Good morning and welcome to the International Seaways Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to James Small, General Counsel. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to International Seaways earnings conference call for the third quarter of 2020. Before we begin, I would like to start off by advising everyone on the call with us today of the following. During this call, management may make forward-looking statements regarding International Seaways or the tanker industry, which may address, without limitation, the following topics: outlooks for the crude and product tanker markets; changing oil trading patterns; forecast of world and regional economic activity and of the demand for and production of oil and other petroleum products; the effects of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the company's strategy; purchases and sales of vessels and other investments; anticipated financing transactions; expectations regarding revenues and expenses, including vessel charter hire and G&A expenses; estimated bookings and TCE rates in the fourth quarter of 2020 or other periods; estimated capital expenditures in 2020 or other periods; projected scheduled drydock and off-hire days; the company's consideration of strategic alternatives; the company's ability to achieve its financing and other objectives; and other economic, political and regulatory developments around the world. Any such forward-looking statements take into account various assumptions made by management based on a number of factors, including management's experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected and future developments and other factors that management believes are appropriate to consider in the circumstances. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, many of which are beyond the company's control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those implied or expressed by those statements. Factors, risks and uncertainties that could cause International Seaways' actual results to differ from expectations include those described in the company's annual report on Form 10-K and its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and in other filings the company has made or may make in the future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. With that out of the way, I would like to turn the call over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Lois Zabrocky. Lois?

Thank you very much, James. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining International Seaways earnings call to discuss our third quarter 2020 results. Before we turn to our slides, I want to take a minute and I want to thank our seafarers. We rely on our seafarers to ensure our safe, reliable, and efficient transportation of energy cargoes for our customers, admits this global pandemic. The ship’s crews are doing a remarkable job adhering to the highest level of not only safety, but professional standards. We're grateful at Seaways and we're proud of the service of our seafarers. Our highest priority remains keeping our seafarers safe and getting them home to their families safely and on time. This continues to be challenged, was shifting national and local quarantine restrictions and now increasing COVID cases numbers worldwide. In this dynamic situation, we have taken important steps to repatriate our crews, such as deviating shifts to more convenient ports for our seafarers, implementing extra measures to prevent the spread of the virus and keep it off our vessels, arranging for private charter flights when necessary. In these unchartered waters, we have made good strides in reducing the numbers of overdue crew. And we will continue to look for every opportunity to get these men and women back to their families. Now going to our prepared remarks, if you turn to Slide 4, we take a look at our third quarter highlights and our recent accomplishments starting with the first bullet. On two consecutive quarters of record earnings as a public company, again, in the third quarter, we generated strong results in a weakening rate environment. Notably, the third quarter results reflect the strong performance of our sizable fleet of crude and product tankers, as well as the four favorable time charters executed…

Thanks, Lois, and good morning, everyone. Let's move directly to reviewing the third quarter results in more detail. Before turning to the deck, let me quickly summarize our consolidated results. In the third quarter, we achieved EBITDA of $54.6 million. Net income for the third quarter was $14 million or $0.50 per diluted share compared to a loss of $11.1 million or $0.38 per diluted share in the third quarter of 2019. However, excluding the impact of $12.8 million impairment charge and loss on sale of vessels and a $0.7 million write-off of deferred financing costs and fees associated with the extinguishment of debt. Net income was $27.6 million, or $0.98 per diluted share. Now, if you could turn to Slide 8. I'll first discuss the results of our business segments beginning with the Crude Tanker segment. TCEs for the Crude Tanker segment were $80 million for the quarter compared to $49 million in the third quarter of last year. This increase primarily resulted from the impact of higher average blended rates in the VLCC, Suezmax, and Panamax sectors. Turning to the Product Carrier segment, TCE revenues were $14 million for the quarter compared to $16 million in the third quarter of last year. Higher period-over-period average daily blended rates earned by the LR2 and MR fleets were offset by a decrease in MR revenue days in the third quarter, primarily as a result of the redelivery of four time chartered-in MRs to their owners between the third quarter of 2019 and July 2020. Overall as reflected in the chart top left, consolidated TCE revenues for the third quarter 2021 were $94 million, compared to $66 million in the third quarter of 2019. The increase was principally driven by substantially higher average daily rates earned across the crude fleet this…

Thanks a lot, Jeff. We want to wrap up the call, leading you on Slide 13, reiterating some of our highlights from the third quarter. With our sizeable fleet of crude and product tankers, as well as our substantial contracted revenues from our favorable time charters executed earlier this year during the strong rate environment. We posted a solid quarter, despite challenging rate environments. Notably our third quarter EBITDA of $55 million was more than double that what we generated during the same period last year. In addition to the four time charters that we signed earlier this year averaging $63,700 per day for the fourth quarter. The 10-year contract extensions on our FSO joint ventures provides a strong period coverage in a challenging market. In addition to locking in the value of these important assets, we expect to generate in excess of $322 million of contracted revenues during the extension period. This strengthens our position to continue to optimize revenue throughout the tanker cycle and provides us with significant optionality. During the third quarter, we continue to deliberately execute on our disciplined and balanced capital allocation strategy, creating value and providing returns to shareholders. Our Board has authorized the increase of our existing share buy back program from $30 million to a total of $50 million. We continue to act opportunistically for the benefit of shareholders, and we find our shares to present an attractive opportunity. During the time when we have continued to delever and reduce our breakeven levels to $17,600 per day, our overall financial strength has improved. This is highlighted by a net loan to value of 39%. This represents one of the lowest leverage profile among our tanker peers, and we have $194 million in total liquidity. Going forward, we remain in a position to return capital to shareholders and to take advantage of strategic opportunities as they arise. Thank you very much. And we would now like to open it to questions.

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Randy Giveans of Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Lois, Jeff and David, how are you all?

Good. Good, thanks.

Great. Excellent. Yes, first, obviously congrats on the FSO contract extension, based on our math, I think the new EBITDA contribution for your 50% is more than $20 million per year for 10 years. So clearly that is a non-core asset for INSW. So what are the thoughts on either selling your portion of the joint venture or maybe even the opposite, right, buying the other 50% from your own asset?

Well, indeed, this – the conclusion of this contract really represents years of hard work and I think exemplifies how these particular assets, being on the field from 2010, Randy, and having absolutely zero off hire time. We we're so pleased to have secured this renewal, especially when offshore markets are certainly not stellar at the moment. So for us, this is a huge conclusion and really makes this project shine for the joint venture. And having concluded it, we do have options. We do consider these assets to be non-core and with our JV partner, we'll explore how to maximize and monetize these assets going forward.

Okay. And I guess segwaying with that monetizing assets, can you provide us with a little, maybe additional details on the decision to sell the three older vessels, what the aggregate sales proceeds are and the debt repayment associated with to shine [ph] and get the impact on liquidity from those?

Yes, the beautiful thing is Jeff's team paid down the $40 million loan that was a transition loan on the older vessel. So these three vessel sales are unencumbered and they will bring in $62 million in cash into International Seaways. If you are asking why did we sell those particular vessels? We felt that we were able to realize a healthy sales level, and bring that money into the company and then utilize that for capital allocation in a better way.

Wow, all right. Well, that’s a meaningful number, I guess, just following-up on that, you're increasing the share repurchase authorization even without using in the third quarter. Is that the top use of cash or is kind of debt repayments still the top priority here?

Jeff, do you want to take that?

Sure. Yes, we had a lot going on in the third quarter. So hope definitely we will take care of business, we were taking care of business. But I've been asked that question before, but deleveraging we – and Lois mentioned that we have done all four types of capital allocation this year, and we bought a ship very early on, but that was kind of a unique thing. But dividend, share repurchase, and deleveraging, we delevered $70 million based on regular scheduled interest payments or we'll have by the end of the year. But an additional $70 million of voluntary or unscheduled additional debt pay down, including the $40 million at the transition we take down in August. So, we think that's a pretty healthy amount. It's kind of like saving money because you don't make a lot on your cash. So paying down debt, you see how – it's like putting money in the piggy bank and you can get it back out again when you sell a vessel and have all the proceeds available for whatever capital allocation. So I think – and then you heard me comment final last thing I'll say, Randy, is it – less than 1.5 times net debt to trailing 12 months EBITDA, we're at a pretty good level.

Yes.

So, I don't think we need to prioritize for leveraging. So I think, well, it’s not those at these prices, we look at our share price as being a pretty attractive value for using cash.

I concur. All right, that's it from me. Thanks so much.

Thank you.

Your next comes from Ben Nolan of Stifel. Please go ahead.

Hey, you got it right. Hey guys, good morning. I have a couple. Number one is – and I apologize if this was the way that it was, but I didn't think that it was, there looks like there's an awful lot of Panamax or LR 1 dry docking in the fourth quarter. I was curious if some of that was brought forward in general. And I know that it came up on a different call yesterday. I think that when I was bringing forward dry docking to the extent that they could, is that something that you guys are doing in this kind of a trough market here?

You know, Ben these vessels, many of them were due to drydock that earlier in the year, there were a significant congestion and very difficult for many of the repair yards to actually affect the dry docks because of COVID-19. And we were able – the market was earning beautifully, we were able to push some of those dry docks and indeed we are pulling a few. So Q4 is a very heavy dry dock period time for us. And that is a combination of implications from COVID having pushed them, but also from pulling and doing it at the time when the market is the lowest.

Okay, very helpful. And then another thing that I'm curious about and you guys are in a relatively unique position on is again, you are really just doing crushing it really on your Panamax is which is hard to really differentiate in shipping in a commoditized business, but you seem to be able to do that there. Although there has been a West Coast refinery that's closed, there's talk of others, is there any risk that maybe some of that Pacific coast trade that really fits in well with your Panamax, Panamax international business? Is that at risk at all, or is it more a function of where the crude is being sourced rather than where it's ending up?

Well, Ben, I would say it's a combination. And we're definitely following various refinery closures. And there have been some on the West Coast, but we have to watch very carefully because some of these refineries are trying to turn themselves into bio diesel facilities. And you may see continued movements in the marketplace. I don't think that we're going to see an asymmetrical and inordinate amount of closures, particularly on the U.S. West Coast. I think we're going to see a smattering of closings, like convent, down in the U.S. Golf, some of the refineries in Europe. So we're watching to see what the impact is. But presently, we don't see that too particularly disadvantage the Panamaxes.

Okay. That's helpful. And I have one comment – one caught me off guard this morning. I was not expecting that.

Yes.

And in general, I think, I'm just curious as to your view that if you're maybe a little bit more out of the product tanker guys, hey, this is all fantastic for – these refinery closures are fantastic for the long-term outlook for especially larger product tankers. You guys kind of play both, right?

Yes.

You're, a little bit more heavily oriented towards crude. But how do you think without sort of necessarily having a bias towards one or the other, how do you think all of this is playing out and what are you doing to position yourself for that?

We are watching everything as it's happening. Obviously, you see that China has brought on over two million barrels a day over the last couple of years and still have more coming. That's clearly very ideal for the crude carriers. Then once they put the refineries in, they are going to run them, whether they have enough demand or not. And then you see a lot of product exports out of China. So a lot of this is linked certainly in the Middle East, we see that there are going to be refineries coming online. That should be quite good for LRs, remembering now that there's a significant number of LR1s and LR2s that trade in the dirty market, that we'd be perfectly happy to see them clean up, and that should bolster the midsize of the fleet, whether you're clean or you're dirty. So, we are watching all of this with great interest and making sure that we're following the trends so that the next dollars we send there in the sectors that we think are going to have the most robust dynamics.

Okay. But you don't have – or at least you're not willing to say that you have kind of line of sight as to what exactly that means right now.

No, I think we're pretty – we are pretty opportunistic. And we're going to be looking for, as we go forward here and through this down cycle, where the opportunities are.

Okay. All right. I appreciate it. Nice quarter guys.

Thank you.

Thanks Ben. The next question comes from Omar Nokta from Clarksons Platou Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi, thank you. Lois and Jeff, you guys made it pretty clear that you find the stock pretty attractive at today's prices. And you seem to be hinting at buying back pretty quickly. Out of curiosity does the Board authorization come sort of hand in hand with the vessels you've agreed to sell? In other words, would you be buying back the stock irrespective of whether you decided to sell ships or not?

Well, Omar, I'm not sure if that's such a simple question, because in today's world where you're in the middle of the coronavirus and rates are not at stellar levels. I think as a judicious company, you need to look at your whole picture and what is your liquidity, what is your – what's the best use of your capital, and make sure that, which we feel we're quite comfortable with the financial strength of the company. So, we are taking what we believe to be the right move selling some of these older vessels, when we can capture extra value above what our recycle level would be pretty significantly. And I think that then you look at where is the entire company, and then you're comfortable with the $15 million buyback program. So, if and buts, I think, we'll lead them aside as to what would have happened if we weren't in a position where we have the type of liquidity we do.

Okay. Got it.

Can I just add – could I just add Lois? Another aspect that goes into it, for example, is the time charters, right. So the time charters we entered into, as well as the FSOs, we have, of course they will be extended but that's later, but the contracted revenue brings down the breakeven. So, when you look at the break evens we highlighted in our deck, which includes debt amortization, right. So that's not before debt amortization, it's inclusive in that number of debt amortization. So, that gives you a number – a bit of a window into what you think you could do in terms of generating cash in a weak market. So that's part of it as well. So it's like what was said, it's not any one thing it's all the piece as you look at your capital allocation choices.

Yes, thank you. That's pretty clear. And it's good to hear definitely a bigger picture, holistic view. I was just wondering if that had come about as, hey, our stock is cheap, okay, let's sell some ships to buy some stock and it's clearly not that one.

No, what's interesting is, in fact, some of these sales particularly on vessels that are 15 plus years old. These are many, many months in the development. So we try to do what we believe is the right – take the right moves for the right time in the cycle. And then it just kind of serendipitously works out that it happens to be an amount similar to what we're able to buy back or we believe we may be able to.

But a little verbal clue Omar, we call that part of our loan facility if we did in January, that secured older vessels and transition well, with a lower amount and with older vessel. It's the job of these older vessels to – at the right time exit stage left, right. And then that's their best use at some point is get a good last act as far as revenue goes and then leave the stage. And that's for the benefit of the company entirely. So that would be happy in their normal course.

Yes, I know. It looks like they definitely had a very nice closing act.

Yes, they contributed beautifully in Q1 and Q2 just, yes, very strong.

Yes. And then just, maybe on the JVs, I mean, really, if we look over the past year, it seems that the JVs have been sort of like this consistent, nice positive surprise. And of course, the tanker market itself, at least for most of the past year had a nice run. When you think about further investing do you see yourself in and Lois you had mentioned this you guys are evaluating opportunities, now that the markets come in. Do you guys see yourselves making outright purchases at the company level? Are you thinking more about partnering with other companies to acquire maybe specific, certain project type assets or doing some sort of project level investments on a joint venture basis? Any sort of color that you can give on that type of thinking?

Well I guess the first part of an answer there would be speaking specifically about the episodes and we've had a wonderful joint venture partner on that and contract partners. However, we will not be looking to expand in the offshore space. I mean, that is something that you should not expect from International Seaways. And when you look at the tanker side, I think, when you start talking about joint ventures and things, I do believe that there's going to be higher level of innovation required from all of us ship owners. And when you start talking about joint ventures, to me that there could be a place for that in non-research and development and trying to figure out what does a decarbonized future look like and what will be the most effective technology, because that's going to take a lot of really bright minds to achieve that.

Yes, great. Thanks Louis for that. And thanks, Jeff as well.

Thank you.

Thanks a lot.

The next question comes from Greg Lewis of BTIG. Please go ahead.

Yes, thank you. And good morning. I guess I'm going to ask it a little differently. Clearly over the last year you guys have done everything you've said, you've strengthened the balance sheet, you've started to return cash to shareholders, the balance sheet is probably where you want it to be. At what point, how should I ask Lois, how are you thinking about as you look at the market and see how the market is developing, at what point do you use this back that you've really strengthened the balance sheet to maybe get a little bit aggressive and start buying ships? Because it does seem like asset prices have kind of come down. I mean, I guess they can always go lower. Clearly you guys have a bullish outlook in the market, maybe not in the next six months, but maybe longer term as do way So I'm just kind of curious – is there anything how are you thinking about that? Because it does seem like you guys are in a great position to kind of really load up a little bit here.

We would agree and as we look at the market, obviously we're constantly following and looking at where are the opportunities. It seems to us that destocking will probably continue to say for maybe about a six-month period. And you never can call the perfect media on the bottom of the market, but we think that that will be coming and then we'll be looking at opportunities accordingly.

And so just to tie it in, I mean, clearly with your stocks trading below NAV, so obviously the best use of a dollar is to buy the stock. But when you think about the fact that you can – you're probably not going to use your balance sheet to buy stock, when you can use your balance sheet to buy ships. So I'm just kind of curious is there a level of discount to NAV that just – or like – I mean, I guess how – as you think about the stock price, and we can all agree that it's at a too much of a discount to NAV. I guess, you think about that, does that come in to discussion about whether or not you think about going after and adding to the fleet?

You’re going to get a formula out of us.

Sure.

But you definitely – no it’s okay. But as we look at everything we look at what does our share price represent as a ship purchase price, right, which I think is what a lot of people do. And Jeff always says, we're never going to do one thing. And I think that a little bit of balance is wise. And then I'll let Jeff come in, in and talk a little bit about that.

Well, sure. I mean, thanks Lois I mean, Greg balance is the key word with us. That's how we see it. I think you should be – any company with good capital allocation strategy should be looking at a mix of things and evaluate them continually. So that's how we do it. And that is in our formulas as Lois has said. I definitely agree with something you said it's not borrowing to buy – to just to do sort of financial engineering. That's kind of – that would be capital speculation as opposed to capital allocation. I like the term capital allocation, allocating amongst a few different areas. So that's how we look at it. But I think the other thing that is always in the equation is when you're valuing your stock versus NAV, you want to look forward and make sure that if as is the case now where values may be falling a little more as Lois has said a minute ago, you could see that could have an effect. But again without giving a formula where we are sort of got to be safely below any estimate of current or forward NAV, you know?

Okay. Yes, sure, perfect. And then just one more from me, just looking at the October OPEC volumes, not a big increase and we know that there’s still really have the foot on the brakes. But I guess production did go up half a million barrels a day, versus September. Did that had, I mean, looking at rates, it didn't look like it does, but was that noticed in the market at all? And really what I'm trying to get at is, I think, we can all agree that at a certain point in time, OPEC is going to ramp production. And I'm just trying to understand as that ramp happens, like how should we be thinking about that in terms of really starting to tighten the market?

There was a brief moment there for maybe a couple of weeks where rates did pick up a little bit. But I think that a lot of that increased volume is being taken on vessels that are coming off storage, which is a piece of what needs to happen for the market to become healthy. So I think we're just in this painful period where the destocking, I mean, IEA is right, and you're coming down four million barrels a day in Q4. That's powerful, that's 360 million barrels. You see in the U.S. commercial crude stocks are now somewhere around 490 million barrels. They were at 5.50. They had got to touch the five-year average or coming close that you want to see them around 4.60 they are heading in that direction. So, I think, that we continue to see the drawdowns, and demand picking up and the unwinding of the storage. So you have all these factors coming together. So to us we think that there'll be a few months of pain while the destocking happens, and then you're going to see increased demand and the market will pick up. But we need – as ships have unwound, they've absorbed those additional barrels that came out.

Okay. Perfect. Hey everybody, thank you for your time and have a great weekend.

Thank you so much.

Thanks Greg.

The next question comes from Liam Burke of B. Riley FBR. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, Lois, Jeff and David.

Good morning.

Hi, Liam.

Lois crude deployment has been both on operational and cost challenge for you. How much has that influenced your cash costs? And how quickly do you see it easing now that you've sort of gotten the deployment challenge in line?

You know, what's interesting is – I’ll answer the second part of the question first. We’re really glad that that we've taken measures we would not in a normal cycle to repatriate people because this just continues. COVID has not been resolved. So, the idea of waiting for things to get easier would not bear fruit. So we’ve continued to do that. So it's an ongoing challenge, I would say. Operationally, what has that cost us? You have the fact that people weren't being able to be repatriated, so you had no flight cost. Now, very often the flight cost is more extreme. But it hasn't had too extreme of an impact on our EBITDA or on our net income at this point. But you should continue to expect us we do some occasional deviations to Manila, which would cost a couple of days. Certainly at this point in the cycle, that is much less painful than when rates were really high. When we're sending these vessels for dry dock, we're doing crew changes. So we’re doing everything that we can when there is a moment to make these crew changes happen. I don't have an exact cost code broken out of what it has costed us. We have deviated, but we don't have an exact number on what – how that would have had impacted things to date. I don't know, Jeff, if you want to add anything to that or Bill.

No, I think that's a good recap.

Okay. I’m sorry, go ahead.

No, no I think Lois you captured it perfectly. I mean, it has – we've been really fortunate to manage the crew changes that we have. And we see some associated cost, as you mentioned, but we're really on track.

Great. Jeff, I hate to keep bringing up the capital structure, but you are operating in a high fixed cost business, your debt to last 12 months, EBIT is 1.3 times, your loan to value is 40%. Are you just content to just keep lowering those ratios, or is there any balance you see on the debt side to maintain capital efficiency in your business?

Well, don't say you hate to bring it up Liam, it's fine. Happy to always talk about it. I think I hit on this a little earlier that at these levels, and I call it maybe 35% loan to value to include the book the FSO at book value. So, you are mid-30s and you're – as you said, 1.3 times net debt trailing to EBITDA. But anything went to kind of mid cycle EBITDA based on certain examples we put out there before if you look at our decks that are on the website. You are looking at maybe two times net debt to EBITDA, where it's a little higher than that. Those seem like good levels, right. I feel like we've achieved our objectives in terms of de-leveraging. And you can see the benefit of it concretely, it's not just about averages, or percentages, or multiples, it's about having if it becomes a right time to sell three older ships for $62 million, like we did, you get all the proceeds, right. So, I think we like where we are. And I think we've sized the share repurchase and dividends. So dividend is $0.6 a share, but it's close to 2% right now. It's a pretty nice little dividend yield. And if you proforma the $50 million share repurchase with the $30 million that we've already done, that's an over 20% return to shareholders and close to 70% of last 12 months’ net income. So, you use all the factors you take into place to balance it, kind of a question that was asked before there was any one thing or one formula, you just try to strike a balance that makes – what we feel makes management and the Board feel makes the most sense.

Great. Thank you, Lois. Thank you, Jeff.

Thank you.

Thank you, Liam.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Lois – I'm sorry Zabrocky for closing remarks.

Either way works. Thank you very much, everyone for joining us today. Seaways is well positioned to not only weather this downturn, but to actually add to shareholder value. We believe we can find that even at this point in the cycle. So thank you very much. And everyone take care, stay safe.

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.