Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the Ingredion Third Quarter 2017 Earnings Call. For the conference, all participant lines are in a listen-only mode. There will be an opportunity for your questions. Instructions will be given at that time. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded. I'll turn the conference now over to Ms. Heather Kos. Please go ahead.

Good morning and welcome to Ingredion's third quarter 2017 earnings call. Joining me on the call this morning are Ilene Gordon, our Chairman, President and CEO; and Jim Gray, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Additionally, Jim Zallie, CEO-elect and currently Executive Vice President of Global Specialties and President of the Americas, will be participating in our Q&A session. Our results were issued this morning in a press release that can be found on our website, ingredion.com. The slides accompanying this presentation can also be found on the website and were posted a few hours ago for your convenience. As a reminder, our comments within this presentation may contain forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those predicted in the forward-looking statements and Ingredion is under no obligation to update them in the future as, or if, circumstances change. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed during today's conference call or in this morning's press release can be found in the company's most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K. During this call, we will also refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted earnings per share, adjusted operating income, and adjusted effective tax rates, which are reconciled to U.S. GAAP measures in Note 2, Non-GAAP information included in our press release and today's presentation appendix. Now, I'm pleased to turn the call over to Ilene.

Thanks, Heather, and let me add my welcome to everyone joining us today. We appreciate your time and interest. I am pleased to announce Ingredion ended the quarter with solid growth in earnings per share, operating income, adjusted operating income and adjusted earnings per share. Volumes grew by 2%, driven by acquisition-related and specialty volumes. The TIC Gums, Shandong Huanong and Sun Flour rice acquisition integrations are underway. We remain excited about the pipeline of projects and customer demand for new ingredients produced by these companies, as well as the margin expansion potential from synergy opportunities. Overall, I'm pleased that our business model and strategic blueprint continue to deliver shareholder value. And to that end, we announced a 20% increase in our dividend in September. Now, let's spend a moment on each region's performance in the quarter. Operating income in North America was $179 million for the quarter, up $15 million from last year. Overall volumes were up 1%, driven largely by our TIC Gums acquisition. In addition to supply chain interruptions caused by natural disasters, on both us and our customers, Mexico core volumes were down for the quarter due to customer shifts in brewery. Continuous improvement initiatives and lower input costs continue to drive good operational efficiency throughout the region. The TIC Gums integration continues as planned, further enhancing our texture capabilities and enabling us to deliver custom solutions faster, to small and medium-sized customers. We are pleased with our profit growth as we continue to focus on our trade up strategy, underpinned by our intense customer focus. In South America, operating income was $26 million, down $1 million versus last year, however, up $22 million from the second quarter. Our Brazil and Argentina network optimization and restructuring have made us more cost competitive and we are pleased…

Thank you, Ilene. Good morning, everyone. Let me start by covering the highlights of the income statement. Net sales were flat for the quarter. Higher volumes were offset by lower price/mix. Gross profit was higher by $19 million as a result of margin expansion in North America and the inclusion of the TIC Gums business and specialty ingredient volume growth. Reported and adjusted operating incomes were $233 million and $241 million, respectively. Reported operating income was lower than adjusted operating income by $8 million. The difference largely related to pre-tax restructuring charges of $5 million for our Finance Transformation project and $2 million for other employee-related severance. As you recall, the Finance Transformation project is expected to help us better leverage our cost structure to support our strategic growth initiatives. Additionally, we had pre-tax expense of $1 million for integration and acquisition costs. Our reported and adjusted earnings per share were $2.26 and $2.21, respectively. Reported earnings per share were higher than adjusted earnings per share, given the finalization of the U.S.-Canada tax settlement, which resulted in a tax-only deductible foreign exchange loss of $10 million. Moving on to the net sales bridge, our sales were flat versus last year. Volume and foreign exchange contributed $30 million and $3 million, respectively. This was offset by $37 million of unfavorable price/mix. Our price/mix change was largely driven by the pass-through of lower raw material costs in Brazil. As we look more closely by region, you can see unfavorable foreign exchange affected South America slightly but was offset by favorable foreign exchange in EMEA. Volumes were up in all four regions. In North America, volume was up, driven by our TIC Gums acquisition. In Asia Pacific, volume was up, given our specialty capacity expansions. However, price/mix was down due to the pass-through…

I'm pleased with our results this quarter. From a strategic perspective, our business model remains relevant and our blueprint continues to drive growth and maintain our momentum. Regional and sector fluctuations are offset by our geographic scope and customer diversity and we continue to optimize our cost structure for the future, while enabling investment through growth in our specialty business. As consumer demand for healthy products grows, we are well positioned to deliver innovative, on-trend ingredient solutions to meet this demand. We're very pleased with the integrations of our recent acquisition and we will continue to evaluate other acquisition opportunities that add value. I am also pleased with our ability to invest our capital to support growth and deliver shareholder value as evidenced by our 20% dividend increase. And now, we're glad to take your questions.

First, we'll go to the line of David Driscoll with Citi Investment Research. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you and good morning.

Good morning.

Hey, David.

Ilene, I want to say congratulations on the announcement for your retirement. Good luck with the next chapter and really appreciate all the assistance.

Thank you.

My question – thank you. My question is on North America and the volume environment. Can you discuss organic volume growth in North America in a bit more detail, specialty versus bulk and kind of how does it look on a forward basis? And just, finally, a background. I ask this question because I just get so many investor questions on the stability of North American margins, which are in my opinion in large part based upon volumes and just kind of how you guys see the outlook. Thank you.

Okay. Thanks, David, for that question and I'm going to turn it to Jim Zallie in a moment. But, as you know, we have not specifically broken out specialty volume versus bulk by region, but we are – although we alluded to the fact that the growth in specialty has continued to do well in the mature industries. And so, North America, as a region, in general, is a more mature region, though, of course, Mexico is considered a more emerging region. But, Jim, why don't you take some of the details?

Yeah, David. Let me start by just answering the question related to quarter three. So, for quarter three, what I would say in our core business, our core sweetener business, volumes were fine in U.S.-Canada. In Mexico, we saw some headwinds primarily related to the brewing sector and also some moderate impact due to natural disasters. And for specialties for the quarter, we basically were flat but in line with our expectations for the full year. And our focus going forward in specialties in North America is really intense customer focus to understand all of the shifts that are taking place, with consumer demand that are impacting our customers and focusing on providing the right solutions to those customers that are driving the growth and innovation. And we believe that our on-trend ingredients very much lend themselves to support those customers and their needs. So, going forward, I think, we're pretty optimistic about the future, as it relates to specialty's growth in North America.

So, just let me be clear. Like when you tie it all together for North America, some small amount of positive volume growth feel like a reasonable outlook for this segment and then that would fundamentally support the existing margin structure. Is that a fair statement? Would you agree with that?

Hey, David. This is Jim Gray. Yes. I would say that we get weighted up average for Mexico over the long run. I think, within U.S.-Canada, we experienced at least a bit of headwinds in some of the core sweeteners. But we think it's more than offset by some of the other sweetener segments and the starch segments and, in particular, the specialty segments that we participate and compete in. And so, yes, I think you're going to see a modest sales growth, but you're going to support that in terms of our overall margin mix and our margin improvement, as we've kind of put forth in the algorithm.

And then just completely separately, some of the food companies have been indicating that they see some early signs of improvement in the emerging markets. Can you give us your viewpoint on that topic? Obviously your Latin American business has been a struggle. I mean is there any indications that you're seeing some improvement within the emerging markets?

Well, this is Ilene. I'll start off and then – on EMEA and Asia Pac and then turn to Jim Zallie on the America. Certainly, in Asia-Pac, I think, we mentioned in places like China and Southeast Asia, we continue to see some improvement in the – certainly with our focus on the specialty environment. And so, we've been able to come up with solutions to really address the growth in those markets such as dairy, even the focus on clean label. EMEA, certainly the Europe side where we have a very strong specialty franchise has continued to perform and then Pakistan is an area where we are growing specialty. So, we do see in the emerging areas the opportunities. Even in Korea, consumers want to eat healthy. So, we are well positioned with our solutions that we move from one area to the other and localize. But let me turn it to Jim to talk about especially South America there.

Yeah. What I would just say for South America is that specifically in Brazil that we're seeing a little bit of economic uptick from a standpoint of what that means going forward. And we've got a very intense focus there on specialties. And our specialties business continues to do well there, despite some of the macroeconomic headwinds that have impacted that region. So, I would say the economic uptick in Brazil is just starting and we expect that hopefully to continue going forward into quarter four and into 2018.

Thank you so much. I'll pass it along.

Thanks, David.

Next we'll go to Rob Moskow with Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Hi. Thank you. And, Ilene, thank you for all your years of work on Ingredion. You really remade the company and set it up for success. So, congratulations.

Thank you. Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: And for, Jim, I just want to ask you about specialties being flat for the quarter. Nothing wrong with the quarter being flat but my impression is that this is a growth business. And was there anything specific that caused it to be flat? You said you're going to work to understand customer needs. I would assume that those needs just continue to push towards healthier product formulations and you need the starches to maintain the texture. Is anything specific happening in the quarter that we should know about?

Yeah. I would just want to clarify. So, for specialties overall on a global basis, we're actually up. The comment that I made was in relationship to the specific question on North America where volumes were flat. But for the year, in North America, volumes are also up so, for specialties. So, I would just say, it's kind of timing in shifts and roundabout that you typically see within a year, within a quarter. And I don't think there's anything specifically that's overly concerning right now. Again, our focus is working to find the growth and innovation that actually is occurring in the U.S. market coming from what we call emerging customers. We've got a very strong distributor network that actually cater to small and medium size and emerging customers. We're working on productivity projects that require specialty ingredients with the large CPG companies. And we're just monitoring all of the consumer shifts that are taking place and are very in tune to that. And we think that lends itself really well to our specialty. So, again, my comments were only for the quarter. Globally, specialty is up; North America year-to-date specialty is up. Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: I recognize that. So, Jim, like what are the leading indicators in North America specifically? Is it the number of requests for new product work? Is it reformulation work? And has anything changed in that regard?

I think, traditionally, we work to get new product briefs from customers, and we back-end monitor our win rates, for example, with customers, what our pipeline for new innovative projects are. So, we've got a very healthy pipeline and monitor that on a regular basis, on a customer-by-customer basis. So, we're feeling pretty good right now about the work that we're doing with customers from a standpoint of the richness of the pipeline.

The other thing I would add is the TIC Gums acquisition, which was very much focused on blending systems in small and medium-sized customers is really giving us an opportunity to look at the portfolios of these customers and come up with solutions that can be offered to both base customers, as well as the new customers. And so, the whole purpose behind that acquisition was to really expand our types of customers and our capabilities. So, that continues to make progress. Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: That's great. Thank you very much.

Our next question is from Brett Hundley with the Vertical Group. Please go ahead.

Hey. Thank you. Good morning, everyone.

Hi, Brett.

I originally wanted to ask a broad question on NAFTA, and I realized kind of quickly that I don't think any of us have a good idea of how that ends up. We all read about how things are trending. But what I wanted to alter my question was you guys have a very unique perspective because of your footprint across North America. And I wanted to see if you're hearing anything from customers, in-country, whether it's Mexico or Canada, kind of, under the broader dynamic that's occurring within the NAFTA renegotiation and if you're hearing anything positive or negative as it relates to your in-country assets and kind of the go-forward business dynamics?

This is Jim Zallie. So, what I would say is that we feel that the quality of communication that's occurring between all three countries and what is at stake is very clearly understood. And that the teams that are actually doing the negotiating are working together extremely well. And the impacts from a standpoint on food and agriculture are really understood and being communicated to representatives at the state level such that the governments involved will have all of the information at their disposal to make a very robust (32:43) decision at the end. So – and then, obviously, we're working through our industry organization, which is the Corn Refiners Association, to communicate in relationship to the impacts to our industry. So, we feel communication is excellent and that all the facts are on the table. And we're developing obviously all of our plans for whatever the outcome may be to continue our business model.

I appreciate that comment. And, I guess, where I was ultimately driving with here is a lot of people think about NAFTA dissolving as a worst-case scenario for a lot of industries, particularly across agriculture. But what I'm increasingly wondering, and I'm curious if you guys have had these conversations internally is, if NAFTA does dissolve, is that potentially even a net benefit for Ingredion. Ilene has long talked about the localness of these businesses. I'm just curious, given your asset footprint, if that's something that you – even if benefit is too strong of a word, if you can navigate that better than many might think.

Yeah. We really support free and open trade. And so, that's really how we think about it. And that even after the sugar suspension agreements were renegotiated, we thought very balanced. We looked at that as – made us very hopeful that it will all work out to be what it ought to be. So, we continue to support that open trade and believe that that's the course that we'll end up being at. And so, we don't take a position and are not having these discussions what if. We're obviously well planned. We have local ingredients. We still continue to, from a specialty point of view, take solutions from one area to another. And so, as an example, in Mexico, it's certainly very important that we have specialty solutions that help the consumer product companies save money. And we've actually worked on those briefs with those customers. But as it relates to NAFTA, we believe that the open trade will continue and will be very important.

Okay. I appreciate your comments on that. And then, I just have a question on APAC, and then I'll yield the floor. So, I wanted to go back to an announcement that Thailand made on instituting tariffs for sweetened beverage imports, and I wanted to tie that back into product mix changes that you guys are seeing in your Korean business. And I'm just curious, whether you're – with what you're seeing in Korea, if you're seeing the potential for more action like that, more broadly across the APAC region. And what that means for maybe near-term – both near-term volumes and longer-term margins for that geographical segment for you guys?

I'll start off and then Jim Gray can add something. But I would say that I've been actually very excited about the trends in Korea towards healthy specialty type ingredients. And that has given us the energy to really come up with formulations, especially in the sweetener area, to serve that market with those solutions. And it's not driven by any type of tariff or tax talk anywhere. And so, I look at that as the culture of Korea being really want to be driven towards healthy ingredients. So, there's always discussions in different regions of how this might – different taxes and trade. But, for the most part, we are very focused on the consumer and the demand for these healthy ingredients and the millennials that are buying their products, as they sit on their technology, their phones on their way home from work, whether it's in China or Thailand, and coming up with solutions that end up in the grocery store. So, we feel that that region is really, it's a young region. It's very right with wanting healthy, clean label solutions. So, Jim?

Maybe just to comment specifically on Thailand. As I interpreted, that import tariff was primarily designed just to tighten up the local market to support farmers of tapioca and rice. I view it as somewhat temporary. It might be in place for a year or so, but it didn't seem to indicate that it was kind of a permanent shift in the government's view on tariffs.

Appreciate that. And, Ilene, let me echo my same thoughts that have been passed along here thus far. Congratulations on a job well done at Ingredion. Thanks.

Thank you.

Next question is from Ken Zaslow with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning, everyone. Ilene, also good luck, and we wish you the best, and you've done a remarkable job with Ingredion. And so thank you very much.

Thank you.

Just going to the guidance for a second. You kind of indicate that it's going to be on the higher end of the guidance. Can you talk about the level of conservatism given that you exceeded expectations in the quarter and your non-operating opportunities of FX, lower tax and lower interest rates is probably about $0.25 to numbers? Why only raise it – why only kind of put it to the high end? Is there something fundamentally a little bit more difficult than you thought because again it just seems like with the beat (39:00) plus the $0.25 you'd be above the guidance? Can you talk to that?

Sure, sure.

I'm going to turn it to Jim Gray.

Yeah. I cannot – I don't know if I necessarily follow. You're saying the $0.25 in total, okay.

Yeah. Yeah. FX is up $0.05, tax about $0.10 and probably interest expense another $0.08 or $0.09, in that range. I might be off by a $0.01 or $0.02 but order of magnitude.

Yeah. So, just maybe one or two things. But the OpEx does pass-through to on the tax rate that's in the adjusted effective tax rate. The way we're kind of looking at Mexico resolving from a tax perspective, we're seeing a little weakening in the peso here going into Q4. To remind you, at the end of the year, we revalue our U.S. dollar-denominated balances that sit on our Mexico books, and we have a tax liability or a tax benefit. So, if Mexico peso devalues a bit, we're going to have a bit of a tax liability. So, that's why we guided a little bit more towards the adjusted effective tax rate being in the mid-30s. So, that's going to be one. I think, operationally, what we're seeing is, really, what we're a little bit cautious about is just some of the impacts that natural disasters, specifically Harvey, have had on some of our key inputs. And as that – particularly, chemical industry has been pretty well matched on supply and demand, has taken a little while for them to catch up on available supply. We're thinking that's going to have some pressure on input cost. So, we're just a little cautious there. I think in Asia Pac, we're a little – also cautious just a little bit on, right now, with the rains and – have had on the impact in tapioca root. We're seeing some price increases on root costs. It's pretty normal. We've been through these changes in the past, but it could have a pressure for a quarter or two on some costs that we see in Asia Pac.

Okay. And then, my next question is in terms of Mexico, can you give us an update on your volume movement there?

Volume movement in Mexico?

Yeah. How is that trending, particularly given the consolidation on the beer industry and stuff like that? I didn't know if there's any update on that.

Yeah. I'm going to let Jim Zallie handle that.

Yeah. As I mentioned earlier that there were some headwinds in Mexico primarily related to shifts in brewery. And, specifically, what happened is two of our larger customers were optimizing their network, one in particular, and shifted their mix of adjuncts. And so, we did see some volume decline. But longer-term, our products are very competitive for that market. And we use that position obviously and the leverage we have from an operational efficiency standpoint to drive our specialties business in Mexico. So – but that's what's happening with brewing in Mexico for the quarter. And it's something that probably will go into a little bit of quarter four. But long-term, again, cost competitiveness on our ingredients for the brewing sector remain intact.

But it will not affect 2018. Is that fair?

I don't think we anticipate anything acute in that area for 2018.

All right. I appreciate it. Thank you.

Next, we'll go to Farha Aslam with Stephens. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning.

Hey, Farha.

Good morning.

And, Ilene, my congratulations as well.

Thank you.

You've had a fantastic effect on Ingredion over the years.

Very excited.

And when we look at South America, I mean, that's a segment that's really – you see the delta quarter-to-quarter. Could you share with us your outlook on how you expect South America to recover? And longer-term, what's the earnings power of South America going forward?

I'll start of since I've had this continuity and then I'm going to let Jim Zallie give his view. He was in fact just down there. I do see the – I always like this green shoots. Brazil raised their GDP. It's starting to come back. That is exciting and a lot of people wanting healthy solutions. We're going to grow specialty down there. We've really nicely optimized our footprint in Brazil and by taking the right costing actions in Argentina we really feel like we've made some progress in that area. And, of course, Colombia GDP has been better than the other two and has some nice forecasts for next year and the year after to come back. So, we think that South America is an exciting market and many of the solutions that come from North America can be used down there, of course, altered to the particular area. So, I think the challenges have been more in the shorter-term. So, I know, Jim, would you like to add something to that?

Yeah. I think that we have been waiting for where the bottom is going to be for South America. And I think Brazil feels like it's reached that. I think one of the things that's important to highlight is the political stability, if you want to call it that, in both now Brazil and Argentina. Specifically in Argentina, it appears the Macri government has won in most recent parliamentary and Senate elections. And, so he seems to have more of a mandate. It seems like the President of Brazil is going to be able to finish his term. So, what I am feeling is that there's political stability between those two countries and they're very large trading partners with one another. And the GDP forecast for quarter four and for 2018 are certainly up in comparison to what they have been. So, we are seeing the feelings of green shoots in Brazil right now, so that we'll remain optimistic on that. And the Andean region imposed VAT, which kind of moderates its growth and the consumer confidence there has come off a little bit. But, overall, again, it's a more specialties business for us and continues to grow nicely. But I would say that what's optimistic is the political stability and consumer confidence. Ilene talked about GDP increasing. Inflation is also coming down in both Argentina as well as Brazil. And also unemployment is coming down in Brazil. And so, we think all of those factors collectively make for a brighter outlook for 2018 than 2017.

Helpful. And, Jim, as you take over leadership of Ingredion, do you anticipate maintaining the company's target of double-digit EPS growth?

Well, what I would say to that is that we have November 14 on your calendars for the Analyst Day and that's the purpose of that. And we look forward to seeing you there and everyone else.

Thank you very much.

Our next question is from Akshay Jagdale with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Ilene, congratulations. You'll be dearly missed.

Thank you.

So, I wanted to ask first about just this year how it's panned out relative to your initial expectations and the implications that that might have on 2018. So, since you gave your first preliminary look in 4Q, the EBIT pre-FX, if I may, or constant currency is weaker than what you may be thought, right. And so, there's been some pretty significant issues, right? You got the South America issue, which is probably the biggest one, the brewery customers in Mexico and then the APAC's mix shift. So, first, am I capturing the main headwinds relative to what you thought was going to happen? And, secondly, some of those things are going to come back in 2018, right? Specifically, in South America, you've got this cost savings. I think it's $8 million next year and you had the $10 million or so in transitory cost in the first half. So, can you just help me? I'm trying to get a sense of 2018. Like some of these issues seem like they were pretty big and transitory this year, but should benefit next year. So, am I thinking about that correctly? Maybe you can give us a little more color there.

Well, it's Ilene. I'll start off and then I'll turn it to Jim Gray. And we are working through next year. And, as you know, we don't give guidance for 2018 yet. We will at the fourth quarter call. But it's interesting actually. I was looking back at the original guidance last February of $7.40 to $7.80. And there was a lot of water ahead of us in the year. And today, to really bring the bottom up and we brought it up to $7.50 at the end of Q1. And then now, we're bringing it up to $7.65. So, I would say that we're certainly still in the original range and more of the above in the first – in the top half of the original guidance. So, things have really – many positive things have happened to help us be in the trajectory that we've committed to on our algorithm. I would say, certainly, you've been able to point to the things that we've been very transparent on whether it's – obviously, when we gave that guidance, we weren't ready to do the restructuring in Southern Cone. And so, we've been through the whole Argentina issue and we've denoted some things with the brewery and then, of course, some of the natural disasters we really weren't dialing in, but we've been able to have a number of things to offset that. And, of course, we're excited about the sugar suspension agreement and how that's been navigated by our government and the industry as we went through all that. So, I think, you've captivated a lot of the main events, but I would not say that our results are weaker than we anticipated. I think they're right on. And so, it really is all about setting ourselves up, growing our specialty. Our specialty growth is on track with our algorithm. And so, I think that when we have our Analyst Day and you'll hear us continue to talk about our excitement of growing our specialty strategy and some of the bolt-ons that we get done in 2016. I mean TIC Gums was the end of last year. The rice one was completed in March 11. So, really, we are getting – we're still working through all the benefits of the integration of the specialty acquisition. So I know, Jim, how do you think about the other (51:24) side?

Actually, I think, it is interesting that you pick up on those three events. First in South America, particularly in Argentina, we did have some one-time costs that were captured within our operating income. Those are transitory but we really had to take the actions to do everything we could to set ourselves up for the best success we can going forward. And I think that's what we've done in Argentina. I think when you think about Mexico and the headwinds that we've experienced a little bit in brewery, customers have to resolve things in mergers and plant shifts. And so, it's not – it wasn't unexpected and it's something that we're very capable of managing through in the long run. So, I still feel very optimistic about the cost base that we have in Mexico on our ability to compete and win, particularly whether it's adjunct inputs or other specialty ingredients or other starches within Mexico and kind of really love the Mexico market opportunity. When you think about Asia Pacific, I don't want to show necessarily – focused on necessarily what we're doing in our Korea core mix shifts. Those are lumps that we have to take. We're moving towards more specialty blends but, more importantly, we've made some great investments in Asia Pac that really set us up in other organic platforms, notably rice, as well as expanding in tapioca that we feel are very, very on-trend. So, I would say I'm really excited about the longer-term smart moves we've made in Asia Pac and kind of excited to see how that's going to play out in 2018 and beyond. And then, finally, I don't want to underplay, but TIC Gums acquisition is really going to be beneficial. It's a wonderful marriage, furthering our capabilities in both starch as well as gums. We're into some very, very unique platforms there and love the customer service spirit that we have in TIC Gums. And I think that's going to really play well for us not just in North America, but elsewhere across the globe.

Perfect. Yeah. I didn't mean to imply it's been a worse year in any way. It's been a very solid year, but below the line items, right. So you've had several benefits there, slightly lower tax rate, lower financing cost than initially, I guess, expected. So, you've been able to navigate through a lot of those things. And I was just trying to get a sense of some of the benefits of the things you navigated through that might be coming next year. But thank you for the color. Can I ask about the contracting season? Obviously, ADM made some comments, I think, recently. So, can you give us some sense of how that's going for next year and how is the uncertainty about NAFTA impacting those, if at all?

Yeah. No. It's Ilene and I'll ask Jim Zallie to be ready to make any comments here since we don't really talk about contracting this early. But, Jim, how would you take that?

Yeah. I mean, I would just repeat what you just said that our policy is that we don't comment on 2018 contracting until it is complete. However, just in relationship to overall industry fundamentals and industry capacity utilization remaining high and overall sweetener dynamics, we're feeling very good about 2018 as well. And, again, it's really too early to understand the full ramifications of NAFTA and what is actually going to happen with NAFTA.

Okay. And just one last one for you, Jim. I don't want you to steal any thunder from your Analyst Day here, but one of the things we hear about from investors is sort of trying to better evaluate more frequently, I guess, the value of your specialty portfolio. And I know we've had discussions with Ilene about the challenges that are posed as sort of breaking that out financially in terms of separating the costs. So my question to you is just more broader. I mean, do you think – I mean, the stock's been really well under Ilene's leadership, no doubt about that. But do you think the market is fairly valuing the specialty portfolio you have today and the opportunity going forward? Just high level what do you think? Thanks.

Well, I mean I would – this is Jim Gray. I think that the market definitely has both a view of what we've delivered in terms of net sales and profit growth as well as some consensus, implicit expectation of what we can do going forward with regard to net sales and profit growth. I think that – and it's hard for me to kind of say where the market's at. I would say though that when we look at our plans, our long-term plans and our capital allocation, we see many opportunities to further our strategic blueprint. And that includes real, crisp focus on specialty products and platforms where we think we can compete very effectively in the future and compete globally. We are trying to make sure that our costs are in line to go do that, so that we can leverage that growth and accelerate that growth as much as possible. But I remain really excited about what our growth potential is from a profit perspective, driven by our specialty platforms.

Thank you.

Okay.

And we'll go to Adam Samuelson with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Adam Samuelson - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: Yes. Thanks. Good morning. And let me just follow on and echo everyone's comments. Ilene, congratulations on tenure and the retirement. Good luck in the next part of your life. There's been a lot of ground covered today. I guess I wanted to hone in a little bit on Mexico and Latin America. If you look at some of the comments made by some of the big food and beverage companies, especially the bottlers, noted a real softening in Mexico on the volume side for CSDs beyond just some of the brewing disruptions that you've already alluded to and parts of Colombia as well. Just wanted to get your sense if you're seeing the similar comments in your engagements with those customers and how the negotiations on pricing with them have evolved for 2018? And then I have a follow-up in North America.

Yeah. It's Ilene. I'll start off, and then Jim Zallie will make some comments. But we work very closely with our customers to help come up with these specialty solutions. And we do see these trends of the consumers wanting healthy ingredients around the world continuing to accelerate. They're obviously in different stages in different parts of the world, a more mature market in the U.S.-Canada versus more of the growth in a place like China or even very early days in Brazil. But we do see the consumers wanting the healthy ingredients. So, we're very excited about our portfolio and our ability through our Idea Labs to develop those solutions and then to localize them. But, of course, when you look at some of the mature regions, the larger companies are finding challenges and have to renovate their portfolio. And some are more able to do that than others, certainly with healthy ingredients. And so, that's why, when Jim Gray mentioned before, again, the TIC acquisition, which will – brings us a newer set of customers, smaller ones to go after, that could be bought by the big ones or that we can tailor our solutions. But I still think that the acceleration of the demand for the healthy ingredients is really in every region at different rates, and so that really is our whole strategic focus. And so, I know, Jim, you have spent a lot of time with customers. So, what would you want to add there?

Yeah. Just specifically, maybe to talk about some of the recent announcements, as it relates to Mexico and then Colombia. I do think what we've heard from various customer announcements is that the impact of the earthquake in Mexico did have some impact on supply chain dislocations and disruptions. And that impacted some of the customers that you're referring to – their business. We're not really seeing that much of an impact, but we do see a small impact in quarter three and a little bit probably in quarter four. But, again, this will be a kind of a temporary natural disaster-related impact, but it won't change the fundamentals and the bullishness that we have for Mexico. In addition, Mexico GDP has kind of moderated down to the lower ends of the 2% range. For Colombia, I did allude to this fact that Colombia had been growing nicely, I would say, in the 3%, 4% GDP range. This year, it's forecasted at about 1.7%. And they did impose early in the year a VAT from 16% to 19%, and consumer confidence has taken a little bit of a hit in that regard. So, I think consumer spending there. But the fundamentals of the country in Colombia are still very sound, very solid. And our market position, which Jim talked about, our market positions in Mexico, our market positions certainly in a country like Colombia are excellent. And the cost competitiveness in which we operate lends itself extremely well to participate at a very high level when consumer activity starts to strengthen. So, we don't see anything that you're referring to that are maybe natural disaster-related being anything that would be protracted in regards to impacting our business. Adam Samuelson - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: Okay. And then I guess to follow-up on North America was – and you alluded earlier the specialty volumes in U.S. and Canada were flat in the quarter. Some deceleration from the first half, maybe it's a little bit of quarterly noise. Just trying to understand the confidence level and the idea that it's just noise and you're – any kind of quantification or color on your brief activity, your new product pipeline, customer wins that would point to a reacceleration in that as you move into next year, excluding kind of TIC Gums coming into the base for organic, I guess, in the first quarter.

Hey. Adam, this is Jim Gray. Let me comment once, and then Jim Zallie can provide color as well. One of the reasons that we don't talk about specialties from quarter to quarter, right, is understanding that our CPG firms that we serve have different innovation cycles, right? So, right now, if you're in a big CPG company, you're actually getting ready for your innovation. You've probably already approved it in the pipeline. You're beginning to make cycle because you want to have product landing whenever they're going to reach that shelves, right, at Walmart or wherever else. And sometimes in your category, they may reach that shelfs in January. They may reach that shelfs in April, right? So our off-take of our demand for our new ingredients that support innovation at our customers whether it's in clean label, non-GMO, gluten-free, et cetera, et cetera, there's various timing differences on when that off-take can go, right? So, from quarter to quarter it doesn't really matter. What we need to focus on are those indicators that say that we still have a robust specialty business. We look at our innovation pipeline. We look at the number of conversations that we're having, the breadth of those conversations, the quality of the customers, the size and the potential growth for those customers. So, that's really how we've kind of shaped our business when we're looking at broadly across North America. So, I would just say, as Jim echoed, we're still very positive on all of the technology we bring, particularly our new platforms that we're bringing in rice and potato and evolving in tapioca and honestly behind all the work that's done in Bridgewater and behind our commercial teams. We remain very excited about the opportunities within U.S.-Canada, as you pointed out, I would say broadly in North America. And then we're rapidly working on that integration of TIC Gums into that. So with that said, I'll be purposefully commercial and just say, come to November 14, because we're going to highlight some of that as well and we're very kind of proud of that progress. So - Adam Samuelson - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: I'll be there, looking forward to it.

Okay. Great. Thanks, Adam.

Our final question will be from Arthur Reeves with Société Générale. Please go ahead. Arthur Reeves - Société Générale SA (UK): Good afternoon, everyone, and congratulations, Ilene. Two questions from me, please. South America, we've got operating income in the quarter of $26 million. Is that the sort of new run rate now that you've done all the restructuring or was that affected by any one-offs in the quarter? And then my second question is about North America, just covering the previous question. You've talked before about smaller customers growing faster than larger customers. Is that sort of the case, please?

Arthur, let me take the South America kind of run rate question. So, just to remind you and everyone, so South America's business tends to be a little bit more seasonal. So, as we see spring, summer and then their fall, right, which is kind of that November, December, January, February, that's when we see the peak in our business there. So, quarter-to-quarter, usually first half is 40%, 45% of the profit. The second half is going to be 60%, maybe a little bit more of the profit. So, anticipate that Q4 will be sequentially larger than Q3. And then to answer your kind of question technically, actually no, because we are building in some expected savings from the labor actions in the restructuring that we took in Argentina. The run rate on that savings – we'll start to see that more in Q4 of 2017 and then that will carry over into 2018. So, we would probably expect – all things being constant, we would expect a bit higher run rate on a Q3 for 2018 versus Q3 for 2017.

And what I would say on the smaller, medium-sized customers, yes, they are growing faster than the larger ones. So you know that the large companies are buying some of the smaller ones. And so, we look at our role is, really, to come up with solutions that delight the consumer who may be served by any one of the size customers now and in the future. And so, it's all about healthy ingredients. And so our specialty starches, some of our specialty sweeteners blends really address those different areas and those different type of consumers that we reach in different parts of the world to tailor to their taste. Arthur Reeves - Société Générale SA (UK): Okay. Thank you very much.

Thanks, Arthur.

So, I think we're at the end here and I know we've been through the questions. So, what I would – just like to send a couple of closing comments here and say that before we sign off, I'd like to reiterate our confidence in our business model, strategy, and long-term outlook. We remain keenly focused on value creation and delivering value to shareholders. Thank you for all your comments and questions. And we'd like to remind you about November 14, if we haven't already, as our upcoming Analyst Day in Bridgewater, New Jersey. You're all invited. We hope to see you there. So, that brings our third quarter 2017 earnings call to a close. Thanks again for your time today.

Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude your conference. You may now disconnect.