Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Ingredion Second Quarter 2023 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Noah Weiss, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and welcome to Ingredion’s second quarter 2023 earnings call. I’m Noah Weiss, Vice President of Investor Relations. Joining me on today’s call are Jim Zallie, our President and CEO; and Jim Gray, our Executive Vice President and CFO. The press release we issued today as well as the presentation we will reference our second quarter results can both be found on our website, ingredion.com, in the Investors section. As a reminder, our comments within the presentation may contain forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and include expectations and assumptions regarding the company’s future operations and financial performance. Actual results could differ materially from those estimated in the forward-looking statements, and Ingredion assumes no obligation to update them in the future as or if circumstances change. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed during today’s conference call or in this morning’s press release can be found in the company’s most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K and subsequent reports on Form 10-Q and 8-K. During the call, we will also reference to certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted earnings per share, adjusted operating income and adjusted effective tax rate, which are reconciled to U.S. GAAP measures in Note 2 non-GAAP information included in our press release and in today’s presentation’s appendix. With that, I will turn the call over to Jim Zallie.

Thank you, Noah, and good morning, everyone. As we enter the second half of the year, I am pleased to report that sales and profitability remained strong with net sales up 4% for the second quarter, absent foreign exchange impacts, driven by solid price and customer mix management across all regions. Adjusted operating income was up 17% due to pricing and mix improvements, which helped us overcome inflationary input cost pressures that have been a headwind over the last 2 years. Additionally, gross margins have recovered nicely due to effective customer contracting and disciplined operational execution. And this quarter’s performance is the fourth consecutive quarter of gross margin expansion. Our performance this quarter demonstrates the value of a diversified portfolio, where North America’s strength in core ingredients and EMEA’s strength in specialties contributed to record second quarter net sales and operating income. These results are particularly noteworthy given the strength of last year’s second quarter performance and demonstrate that we maintain our ability to price and pass through significant raw material inflation. Our results also demonstrate our ability to be responsive to shifting market dynamics and deliver continued profit growth. Turning now to our Specialty Ingredients growth highlights. During the quarter, Specialty Ingredients net sales grew 3% due to better price mix, even as continued inventory rebalancing throughout the entire supply chain led to softer volumes. Increased collaborations with customers seeking to improve the affordability of recipes, help drive new business momentum throughout the quarter. Historically, in times of higher commodity cost inflation, our customers look to Ingredion to leverage the functionality of our solutions capabilities to reduce their formulation and production costs. Our teams are actively engaged with customers to co-create new food products, leveraging our proprietary ATLAS product simulator, which accelerates innovation using digital prototyping, helping our customers…

Thank you, Jim, and good morning to everyone. Moving to our income statement, net sales of approximately $2.1 billion were up 1% for the quarter versus prior year, but close to 4% absent FX impacts. Gross profit dollars grew 13% versus prior year, driven by a combination of factors. It is encouraging that gross margins are above 20% again this quarter and are beginning to reflect historical averages, especially as corn costs fluctuate globally at high levels. Reported and adjusted operating income were $251 million. The increases were driven by favorable price mix, partially offset by higher raw material and input costs and lower volumes. Our second quarter reported and adjusted earnings per share were $2.42 and $2.32, respectively, for the period, up 14% and 19% – sorry, 9%, respectively, from the prior year. To highlight in this quarter’s results, reported EPS benefited from a $0.10 tax rate reduction due to a strengthening in the Mexico peso during the quarter, and the subsequent valuation impact to our U.S. dollar-denominated working capital balances in Mexico. We adjust out this tax benefit for non-GAAP adjusted EPS. Turning to our Q2 net sales bridge. We achieved strong price mix of $297 million, including the pass-through of higher corn and input costs. This was partially offset by decreased volumes of minus $225 million and foreign exchange impacts of minus $47 million. Turning to the next slide. We highlight net sales drivers for the second quarter. Foreign exchange was a minus 3% headwind in the quarter, with most of the impact in EMEA, particularly in Pakistan. Sales volume was down minus 11% as customers continue to work through elevated inventory levels. Customers are moving towards just-in-time delivery as supply chains normalize. Contributing to net sales growth, price mix was up 15% due to value-based pricing…

Thanks, Jim. Before we go to the Q&A, just a few final thoughts on how we see the business outlook for the remainder of the year. We are seeing softer volume demand across the food and beverage supply chain, driven by inventory rebalancing, which we are describing as a move from Just in Case to Just in Time. We are also seeing consumers economizing in response to price inflation. That said, we expect to see a gradual but bumpy pickup in volumes throughout the second half. Our full year guidance reflects this volume demand outlook and its impact on fixed cost absorption. After 2 years of historically high supply chain costs, and raw material inflation, we are steadily seeing our gross margins recover to pre-pandemic levels. While we are pleased with this progress, we are actively pursuing additional levers that we can pull to further improve the quality of earnings and reduce earnings volatility, all of which align with our long-term strategic goals. Now let’s open the call for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Ben Bienvenu of Stephens Inc. Your line is now open.

Hi, thanks. Good morning, guys.

Good morning, Ben.

I’d like to start kind of where you left off, Jim, on the volume front. Could you talk a little bit about with what you saw in the second quarter, how did that compare to your expectations for volumes in the second quarter? And then, Jim Gray, I think you mentioned that you expect to see the rate of orders to pick up in the back half of the year. Should we interpret that to mean that volumes are still negative across the global footprint and then potentially turn positive in the fourth quarter? Or how should we think about the outlay there?

Yes. Do you want me to take the first part. So what we’re seeing is that the lower volumes, we believe, are primarily due to downsizing of inventory as the food supply chain at large moves from a situation where people are operating to build inventories Just in Case. There were supply chain issues or disruptions to now, with interest rates and the holding cost of inventory increasing to more of a Just in Time approach where perhaps the industry is over indexing on that side and having safety stocks be reduced to, say, dangerously low levels potentially as companies try to manage their working capital. And again, believe that the supply chains are back to normal. We do believe we’re seeing demand bottoming and we do believe we will see a gradual but bumpy pickup in demand over the coming quarters. It is noteworthy, I guess, to highlight that in contrast to those comments, one source of steady volume demand has been syrup shipments, for example, primarily into beverages as we have seen a very modest falloff there. This is likely driven by relatively steady restaurant traffic, QSRs, fast casual, which has been relatively flat in the first half. We also believe we’re seeing a bottom in industrial starch volumes in North America as packaging and paper to a lesser degree, have shown some signs of recovery. So our current view now assumes that volumes remain soft through Q3 and start to gradually recover in quarter four.

Okay. Fair enough. In your guidance update today, you did also raise your cash flow from operations forecast thinking outside of organic growth investment in the business, you upped your stake in PureCircle. Can you talk about some of the other priorities that you have and what the M&A landscape looks like versus potentially buying back your stock as we move forward given that you’ll have nice free cash flow generation?

Yes. Maybe I’ll take it and maybe Jim can add in terms of the view of the M&A landscape. So our capital allocation priorities are still one around the organic growth opportunities we see. Obviously, if volumes pause, then we have a little bit more head space in front of us, which is great as our teams continue to pursue growth and texture and as well as in nutrition and as well as we look at sugar reduction, we are going to then look at M&A as well as mining the dividend. As I pointed out, we have raised the dividend again, for the October declaration and really just demonstrating that we believe in the future growth, free cash flow in the company as we look forward to 2024 and 2025, and just as a reminder, Ben and for everybody, we are really targeting a long-term dividend payout ratio in the upper 30s to 40% of our adjusted EPS. So this move gets us there, but we really look at the dividend as a primary means to returning cash to shareholders. With regard to M&A, we are still – again, we have a very wide M&A net globally as we have many relationships around the world. And I think we are seeing some opportunities for, again, probably more tuck-in type of M&A, but opportunities where we really think that we can further secure our market share and our market positions and the types of businesses that we want to be in.

Yes. I mean what I would just simply add is that what we’ve been emphasizing for the last few years is that Ingredion is not the same company that it was, say, 5, 6 years ago, we really have transformed from a starch and sweetener company to what we are today and what we will be more of in the future, which is a Texture and Health Solutions Company. And anything from an M&A standpoint that’s going to enhance the value propositions for Texture and Health Solutions, I think you can expect to see us pursue.

Okay. Great. Thanks very much.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Strelzik of BMO Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Hey, good morning, thanks for taking the questions. My first one…

Hi, Andrew, welcome.

South America. Thank you very much. Just wanted to start by digging in on South America first. And I heard some of the reasons that you talked about for some of the pressures in the quarter. But I guess I didn’t totally understand why there was such a dramatic fall off in the margins. I mean with the corn costs have been that different. And I’m looking at a price mix where the increases weren’t quite as meaningful as they have been? Are you seeing any resistance from a pricing perspective in South America? And then lastly, I guess, on this piece. If my math is correct, the margin the guidance implies a pretty quick snapback in margins to kind of that mid-teens level. So I guess the confidence there in the quick recovery, are you already seeing that? Just would love to better upstand that for these.

Yes. I’m going to tag team with Jim on this one, Jim, why don’t you take the corn piece?

Yes, sure. So Andrew, sometimes in our business when we’re towards the end of corn inventory that we’re holding. And the new crop harvest is about to come to market. And the market participants can see whether or not that was a bountiful crop and what it implies for prices of corn in the marketplace. That all happened in Q2 within Brazil. So really, really strong corn crop prices had come down. We were carrying some corn through Q1 and our pricing had really reflected at a higher level the cost of that higher corn kind of at the end of Q1. As you start to see the balance of full crop coming through, prices of finished goods start to adjust downward, and we’re continuing to adjust those prices, but we’re moving through that old corn. So you just had a bit of margin compression. As we look forward now, we’re going to enjoy the lower cost of the corn as we go into Q3 and Q4 as well as we’ve done our job through our pricing centers of excellence to maintain our margins and manage our margins as we continue. I think on top of that, we also had some transitions from our energy complex in Brazil. We moved from natural gas to biomass boilers. And so doing that just had some one-time nat gas costs that were higher that we don’t expect to repeat as we go forward.

Yes. That last point was not an insignificant impact in the quarter, but it was the right thing to do. It’s consistent with our sustainability commitments, but it’s a big investment from a standpoint of an energy transition, which is hitting quarter two and just a little bit of remnants, I guess in quarter three, Jim, as well.

Yes.

But that was probably like $3 million to $4 million just kind of a one-timer to put out there.

Right. And then also, what I would say just more generally related to take our largest market in South America, Brazil, we are seeing a slowdown in brand and product consumption such as beer, for example. And the Brazilian government has pulled back on consumer subsidies and interest rate tightening has also slowed economic growth. And in our second largest market, Colombia, we experienced a shutdown to our plant as the natural gas supply to the surrounding community was temporarily disrupted. So, that was another one-time event I guess in the quarter. So, that’s the reason why there is optimism for the forward outlook for South America.

I mean we are also coming out of winter going into spring and summer, right. So, traditionally, when you look out the layout and the phasing in South America, your largest quarter is always going to be Q4 in the calendar year.

Got it. Okay. That’s all super helpful color. And my second question I was just hoping you could give us kind of a sense for utilization rates in North America, obviously, with the volume softness here that you have been talking about. We have enjoyed a very tight utilization rate environment for a while here. We are going from inflationary corn environment to a deflationary corn environment as we approach kind of contracting season. So, just any thoughts around utilization as we head into kind of a key period I guess in North America. Thanks.

Jim.

Yes. So, I mean maybe I would just remind everybody that we report a change in sales volume, right. And so therefore, when you look at sales volume, it may be impacted by more by higher priced or higher value tons. The underlying, particularly in the U.S., as Jim noted, there has been pretty steady demand, at least for sweetener volume throughout at least the first half of the year we are seeing pretty steady foodservice traffic. There is nice pull for HF, very modest, flat, if not maybe down 1%. So, I think that’s acting as a real stabilizing factor when we look at U.S. utilization, for example, as one instance. So, as we go forward, I still think that we are not seeing kind of not yet, at least or any type of broad significant recessionary impact that’s impacting consumers and how they feel about eating out. I think it’s a little bit bumpy, as Jim referenced, but we are still seeing decent QSR traffic, fast casual traffic, and I think that pulls for foodservice, and that’s a decent part of our volume.

The only exception to that, I would say, is Europe does feel softer than the rest of the world right now. And so that’s something that we obviously will watch carefully for the second half of the year. But I would say Q2 volumes in Europe were soft, less so in North America.

Got it. Okay. Thank you very much. I will pass it on.

Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Cody Ross of UBS. Your line is now open.

Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions.

Hi Cody.

Hey, good morning. I want to zero in on North America for a second. Your profit there is up really nicely so far this year. However, your guidance implies a significant sequential step down in the margin to the tune of about 300 basis points to 400 basis points based on our math. Why is that?

I don’t know if I am seeing the same margin decrement that you may be calculating Cody, so we probably could take it offline. I would comment that generally, as we go through the year, we always are going to look at the layout of our corn costs. We are also going to look at now kind of maybe the layout of our hedges. But we should see generally kind of continued profit growth in North America as we definitely move into Q3 and Q4.

Okay. Maybe we can take that offline. And then I just want to move over to your gross margin, specifically on corn prices right now. They are down about 20% recently. I know you have changed your hedging practices a few years ago. At what point do you expect to receive a benefit from the lower corn prices? And do you expect that to affect your pricing negotiations as they come up in a couple of months?

Why don’t you take the mechanics and I will take the outlook?

Yes. Well, definitely I mean so, while CBOT prices are decreasing. Our corn costs will remain a bit higher for the balance of the year as we have hedged kind of late in late last year or the fall of 2022. And those hedges will show a net loss position, but that is reflected fully in our guidance. So, in the second half of last year, while we had rising corn costs, our expanded hedging practice showed a gain to mitigate some of that increase that we had in 2022 from the start of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. So, net-net, we do not see a notable benefit from the decreasing cost of physical corn, in the second half of this year, still seeing basis and premiums are a bit elevated. For co-products, we were anticipating a modest decrease in value in the second half following really lower market costs. And again, that is factored into our full year guidance. So, for me, I think it’s just important to note, the expanded risk management practices should really limit earnings volatility whether corn or co-products increase or decrease significantly from quarter-to-quarter. For next year, I will let Jim talk about contracting, but generally, as an idea, if we see lower CBOT futures or lower cost of corn, that’s going to work into how we quote prices and then also how we place hedges for 2024.

Yes. As it relates to contracting for next year, I mean we will have a better idea of how 2024 is shaping up as we get more data points in the coming months, say, for volume. But we historically, have transparently communicated with customers regarding rising or falling raw material costs, and we anticipate some pass-through of lower corn costs in 2024 if the markets remain with a similar outlook as they are today.

Yes. And Cody, I just want to make add as people listen to the call, right. So, our dollar profit per ton that we make on products, we believe that, that is sufficient for us to earn the return that we need to invest capital and to continue covering all of our operating costs. And so we really look at if there is a change in the cost of the raw material or the corn, we are going to be transparent with customers about that, but we firmly believe that in the dollar profit that we earn per ton is paying us for the value add that our ingredient solutions bring as well as incenting us to continue to invest in assets in the business.

Thank you. I appreciate it. I will pass it on.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Adam Samuelson of Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.

Yes. Hello. Good morning everybody. This is actually Guillermo [ph] stepping in for Adam. I am just wondering if you could provide some additional color on fixed cost absorption during the quarter and your expectations for the balance of the year.

Fixed cost absorption and impact in the quarter and for the – so as Guillermo, as we have said, when we had volumes decline in Q2, and we had actually talked about this in Q1 as well. That what we were anticipating is that we would be able to reduce some of our semi variable costs maybe such as the amount of hours of overtime, or the amount of expediting freight costs. Those costs disappear and those costs have been prevalent in our P&L in both ‘21 as well as in 2022. So, while we have had some higher fixed costs due to kind of lower absorption, but we have also been able to run the plants kind of with costs less at the French. And so we have been able to reduce some of those extra costs that always come at a marginally higher rate. And so we really, I think have done a nice job mitigating costs as we go forward. When we anticipate Q3 volumes being soft as well as in some recovery in Q4, that unabsorbed fixed cost is in our guidance for the balance of the year.

Okay. That’s super helpful. Thank you very much. And just as a follow-up, if you could describe a little bit into more detail each scenario under which you would hit each end of the guidance for the remainder of the year? What do you need to see over the vast of the year to hit each end of the guidance? Thanks.

Yes, sure. I think on the risk side, we are just – obviously, we are a little bit cautious on what the volume mix is, as Jim pointed out, I think the shape of the European economic growth or recession is still a little bit to be forming. On the – I think on the positive side, though, we really think that there are potentially some even stronger volume recoveries as we see into Q4 as well as we are looking at some of the costs of the spring corn may be beneficial to us as we think about the second half of the year.

That’s super helpful. Thank you very much.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Ben Theurer of Barclays. Your line is now open.

Hey. Good morning, Jim and Jim.

Good morning Ben.

Thanks for taking the question and congrats on the results. Wanted to dig into what you are seeing on the plant-based site and your venture there. I know that that’s been one of the topics we have talked a lot about in the past, but didn’t come up that much and the more recent ones, also in light of some of the comments we have heard from some of your peers and softness and saw our company’s results. Maybe what are you seeing on the demand for the ingredients side? And how do you feel about plant-based in general? That would be my first question.

Yes. So, we believe the plant-based trend is a long-term enduring trend. The market right now continues to be soft. In the U.S., quarter two IRI plant-based milk and alt meat sales were down 10% and 18% year-on-year, respectively. And we simply remain focused on building our customer pipeline and meeting new specification requirements for customers that’s where we think the opportunity is going to be for us because the consumers are going to be very discerning with these products related to the perception of their clean label status as well as the price points. So, as we can help the leading companies in that space – in those spaces, to deliver on high degrees of protein fortification, great texture, great taste, along with the clean label aspects, which we believe our products can help enable. And it’s not just the plant-based proteins piece, but it is the other texturizers that typically are part of those formulations. It’s more of a solutions approach to the plant-based sector that we expect to grow revenue and optimize our cost structure and be a significant player in that space. But right now, the market does continue to be soft.

Okay. Thanks for that. And then my second question is really about the ability around pricing and what you are seeing with your customers in regards to potential pushback or sensitivities around pricing? Because obviously, we saw a very good momentum still on pricing, but at the same time, volume in each region somewhat – some more and some a little less, but meaningfully impacted. So, what are your customers saying to you as you look into the back half and maybe into the, call it, next 12 months or so as it relates to pricing and some of the input costs coming down, are you seeing like first request for discounts, etcetera. So, how should we think about the price mix in light of the volume weakness?

Yes. I think it’s really too early to tell about how all of the factors that are going to impact market pricing for 2024 take shape. And why do I say that is because while some commodity cost inflation is subsiding, you have food inflation still sticky in other areas. And people are trying to determine what’s going to be the outlook for food inflation and energy inflation, especially as it relates to, say, oil prices now going back up. So, it’s quite cloudy and murky in relationship to the input costs side of the equation. And I think it’s one of the reasons why the markets are somewhat jittery in relationship to weather inflation may resurface. And that’s why I think the next few months are going to be very important to see how volume and demand manifest itself because if the total food supply chain network has over shifted from, again, a Just in Case to Just in Time and inventories do have to be replenished. That, along with what we are seeing right now with an uptick in oil prices and some aspects of food inflation increasing that could tighten things. And so I just think it’s too early right now to give a clear picture on that outlook. For us, we certainly want to retain the benefits that we have achieved from our pricing centers of excellence and the great job our go-to-market teams have done in delivering value through pricing. So, that will be our focus, but we want to do that in a very thoughtful, considerate way. But regardless, we are developing levers that we can pull to, again, focus on quality of earnings and drive growth in the business. And that’s why on the cost competitiveness side of the house, we are also driving a lot of productivity initiatives.

Thank you very much Jim.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions]

Operator, I don’t know if there is any other questions coming.

Alright. So, at the moment, yes, we do not see any other questions at this point. I would now like to turn the conference back to Jim Zallie for closing remarks.

Thank you. And to everyone, I just wanted to thank you for joining us this morning. We look forward to seeing many of you at our upcoming investor events, and I want to thank everyone for your continued interest in Ingredion.

That concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.