Spero Theodorou
Analyst · Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.
Yes, I think Shak thank you for saying all that. I think what's important here to understand is that we've identified what we call a treatment gap, that's a concept that we noticed in the market, we found unmet need, and what does that mean, and I'll repeat again for people who don't know. So you have two end to the spectrum, you have the one end of the spectrum; we have major operations, we have plastic surgery operations, taken care in the hospitals. And then you also have on the other side of the spectrum, you have a lot of these non-invasive procedures, lasers, et cetera, et cetera, which are not as effective as they can be. So you have a whole number of patients between 35 to 60, 55, 60 years old, which a) are not bad enough to have a big operation by being bad enough, meaning they don't have enough skin laxity, they're not ready for a facelift, the same token, they've tried everything else and it hasn't really worked. And they're getting there is a fatigue component involved there, right, getting fillers every three months coming and getting doing these lasers. So finally, if they can find a procedure that will essentially tighten their skin or give them a long-lasting result in one session, 45-minute session, even though it might be a higher price at the end of day, if you look at the number of continuing treatments over a period of time, financially even makes more sense just to have one procedure done or is finished in the last for eight to 10 years. So there's been a paradigm shift in the way people are looking at these things. And a combination of what Shak mentioned in addition to the fact that people are starting to smarten up their life. If I'm having filler three times a year, and I'm having these things done, and I put all together it's just easier for me to have something like this, which is permanent and it looks good, it looks great. So the minimally invasive approach to what we're doing is a paradigm shift in aesthetic medicine. And that's why you're seeing the growth that you're seeing, because we're able to penetrate these offices, but most importantly give the patients what they really need. And the doctors are relieved, because they don't have to explain themselves afterwards why this works, it doesn't work. They're like, here you go. And add to the fact that you have the hospitals and patients are afraid of hospitals, add to the fact that office-based procedures is where it's at. All these elements are what make us competitive, but also are changing the way the industry has been in the past. I'm not surprised there's weakness in other sectors aside from the aspects that Shak brought out. It's also combination of patients having what I call failed and fatigue for example.