Good day, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Iridium First Quarter 2012 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Steve Kunszabo, Head of Investor Relations. You may begin.

Good morning, and thanks for joining us. I'd like to welcome you to our first quarter of 2012 earnings call. Joining me on the call this morning, our CEO, Matt Desch; and our CFO, Tom Fitzpatrick. Today's call will begin with a discussion of the 2012 first quarter results followed by Q&A. I trust you've had an opportunity to review this morning's earnings release, which is available on the Investor Relations section of Iridium's website. Before I turn things over to Matt, I'd like to caution all participants that our call this morning may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and include statements about our future expectations, plans and prospects. Such forward-looking statements are based upon our current beliefs and expectations and are subject to risks which could cause actual results to differ from the forward-looking statements. Such risks are more fully discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our remarks today should be considered in light of such risks. Any forward-looking statements represent our views only as of today and while we may elect to update forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so even if our expectations or views change. During the call, we'll also be referring to certain non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Please refer to today's earnings release in the Investor Relations section of our website for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures. With that, let me turn things over to Matt.

Thanks, Steve, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us. This morning, we announced first quarter numbers that showed we're off to a solid start for the year and tracking towards our full year 2012 financial targets. I'll spend my time with you today outlining key competitive changes to our markets, taking you through our strategic initiatives and updating you on the progress of our Iridium NEXT build and hosted payload opportunity. Then Tom will take you through our financial results and guidance before we wrap up. Let me start by immediately addressing the product recall we had last week for our Iridium Extreme phone, which had impacted our first quarter financials. The bottom line is that the technical problem with our unit's -- with the unit's antenna is understood and has been corrected. Our customers' handsets will be exchanged by the end of the second quarter, and we don't believe this issue will affect our equipment sales for the full year. Now Iridium Extreme is a great product and our partners continue to tell us that their customers love the device. And while I'm obviously disappointed we had this issue, I think we've addressed it appropriately and we'll have it behind us quickly. So back to our business and continued growth. The core principles that set our business strategy apart and sustain our many competitive advantages still stand. We like our markets, and aside from what we believe is a temporary slowdown in the government voice business, they all continue to grow rapidly. Our current network is performing well, remains healthy and thanks to its flexible design, is expected to stay that way to our Iridium NEXT launch. We have a great partner Ecosystem that continues to innovate around our products and extend our reach to customers in a…

Thanks, Matt, and good morning, everyone. We reported first quarter 2012 results that were in line with our expectations and demonstrate a continued progress in several key areas. I'd also Matt's assessment that the quality of our service revenue profile and expanding service portfolio are the keys to our ongoing success. I think of that in these simple terms. We're the only company in our space developing a third-generation M2M device that works everywhere in the world, with a network that's particularly well-suited for this type of data traffic. We stand out in the voice business with advanced handsets and a multi-device strategy that includes personal communicators and accessories. We're the only business developing and testing a global push-to-talk capability for our U.S. government customers, which will ultimately leverage for additional service revenue in the commercial business. We're the only truly global near real-time option for the aviation community in monitoring aircraft over oceans and remote regions, a key competitive advantage that really excites us as we continue to develop the business model for this hosted payload opportunity - As I've said before, it's meaningful to me to be part of an innovative company that delivers cutting-edge solutions. We're making commerce possible all over the world and in some cases, saving lives and supporting national security objectives. Onto our results now before I take you through our firm 2012 outlook. Iridium reported first quarter total revenue of $93.5 million, and operational EBITDA of $43.9 million, representing growth of 2% in both cases from last year's comparable period. Our operational EBITDA margin was 47% for the first quarter, which was unchanged from the year ago period. First quarter net income was $12.4 million. This compares to net income of $8.3 million for the year ago quarter. First quarter 2012 net income…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from James Breen of William Blair.

Just a couple of questions. One, Matt, can you just talk about the timing of the approval of the air traffic control system upgrade? It seems like obviously that may take a couple of years to implement, but it sounds like there's a potential for you guys to get revenue sooner as some of these systems get put in place ahead of the actual true implementation of it. And then secondly, can you talk about the M2M space in general? It seems like you had good data sub-growth there. Do you think that these subs are coming from customers of other satellite providers or is it overall an increase in this -- in the market size because of the shipping companies and so forth are becoming more cognizant of the fact that using these types of devices makes them more efficient?

So Jim, on the first question, you were referring to the Aviation Safety Services approval for our systems to be installed in aircraft, is that what you're referring to?

Yes, correct.

Yes. So I mean, just for everyone's knowledge, we did get approval for the data link component of that and are seeking voice approval here this year that would allow Iridium systems to go on commercial aircraft, primarily long-haul commercial aircraft to replace or augment the high frequency communication systems that they use today because we're lighter, we work more -- actually, we work more effectively everywhere and we're a lot more cost effective to maintain and operate. And so everyone -- especially since the data link portion is a very important piece, everyone is now looking to put us into airlines soon and that has progressed. I think that you won't probably see a big impact in revenues necessarily this year because it's still very early days. I think that starts to gather momentum over time. Nice thing is those systems are good ARPU generators, higher than probably our average ARPU because they're used fairly often and they're used all day long typically and everyday of the month on most of these aircrafts. So they're nice systems, not high volumes necessarily but an important piece and it does put us into the cockpit of long-haul airplanes, which frankly want to do many more things in the future. They want to support things like electronic flight bags, updating flight plan information and charts and have other things that they want to do and that all complements of course of our long term position in the GA, in corporate and other places where we've been. Your second question was about M2M subs and our growth and where is it coming from, is it new growth or is it taking away. I think it's primarily new growth. It's a very early stages of an expanding market right now in M2M. it's an area that people are realizing they can get lots of efficiencies, cost savings, revenue generation et cetera by tracking assets, by tracking things, by controlling remote machinery, by all kinds of things that you can do with M2M. I think we're really early stages. Most of this is I think new business. I mean, there is some takeaways, especially as our device costs have gotten lower and lower and really because we were sort of the high end of the market sector now we can kind of serve almost the whole market. But it's a pretty big market and so I really think there's room for everybody there.

And just on the first point on -- in the cockpit of commercial planes, I think there's also been -- Congress approved spending bill, so for the future upgrade of the ATC system in general. And I think there's been discussion about moving from the current STARS radar-based platform to something that's more satellite based just increasing efficiency, being able to land planes and handle traffic of the airport and so forth. Is that something that is longer term but it seems like you set up well for that if you already have approval to get into the plane's cockpit.

Well, what's that about is often called NextGen, at least that's what FAA calls it, and they're building ground towers across the countries as the country is actually partially built out with these NextGen receivers that can replace radar, particularly in remote areas and allow aircraft to be controlled more efficiently, be able to operate point-to-point and self-manage, et cetera, save a lot of costs. And yes, it's good news that, that continues on. That's actually more aligned while we're consistent with that with what we do in terms of our services in the airplane. That really is more aligned with what we're doing and talking about it relates to a hosted payload. So when we talk about a global aviation monitoring business, what we're really talking about is taking that technology or that capability that's being deployed for threshold services and extending that around the world, allowing surveillance of aircraft over oceans, remote areas, places where they can build those ground systems, not that unlike what -- how we compliment really the cellular phone systems of the world that cover 10% or less of the world and we cover the other 90%. So it's kind of consistent with sort of our overall business model of complementary and important and growing capability. And so yes, we are going to take I think advantage of that and you'll see a lot more of that soon.

Our next question comes from Jonathan Atkin of RBC Capital Markets.

Yes, a couple of questions. First, some of your peers have diverse government revenue streams, not just the U.S., and I wonder if you can just kind of recap to what extent there's opportunities to grow with foreign governments as a segment. And then with regards to the product recall, I wondered if there's going to be any charges taken in second quarter or were the 1Q charges kind of the extent of it?

I'll take the second question first. The charge we took in the first quarter, we believe address the problem in its entirety and we don't expect a charge in the second quarter.

Yes. And to answer the first question, we are used by governments all around the world right now and really quite a broad number of just about every government, whether it's a military, but also first responders, fire, police to Europe and Asia and South America. All kinds of governments use our services. But they all really flow through our commercial gateway, so it's difficult to necessarily pinpoint exactly what our revenue stream is from them, except to the extent we know, which partners serve those customers and have discussions with them and often have detailed discussions with their end customers when they bring us into it. And yes, there is still a lot of interest in not just this expanding portfolio of products that we have today. There's a lot of interest, for example, in Netted Iridium and where that is, people want that capability. A lot of a machine-to-machine interest, especially as it relates to unattended sensors and blue force tracking and those sorts of things. A lot of them are able to encrypt their services and provide a kind of similar capability that the U.S. government is getting as well. So it's hard to describe what that capability is of course, but it is -- we're very diversified around the world and while we focus on the U.S. government because we can both define its revenue and because it's sort of the strategic private network it employs, I really do think it's a global opportunity for us.

And then for Tom, if you assume the second quarter EBITDA takes a similar kind of trend that we saw last year from 1Q to 2Q, it looks like the EBITDA growth rate in second half would need to accelerate into the double digits. And so I'm just wondering, to hit your guidance, I'm wondering what your comment would be there and what gives you the confidence that you're reiterating your guidance. And then just from a housekeeping standpoint, what's the very first year that the hosted payload would hit the P&L?

I think the latter question, I think we'll talk more about that when we get in June. I think that's really what the focus of that should be about and we should really, probably save that question for that. That's -- that will be an important part of what we describe in that way. But Tom, do you want to talk about that first part?

Sure, yes. I mean, as you know, Jonathan, the business is inherently seasonal and the first quarter is -- tends to be the low point if you look at last quarter or last year, for example. It's just the effect of seasonality because of the usage in the spring and summer months just spikes up. And so our guidance is based on our funnel of activity, the growth in most notably machine-to-machine. We see significant growth in our recurring service revenues and then kind of the expense front. While the first quarter is kind of seasonally low, it tends to be seasonally high in terms of expenses. I think we noted last quarter that SG&A was low in the mid-15 range at $18.2 million or whatever it was, $18.1 million. This quarter, it's high. So we see that down sequentially. Similarly, cost of service was a bit high in the quarter. Our Boeing activity tends to be not even through the year and so we have visibility into that expense moving down. So it's really the combination of all of those factors that underlie our affirmation of guidance.

Our next question is from Jim McIlree of Dominick and Dominick.

Matt, you talked a little bit about potentially doing carried interest on the hosted payload. Could you expand on that, as well as indicate whether or not you're still comfortable with the $200 million or so from a potential hosted payload deal or end? And then lastly on that, would you be looking at putting your own cash into some sort of deal, potentially with a venture where you would be a partner in that?

Yes. You're going to steal all our thunder Jim, for June here, if you're not careful here. But those are reasonable questions and you're directionally I think correct at least in terms of how we're looking at setting up a business that truly could exploit this unique opportunity. I don't want to go on to too much detail about the details of it right now because obviously we're working those out and want to make sure we have a -- we're very clear about that. But as we said, we do believe there is what I described a real estate element to this transaction, which means hosting fees during that timeframe of building up Next, as well as both -- as what we've always expected to be data fees for this payload, as well as, in this case, you call it carried interest, I call it a retained interest or at least a profit out of the service and the unique nature of what that would be. And that's kind of a new piece of all this, obviously, is that we've become encouraged enough throughout this opportunity, the uniqueness of it, the fact that it can't be really done other ways, our partner's enthusiasm, customers' enthusiasm that says, we probably want to be part of this long term as well. So that will be all part of our job, is to really explain what that all that means due in June and we'll do that and I think that's the time really to answer all of those other questions and we need to provide you as much information as we can then.

Okay, great. And Tom, is it -- are we going to see a big ramp in CapEx for the last 3 quarters of the year. And then secondly, there's a very large increase in accounts payable quarter-to-quarter, what was that about?

I think the payable increase was just -- there was a payment in Thales sitting in accounts payable. And then -- and swings in accounts payable is going to be very susceptible to where we sit with the Thales vendor. And CapEx, let me come back to you on the CapEx question. I'd hold that up. Let me take another question and I'll come back.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from Chris Quilty of Raymond James.

So as you mentioned, probably a good opportunity with Iridium's Inmarsat's price increase to pick up some customers there. However, is also true that a lot of those customers are sort of locked in to Inmarsat because of their position as the only certified GMDSS provider in the market. So I guess my question for you, where are you at in the process of becoming certified for safety services?

Yes, we're committed to going after that. We believe the opportunity is probably the largest it's ever been for us. I would say, when I got here 5 years ago, 6 years ago, it was pretty clear that even if we've pursued it aggressively, it would be difficult to achieve just because of sort of the political dynamics around the world. We've demonstrated, we can break into that kind of regulatory environment with the aviation safety services approval, and maritime I think is going to be similar. Some things that will have to happen to make that occur, it isn't really technical so much and that we can, I believe, resolve. It's just that those rules were written around a system that's very different than ours and will have to go through the process to educate why our system is not is only -- is not equally reliable and reliant, but actually even maybe even more so in many ways than the current systems that are -- the system that's being deployed today. That isn't a real revenue generator, but I agree is a nice mark to have. It's a big, big check mark you can have and to give your customers and partners confidence that whatever happens, you can serve that need because it's almost more of a cost than it is a revenue generator. It hasn't really affected -- you can tell our growth to date, don't think it will necessarily in the future, but we are -- we believe it's the right thing to do to continue to pursue it. But I don't think it's going to happen this year, but we'll keep focused on for next year or the year after.

Any chance with the Iridium's Inmarsat customers writing a letter of complaint to the International Maritime Organization that they might speed up the process?

Well, I hope so. I mean really don't think that there's -- we're getting a lot of support and encouragement across the board not just from our customers but from others in the industry who are in the maritime space who believe an independent partner like us is the right thing to have. So we're -- I expect a lot of help.

Great. Can you talk about the new, I call it the 9603, your new M2M devise in terms of timing and whether you might have any customers holding back as they wait for that since you've already announced it?

The 9603 -- I mean, the 9602, which is driving all our growth is quite small and everyone was very pleased with its size. The 9603 is something like 70% even smaller. So it really does -- for some kinds of applications, it really drive potentially even more growth because of -- or more innovation at least, because things like consumer devices and really small asset tags and that sort of thing are possible. It's very imminent. It's almost ready to go out the door from a manufacturing perspective. We've -- our early partners know its capabilities and they're starting the process of designing it in. It does not replace our 9602 because there's a lot of people who've designed the 9602 and we've been getting -- there's a lot of those, so it sort of adds to our portfolio, but that's our strategy, is to keep providing more ways for people to innovate and put us into their networks. I don't believe there's really a wait for it. Most people find the 9602 perfectly acceptable. It's probably more of a new category of applications that I think that it may enable as opposed to somehow a replacement of the existing systems that work very well.

Can you give an update on progress you're making with OEMs as well as the sort of growth you're seeing out of some of your new consumer tracking devices?

Yes, I mean, OEMs continue to expand. I mean, I would -- I think I used to call that a strategy. You got to be careful not to let them expand in places where they don't need to expand, but we continue to have people being attracted and want to become value-added resellers and technology partners, et cetera. So the total count continues to grow. We are seeing some new partners, particularly like in the heavy industry space, the one we probably hadn't really addressed so much in the past, large equipment that we're now cost affective to be able to track and I think that will be an interesting growth space, as you said. Just had a detailed review of the consumer space. I think that's poised to really grow, particularly with some products that will be announced soon in that space. I think our partners there still feel very good about their prospects of a two-way personal communication and tracking devices. There's a number of those in that category, but a couple there really now very cost effective. We're going to be at CTI, I'm sure that's going to be part of the buzz with some of our partners at that point because there's a lot more intersections than ever with us in the consumer mobile space with -- around M2M because there's a lot of activity there but we're kind of converging with some of the carriers, some of the suppliers in that space and traditionally just focused on threshold. M2M now focused on adding a satellite component to that and realizing we're probably the best choice for that to be added. So we're still feeling very good about our long term growth prospects and that we're still very early days in this whole machine-to-machine world.

Okay. And final question for Tom, OpEx was up about 10% ex D&A in the quarter, a little bit more than I was looking for. Is that a good level on a go-forward basis or were there some one-time items in there or seasonal items that impacted Q1 on both SG&A and R&D?

Yes, and I wouldn't call them one-time. If you look at last year's sequential quarters, Chris, you'll see that SG&A was at its highest point in the first quarter and so we think you're going to see something similar here this year. You'll see SG&A move down through the year. In the first quarter we always have our partners conference and we take that charge, we take that -- recognize that expense in the quarter when it happens. So if first quarter tends to be higher, similarly some payroll related taxes to access and bonus type things tend to hit more unevenly in the first quarter. So our expectation is that moves down and similarly in cost of service, the Boeing expense was heavy in the quarter and we see that moving down.

And the R&D plan for the year?

That's going to be a little -- that's going to be a bit more episodic. Over the course of the year, 5.7 feels a bit high. I think you might see that come down a tad.

So full year around the 2011 level, higher or lower?

I would say in the area of the 2011 level.

The R&D expense is typically -- especially, since we use a lot of outside contractors, as well as some internal people, it sort of depends on what we're spending on that quarter. It's not necessarily a run rate of x number of bodies doing the same amount of work every year like maybe a traditional supplier might have. So -- but I do think Tom's comment here are instructive.

And then could I come back to Jim's question on CapEx? Jim, just let me answer your question directly. So the cash CapEx and the source and use of $35 million-ish is low. If you take that number and add to it the PP&E received but not yet paid and this kind of goes through your question of what's in accounts payable. That's $107 million kind of number, so it's 140 plus, you won't see us ramp up from the $140 million level, you certainly will see us ramp up from the cash CapEx of $35 million.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from Chris King of Stifel, Nicolaus.

Just 2 quick questions for you. First of all, on the M2M consumer ARPU metric, you guys have been flat for well over a year, certainly around the $18 range. Obviously, you have a lot of puts and takes there with respect to some of the new products that you guys have launched and will continue to launch over the coming quarters there. Just was wondering if you could give us a sense whether you expect that ARPU number to remain flattish for the remainder of 2012 with all of those various changes taking place there. And then secondly, just with the Iridium Extreme issue. Just wanted to get your take on second quarter impacts and whether you see any meaningful or measurable impact with respect to voice ARPUs and voice usage or anything along those lines with respect to losing those handsets at least for a brief period of time.

I'll take the first question. We've guided and we say in our public filings that we expect M2M ARPU to move down over time as we take on different applications that have very high volumes but lower ARPU per user. And so that is our expectation and we think about ARPU as moving down over the course of the year as we continue to add significant volume to customers.

Yes. And to the second question, the number of units in -- well, the Iridium Extreme has been very popular and I think it will continue to be popular. As I've said, we're going to not only replace the units we think in the second quarter that were affected but still continue to grow new orders because there's still additional demand as it's rolling into the second quarter. But in terms of like ARPUs, we think that we'll be able to replace most of those units literarily on a days or very -- a week or 2 kind of basis for most customers. And so -- and overall, the total number of units we're talking about affected is a very small percentage of our overall. I mean, still a fairly small percentage of our overall voice subscribers. So in terms of its overall impact on ARPU, I'd be surprised that it has a very material impact in terms of second quarter. So I don't really think there's that much impact.

And then just a follow-up on the consumer ARPU issue, so I'm clear. So you do expect that $18 number to trend down albeit slightly by the end of 2012?

That's correct.

And by the way, you've used the term a couple of times, consumer ARPU. I would call that commercial ARPU because we sort of identify the consumer space sort of being a subset. Within the commercial space, there's an industrial segment and a foreign military segs. There's a lot of other segments, none of which really we really -- we describe. But long term, I mean, ARPU is expected in our plan to decline as we get into more and more applications that are -- that don't need as much data, but as I've described before to the market, ARPU is sort of a misleading term, it's not really a parallel for the terrestrial world for us because incrementally, each of those revenues adds to the bottom line. They're not really related so much to cost, so it's not a direct comparison. But of course, if it's long term and you're modeling, you can't -- we're surprised actually still that the number continues to hold so steadily. But I'm very pleased that it is.

And then I guess just one more quick question with respect to OpenPort, arguably a little bit of a more cyclical business there at least for a portion of it. Have you guys seen anything from a macroeconomic perspective that would give you more or less confidence, my guess, throughout the remainder of the year?

Yes, look, the shipping industry is not doing very -- hasn't done very well for a while and it's not necessarily in great shape. But I think overall competitive dynamics and the fact that we are into the space with sort of a new products for new builds and new systems at the right time really kind of overshadow that for us and allow us to continue to grow, which probably sets us apart from others. And as I said, the competitive dynamics are only helping right now in terms of people wanting to work with us even more. It's been good timing that we've introduced the Iridium Pilot just at the right time and that are doing well. So that sort of adds to our overall confidence in that market and yes, it continues to grow.

Our next question is from Andrew DeGasperi of Macquarie.

Just call for -- I'm putting in for Amy Yong. But I just had a question on the subscriber equipment. I noticed you had a tough comp year-over-year because of the bulk sales from last year. I was wondering if -- is that going to be repeated sometime this year or is -- should we see subscriber trend sort of go -- sort of normalized rate?

It's not subscriber trend, it's equipment sales. And so last year, we put out incentives in -- to cause RFPs to take delivery early in 2011. No such incentive existed in '12. So '11 equipment sales we believe were stronger in the first quarter. But we believe that on the full year, equipment sales and margin from equipment sales is going to be in line with what we saw in 2011. So that's equipment sales, I guess, if there's a subscriber question, maybe you could rephrase it because I'm not...

No, no, I meant equipment sales, sorry. And then just one follow-up on the -- have you been getting more color from Inmarsat's partners regarding the shift in strategy. In general, could you like give us some more information on the market opportunity there?

Yes. We certainly are getting color from them, but color for language probably is appropriate. It's been very disruptive across the board and really there's -- everyone is talking right now about what to do about it. I think prices went up in May. A lot of people is -- I think the previous questioner asked, are stuck right now but that doesn't make them happy about being stuck. And I think it called to question sort of the competitive -- where they stood as partners, what it looked like going forward to them, what they could expect in terms of what used to be sort of an independent channel where they could develop their business kind of independently and now are seeing that business possibly leak away or taken away from them by their supplier, and obviously, they've been looking for what to do about that as they have been for a while. So I think we're a safe harbor for that sort of partner, a kind of place for them to go to that provides a valuable service, a cost-effective service. I think it's made people want to talk with us more. We are seeing the effects start. It takes a while to ramp up. It's not going to be an immediate huge impact right away, but I think it's more of a long term trend and momentum that I think will occur and we'll be the beneficiaries of that.

Our next question is from Brian Ruttenbur of CRT.

I have a big macro question, trying to understand your upcoming catalyst, obviously this FAA deal. What about the competition? Can Inmarsat or somebody else squeak in here and do the same thing and disrupt this? And talk about what you're seeing out there in the competitive environment from that angle.

Yes, I think there's -- I mean, one of the reasons we are developing the confidence to move forward in that space is the fact that it's technically challenging to be able to monitor aircraft all over the world from anything other than lower orbit. It's one of the advantages of having a cross-linked lower orbit with satellites only a little less than 500 miles away above the earth, the ability to actually -- that is an altitude in which you can see aircraft, see their transmissions and be able to relay those to air traffic control facilities. So it isn't very likely that anyone else could do it, certainly not cost effectively. There are others that have proposed solutions that require massive new investments in -- for aircraft beyond what's currently being proposed. I mean, there's mandates that actually put certain equipment on. One of the advantages of our approaches is it doesn't require any new equipment besides what has really been mandated today. So even if another system came along, it would cost a lot of money and I don't think there's a lot of interest in the overall aviation market for significant new investment, for commercial or general aviation aircraft to be able to get the benefit that we could suggest. So our interest in this is quite unique. In fact, if we don't do this, some of the things that we -- that would -- the benefit that were accrued would not happen any other way for potentially ever, but certainly for many, many years given the investment that would be required and the next lower orbiting system could be launched is a long, long way away if ever. So that's why we are quite enthusiastic about the competitive dynamics.

Okay. So Globalstar is your NEXT kind of -- having difficulty, but low Earth orbit tier, correct?

It is another, I wouldn't know if they were NEXT or not. I don't see a lot of them in the market these days but they are low Earth orbit. Of course, remember, they're not cross-linked. So being a bent- system, they really are more threshold-based system, they're not a global system, they really operate well under where ground stations or under their satellites and when their satellites work, they're a quite different system than us. So even in their case, first of all, they're not launching satellites that cover the whole earth and everything anytime soon that would be able to have any other payloads to perform this service. And while they could be used as sort of a data link for a system that would require new hardware and aircraft, that really isn't I think the dynamic anyone is looking for.

Okay. The last question along these lines and I'm done. Budget delays. How much of this potential award is tied to current budgets? What happens with -- there's all sorts of cuts being proposed out there for federal budgets. Is this already fully funded? Can you talk a little bit about that?

I don't really know if that makes a lot of sense to talk about it now. Again, that's I think more of an item for June. Obviously, we wouldn't move forward unless we felt a lot of confidence about our -- about the ability and the ability for us to generate the kind of returns that we're expecting. So I'll just leave it for that and I know you mentioned the FAA. Of course, remember, they're going to be a potentially important customer, but we're really talking about a global system with all the ANSPs, with the Nav Canada and U.K. NATS and the Asian operators, et cetera, and that the exciting part about this is it's really a global system that the FAA is a really important part of but not the only part of.

The last question is from Chris Quilty of Raymond James.

Speaking of aviation. I think this is the first time you've confirmed that you're now shipping your -- call it the Aero OpenPort because I can't remember the name. Can you give us an idea of what the opportunity is in that market in terms of volumes, ARPU contribution? And also for Tom, where would that fall inside your reporting structure?

Yes. That's -- we call it Aero OpenPort, so you got the name right. And we say we're shipping it. Frankly, in many cases, we're shipping parts to our technology partner, LiveTV, who really is the technology supplier behind the scenes to those and so that is a little indirect. The opportunity we think is growing and extensive, there's a lot of interest in getting the higher speed service onto aircraft at least, just particularly in our case, we believe in the cockpit, which is the primary focus and the sweet spot for our product, we think. There's a lot of interest in the cabin too, but I really think that, that's more of a KA or KU our other kind of system long term. And so there's going to be more of a partnership we think we have or at least a complementary system on the aircraft. But as it relates to cockpit, we haven't been addressing because in some cases customers don't want to announce publicly at this point, our partners don't want to announce it publicly, so it's difficult for us to be too specific. But we have seen carriers be interested in fact, adopting the technology and the fact that it's starting to be deployed right now, there are some regulatory things that have to happen for aircrafts. This thing called STC, a supplementary type certificate that is required to be obtained for new equipment installations and those are done by airframes. So different types of aircraft have that at different times. That is one of the things that will gauge the deployment. But this is thousands of aircraft. Potentially, there's an opportunity over a number of years and those are -- and the ARPUs of these, they're yet to be seen but I think that they are at or above the maritime, potentially well above the maritime environment or maybe in the -- maybe these things could be $1,000 per -- because again, they're used in a very important service. It's sort of on all the time or on very often and these services fly all the time. They don't sit in dock, that sort of thing, and port for a while. So they will be good contributors to our bottom line when they come.

And Tom, now that the OpenPort is 10% of service revenues, does that mean you're going to break it out for us?

We haven't. I mean, it's part of commercial voice.

Okay. Can you at least give us sort of an update on where you are in terms of installed units and ARPUs?

I still think, obviously, we will do that over time. I think that's very competitive information right now on our mind, especially with the changing industry as it stands right now. We'd really rather -- since it's not that material in terms of numbers compared to our overall subscriber numbers, we're kind of keeping that competitively quiet, but I think the 10% at least gives you an indication that it's starting to become an interesting part of our business.

Tom would've just said no.

That's why you want me to answer your questions, Chris.

Okay. And final, final one here, the AxcessPoint. I think that's been shipping for a little bit now. Can you give us a sense of what you're seeing in terms of types of users and usage patterns and how you feel about the product, how well it's taken off?

I'm pleased. I mean, we're really -- I think a relatively good number of units. Again, we haven't talked the total numbers, but there's -- for just a product that's now being really understood by our partner channel and their customers as to what it can do, I think we've had a lot of users. We've had a lot of great anecdotal evidence from people sending me pictures and tweets and telling me about how they've been able to do their BlackBerry at 18,000 feet in a general aviation airplane or be able to send messages from their smartphones in places they hadn't done or I hear of iPad apps that people use that work on our network very well. So I'm hearing a lot of good things. I think our partners have told us that it's a nice addition to our product line. It does add ARPU and in fact, pretty healthy ARPU, probably a significant percentage above what a typical user on an average would be. So I think we'll let that settle out a bit more. I'd like to really give it a little -- a few more months at least before we start talking about what is sort of contribution is if we do. Because it's still early days and I'm not sure if it's totally indicative, but it's certainly above our expectations when we first put the product out.

There are no further questions in queue at this time. I'll turn the call back over to management for closing remarks.

Well, thanks, everyone, for joining us again and we look forward to talking you through the quarter and hopefully seeing many of you in June as well. Thanks.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's program. You may now disconnect. Good day.