I would say generally continuing to track consistently across all three of those segments. Bill Southerland – Northland Capital: Okay, thanks guys.

Your next question comes from the line of Kelly Flynn with Credit Suisse. Please proceed. Kelly Flynn – Credit Suisse: Thanks, guys – a couple questions. First question, it relates to a couple other questions people have asked but I just want to drill down further into what you’re saying about near-term contract value expectations for research. I wanted to look at it this way: can you talk about if new sales, renewals or any other indicators deteriorated at all as Q3 progressed and then what we saw in October; and I know you can’t really predict the future but whether or not so far what we’ve seen in Q4 is tracking kind of in line with mid-teens contract value growth? Thank you.

Hi Kelly, thanks. So a couple things I would say there: first, overall from a renewal perspective, our renewals are pretty balanced throughout the whole year so every single quarter we’re seeing a pretty good indication. So give or take a few points around 25^% - that’s how much our book of business comes up for renewal. What I would say as we look at our retention rats, they’ve held very steady so from a retention point of view we’re seeing no issues or no changes in what we’ve seen earlier in the year, and they’ve been pretty consistent for quite some time. From a new business perspective we’ve had record new business again in Q3. It’s the highest Q3 we’ve ever had so we still are seeing really good demand from clients, still seeing really good new business bookings. We’ve continued to add to the number of client organizations, so penetrating new organizations; and because of our wallet retention number increasing yet again we continue to penetrate the existing client base. So no matter how we slice and dice and look at it, and as I said earlier if you look at our CV growth geographically, industry-wise, client-size – all of those are up so we’re seeing a very broad-based performance. So at this point there’s nothing that we’re seeing that says we can’t continue on the delivery we’ve seen this year and keep research revenue in our long-term expectation range of 15% to 20%. Kelly Flynn – Credit Suisse: Okay, so but for October specifically I guess versus Q3, does what you just said apply to October as well as September?

October, when you look in between quarters, the early part of the quarter tends to be relatively small. We’ve seen nothing; we don’t go into a lot of details in-quarter but we haven’t seen anything that we’ve seen so far. In addition to the comments Gene made, we’ve seen great demand in our events business and we’re seeing great demand in consulting; still seeing the continued performance in research. So nothing we’re seeing in the business at this point suggests anything. Kelly Flynn – Credit Suisse: Okay, great. And then can I ask a second question related to the Orland symposium? I don’t know if you can get into this much detail but you mentioned record attendees and I think exhibitors as well. Can you talk about the growth for each of those for that symposium year-over-year?

We don’t have that actually handy.

Yeah, if there’s another question, Kelly, you have I will try to dig it up. Kelly Flynn – Credit Suisse: That’s okay, we can take it offline or if you have it later in the call let me know. But I’ll leave it at that, thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Daniel Leben with Robert W. Baird. Please proceed. Daniel Leben – Robert W. Baird: Thank you, good morning. We talked a little bit about AMR earlier. Can you talk a little bit about [Burton] and kind of the growth rate you’re seeing there as well as the aggregate contribution of those two products to the overall contract value growth?

It’s Gene. We’re seeing very strong growth with what’s now IT One, and the aggregate contracts, that’s been just a complete homerun. As you can imagine that’s a product where all of our IT salespeople can sell it. It’s applicable to every one of our IT clients and so it’s having extremely, I’d say very strong growth. And if you look at the contributions together, both are doing great and we’re very happy with both of the results of those. Daniel Leben – Robert W. Baird: Okay. And then Gene, to the extent you had a lot of conversations with CIOs at symposium, could you talk about the tone you’re hearing from them as they’re thinking about their 2012 budget planning process?

Yeah. I mean basically there’s a full range, and this is true kind of in any economic times. There’s some people that are focused on growth-oriented activities and there’s some groups that are focused on cost reduction, like datacenter consolidation, stuff like that; and then virtually everyone is asking questions about these disruptive technologies like things like “Do I need an iPad app? How does mobile affect me? How’s the consumerization of IT affecting me? How does social computing affect me? Cloud?” So all the traditional stuff that’s on people’s mind is I’d say more important than it’s ever been, and then you layer on top of that all these what I call “disruptive” technologies that are on their mind. And in fact, I think that’s one of the things that’s really driving strong demand at symposium and throughout our business, is the combination of the traditional drivers with the layering on top of it of all of these new technologies that have opportunities and frankly risks for these companies, too. Daniel Leben – Robert W. Baird: Great. And then the last one from me, the consulting utilization down to 61%, struggling a little bit there. Does that number change in terms of the targets for all the historicals where we’ve seen utilization in excess of 70% with the new managing partner model? How should we think about a target for that going forward?

We have not changed our long-term expectations. We still absolutely expect and believe we can have that business in the 70% range, so what we’re seeing in the short-term has not caused us any reason to think differently about that business or think differently about utilization. Daniel Leben – Robert W. Baird: Do you need to do something on the headcount nearer-term to start getting that number back or is it by driving the top line you’re going to get there?

As I said, we manage our capacity to the backlog but like right now, our expectation is that we’ll continue to see the kind of demand we saw in Q3. So if you look back at the first couple of quarters we commented earlier in the year and again that the first couple of quarters of the year were a little weaker than we expected; Q3 was a much stronger quarter after a strong end of Q2 bookings-wise. And we expect that to continue in there and ultimately drive utilization back to the levels that we expect. Daniel Leben – Robert W. Baird: Great, thank you.

(Operator Instructions.) Your next question comes from the line of Brian Karimzad with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed. Brian Karimzad – Goldman Sachs: Hi. I guess the first one would be at your symposium in Orlando, you guys did share some preliminary results of your CIO survey for budgets next year. I wondered if you could share that with us and put in some context with what that survey said last year, and then I have a follow-up question.

Yeah, we don’t actually have that handy so we’ll have to get that to you separately. Brian Karimzad – Goldman Sachs: Okay, I can tell it to you, that’s alright. Generally it was pointing to low single-digit growth in budgets for next year, but looking at historic numbers am I correct in saying that the last couple of years that survey has also pointed to low single-digit growth?

Yes. Brian Karimzad – Goldman Sachs: Okay, and you’ve grown despite that. I guess my follow-up is what do you need to see to be confident that you can achieve the mid- to high-end of that 15% to 20% research revenue growth next year? What are some indicators you need to see happen and some benchmarks for that?

It’s Gene. So to me, the key thing in driving it – there are two key components in driving it. The most important one is our sales force productivity, and so we are continuing to drive sales force productivity. It’s been increasing over time as I mentioned. We are focused on existing salespeople and getting their productivity as well as the new salespeople. It ranges from things like training, the tools we give them, making sure we hire the right profile, etc., and so all of those things are driving sales productivity and that’s the single biggest driver. And then the second one is obviously adding capacity over time, which is we’re planning to add between 15% to 20% more salespeople over time. And that helps with the long-term but the thing that really drives it is what we get with productivity, which is why we’re so focused on that. Brian Karimzad – Goldman Sachs: Okay. And one of your competitors had some issues with productivity. Did you get a sense that you were able to take some share in the quarter as a result of that?

Well as I mentioned, we’re very happy with our productivity and as I said, the productivity’s good. It’s going the right direction and that’s what we like to see. Brian Karimzad – Goldman Sachs: Okay, thank you.

(Operator Instructions.) With no further questions in queue I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Hall for any closing remarks. Please go ahead, sir.

Great, and before Gene finishes up I just wanted to follow-up on Kelly’s question on the symposium. Kelly, we’re seeing good double-digit growth in both attendees and exhibitors in our Orlando symposium so in excess of 10% on the attendee side and even faster than that on the exhibitor side. So I don’t have all of the final, final calculations but it’s in that range and it was a very strong event. Gene?

Yep, it’s Gene. I just want to thank everybody for joining us today. We look forward to talking with you again next quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today’s conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect. Have a great day.