Greetings, and welcome to the inTEST Corporation's First Quarter 2023 Financial Results. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Shawn Southard of Investor Relations.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone. We appreciate your interest, and thank you for sharing your time with inTEST Corporation. Here with me are Nick Grant, our President and CEO; and Duncan Gilmour, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. You should have a copy of the first quarter 2023 financial results, which we released earlier this morning. If not, you can access the release as well as the slides that will accompany our conversation on our website at intest.com/investor-relations. After our presentation, we will open the lines for Q&A. If you'll turn to Slide 2, I'll review the safe harbor statement. You should be aware that we may make some forward-looking statements during the formal discussions as well as during the Q&A session. These statements apply to future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties as well as other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from what is stated here today. These risks, uncertainties and other factors are provided in the earnings release as well as in other documents filed by the company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents can be found on our website or at sec.gov. During today's call, we will discuss some non-GAAP financial measures. We believe these will be useful in evaluating our performance. You should not consider the presentation of this additional information in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP. We have provided reconciliations of non-GAAP measures with comparable GAAP measures in the tables that accompany today's release and slides. With that, please turn to Slide 3, and I'll now turn the call over to Nick.

Thank you, Shawn, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us on our first quarter 2023 earnings call. We delivered another strong quarter as the team is continuing to execute well on our 5-point strategy for growth. I would like to once again thank the entire organization for their commitment to our strategy and for delivering the plan. Revenue grew 33% year-over-year to $32 million, driven by strong performance across most markets, with particular strength shown in front-end semi for silicon carbide crystal growth and epitaxy applications, as well as defense/aero and life science markets. The revenue growth was all organic as we now have a full year of the acquisitions under our belt. I believe our results are demonstrating the success we are having with the integration of those three businesses. Under our 5-point strategy, we are beginning to unlock their potential. I should point out that we believe innovation is at the heart of our success, which is validated with every new product we launch. For example, our compact EKOHEAT system is now a standard offering in our induction heating solutions. We've made significant headway in our electronic test business with our high-voltage, high-current superset interface solution for testing higher-powered chips, as well as our continued expansion of our automated manipulator portfolio with our new LSC and LFL manipulators. And we are excited about Videology's new SCAiLX Zoom Block camera with AI-capable edge computing technology, which formerly launched last quarter and will start shipping in June. Innovation is driving demand. Our sales and marketing efforts to expand our business are also validated by our continued success. We are consistently adding new customers, deepening our reach into existing customers in key markets, while expanding into new applications. A good example of this is our industrial grade embedded video cameras,…

Thank you, Nick. Starting on Slide 4, revenue for the first quarter 2023 was $31.9 million, up 32.5% or $7.8 million versus the same period last year and at the top end of our guidance range of $30 million to $32 million. This revenue growth of $7.8 million was entirely organic and, as Nick mentioned, was driven by strong demand across semi, defense/aerospace, life sciences, security and other markets. In the case of semi, increased demand for induction heating technology solutions for silicon carbide crystal growth and epitaxy applications, combined with strength in supporting trailing edge or less capital-intensive technologies for analog and mixed signal applications, drove semi sales to $17.7 million, up 32% year-over-year. The automotive EV market was down 6% on a tough comp, and the large order we announced this morning, we believe, shows the decline is less meaningful than it might first appear. Moving to Slide 5. Gross margin of 47.2% in the quarter was up 150 basis points compared with the prior year Q1 period due to higher volume, better product mix and improved pricing. Compared with the trailing quarter, gross margin improved 100 basis points, reflecting favorable product mix and improved pricing. Our trailing 12 months gross profit of $57.5 million or 46.1% of sales is in line with our updated outlook this year of gross margin between 46% and 47%. As you can see on Slide 6, our operating expenses were up $1.3 million versus the prior year but down 630 basis points as a percentage of revenue, driven by operating leverage as the business scales up. Versus the trailing quarter, total operating expenses were up $600,000 at $11.5 million. This was a little higher than anticipated due to slightly higher selling commissions and noncash stock compensation expense as we saw higher and…

Thanks, Duncan. Slide 11 shows that we are making solid progress towards our 2025 revenue goal of $200 million to $250 million. Including our 2023 expectations, we will have grown the company at a greater than 30% CAGR since we implemented our 5-point strategy at the start of 2021. Excluding future acquisitions, we expect to continue driving high single-digit growth with our base business. With future strategic acquisitions, it should enable us to achieve our 2025 goal of between 200 and $250 million in revenue. We have an active pipeline of acquisition and partnership opportunities, and we have flexibility with our capital structure that we believe will allow us to execute on our plan. If you'll turn to Slide 12, our revenue growth goals should translate into strong earnings growth. Our plan is to deliver divisional operating income of over $40 million, adjusted EBITDA of over $30 million and improved earnings power to over $20 million in 2025. Let me sum up on Slide 13. As I have noted, our 5-point strategy is delivering results for our shareholders. Our engineered solutions that enable our customers to improve productivity or create more effective solutions within their own portfolio are in high demand. Our growing sales force is reaching more prospects and our new organization structure with three technology-focused business segments has driven greater focus and collaboration across the company. We believe this, in turn, will create even more opportunities for growth. We continue to unleash the potential of inTEST on our journey to becoming a supplier of choice for innovative test and process technology solutions. We are driving organic growth and actively pursuing acquisition opportunities to build our technology base, deepen our market penetration and broaden our market reach. With that, operator, let's open the lines for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Jaeson Schmidt of Lake Street. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question. And congrats on a nice start to the year. Just want to start with the silicon carbide business. I mean, you guys continue to see some really nice traction there. Just curious how much of the revenue pie is coming from those type of applications this year? And I guess relatedly, is this ramp in the business more driven by overall market growth or continued share gains as well?

Hi, good morning, Jaeson. And thanks for acknowledging the performance in the quarter. Yes, as you said, SiC continues to perform well for us. Our front-end semi business in the quarter was roughly, Duncan, 30% of our semi number. We saw nice strength in our back-end semi business in Q1. And then, within that front-end semi, 60% of it probably are more SiC-related, I would say.

Yes, correct. About 70%.

So, yes, it's an area that we have identified as a nice growth avenue. And given the market trends out there, we believe SiC will be a nice driver for growth for us for quite some time.

Okay. No, that's great to hear. And when you look at that full year outlook, thinking about sort of the low end versus the high end, is semi in general really just the biggest swing factor?

I would say, yes, semi, obviously is a big part of our business. So, it can impact the full year. I would say, though, our ramping of our acquisitions will also be a big part of the full year achievement there that we're driving. Duncan, would you agree?

Yes. I mean, I think across all the markets we serve, there's obviously more optimistic and more pessimistic potential outcomes. So, I don't think it's just semi. I think the fact we're playing across a number of interesting kind of sectors and markets actually kind of helps us from a diversification perspective. So, it's not just semi that is swinging our business.

Yes. And as you probably saw, Jaeson, our automotive EV order this morning, those kind of wins and new applications for our product lines really positions opportunities for future growth.

Okay. And that's a good segue into my last question, and then I'll jump back into queue. Looking at that announcement this morning, it definitely seems really interesting. Just curious if this is with a new or existing customer. And if you could provide some additional color on the potential for follow-on orders or how you're looking at the sort of new opportunity in this market?

Yes, absolutely. So, as you know, we've been serving this automotive EV space for quite some time with our induction heating solutions. And then, with the acquisition of Acculogic at late '21, we added our battery inspection equipment, which expanded our customer base. So, this customer is a traditional automotive big player that has been working to establish their electric vehicle production lines. And this win is really exciting because it's driven also by SiC and the higher power devices that are going into the electric vehicles and what they have to do or what they would like to do is test as well as thermally control the process with these chillers as they manufacture these inverters that manage the power from the battery to the wheels and that. So, pretty exciting. It's obviously something that we believe is applicable outside of just this particular customer and something we're going to explore and exploit as much as possible.

Okay, that's helpful. Thanks a lot, guys.

Thanks Jaeson.

Thank you very much. The next question is from Ted Jackson of Northland Securities. Please go ahead.

Thanks. And I'd also want to reinforce it was a very nice quarter. Congratulations.

Thanks Ted.

I'm going to ask a couple of questions. One is probably more just for Duncan. I'd like to have a little discussion or maybe provide some commentary about the working capital structure and how you see that playing out on a go-forward basis. I mean, not to knock the cash flow generation because it was - the free cash flow number was a very nice number. But your inventory was - it was up quite a bit and it could have been even better. And so, I guess what I'm asking is, how should I think about the structure of your working capital and looking at kind of the current quarter with a particular focus perhaps on inventory and trends we may see there as we roll through '23.

Sure. I think you kind of hit the nail on the head there, Ted. I think we had a nice free cash flow quarter, as you pointed out, but it could have been even better. We do continue to invest in inventory, although the supply chain world is certainly a lot better than it was. We do still - we are still being cautious with certain kind of parts and so on where we want to make sure we have enough supply. We do have a nice strong backlog as well as we talked about. So, the inventory levels we have are certainly supported by backlog is something that as we go forward, supply chain continues to moderate. We will be looking to kind of squeeze that and push that a little bit more than we have. But I think, as you said, really nice cash flow generation in the quarter and the opportunities there to see that continue.

Would it be fair to - would we be - if I thought about your inventory numbers through forward part of the year when I think about kind of trending sideways on a dollars basis on the balance sheet or would I think about it as you kind of execute against the backlog and supply chain issues fade that we would see inventory levels trend down and kind of days inventories occurrence or however you want to look about it, kind of move back to...

Yes. I think it's really a case of - sorry, I think it's really a case of executing against backlog. As I said, we have $46 million of backlog there that we obviously need to deliver on. Certainly, there's components within inventory there where we are making sure we have the right parts and pieces and so on, on hand, to be able to deliver against that. So, if backlog kind of trends down, then we would expect to see inventory trending down. Top line is obviously another factor in terms of where that's trending. Based on the kind of outlook, we see kind of nice, steady top line but not explosive top line growth there. So we'd expect to see inventory really moderate around where it is. We are, as I said, looking to kind of work that down as we slowly get our supply chain challenges kind of behind us here, as I said, as that world moderates.

Okay. Thanks. And then, my second question, which is, honestly, I think probably will be a fun question for you guys to answer. It ties into the previous line of questioning, and that goes around your acquisitions, and your ramping of those acquisitions seeing them bear fruit. And where I'm going with it is, when you had put out the announcement in the quarter with regards to the distribution arrangement for your ultra-cold, what do you call this, chillers, refrigerators and you and I've had discussions on - touch base on. And you had talked about how this was part of the efforts that you are making in terms of growing what was albeit a small acquisition and really taking it and bringing it to the next level and creating value. And with that kind of thought in mind, as we think about that spread in terms of your guidance and the ability of you to come to the higher end with some of that being a success on the acquisitions. Maybe you guys could take a little bit of time and talk about in these acquisitions, some of the actions and things that you've done on an operational basis to grow those businesses in terms of like actions in terms of improving the sales function, improving the products or reducing cost, or you see I'm saying, just kind of how you're going about generating value because you're not just buying a business plugging in and just letting it run on its own per se. You're actually buying a business that is perhaps resource starved or that provide some kind of leverage to inTEST and then making an incentive, one plus one equals two to one plus one equals three kind of scenario. Is that fair to - is that a question that you can answer?

Yes. Happy to address the acquisitions here. So, yes, as we've noted that these acquisitions were really the lifestyle businesses ran to a certain level, and we saw the ability that being part of inTEST, getting them integrated into our processes and procedures and the way we operate, we believe we could scale these things. And each one is a little different in some areas where investments were needed. But in general, it's about driving innovation into these businesses, building robust product road maps that are market-driven as one of the key avenues for growth that we're driving across all three. And I'll give you an example. The North Sciences freezers and chiller refrigerators that you were referencing there. We completely rebranded, I would say, upgraded some of the designs and launched the new product lines after acquiring that business and then have continued to expand our capability and functionality at these products with adding cloud-based monitoring, et cetera, into the products. So, making them smarter there is just one example for that product line on innovation to create demand. We've touched on Videology and the new SCAiLX product that we've launched beginning of this year, and we'll be starting to ship in Q2 here. This is a really state-of-the-art kind of AI-capable edge computing zoom block camera out there. So, we can actually take - embed our software and run it on the camera versus having to feed the data back to a cloud computer or a server or wherever run the analysis and then make the determination, it can actually do that on the camera now. And we've gotten a lot of interest after launching this product from a lead generation perspective. So we're excited to see where that goes. And then, last but not least, our Acculogic innovation areas there, we've been focusing on driving, I would say, enhanced measurement capabilities and their flying probes, systems that they have out there to better serve these battery markets and the trends we're seeing out there. And we've got some new technology there that is a noncontact technology for measuring properties of these batteries, which customers are looking for that we believe will be a nice demand generator as well. So, innovation is a key part of it. Obviously, investments in sales and marketing, adding direct sales heads, building out the channels, that announcement we did for North Sciences was just another example of a channel partner we brought on to help us go after more government opportunities out there. So, yes, we're excited about the progress we're making with these businesses. And now that they're integrated in inTEST and look forward to seeing the results that we get.

That was nice. I'm going to ask one last question, then I will get out of your hair. Just as we were talking about M&A and the acquisition strategy, you commented that you've got a good pipeline and the pipeline is full. I mean, is there a chance we'll see some action on that front within the fiscal year? And then, are you seeing - I mean, with all the turmoil we're having with regards to capital access with the banking crisis and interest rates going higher, what are you seeing in terms of valuations? Is it driving any people to feel more of a need to execute in terms of maybe selling the business or something? Is it - kind of what's the general activity and how has it changed given all the targets we're seeing in the capital markets?

Yes. We - as we said, our pipeline is healthy. We've remained very active on the M&A front, have done so through 2022 after completing the 2021 deals. Lots of opportunities to look at, but we remained diligent to our criteria being able to identify and close deals that we believe will bring shareholder value for the company, better position us with our customers, our target markets and that - so timing of closures of deals vary out there and so it's very difficult to say, but we remain diligent at it. As for valuations, I think the credit markets that's out there is certainly broad multiples more realistic, if you will, where you don't see a lot of teens, multiples or anything like that off the EBITDA with PE firms that are sitting on a bunch of cash and that's absolutely kind of moderated the expectations from the owners, the sellers on what they - in other businesses or worse than that. So it's a good opportunity out there, and we're remaining very active in it. Duncan, would you add anything?

No, I think you captured it, Nick.

Great. Thanks very much.

Thanks Ted. Appreciate it.

Thank you very much. The next question is from Tim Moore of EF Hutton. Please go ahead.

Thanks. And congratulations on the strong gross margin in the quarter and the continued execution of your strategic plan. A couple of my questions already asked, but I'll start off with asking about, I believe, a comment you made during your opening remarks. It seems like what's going on with a few other competitors that there are smaller order sizes coming from smaller customers just as they maybe buckle down or delay for macro concerns. Could that be possibly enough upside to move the needle on your sales guidance if some of those possible delay orders come through in the September or December quarters? Did they make up enough of an amount, the smaller customer side, to maybe move the needle?

Well, I would say, you're exactly right. The smaller order size is a bit of the economy. You see that also in the fact that the supply chain has improved so much, lead times have come down, and they're more confident on the ability for suppliers to be able to deliver. So, they've kind of moved to that trend, which is a good thing for us. Our lead times are down as well. So, we're able to, as you said, respond more quickly when opportunities come. So, if the demand surges to the point where it creates a lot of opportunity for shipments later this year, that can certainly have an impact. We've kind of modeled in what we believe to be a very doable case here that we've laid out. So we'll keep marching towards that, but we'll see how the quarter plays out. And our activity - our funnel activities remain very active, very robust. So, yes, if something changes in order patterns, we'll be able to capture it.

Thanks. That's helpful. I want to follow up on the news announcement you had a few weeks ago, coincidentally, I think the stock was up 14% that day. But just on the stellar scientific ultra-low-temp biomedical storage news, the partnership with the U.S. government agencies, have you thought about maybe how sizable that could be? Have you gotten any indication or RFPs on that? I mean, could that be $4 million in sales over the next 12 months or something like that?

We're optimistic on - with all of our channel partners on what they're able to achieve there in that, too early to say what that number could be in the next few months on that. But we're excited to add these really quality channel partners as we build out our go-to network for these freezers and refrigerators and our transportation chillers as well.

Great. That's helpful. And just switching gears for geographic opportunities, it seems like Europe and Southeast Asia could be pretty attractive expansion opportunities now that you've implemented your overall strategy. Are you starting to focus there? And maybe related on that question, it seems like some of the low-cost regions you can maybe penetrate more with automated back end testing where some of the competitive offerings only do manual, are you seeing more opportunity for that in the automation back inside in Southeast Asia and Europe?

Yes. No, absolutely. That's part of our globalization strategy out there as Europe and Southeast Asia are two target areas that we want to expand our presence in that. So, yes, we believe we can better serve customers in those regions. We made some progress with acquisitions of Acculogic and Videology in Europe there both brought a small footprint to us, but expanded our exposure there. Yes, we're currently assessing how do we better serve Southeast Asia and some of our customers. As you know, our back inTEST business ships a lot into Asia and Southeast Asia regions there. So, in particular, with that said, obviously a lot of activity with investments in regionalization, of course, in the U.S. here and then Europe recently announcing their versions as well. So, yes, we've got to make sure we're well-positioned to capitalize on those.

Great. Thanks for that color. And my last question is, what efforts are you may be making to grow your aftermarket service business? Have you added more dedicated workers there over the last two or three quarters?

Yes. We have expanded with service personnel within our organizations here across our businesses and that filling gaps where we've got the customer base and we can better serve them locally and that likewise ramping up our service capabilities on product offerings as well as trying to better serve customers through more service agreements and helping them to ensure their equipment as optimized out there as well. So, it's a multipronged approach to expanding our service out there. And we had some good service numbers, right, Duncan, in the...

Yes. I mean, our service business, a bigger piece of the pie in Q1 getting into the kind of low teens. So that's nice to see. I wouldn't say we're claiming victory at all. Nice to see the strength in the quarter certainly helped the margin side, but we'll continue that journey. There are plenty of opportunities for us as we move forward here.

Great. Thanks, Nick. And Duncan, I appreciate. That's it for my questions.

Thanks Tim.

Thank you. The next question is from Peter Wright of Intro-act. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. And congratulations on the great quarter.

Thanks Peter.

Nick, I got a couple of questions for each of you. Nick, My first question is kind of on the innovation cycle. I'm hoping you can share with us some insight into how product evolution is changing at inTEST, whether it be more aggressive new product introductions, a faster next-generation kind of enhanced product cycle, any insights into kind of what is changing on the innovation curve and how it's reflected in the ASPs of your product over time relative to kind of the long-term trajectory or curve there? And then, just kind of tagging a little piece on to that on the service business as you build that out, is more of the innovation customer-driven or is it still primarily engineer/inTEST driven?

Okay. Let me start with the innovation there. I described this and as part of our strategy here of the innovation is really driving these businesses that really do a fantastic job with our engineering know-how and expertise in solving customer problems. But the focus in the past had been more of, from one customer to the next customer or the next customer. We're taking more of a market-driven approach to our innovation, developing product portfolios, product lines that are applicable to a broader number of customers versus one individual customers, but allows for the flexibility of late-stage customization to specifically address the needs for those applications with that customer. So, you're seeing much more of that standardization subassembly type approach in our product funnels. The EKOHEAT - compact EKOHEAT and the compact work heads, good examples of that, where we've reduced the size. But now, we have a wide variety of power settings, power options as well as we design our coils and solutions around the particular applications as late-stage customization. So, being more market-driven is one of the big changes. We commented last year throughout the supply chain challenges. Unfortunately, innovation has took a bit of a backseat on some of our R&D projects as we had to qualify new suppliers, new vendors on products in that. So, I would say, now that things have more stabilized, we're able to put more focus on that and excited to see that kind of ramp back up here going forward. Shifting to the service side of things, I would say, it's a mix. Some of the service avenues and growth that we're driving here are requests we've seen from service - I mean, from our customers and others are more of inTEST-driven, just specifically trying to place individuals and regions to better serve, better response time, et cetera, et cetera, out there as well as framing up these agreements that we could expand our capabilities and solutions that we're providing from a service perspective to customers. So, it's a mix across the board.

And any comments on kind of ASP trajectory that you guys are - there's - in the evolution from kind of component to solution, usually there's some decent ASP lift. Is there anything you can point to there yet that's materializing?

I would just say that as we take the market-driven approach, we're looking for trying to assess market pricing rather than a cost plus in the past. So that gives us the opportunity to validate that we're not leaving money on the table out there in that. But I mean it varies across the product that's being developed and across the businesses in that so - from an ASP perspective.

Fantastic. And then, on the acquisition strategy, if I look - congratulations on your margins, really kind of already hitting long-term plan on an EBITDA margin basis. I guess, what I'm really asking is, is there upside to go on term target? But when you look at your acquisition strategy, obviously there's integration and everything of the sort, but any thoughts there in kind of the landscape of biz dev that you're looking at, what is the best way to think of your acquisition strategies impact on kind of your margin profile?

Yes. I mean, I think - as I think we've talked about a little bit before, our business is kind of running ballpark at those longer-term margin profiles. However, we do need inorganic activity to move us into that next bracket at $200 million to $250 million. There are inefficiencies. There are costs associated with acquisitions, integrations, et cetera. So, our long-term profile takes that into account - takes into account that growing organically, yes, we should see continuing operating leverage and improvements there, but there is a cycle of inefficiency as we execute inorganically and integrate businesses. So that's factored into our thinking there, Peter.

Fantastic. And Duncan, a follow-up, if I could, on that. Your commentary suggested that there might be some moderating signs of a little bit of moderation. The guidance really doesn't reflect that. So, I'm trying to understand the change in visibility. So, is there some pushouts? Is it just slower incremental bookings? Is it phasing out of larger orders that were pressured from supply chain? What is the impact that's causing kind of the moderation? And my very last little part, I'll just add into it. Is there any commentary you can share with us on kind of tool utilization or any of the other kind of forward-looking things that you're looking at that is making you add that slightly cautious comment?

Yes. I mean, I think Nick touched on it in one of the earlier answers. So, we're seeing less of these very large orders where people are buying well in advance because of significant concerns around the global supply chain. It doesn't mean overall activity is dropping, it just means those orders are smaller. They're perhaps on the ordering a quarter - a couple of quarters ahead instead of a year ahead, let's say. So, it does mean visibility by definition, can be hampered a little bit. It doesn't mean the demand is not there. We're seeing the demand. We're maintaining backlog levels even in spite of that dynamic. So that's really what we're talking about. It just makes that visibility a tiny bit tougher versus the situation where you're getting orders for next year and even beyond.

Very clear. Very healthy. Great. Thank you guys for the update.

Yes. Thanks Peter.

Thank you very much. [Operator Instructions] The next question is from Brian Kinstlinger of Alliance Global Partners. Please go ahead.

Great. Nice results. Just one question for me. You mentioned a couple of times, are price increases occurring across the board? Are there pockets of strength based on certain solutions or verticals? Any further detail around the price landscape would be great.

Yes. Yes. I mean, let me try and address that, Brian. I mean, pricing, as we talked about a little bit in the past, has been very dynamic, continues to be dynamic. And what I mean by that is the inflationary environment, cost inputs changing quite dramatically, very quickly over the course of the last kind of 12 months or so. Obviously, we're looking at that constantly. If our prices go up, we have to kind of move and push - if our costs go up, we have to move and push our prices up and our teams have absolutely been doing that and constantly kind of reassessing that. And that process continues. Our input costs, we're seeing a little bit less in the way of that rate of change, but that's an ongoing process. And then, the other element of that, that Nick alluded to is we continue to push around more kind of a market-driven view, what's the value of our product, and continue to kind of push on making sure we're getting value in the marketplace from a pricing perspective. So that's another angle from a longer-term perspective that we continue to kind of work with our teams on. But it's really across the board. There's no one single product, one single market or anything like that, Brian. I mean, it's really across the board with respect to those two elements.

Yes. And I would just add another dynamic from pricing realization is this whole order trend of - if they're placing a blanket for four quarters - large - those prices are locked in on those orders basically, and we have little ability to change as now the smaller orders every couple of quarters or so, we have more flexibility to be able to adjust pricing in that. So, it gives us a better opportunity there.

Great, thanks. Nice results again.

Thanks Brian.

Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, we have no further questions in the queue. And I would like to hand the floor back over to Nick Grant for some closing comments.

Thank you, Chris. I want to reiterate that I'm exceptionally proud of our global team who continue to deliver outstanding results. We look forward to connecting with some of you on May 10th at the EF Hutton Inaugural Global Conference in New York City. We really appreciate you taking the time to join us today on our call and for your interest in inTEST. Thank you all, and have a great day.

Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and thank you for your participation.