Matias Gaivironsky
Analyst
Thank you, Daniel. Good morning, everybody. So going to Page 14, here we have the description of our investment in IDB. The main investment highlights for the semester was that finally we finished the partnership with our former partner. So now IFISA acquired the share from Mordechay Ben Moshe, reaching 31.7% stake and Dolphin that is the vehicle that we are using for our investment through IRSA has 49%. During December, we also agreed with the existing minority shareholders to postpone the launching of the first tender offer. Remember that we have remaining two obligations towards the Company. So you have the description in the bottom right of the page. So we have two tender offers. The first one is to launch a tender offer by March 2016 now, so is via December. So we postponed three months. And we have the remaining for the end of 2016. After the cancellation of the partnership, we are starting to change management. So now we appointed a new acting CEO for IDB and DAC and a new CFO for DAC. We start to change directors in the subsidiaries. So we start to make changes on the managerial levels. During December 2015, also was canceled the sale of Clal is to read a process of an action on Clal and finally that was cancelled, generating a weak decrease in the shares of Clal that I will comment later. On a subsequent event, as Alejandro mentioned, Dolphin signed with IFISA an option to acquire the same shares that IFISA acquired from Mordechay Ben Moshe. So the same shares at the same price. We have an option for two years plus an interest rate of 8.5%. The tender offer obligation, we recorded 100% that are recorded with a loss of ARS1.6 billion, that was already recognized in our financial statements. So going to Page 16, since the acquisition of the shares and since we effectively took control of the Company, we start to consolidate IDB in our financial statement. So this will add a lot of changes to our financial statements. So we presented most of those changes in a separate presentation that is in our website. So any question on that, please call us and we will explain, and I will try to summarize fast the main changes. So for this quarter, we start to consolidate assets and liability. We haven't consolidated yet results. So we will start to recognize results from the next quarter, so starting in our next quarter that we plan to release by May 11. So that will be our nine-month quarter. We will start to show results from IDB. So we will use financial statements of IDB with a lag of three months. So, by the next quarter we will use December figures for IDB and we will recognize it in March. This gap is because they have different rules in IDB in Israel. So they present financials with more time that we have here in Argentina. So we will use this gap of three months to show results. Going to Page 17, something that we will try to maintain in our financial statements, it's the same explanation until now. So we will try to separate results from IDB, from IRSA. So we will maintain in our segment information two business centers. So from now we have defined two business centers for our segment information. So we will have the Argentina business center with the same disclosure until now. And we will add Israel business center with all the segments from Israel. So from now, you will see all the evolution of the business in Israel in this segment. Going to Page 18, this is how it will look. Argentina business center, we will maintain the best segments of shopping center, the offices, the sales and development, the hotels, international. So the same disclosure until now, and we will add on a separate basis, Israel with real estate, there is PBC plus other assets, supermarket that is Shufersal, agrochemicals that is Adama, telecommunication that is Cellcom, Insurance that is Clal and other assets. And so the idea is to try to maintain the separation, to understand better our financial statement. IDB will represent a significant part of our assets and liabilities on a consolidated basis. So in Page 19, we have an example of that. IDB represents 13 times our assets, 17 times our liabilities. It's important to mention that any of the debt of IDB have recourse to IRSA. So we will consolidate. We will show on a consolidated basis that we sold, but for us, if you ask us how is the best way to value IRSA, and to keep analyzing IRSA, it's on a sum of the part basis, try to do the NAV of the Company. IRSA will remain the same until now. We will have our investment in IDB, so that our suggestion is to do the sum of the parts, and valuing IDB different way than with the assets and liability analysis. It's not sorry -- I don't know if I was misleading here. The debt of IDB is not recourse at all to IRSA. So on a standalone basis, IDB has a debt of $762 million. The rest is the consolidation into IDB of the rest of the subsidiaries. So on a consolidated basis, IDB shows all the debt from the different subsidiaries plus DIC, plus Shufersal, Cellcom, PBC, all the debt is recognized until under the level of IDB. So also from now, it's also recognized at the level of IRSA. Going to Page 20, this is the breakdown in the segments on the rental segments for IRSA Commercial Properties. So strong results as Alejandro and Daniel mentioned. Revenues keep growing very well. EBITDA keep growing very well. So the context of Argentina is still very good. Margins remained very good in shopping centers and in offices, and EBITDA breakdown, probably now with the devaluation, the office portfolio represents a little more than before. Remember that our revenues in the office segments are dollars, in the shopping centers are pesos tied to inflation. So with the devaluation, our rents in our offices in pesos' term increased. So for that reason, we increased a little more the segment in offices, and then we sold some that compensate part, that will represent a little more than the quarters before. On Page 21, this is the evolution of our operating income by segment. So rental segment, as I mentioned, keep growing very well, 47% in the semester. Sales and development grew 21%. Remember that in the previous year, we recognized that in the first six months, the sale of Madison and the sale of some floors in the Bouchard Plaza building. And in this quarter, we recognized -- sold off some of the XON building in Puerto Madero, and the Intercontinental Plaza under the level of IRSA Commercial Properties. Remember that when we sold -- remember that we transferred the office portfolio from IRSA to IRSA Commercial Properties. That transfer haven't generate any gain under the IRSA level because it was transferred to a related party. So we will recognize every time that IRSA Commercial Properties sale a building, we will recognize that effect under the IRSA level as well. Financial and others, there was a decrease of 52%. The main reason was remember that in the previous year, we recognized the sale of Madison here. So that is the main explanation of the decrease. So going to Page 22, this is the evolution of our net result. So we started with an operating income, increasing by 23% from ARS1.6 billion to ARS1.9 billion with, as I mentioned a strong result from the rental segment and sales of investment properties. Then we have the results of associates and joint ventures. Here it's important to mention that until September this year, we have been recognizing results on IDB as a market value. So our accounting method was to mark to market the shares of IDB at the price of the market and we recognized the evolution of the price of the shares in this line. So until September we recognized all the decrease in the shares of IDB, that is the ARS681 million. I guess the previous year, that was ARS400 million. Then the multiport driver of our net result this quarter was the net financial result. We have a loss this quarter -- this semester of ARS2.2 billion against a loss of 4.8 million -- ARS479 million in the previous year. So the main drivers of this ARS2.2 billion of this year is the first net FX losses. We recognized losses of ARS397 million. In the bottom right of the page, you have the evolution of the exchange rate in Argentina. So we have a devaluation that went from 9 to 13 in this semester, recognizing FX losses of ARS1.6 billion. Remember that we recognize our dollar-denominated debt every quarter according to the exchange rate fluctuation. So, we recognized this ARS1.6 billion. We sold this back on our debt, on dollar-denominated debt. Then, we were able this semester to hedge most part of our debt in the local market. So that generates a hedge gain of almost ARS911 million for this quarter. And also we have dollars -- liquidity in dollars that also generate an FX gain of ARS311 million. So the net FX losses, we were able to reduce from ARS1.6 billion to only ARS400 million. And remember that all our assets are dollar-denominated assets, and we are not recognizing any gain on the assets. So the assets, we're still maintaining the valuation at book value plus CapEx, less amortizations and depreciation. So we haven't recognized any gain on this evaluation on the asset side. Then, we have another important effect, that is the fair value of Clal, and this is important to mention. I said that we haven't recognized results yet on IDB, because we are using a gap of this three-month period. But since the decrease in the shares of Clal is a material effect for IDB, we already recognized that effect in our financial segment. So we are recognizing a loss of ARS800 million that was generated mainly because of the decrease in the shares of Clal after the cancellation of the sale process. Just to give you an idea, the offer that we received from Clal were more in the levels of ARS4.7 billion, ARS4.8 billion and the price of the market cap of the Company at market value today is ARS2.4 million. So, we are using as accounting method [multiple speakers] -- shekel, sorry is ILS4.7 billion against ILS2.4 billion. And it's important that we are using a mark-to-market on the price of the shares. So we are already recognizing the main loss of Clal. Other fair value or financial assets generated ARS180 million of loss. Net financial cost of the interest, net to gain on investment was ARS453 million loss. This increased also because of the devaluation. We are recognizing interest on a higher exchange rate and the change in valuation method of IDB and the tender offers after September was a loss of ARS389 million more. So with that, we finish the semester with a net result of a loss of ARS910 million. Attributable to our shareholders is ARS447 million and the rest is the non-controlling interest. Going to Page 23, we have the description of our debt. Our debt remained conservative. When you see IRSA standalone, we are talking about a net debt of $104 million within a structure that remember that we have the two bonds in the international market, but we have the credit from the transfer of the offices from IRSA Commercial Properties of $240 million. So on a stand-alone basis, we have only $104 million of debt at the IRSA level. On IRSA Commercial Properties, we have a net debt of $249 million of debt. It is the net debt. The total, the gross debt is $406 million. Net debt to EBITDA here -- this was calculated with an average exchange rate over the last 12 months. So that is only 1.1 times EBITDA. If you calculate on a pro forma basis after the devaluation, that is less than 1.7 times EBITDA. So this is still very conservative and we are planning to reallocate our debt as the best way in the near term. So we are analyzing the market, and we believe that Argentina will bring opportunity to refinance this again in the international market, and replace the intercompany loan that we have with the market. This is something that we plan to do in the next year. So with this, we finish the presentation. So now, we open for questions.