Good day ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Iridium Fourth Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question and answer session and instructions will be given at that time. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the floor over to Ken Levy, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thanks, Karen. Good morning and welcome to Iridium's fourth quarter 2016 earnings call. Joining me on today's call are CEO, Matt Desch; and our CFO, Tom Fitzpatrick. Today's call will begin with a discussion of our fourth quarter results followed by Q&A. I trust you've had an opportunity to review this morning's earnings release which is available on the Investor Relations section of Iridium's website. Before I turn things over to Matt, I'd like to caution all participants that our call today may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and include statements about future expectations, plans and prospects. Such forward-looking statements are based upon our current beliefs and expectations and are subject to risks which could cause actual results to differ from the forward-looking statements. Such risks are more fully disclosed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our remarks today should be considered in light of such risks. Any forward-looking statements represent our views only as of today and while we may elect to update our forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so even if our views or our expectations change. During the call, we will also be referring to certain non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Please refer to today's earnings release and the Investor Relations section of our website for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures. With that, let me turn things over to Matt.

Thanks, Ken and good morning, everyone. We have a lot of good news to report on today. As you know, we started off the year with the successful launch of our first ten Iridium NEXT satellites on January 14 and have made great progress since then in validating these new satellites. The launch was truly picture perfect. We had a clear day with moderate winds and I was happy to bear witness to this milestone have went after so many years of planning. As SpaceX's return to flight, this launch received global media coverage and was a dramatic way to start our launch campaign. The launch was a success on every measure and SpaceX placed our first batch at Iridium NEXT satellites right where we needed them. I also want to acknowledge the good work of our prime satellite contractor Thales Alenia Space. We have a great relationship with the team there and I know they were just as excited as we were given all their work and the design, test and manufacture of these Iridium NEXT satellite. They’ve continued to stay on track with production, and have already assembled more than enough satellites for our next two launches with ongoing satellite production at approximately one per week; Thales has a comfortable margin to meet our launch schedule. Speaking of schedule, as we announced last week, SpaceX is now targeting our next launch date for mid-June. But that’s later than we expected in the function of their manufacturing backlog and availability for rockets. Based on SpaceX’s production schedule, June is the earliest they could provide us with our Falcon 9. They’ve assured me that once they get through the first half of this year it should get a lot easier to get back on track to our needs. Their timeline…

Thanks, Matt and good morning, everyone. I want to start my remarks today by summarizing Iridium’s key financial metrics in the fourth quarter and provide some color on the trends we are seeing in our major business lines. Then, I’ll walk through the 2017 guidance we issued today, review the long-range outlook we affirmed this morning and wrap up with a discussion of our balance sheet and liquidity position. For the full year, we were pleased to deliver top and bottom-line growth that exceeded our strong performance from 2015. In 2016, total service revenue growth was 6% and operational EBITDA was $254.2 million. As Matt noted, this year’s results came in at the upper-end of our guided range. In the fourth quarter, Iridium reported total revenue of $107.4 million, which was up modestly from last year’s comparable period. This quarter’s performance was balanced with both commercial and government business lines contributing to our results. Government revenue and strengthen in commercial M2M drove Iridium’s growth this quarter. Operational EBITDA remains strong at $61.3 million in the fourth quarter, an 8% increase from the prior year’s quarter. Our operational EBITDA margin also strengthened this quarter at 57%, up about 400 basis points from the year ago period. This improvement primarily resulted from higher M2M and government service revenue and decrease in non-income taxes. On the commercial side of our business, we reported service revenue of $62.2 million in the fourth quarter. This was slightly ahead of the prior year’s quarter and reflected continued strength in our M2M business. Our Voice business continues to feel the effect of subscribers using fewer minutes as well as lower than usual subscriber gains on reduced handset sales. On a positive note, we were pleased with the performance of our Iridium OpenPort Service where subscribers were up…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question for today comes from the line of James Breen from William Blair.

Thanks for taking the question. Tom, can you just talk a little bit about the potential for funding? I think you just said, you need Aireon to raise capital by the beginning of 2018. What are your thoughts around that, in terms of how you can potentially fill the gap over the long-term? Thanks.

Right, so, what we said, Jim is, Aireon is working hard to get us money in 2017 and 2018. We said long ago we are not going to bet on that. We hope they do and they are making progress along those lines. What folks should know is, I mean, Aireon has contracts with air navigation service providers, government agencies or quasi government agencies denominated in multiples of the $200 million hosting fee they allot. The financing that’s envisioned is essentially a collateralization of those contracts and they are making progress down that road. So, to the extent that they accomplish that in 2017, they will be able to pay out. Our financing plan assumes that that does not happen and what we are saying here this morning is, with this arrangement with our credit facility lenders, even if Aireon doesn’t get us money at all in 2017 and well into 2018, our financing, this financing arrangement ensures our liquidity through that period. It is in until the first quarter of 2019 when these deferred payments become due that we either need the Aireon money and or we need to consider other financing arrangements. So that’s a long way off, Jim.

Okay, do you think that the funding for Aireon is dependent upon the FAA coming in sometime this year?

Depending upon, no, if FAA funding or FAA contract relevant to it, yes. But it’s not – I wouldn’t say, it’s strictly dependent on it or conditioned on it.

Then absolutely that they are focused with their advisors and they are – what Tom just mentioned was not really related to a specific timeline on the FAA. And of course, it will affect how much rates and things like that, but that isn’t really – they are making a broad based set of plans there.

Okay, and then just one follow-up on – around the CapEx side, obviously, as launch has gotten delayed, CapEx has shifted. Can you talk about is 2017 going to be the peak CapEx year with a significant portion coming off in 2018 and in fact and then down to that sort of $30 million to $50 million level in 2019?

That’s exactly how we see it, Jim.

And how much - can you remind us how much you have left from a funding perspective to get the full constellation launch?

So, I would just direct you to our financial commitments table and the KGM we lay that out.

Okay, thanks.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Ric Prentiss from Raymond James.

Thanks. Good morning guys.

Good morning, Ric.

Hi, Ric.

Hey, congrats obviously, again the first one up there definitely was an important event. I just wanted to walk through the pacing also and just make sure we understand it, so mid-June for the next – the second next satellite launch. How long after that is it expected to be drifting into planes for that next ten?

So, our second launch goes, I think, into plane three and I think we put a few of them into operation. We drift a number of them. Launch three is, say, let’s say it’s in about the August timeframe or so. That also has drifters as well. Drifters take about 11 months or so. Can’t remember the exact number of days and that kinds – those will come in – that one from probably the launch three or the ones that will come in the last, really in terms of the operational side that some of those could be spares as well. Remember that launch 8 that we added two puts five more in there and they are kind of direct insertions into the network two. So, that also hurts feed delivery and it’s why we look at a plan right now that shows everything should be done mid-2018.

Okay.

That kind of answers your question, or I know it’s a complicated, but as I said it’s – I could almost take you through a video that we’ve made that shows you exactly how many launch and drifts. It’s a very detailed plan as it’s kind of locked in really right now with our operations team and suppliers in terms of which satellites go where, but it really does create a plan, but the only thing kind of throws that off really is, for some reason, launches get really delayed. Particularly, these next two are important to us, which is why we’ve really been driving to make sure we get this next launch in June and another launch in, say, two months or so after that.

Okay. And then, from a revenue collection standpoint, Tom you mentioned, you’ve got in 2017 guidance revenue in the mid-single-digit from hosted, would that just be book revenue versus cash revenue then?

I mean, it depends, it could be both, right. It depends. We think that the – just the credit analysis on the revenue recognition look to the enterprise of Aireon which has significant invested capital, equity capital, significant contracts, et cetera and so, the credit analysis looks very good for that revenue recognition and that’s why we are including in our guidance.

Okay. And then the Thales payment delay well into 2018, is that addressing – I must have read in the KL that’s came out, but is that in the financial commitment table as well as far as the timing?

The arrangement with Thales and the lenders has not been reflected in our K because it’s not done. So what is reflected in our K is our commitments fence this arrangement.

Okay. And then when you say that you’ve addressed the debt service reserve, can you help us remember what that involves?

The debt service reserve is a – think of it almost like a sinking fund, where contractually, we were supposed to build it up to $189 million bucks and they are still some in the area of $80 million of payments that are due to go into that in 2017. The arrangement that is contemplated to spend that contribution to that DSRA thus creating liquidity and then that would be – need to be replenished by the end of the first quarter of 2019 similar to the repayment of the Thales deferral. So you think about those as creating a bridge if you will for an Aireon delay in payment, which we are not expecting, right. We are thinking Aireon has been working hard and get their financing done. We just didn’t want to bet on that until we long ago made these arrangements, start to talking about these arrangements for essentially a bridge in the event of an Aireon payment delay and so, we now have visibility with this arrangement that our liquidity is fine, absent an Aireon payment well into 2018.

Okay. And then a final question just on the financial flexibility. You mentioned suspending the preferred dividend for a few quarters. Is that going to become affect payment into few quarters, I mean, 2017 or is it flipping into 2018?

So, all I could say is that, few quarters now, but that accumulates that suspended and it all ultimately be paid, but it will be suspended for a few quarters.

Okay. Very good. Thanks.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Andrew Degasperi from Macquarie.

Great, thanks. First, congrats on the first launch. I just wanted to maybe, I might have missed this in the beginning of the call, but how many satellites have you manufactured to-date?

Yes, we are right now – I think we have done almost about 34 or something like that, as of today, 35, I don’t know exactly what the number or so. We have roughly almost 25 in storage in right now. And they are continuing to grow here through the June launch. So, I know we have started manufacturing of over half of them right now. So I think we are probably on – probably working on number 45 or so right now. So, really a big part of the program is well underway. We haven’t found really many issues in the first satellites on orbit. Everything has really been software fixable in terms of small things that we’ve found and now that we have the first satellite commercial. That’s a huge – I guess, risk retired from my mind anyway as – and by the way ahead of few great calls here in the last couple of days on satellite phones that probably were the best calls I think I’ve ever had both emotionally because it’s a satellite and it’s completes the important milestone, but they were really, really great quality calls. So, and data is slowing, and M2M calls are going through that satellite and really all the services are working. So, that’s a big step. So I think that, that also helps to really feel confident that our production is really not an issue really anymore. That probably is not going to be a – in anyway gating item to the completion of our network.

Great, and then, as a follow-up to that, I mean, would you think there is a potential point in time where you might decide to change the way you market your plans today as more next satellites get into orbit and the performance improves in both voice and data?

Yes, I don’t want to give anything away. But we’ve had some good discussions about that. I mean, the most important thing of course to the new service is that the satellites entail. So, I didn’t really talk about it as much, because I think we’ve talked about it in previous quarters. Our Iridium Certus plans are extensive as terminals are being created, as testing is going to be underway very shortly really of beta units for you this summer of devices leading up to commercial introduction of our new broadband service for the end of this year, I think is really – got the target here. So, that’s the really primary focus. Yes, it also by the way this new technology, Certus technology kind of turbo charges our machine-to-machine offerings as well, our IOT offerings in the coming years as we build new devices and we put other new capabilities at the satellites entail. Voice isn’t really where is that necessarily, you can tell on the results, but with higher quality and new products, I am sure we will continue to kind of maintain that business. I think the more emphasis is going to be around Machine-to-Machine, Certus, Aireon, and other new services that really the satellites entail.

Great, thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Jim McIlree from Chardan Capital.

Yes, good morning. Thank you. Can you talk a little bit about the Boeing transition? Any incremental expense reductions or increases because of that?

Good morning, Jim. We see the Boeing transition as accretive over the long-term as operational efficiencies can be garnered. I would say it’s immaterially so, in 2017.

Okay, thank you and then…

Just to add to that, I mean, it really is about more we have a lot more control really than we did before and there is some efficiencies as we think about how to run our network long-term. We really know how the combined operations team all under one head that we can think more creatively about how we deploy people and resources and manage that and move people around and I am – I think it’s going to be positive as it goes over forward. But it’s not – didn’t do it primarily for – I would say financial reasons directly.

Got it. Thank you. And so, as the new constellation comes in, what happens to the old satellites? Is there a financial obligation that you will face in order to retire those mechanically, what happens to the old satellites?

Well, mechanically, it doesn’t cost anything to eliminate the satellites. It’s really sending commands to the satellites to deploy all the rest of their fuel which most of them have a lot of fuel still to deboost themselves deorbit over coming months or about a year. And so, we have a plan. We are going to keep them in orbits below our current constellation. Some of them – the best ones will probably be kept up there and I would expect that we will even start the deorbit process maybe later on this year, first part of the first groups of satellites. And over time, we will remove all the satellites from orbit, say in the – by about the 2019 timeframe. I know, I’ve getting a lot of Twitter responses about our Iridium flares that won’t be – won’t happen any longer after that, which I am sorry. But we really don’t want to face any longer than necessarily. So there is not - financial aspects to that. No, I mean, we have commitments in terms of the deorbit policy that when deorbit them, that we will take them out of space quickly, really, most of them really within a one year period and that’s just good housekeeping practices really for space and in our orbit.

Okay. That’s great. Thanks a lot.

Okay, thanks, Jim.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Chris Quilty from Quilty Analytics.

Thanks, Tom. Couple of quick follow-ups, just on the Boeing. I can’t remember the time that you guys actually brought them in and I am just thinking in terms of SG&A, when we look at the Q4 SG&A, is that a good indication sort of the runrate on a go forward basis? Or were there other items in Q4?

So, Boeing would have been in cost of service, that’s where the – its geography is, and what you’ll see, not much change, as I said to Jim, immaterially accretive in 2017. The geography is going to change a little bit in that. Boeing was and will continue to show in cost of service though overhead will kind of move out of SG&A into cost of service and so you are not going to – I would think 2017 SG&A will be up sort of – ventilation effect over 2016. We are going to see a big change in year-over-year between 2016 and 2017 is in cost of service, really not owing to Boeing, but owing to the fact that we’ll start expensing the orbit insurance associated with NEXT which is part of our $3 billion plan for NEXT. But under GAAP, that portion of the insurance is expense. So you will see that in cost of service and we will carve it out for EBITDA.

Okay. Speaking of carving out, the hosted payload revenues, are you going to give us a separate line item on that, so we can track it?

It will certainly be easy to follow, yes.

Okay. And you mentioned a forecast for capitalized interest, I just missed it for 2017?

I think we quote 85 or 86.

Okay. That’s what I thought. And when you mentioned for 2017, solid double-digit growth in M2M was that subs or revenue?

Subs, subs.

Subs. Gotcha. And so, the other question on the EMSS contract discussion, typically lot of that bidding proposal work is pretty expensive stuff. You don’t expect that to have a substantial impact on SG&A this year with those negotiations ongoing?

No, we did not.

Okay. And can you remind us, I mean, I know it’s pretty hard to handicap what the next five year contract might be, but perhaps what services you expect to have available for the new five year contract that were not included in the old ones.

So, I think our primary focus is going to be on the – since the subscribers have grown dramatically across the number of services that are in the contract, M2M continues to grow well. One that is going to – I think grow a lot faster starting next year is DTCS as they complete the global services improvements that they wanted to make and I think that they are going to start deploying that more effectively starting next year. So all the same basic services, there is a brand new secure voice devices that will be utilized. So, that’s going to be I think the core of the contract and be more of a comparison between the last five years and the forward going five years. Where I think things maybe outside that contract. Iridium Certus is likely going to be sort of a separate vehicle. We have never really had any broadband business with the US government, but Iridium Certus has a whole lot of advantages for the government in terms of being a secure private, almost broadband L Band service that has higher speeds and things that they are currently deploying today. And discussions are very positive in terms of it being a valuable new capability. But we would not include that in part of the EMSS contract because we can’t make it a fixed cost. It has to be a pay it you go kind of service, because that’s the way broadband works. Other things like SGL which they are quite interested in satellite time and location, also will probably be outside the core EMSS contract, but that’s part of the discussion that are underway with them right now.

Gotcha, and you mentioned Sittellas, do you have any updates there on the commercial aspect of that business and how they are progressing?

Yes, they recently got some additional investments from a company called Royea which is a pretty good size company and I think their partnership I think will bear fruit as they put their products together and supply services to the – like in-build in microcell market that wants to eliminate having to run GPS antennas and pay for that sort of expense. That sounds like a really smart commercial business, but there are a lot of other commercial applications in cyber security protecting assets and a number of other things that they are talking about. So, I have heard good things. I am not as close to that because that’s really Sittellas and Royea kind of working through that right now. But that seems positive. Most of our support with them is more around the government applications and those are encouraging as well as I think that they are able to do some things that the governments really need done right now as it relates to protecting GPS infrastructure in time and that sort of things.

Okay, and a final question here. The in-reach product, which tends to be one of your higher volume M2M products, can you give us any update on either what your partner there may be doing with it, line extensions, geographic expansions, and whether you are looking at other potential customers that might want to integrate that capability?

Yes, I can tell you, first of all Garmin which requires the in-reach product is, I think really pleased with what they’ve got there. I know that they are just been starting to announce a whole new set of products that are coming out. I’ve had a chance to look at sort of the pipeline of products coming out from the technology they have planned and it’s quite exciting in terms of where they are going with it, much smaller products that offer a different level of services. So, I think first of all, the product set is great and it looks super going forward. You are right. They are really one of our highest volume machine-to-machine partners in 2016 and I expect that to continue in 2017 and 2018. I do know that we’ve had some discussions with them about expanding into specific regions, but I think you really should get that information from them. I don’t still believe that in 2016 though our results that we’ve reported almost has any of that expanded distribution in them. I think that’s more of a 2017, 2018 event as they seem professional about how they roll this thing out into their expanded distribution around the world. So, I expect between new products and expanded distribution that that will continue to be one of our largest subscribers – partners really.

And I guess, an extension of that, so it’s not the same question, but, you’ve talked about the automotive OEM. Is there any…

The concept of a connected car is from a satellite is interesting and I know some people are talking about showing what they can connect to a car. That is not going to be, I think a big market for satellite companies for the next couple of years, just because it takes so long to embed things into cars. We have several partners. One in particular I know that is going after that market segments that may have some success there down the road, but I don’t think it’s going to affect our near-term revenue just as it takes the long to embed that technology. And I’ve always been pretty public about, I really think the bigger market there is more in kind of safety services to automobiles, things like airbag deployments on a global basis, software over the air, firmware over the air updates for warranty improvements. The kind of use that’s we are going to replace T-Mobile in your Lexus isn’t going to happen anytime soon with satellites. So, I think it’s going to be specialty applications kind of evolving from – right now today where we have connected trucks, that’s a big market for us in the transportation sector as many, many trucks have Iridium connections on them right now for driver efficiencies and for information about the location and making sure that they are not speeding and all that sort of things. But it’s really more of an extension at the higher value applications of vehicles, where I know some people want to talk about the sexy nature of a mass market to vehicles, but I just don’t think that’s going to happen with any technology really for the next couple of years.

‘ Gotcha. Thank you.

Yes, thanks, Chris.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Spinola from Wells Fargo.

Tom, I was hoping you could clarify a couple of comments you made earlier. I think you said that in 2016, commercial voice subs grew by 1% year-over-year. Is that correct?

That sounds right to me.

Okay, because I – so, voice and data subs toll were up about 0.5% and I think you said that OpenPilot subs grew 15%. I was just trying to figure out what was the offset to that in the voice and data?

I think that voice and data is our external reporting. So that is the combination of – think of it as handset and OpenPort. And the reason that OpenPort 15% doesn’t move the needle that much is because there is not that many subs, it’s something like 7000 subs versus 350000 subs.

Right. Okay.

We should clarify that there is actually three things in there. I mean, they are almost, I think you should remember that we also have our data modems, our circuit switch data modems that are used in aircrafts and ships and have been declining as people move to OpenPort and other broadband technologies. That was a narrowband circuit switch service that really been a trend for a number of years as people move away from those early maritime systems into higher speed services. And so, you got a lot of moving that affects in that voice and data line on our sheet here.

But the way we think about it why we call the OpenPort 15% growth is, you know that in that product and maritime, we had a couple of years where we had some quality issues. They are well behind us and that product is really resonating. That’s important not because it nets down to a 1% growth in the overall external category. But that is going to be our entry, right. As we are selling Certus, we were going in with a lot of credibility in maritime that we can make a product that really resonates as V-SAT backup. And so that’s kind of – that the setting the table if you will for our entry into maritime applications. That was the point of why we are pleased with that rate of growth here and that represents a nice turnaround from what we had but also it should portend good things as we think about rolling out Certus, Andrew.

Yes, it makes sense. Could you just expand a little bit on the revenue result in the voice and data segment in the quarter? What were some of the pressures that led to the decline?

So, what I would say is, it’s not a typical of what we’ve seen historically. We have a profile of L Band transceivers wherein there is a migration away from that technology to fleet broadband or OpenPort because it’s much more economical. And so we’ve seen pressure on voice usage or usage that is – I would say acute in these L Band transceivers versus 25% of our installed base. But also just usage by handheld users is declining over time. So we – for sometime have experienced and have talked about a declining slope of the usage line, right. What we’ve seen in the last couple of years is compounding that kind of downward pressure is that our subscriber net activations in our legacy telephony product had been less than they have been historically and we trace that right back to the low rate of sales in handset that we think has that its origin is largely that the strength of the US dollars. So, I don’t see – in the quarter any kind of acceleration of that trend. It’s kind consistent though, the year-over-year numbers might be up a bit, we don’t see that as a kind of a marked change in what we view as somewhat of a long-term trend.

Yes, I agree with Tom. I mean, I think you agree it, just don’t think fourth quarter really went along, in fact, I saw we had – we always have a little bit of a decline in subs for example in the fourth quarter, we had less decline in the fourth quarter than we did in the previous year-over-year quarter from a year ago. So, it’s our winter season. That’s a slowdown. It’s a little lumpy and I wouldn’t take much into the fourth quarter numbers.

Yes, if you look at the ARPU decline, it’s like a buck year-over-year. If you go back a few years ago, we were experiencing $2, $3 year-over-year declines there as the usage was declining at a faster rate. So, if anything, I think the – I am encouraged by the year-over-year performance in ARPU and voice and data.

Got it. And last question for me, just from sort of a higher level, I think you mentioned that you expect some revenue contribution from Certus in 2018 and I am wondering if we can get more granular and you can explain to me how many satellites you need to have in service to have to be able to offer Certus? I guess, part of my thinking was that, maybe it would be all of the satellites so that the last launch was the middle of 2018, there would probably a couple months until everything was in service and then, maybe even some testing beyond that with the new hardware et cetera as everything gets put together. So maybe, you can help me understand when revenue can start to be – when we can start to see revenue? What milestones have to be hit?

Yes, so, there is not a specific number, but I think our plans are more aggressive than what you are describing there. Our plans with our VAMs - for VAMs that have been selected to bill products, there is going to be products available this year and which includes even more products to pay – allow them to operate on the new speeds with new satellites over them and existing speeds, say, OpenPort speeds when you have an older satellite under them. So there is a lot of value that new product will bring into it and really given that you put that on a ship on in January of 2018, it’s bringing value to the ship owner either standalone or combined with a V-SAT and it only gets better literally month-by-month as the network continues to evolve. I am expecting with the kind of launch plan we have this year that they will be almost half the satellites that are out there maybe a little less than that. So it will be a pretty robust Certus service even at the end of this year and then it will evolve very quickly and by the way, since these terminals that are being built will be upgradable to double their speed really is going to be to firmware really without hardware changes after the network is complete in the middle of 2018 or when that capability is completed in 2018. They are just going to get better and better over time. So, the VAMs that we’ve had are pretty excited about the opportunities that Certus brings already in 2018 and there will be a lot of testing here in 2017 throughout this year of Certus on the existing satellite with these terminals to make that happen. The other thing then is, we are going to be signing up new service providers to deliver those services and we’ve had very good discussions with them. Those contracts are going to start rolling in here over the next couple of months. So, SPs will be also be selected this year to be selling that in 2018. So I am expecting that we will have revenues in 2018 starting early on and ramping up to the year.

Okay, great. Thank you very much.

Thanks.

Thank you and our last questions for today comes from the line of Paul Penney from Northland Capital.

Good morning guys. Just a couple quick questions. On FAA, has the tone or the taste of interaction with them changed given the Trump administration, vocal criticisms of the current “inferior ticking off”?

Yes, what you are referring to is the airline executive meeting a couple weeks ago, where he was mentioning and there was a lot of discussion about improving the air traffic control network. I think – look, I think that the change in administration is probably a positive thing overall in terms of the – for space-based ADS-B not just in the FAA, but in the Department of Transportation and in the administration. I think the two bigger things that are really affecting sort of the FAA’s view, the first one is the fact that it’s now part of what they call their next-gen advisory council process. That’s the knack as they call it, is where all their customers come in and provide them specific guidance about what they want out of the next-gen system. And right now, Aireon space-based ADS-B is deep in that process right now and indications are positive that the airlines has done all their own modeling. Really do see the benefits and they are driving that and that FAA is seeing the benefits as well through that NAC process. The other thing I think that’s going to really affect the FAA is when they start testing starting this weekend, I mean, or maybe they might not be involved this weekend, but over the coming weeks as live data is presented not just for the FAA. But for customers all around the world, it makes it real when they see airplanes that they’ve never seen before and places they’ve never seen before and I think that will also be a driver for adoption by the US. But I think the international business is going extremely well. The FAA is on their own timeline and are doing well. The Trump thing doesn’t hurt, but I think it’s - a number of other activities that are probably more important.

Okay, great. Last question on margins. You are 59% margins now in 2019 in a world where we have all the satellites up and you should have a string of new business coming in, what’s to prevent margins from going above and beyond your 60% target?

So, Paul, 60% is in 2019, we’ve said for a long time. There is nothing to prevent on a year-on-year margin growth, all other mature satellite players that have 70%, 80% margins, it’s just operating leverage and you are right to observe that that should continue into over time.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Are there any other questions?

That concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn things back over to you for any closing comments.

Great, well I appreciate all of you being on, the quarter won’t be long before we are talking about first quarter. So I’ll see you very soon. Thanks.