Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q3, 2018 IRIDEX Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct the question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Leigh Salvo, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you Chris and thank you all for participating in today's call. Joining me are Will Moore, Chief Executive Officer; and Atabak Mokari, Chief Financial Officer. Earlier today, IRIDEX released financial results for the quarter ended September 29, 2018. A copy of the press release is available on the company's website. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that management will make statements during this call that include forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws, which are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements made during this call that are not statements of historical fact, including but not limited to statements concerning our strategic goals and priorities; product development matters; sales and marketing matters including our presence at future industry events; sales trends, including our ability to secure orders from hospitals, clinics and ambulatory surgery centers; the markets in which we operate, including South Korea and China; the recall of our LIO product, its impact on our business and results on our plans to return this product to market; our ability to convert backlog orders; our guidance for 2018, including expectations for overall and product line revenues and G6 system and probe shipment levels; and our plans to provide public updates on any of these matters. All forward-looking statements are based upon our current estimates and various assumption. These statements involve material risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to materially differ from those anticipated or implied by these forward-looking statements. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these statements. For a discussion of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business, please see our most recent Form 10-K and Form 10-Q filings with the SEC. IRIDEX disclaims any intention or obligation, except as required by law, to update or revise any financial projections or forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise. This conference call contains time-sensitive information and is accurate only as of the live broadcast today, November 1, 2018. And with that, I'd like to turn the call over to Bill.

Thank you, Leigh. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. We've made significant progress on multiple important fronts over the first three quarters of this year which we believe are positively impacting our market opportunity and growth trajectory in treating patients with glaucoma. I am pleased with the solid performance of our team executing on our strategies to expand the G6 installed base and increased utilization. We are beginning to realize the benefits of investments made in building out our commercial team to increase awareness and acceptance for our G6 platform and MicroPulse technology. I'd like to take the next few minutes to provide some color on our business then we'll turn the call over to Atabak to cover the financials and guidance for this year. In summary, progress in third quarter included continued momentum in G6 systems and probe shipments. FDA clearance to the introduce our updated true focus LIO premier Laser accessory to the U.S. markets. A significant number of physician presentations around the world. Advancements in probe development particularly on G6 probes and capital raise with gross proceeds of $11.5 million to fund our growth. Total revenues for the third quarter were $11.3 million, including a 23% year-over-year increase in revenues for our G6 business. Our third quarter results are typically impacted by summer seasonality given doctors and patients vacation schedules. However, we were pleased with the performance of our G6 business as well as our retina business following the FDA clearance of our updated LIO, laser accessory. Key to our growth strategy and one of the primary goals for 2018 is to improve G6 probe utilization from our existing installed base while continuing to span shipments of nukes G6 systems across the globe. In the third quarter, we were successful in achieving year-over-year growth…

Thank you Bill. I will begin with an update on the G6 business. In the third quarter of 2018 G6 revenues increased approximately 23% compared to the third quarter of 2017. We shipped 117 G6 systems in the quarter compared to 111 in the prior year period. System ASP increased relative to the second quarter due to a lower portion of sales under our probe to purchase and trade-in programs. On the G6 pro side we shipped 10,400 probes in the third quarter of 2018 compared to 7,800 in the prior year period an increase of 33%. Probe ASP was relatively flat on a global basis compared to the second quarter. From a geographic perspective and the third quarter approximately 45% of our G6 systems shipped were in the U.S. while approximately 65% of our G6 probes were in the US. Total revenues for the third quarter of 2018 were $11.3 million, an increase of 4% compared to the third quarter of 2017, as growth in our G6 revenues was complemented by relatively flat retina product revenues. As Will mentioned, our retina product revenues benefited from the LIO FDA clearance in the U.S. and some large orders internationally that were pulled forward from the fourth quarter. In the third quarter of 2018 domestic system sales [increased] 2% to $2.5 million, while our international system sales increased 11% to $3.3 million. Our domestic system sales were primarily impacted by an increase in retina product revenues partially offset by decline in G6 system revenues. Our international system sales were primarily impacted by an increase in G6 system revenues. Recurring revenues in the third quarter of 2018 increased 1% to $5.5 million as growth in our G6 probes was partially offset by decline in our legacy probes. Gross margin in the third quarter…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from David Solomon with Roth Capital Partners. Your line is now open.

Hey guys congrats on the quarter and thanks for taking my questions. How are you guys? So I just want to start off on the G6 side. I believe you said it was possibly around 53 systems sold in the U.S. and 64. So they were owe U.S., so the trends look pretty good. So just kind of looking at guidance based on utilization rates that you've and the system sales you've had recently in the last couple quarters I'm just looking at this probe guidance and overall guidance I'm starting to think that it's hard to see how you're going to get less than the net number of probes unless you're expecting system sales to be a little bit more challenging. Is there any reason to believe that the system sales won't continue to improve?

Hi David. It's Will. There was a number of questions in there. I'm going to try to answer them. I think I do believe the system sales will continue to improve that's why Atabak raised the number up to 430 to 450. I think and then earlier question, I'm trying, I'm struggling with getting exactly what that question was. If you could give it to me again I would appreciate it.

No problem. I apologize. Well, just starting with the systems 450 would imply 109 for the world and that would be sequentially down significantly on a relative basis from the last couple of quarters, so I'm just trying to get a sense given its Q4 that I'm assuming it's supposed to be a heavier quarter historically. So I'm just trying to understand why it wasn't ready to maybe a little bit more than that on the systems side and then just going with probes just based on the number that you sell with systems there's a certain amount that kind of you factor into the number that make it seem unlikely that probes would also be as low. So I'm just trying to understand.

Yes. Okay. I got it. In regards to the OUS number, I think the OUS number is going to continue with this cadence as Atabak said there was some large orders that came in that might have – might affect Q4. Japan has been substantially strong in Q3 and I'm not sure how much more will be in Q4. There will be some but, all right. There will be some. I think from my standpoint I think the cadence of systems is fine. I expect this to be in the 430 to 450. We're trying to maintain our viewpoint of providing guidance and meeting the [beating]and there's a lot of background noise. Okay, so if we're going to be conservative and looking at these numbers and I'm perfectly satisfied where we are at the moment. In regards to the probe piece I think you have to look at the situation as we talked about seasonality. In this world the procedure is really an elective procedure and when holidays come and go those procedures slow down and so we're going to see a little bit of drop in the probe utilization and we should see some increases as we go forward.

I understand and then just regarding the data that you've been seeing and kind of trying to shift the treatment paradigm towards more moderate severity glaucoma patients, what kind of discussions or what kind of color can we have regarding the recent conference on this matter and what kind of, where do you see it going and then as well in combination which stands potentially.

Okay. So in the beginning we went after studies that dealt with safety around the late stage of glaucoma. I think we've done that. It's been validated and we're well on our way of having a large portion of that business. Once the safety profile is accepted in the marketplace the next question that starts to come forward is the question around a method of action. Those papers have started to come out. We've got one posted from University of Washington. We've got another one post coming out of a UK. Once those start to come on the horizon we're after the next piece which is how do you move this from the glaucoma specialist that treats to what I'll call the train wreck eyes to a comprehensive that's treating the healthier eyes. The risk/reward profile changes a little bit because you're treating people with the sick eyes that if it doesn't work you can and not much is lost, you can do other treatments. On the healthier eyes you want to make sure that safety profile is there. You want to make sure your doctors are explaining to other doctors on how to use it on those eyes. They have good visual acuity and that's what's happening. So we've had the first one showed up at the [ARBO] meeting earlier this year. We've had a couple more. We had one from this AAO from Mayo Clinic and University of Buffalo looking at healthy eyes, reducing the pressure but more predominantly looking at being able to reduce the pressure slightly but to eliminate drugs and maintain that controlled glaucoma at a lower cost to the patient. As those come forward you'll see the migration. I think everybody wants it to move faster including us but it takes the time to get the comprehensive doctors in line with a safety profile and the treatment of those patients. And I'm comfortable that all things we're putting in place are there. Many of the presentations in our booth that was well attended. We're on the situation of treating healthier eyes.

Excellent and then just lastly given the safety profile and the recent recall in the spent market, did you have any color there regarding conversations you're having with doctors or are you seeing potentially the G6 benefit from that in the [MIGS] market?

Well, I think that the benefit I'm seeing has to do with the power of the message of MicroPulse regardless to retina or glaucoma. Ophthalmologists talk about it. The idea about the [MIGS] situation, we're seeing – we're obviously seeing some benefits from the conversations. I don't really see that we're not in competition with Glaukos, the other devices that that may try to treat earlier. They're still invasive and the doctors are more inclined to look at what we're doing. So I think there was just more curiosity confusion but not really, they stopped doing the side pass and they're going to start doing ours. I think they stopped doing and they're trying to figure out what they're going to do next.

All right. Okay, well thanks again for taking my questions and congrats again on the quarter.

Thank you.

Thanks David.

Thank you. And our next question comes from John Block with Stifel, your line is now open.

Great. Thanks guys and good afternoon. Maybe just first question on the clinical specialists. I know it's still early days but Will what are you seeing in the accounts where they're deployed and what do you need to see if you were to decide to start moving forward with additional hires?

Okay. So what we've been seeing in the accounts that they've gone to, we've seen an increase of probe utilization in those accounts. So let's say there was an account that tried it and the outcomes were not exactly what they wanted for some reason or other they slowed down their use or maybe a doctor stops using it. We send the clinical specialists in. They go through the training and all of a sudden the probe usage goes back up again. So I think we've seen and I've got enough of those accounts now to be comfortable that the clinical specialists program it will enhance the probe utilization, we will improve the education, we will improve and get consistent outcomes and therefore the decision is being made to move forward with the clinical specialists the final outcome will be as we finish the operating plan for 2019 but I think the evidence is already there that they are an asset that hospitals are looking for. They put in a program John, that's called MD certification and so many hospitals really want their doctors to be certified on all procedures before they do it. So this is a great situation for us and the doctors are using our product.

Okay helpful and maybe just to push you a little bit on if you're able to provide specifics but can you talk about the utilization and clinical specialists accountants versus non-specialists? I guess where I'm trying to go with this is, the increase in utilization that I think we're starting to witness in the U.S. [indiscernible] Atabak is that broad-based across all accounts or is it mostly confined to those accounts where the clinical specialists have been deployed?

I think it's a broad base what we're seeing is that we have a large bucket of counselor doing everything we want, that has something to do with clinical specialists, has something to do with sales reps that are well trained and are focused on the probe utilization. The accounts that don't either weren't trained appropriately and they had an adverse event that it was transient and then they stopped using it as much and those get corrected by clinical specialists and then we'll see those go back up but lot of our sales reps do a good job on training. Some are just a little, not quite as good I'll say.

Okay. Good. And maybe one or two more for me, at AAO I saw you guys there. I saw the buzz and there was certainly a very good buzz I'd say at AAO and G6 and I don't have a great baseline going back a couple of years, so maybe you can just talk about, do you feel like this was a step function? I know you're at many meetings throughout the year. So do you feel like this was a step function versus prior meetings? Maybe you can just comment on that and the types of questions that you're getting from doctors they more I'm ready to purchase oriented types of questions if that makes sense.

I think is a step function and has been for the last couple of years since 2012 with the introduction all the questions at that point in time was what is it, how does it work, what, why do I need it to a little more curiosity last year but this year was the questions were substantially different partly due to the fact that we went to that in booth format with multiple doctors doing presentations at one time a panel. We had more than 300 doctors witness those conversations. The questions already were more buying questions, how do I do with this kind of patient, what about this one and that I believe is what we're looking at and seeing the momentum moving forward and that's the same in the U.S. as it was at the ESCRS and Vienna. The number of leads we've written in the last, those last two shows for us are basically staggering triple what we had few years ago.

It was very helpful and maybe just one more for you Atabak Mokari you are offline but the new products that you alluded to earlier, I want to make sure I've got the comments correct. I think you said you'll provide an update in early ‘19 is that correct? And then should we still think about the commercialization as ‘19 as well or is that more of a 2020 event? Thanks for your time guys.

Well, I think John early what I will start talking about it as we're ready to file with the FDA 510-Ks or letter files or whatever it's not going to be a PMA type product. Then it's really a matter of times after that. So I'm expecting some revenues in 2019. I'm expecting us to have a couple of whether it's in the disposable line or on the hardware line products coming forward in that point but your comment about revenue I think it has a major impact as we move into 2020.

Perfect. Thanks for your time guys.

Thank you and that does conclude today's question and answer session. I would now like to turn the call back to William Moore for any further remarks.

Thank you once again for joining the call today. We look forward to seeing many of you during the upcoming conferences and marketing trips. Have a great evening. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude today's program. You may all disconnect and everyone have a great day.