Barry Steele
Analyst · Craig-Hallum Capital Group. Please go ahead
Thank you, Rich, and thank you, everyone, on the call for joining us today. I'm going to focus on three topics, the main drivers for the current quarter's results, some details related to our outlook for the fourth quarter and a discussion of the new Sanara partnership, including how we will account for this - for its activities. First, let me touch on our financial results for the third quarter, which will include both year-over-year and sequential improvements on various metrics. Net revenues for the third quarter of 2022 totaled $27.3 million, which was about a 3% increase from the prior year. While this fell short of our expectations, a topic which I'll talk more about in a moment, we set a new quarterly revenue record, the third time we've seen that this year. The year-over-year growth came from the IPS segment with oncology increasing by $550,000 or 4% and pain management increasing by $308,000 or 37%. Revenue for the DME segment was slightly down compared to the prior year, but that was due to lower medical equipment sales, which tend to vary from quarter-to-quarter due to the uneven timing of large orders. This decrease, which totaled $837,000 or 41%, was nearly offset by increases in rental and biomedical services revenue, which increased by $522,000 and $236,000, respectively, both of which saw double-digit increases of 13% for rentals and 16% for BioMed. The Biomedical Services revenue included initial amounts of revenue from the GE Biomedical Services agreement that was launched in April of this year. Revenue under that agreement totaled $414,000 for the quarter. You may recall that our revenue under this important contract is expected to grow as we continuously onboard locations and devices. As of September 30, we have cumulatively onboarded nearly 27,000 devices. This represents 13% of the devices needed to reach the midpoint of our annual revenue goal of $10 million to $12 million under the contract. Gross profit for the third quarter totaling $16.2 million was also an all-time record. This improvement was due to the higher revenue and an improving gross margin percentage, which increased to 59.5%, representing a significant increase from both the prior year and sequentially. This increase was driven by both improved product revenue mix coming from higher ITS and rental revenues, both of which are higher in gross margin than say, equipment sales, which decreased and improved productivity for our team of biomedical technicians. You may recall that in prior quarters, we had begun to increase the number of biomedical technicians, which increased costs prior to revenue coming online. These costs were better absorbed with the higher Biomed services revenue during the current reporting period. Total selling, general and administrative costs were $15.3 million for the third quarter. This was $333,000 or 2% lower than the prior year third quarter. Decreases in stock-based compensation, which was $900,000 lower and intangible asset amortization, which decreased by $421,000, were partially offset by higher general and administrative expenses, including costs to upgrade our internal control documentation for Sarbanes Oxley actually, which is being audited for the first time this year and higher short-term incentive compensation accruals. Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter was $5.6 million or 20.5% of net revenue. This amount was $100,000 higher than the third quarter of 2021 and about the same as this year's second quarter. Now let me tell you more about our full year outlook. As I mentioned earlier, reported revenue was behind our previous forecast. This was attributable to revenue growth coming slower than anticipated for both pain management and the new biomedical services contract, longer than anticipated time needed to prepare a new device for Wound Care and the timing impacts of equipment sales. Despite year-over-year revenue growth of 37%, our expectations for pain management revenue were much higher than our actual performance. This is due mainly to slower onboarding of new customers. This lower growth rate is expected to continue during the fourth quarter. The same is true for our biomedical services revenue. While picking up significant momentum in onboarding of new devices under the GE Healthcare contract, the pace was still behind our previous expectation. This has not changed our overall assessment of the amount of revenue we will ultimately achieve under the agreement. In fact, that expectation has improved considerably. This lower onboarding pace will continue during the fourth quarter. However, the new contract to provide RFID tagging, which was not in our previous forecast, will mostly offset this. You may recall that we reduced our expectations for Wound Care revenue when we provided our previous guidance by taking out anticipated equipment leases that cannot be fulfilled since our supplier at Cardinal Health, took away our ability to provide the necessary equipment. We do not anticipate that would have a negative impact on our ability to grow our treatment volume. That volume actually decreased during the third quarter. Fortunately, now that we have a new supplier for negative pressure wound therapy devices and a new customer that needs equipment due to the Cardinal supply issue, we are now expecting an equipment lease to be completed in the fourth quarter. Finally, our DME equipment sales were lower than anticipated for the third quarter. As I mentioned earlier, this represented typical timing for that business since large orders have a tendency to vary quarter-to-quarter. We expect to make up for this shortfall during the fourth quarter. Furthermore, we are anticipating a number of additional large orders to close during the fourth quarter as customers rush to complete their fiscal year and capital spending plans. These orders, along with the anticipated negative pressure wound therapy equipment lease are expected to drive a significant increase in net revenue for the fourth quarter. However, we have only included a portion of these amounts in our stated revenue outlook as we know we will not close 100% of them by year-end. For example, we have only included 50% of the negative pressure wound therapy lease deal despite our confidence being significantly higher. As a result of these factors, and as Rich has stated, we are forecasting to complete 2022 with total revenue of approximately $112 million and adjusted EBITDA of approximately $22 million. The last topic I'd like to talk about related to the new partnership in Wound Care. The setup for this arrangement will have an impact on how you will see earnings appear in our financial statements for the commercial activities of the partnership. That is because products that will be sold by InfuSystem will run through the partnership in order to capture margins that will then be shared equally by the partners. For regulatory reasons, the partnership will not have its own revenues to third-party customers. Instead, it will sell products to InfuSystem for resale to customers. Because of this, our gross profit on partnership revenue will only cover certain general and administrative expenses. In addition, there will be expenses that we charge directly to the partnership through a separate services agreement. We will not be able to consolidate the partnership's financial statements but will account for our interest as an equity investment. As such, InfuSystem's share of earnings, which is 50% and includes the gross - product throughput will be reported as income from equity invested and included in InfuSystems operating income. And with that, I'd like to turn it back over to Mr. Dilorio.