Good day, everyone, and welcome to the First Internet Bancorp's Earnings Conference Call for the Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2023. At this time, all lines are in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] And please note that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Larry Clark from Financial Profiles, Inc. Please go ahead, Mr. Clark.

Thank you, Jenny. Good day, everyone, and thank you for joining us to discuss First Internet Bancorp's financial results for the fourth quarter and full-year 2023. The company issued its earnings press release yesterday afternoon, and it's available on the company's website at www.firstinternetbancorp.com. In addition, the company has included a slide presentation that you can refer to during the call. You can also access these slides on the website. Joining us today from the management team are Chairman and CEO, David Becker; and Executive Vice President and CFO, Ken Lovik. David will provide an overview, and Ken will discuss the financial results. Then we'll open up the call to your questions. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that this conference call contains forward-looking statements with respect to the future performance and financial condition of First Internet Bancorp that involve risks and uncertainties. Various factors could cause actual results to materially be different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors are discussed in the company's SEC filings, which are available on the company's website. The company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements made during the call. Additionally, management may refer to non-GAAP measures, which are intended to supplement, but not substitute for the most directly comparable GAAP measures. The press release, available on the website, contains the financial and other quantitative information to be discussed today, as well as a reconciliation of the GAAP to non-GAAP measures. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to David.

Thank you, Larry. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining us today as we discuss our fourth quarter and full-year 2023 results. The fourth quarter was notable for a multitude of reasons, but most importantly because it showed the meaningful progress and early signs of the tangible financial benefits resulting from our efforts to transform our company and balance sheet over the past few years in order to improve returns for our shareholders. We are a little less than a month away from our 25th anniversary. And while each year brings both triumphs and setbacks, I can honestly say that 2023 was peppered with a greater variety of challenges than the rest. It was this time, one year ago, that we announced our decision to exit the residential mortgage business, a cyclical, transactional, low-multiple business. Also in '23, we managed successfully through a very challenging interest rate cycle, while also navigating an industry liquidity scare. We now stand poised to benefit as debt policy looks set to provide a helpful tailwind, rather than a headwind, to our business. We also effectively turned to battleship and transitioned our loan composition in favor of variable rate and higher-yielding loan products which have helped to diversify our loan portfolio, and significantly improve our interest rate risk profile. Necessary but never easy, these actions have, in the aggregate, improved our balance sheet positioning and financial results. And will enable us to continue to drive improvement in our earnings and profitability. Starting with the highlights on slide three, I'd like to discuss some key themes for the quarter. As I said, we continue to transition the composition of our loan portfolio and optimize our overall balance sheet mix. We deployed some of the liquidity we had built up in the previous quarter to drive loan…

Thanks, David. Since David covered the loan portfolio, let's jump to deposits on slides five through seven. Deposit balances declined slightly from the prior quarter as we deployed some of the liquidity built up in the prior quarter to fund loan growth and to pay down higher cost broker deposits. Non-maturity deposits were up over $82 million or 4.6% due to increases in fintech partnership deposits and money market balances. Deposits from our fintech partners were up 34% from the third quarter and totaled $218 million at quarter-end. Additionally, these partners generated over $4.7 billion in payments volume, which was up 23% from the volume we processed in the third quarter. Total fintech partnership revenue almost doubled quarter-over-quarter to $414,000 with the large majority of the increase consisting of recurring interest income, oversight and transaction fees. Related to CD activity during the quarter, total balances were down about $19 million from the linked quarter. We originated $278 million in new production and renewals during the fourth quarter at an average cost of 5.03% and a weighted average term of 15 months. These were more than offset by maturities of $297 million with an average cost of 4.34%. Looking forward, we have $466 million of CDs maturing in the first quarter of 2024 with an average cost of 4.61% and $337 million maturing in the second quarter with an average cost of 4.81%. So, as we noted last quarter, the repricing gap between the cost of new CDs and the cost of maturing CDs is closing, which will contribute significantly to the continued pace of slowing deposit costs. Additionally, as I noted earlier, we use liquidity to pay down broker deposits, which decreased $79 million from the end of the third quarter as we continue to reduce higher cost portions of…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your first question is from Brett Rabatin from Hovde Group. Please ask your question.

Hey, guys, good afternoon.

Hey, Brett.

Hey, guys. Wanted to start with just the funding mix from here, and just thinking about you mentioned the fintech opportunities, and those seem to be slightly lower cost than maybe the CD internet rates. Just wanted to see what the outlook was for growth of those deposits? And then it does seem like your cost of funding has kind of gotten close to peaking now. And I see on the internet a 535 rate for a one-year CD. So, maybe there's still a little pressure left. Can you maybe talk about the funding mix from here? And, obviously, if rates do go down, I would assume you'll seek some benefit from that in the back-half of the year.

Yes, I want to -- we'll take the CDs and the benefit in the back-half of the year. I think in the CD, what we have found here -- I mean, in the first quarter here actually our CD origination -- new origination costs have actually come down. What we've seen is actually consumers in small business going out longer on the curve, where the yield curve is still inverted. So, we're seeing more three-year and five-year CD mix than, say, one-year. So, our new CD volume is actually coming in around 4.80% right now. That could change based on the outlook, but that's what we're seeing right now. And certainly in the back-end of the year it's hard to predict when or if rates will come down. But certainly as the Fed brings -- if the Fed were to bring the front end of the curve down there is a benefit for us. I mean just kind of as a data point we have -- we got $1 billion of CDs that are tied in -- or not CD, rather $1 billion of deposits that are tied in some way directly to Fed funds. So, you can kind of do the math on what impact rate declines will have on deposit costs when and if the Fed starts bringing rates down.

Okay, that's helpful. Thanks for that.

From the backside of things, Ken made the comment that, in his presentation, I can't remember off the top of my head, that we had an increase in the fourth quarter. We have that same capability going forward. As stated earlier, we are still a little bit cash-flush. So, kind of depending up on loan demand, we can move that number up and down. But you hit the nail on the head. It is very inexpensive compared to some of the other alternatives for cash. So, that'll be kind of dependent on what goes on. We don't want to be in a position to bring in a ton of cash and then have to move it out into the secondary market. So, we're paying attention and trying to balance both side. But you're right; it is less expensive than CDs today. It's on par with our internal money market accounts. So, it's not as expensive as it was in the first quarter of last year by any means. And most of those higher balances we've been able to run off, and we're kind of at the end of the line on swapping a higher rate for lower rate. So, it's available to us, and we'll take it as needed would be how I'd leave it for you.

Okay. And that brings us to the second question. You mentioned liquidity in cash. You obviously used some cash this quarter to fund the loan growth. Can you talk about what the light liquidity level is or cash, and where you see that number bottoming out or what's a good liquidity ratio for you guys?

Yes, I -- I think as the things that went on earlier in '23 have kind of settled down. I think for us a good liquidity number is probably somewhere in the 300 to 350 range on any given day. We have been maintaining slightly higher than that, and certainly much higher than that earlier in the year. But that's probably a good balance on a day-to-day basis for us.

Okay, great. If I can sneak in one other, I've got a ton of questions; I'll jump back in the queue. But on the fee income growth of 30%, can you break out maybe how much of that would be SBA versus other sources of fee income, fintech opportunities, et cetera?

Yes, I would say that probably -- well, let's -- I would say SBA is forecasted to be up about maybe 25%, but that's obviously the biggest number in there, so that's the biggest driver. There is certainly a fee -- there's probably about an additional maybe $1 million of extra income that we're forecasting from fintech. We also expect to start to get some distributions from some of our fund investments, that's a piece of it as well. But certainly the biggest piece of it is just growth in SBA.

Okay, great. Thanks for all the color.

Thank you.

Thank you. Your next question is from Michael Perito from KBW. Please ask your question.

Hey, guys, good afternoon. Happy New Year. Thanks for taking my questions.

Hey, Mike.

Hey, Mike.

I wanted to maybe just start building on some of the guide that you guys provided, which was helpful, so thanks for that. But just as we think about the NIM getting to 1.95%-2% by the end of the year, rates cuts, obviously if they come to fruition probably helpful on top of that. Could we start getting back in the conversation about the ROE on the business here, and what you guys think can -- we can maybe exit the year as conservatively on that 1.95% to 2% and probably have some upside if you get two or three cuts. Just trying to think about how you guys are positioning the business from a profitability standpoint and prioritizing growth? Like I mentioned, SBA has been very ROE accretive as it is some lower yielding loans. Just trying to get some updated thoughts around that?

I'll let Ken hit ROE question for you. But from an earnings perspective, as we discussed last quarter, we think earnings for the year will be right at the $3 mark, a little above -- maybe a penny or two below compared to -- and that's with no change in the Fed funds rate. If that happens, then kind of a little bit of modeling, for every quarter point they drop the Fed rate, that impact to us is going to be somewhere in the $500,000 to $600,000 range. So, it could move significantly if the Fed starts popping. But we're pretty comfortable we're going to have a three handle on earnings at the end of the year. And Ken could convert that to ROE for me.

Yes, maybe -- yes, I mean in terms of -- if we just look our baseline --

I'm not necessarily asking for ROE guide, but like just -- well, if you guys are picking where to allocate capital and what businesses to grow, and where do the ROEs you think the business can start to generate as this NIM finally gets some recovery here, which is great to see?

Well, I think if you think about what we've doing on the lending side, where we've been -- in terms of -- I would maybe even say allocating or re-allocating capital, right, with this interest rate environment it hasn't made sense to be lending in competitive long-term fixed-rate verticals, and we focused on the SBA, which obviously has higher yield. Then you have the fee income. You have construction, which when we started we were coming from almost nothing. And the higher -- not only the benefit of a higher yield, but certainly improves the interest rate risk profile of our institution. And we've had some growth in franchise spending. And since some of that growth will probably not be as pronounced as it was this past year, we've pulled forward some growth there. But in terms of the lending areas, that will be the primary focus as we remain in this elevated rate environment. I think all-in, if we're looking on our baseline assumption, we're probably getting -- starting to get close to a 10% ROE by the fourth quarter. And as David talked a little bit about the impact of rate cuts on that, then it goes north of that.

Pre the run-up in rates and stuff, when we were running at a 1% ROA, our ROE was in that 10.5% to 11.5% range. And I can tell you senior management for the bank, our long-term incentive this year is based on, Mike, us getting back to 1% ROA. That's going to be a tough call, but we think it's achievable. And so if we hit the 1%, as Ken said, we should be back into the low double digits on ROE.

That's helpful, guys. And it makes a lot of sense. And then I guess the follow-up I have is just, understanding you guys are allocating capital to a bunch of different things. But with that frame in mind, doesn't it make -- does it make sense for buybacks to continue at some pace here? And any updated thoughts around that capital, for the next couple of quarters here?

Yes. We're still in the market and we're buying back shares. But I would tell you, we slowed down significantly in the fourth quarter, and until we get kind of back above the 7% and the 10% on the TCE and Common Equity Tier 1. Common Equity Tier 1, we are going to be conservative a little bit on the stock repurchase. But we are in the market. We're out there. The numbers will be a little thinner than it was last quarter. But again, that's a tremendous use when book value is $45 I think we were top to $30 today. That's still a pretty serious discount to book value. So, we will take advantage of it. And for some reason, some geopolitical event or something blows up out here, we will be back in the market, but knocks down pricing and become an active purchaser again.

Got it. And then, just lastly for me, the SBA and the Banking-as-a-Service businesses seem like good stories where you guys invested early and they're now kind of bearing fruits from those early labors. Is there any other kind of initiatives you feel like you're at earlier stages where you think over the next year or two we should be mindful of revenue ramp or is it just kind of or is there just more kind of continued runway in those two that you think is still worth the majority of your attention? Just would love a kind of an initiative update.

I would tell you that, yes, there's still a tremendous upside for both of those. And as I stated, we don't even within the BaaS Businesses we have aligned today, we don't add another one. We have phenomenal upside and opportunity. If somebody folds out, we might take a look or a good opportunity comes along. But yes, there's tremendous upside there. We continue to look at other verticals. We've talked to different equipment leasing firms and things. But I would tell you, those two will be the Lion's share of our effort and focus in 2024.

Got it. Great. Hey, guys, thanks for taking my questions for all the color. Appreciate it.

Appreciate it, Mike. Thank you.

Thank you. Your next question is from George Sutton from Craig-Hallum. Please ask your question.

Thank you. David, you were pretty optimistic about the construction loan market and you have some pretty big year-over-year growth. Can you just talk about the pricing dynamics in that market? How it might compare to the overall portfolio?

Yes, George. And Ken, correct me if I get this wrong. It's SOFR -- bingo plus 3% on average, some cases a little bit higher, maybe just a tad bit lower, but it's all yielding north of 8% now, adjustable rate. So, it is very accretive to day in and day out earnings for us with the portfolios averaging a little over 5%. That's a nice bump and it's a big number. It's solid. We've got no concerns about any of the commitments that we've made, and it's a real strong piece of business for us.

That sounds great. One quick question for Ken, how do we think of the economic impact to you? What you mentioned $1.4 billion of volume coming through the fintech partnerships. How do we think of that netting down to you?

That's on the payment processing side of things. That's really just a transactional fee on the ACH clearings where the income comes into us, George, is we're in the lending side of things. Today, we're getting and obviously, it's kind of the buyer's market today as the fintechs are having some issues and concerns out in the marketplace. We're adjusting pricing on a unit-by-unit basis, both on a fee, on a transactional play as well as base fees for the ongoing monitoring. So, revenue is going to increase, but as we said, we went up 83% fourth quarter over third quarter. And I would tell you, it will be up probably double that by the end of the year. So, we're looking at this year, we had probably about $1 million, right at $1 million, little over $1 million in revenue out of BaaS. Next year, it will be closer to $2.5 million in total revenue.

Yes, the added piece too on payments volume is just more deposit activity because you have higher balances there. So, if you look at the line item that's the BaaS broker deposits, you saw that go up. I mean, that kind of goes up in line with the volume of payment volume processed.

Perfect. Thanks, guys.

Thanks, George. Appreciate it.

Thank you. Your next question is from John Rodis from Janney. Please ask your question.

Hey, good afternoon, guys.

Hey, John.

Hey, John.

Ken, David. David, I guess a question for you or maybe I guess Ken really. But David, you mentioned sort of $3-ish for this year in earnings. I guess the question is for you, Ken, what sort of tax rate would that assumes? And then, how should we think about provision expense?

Yes, I think obviously our tax rate this year was wonky because of what went on in the first quarter obviously, we had the charges on shutting down mortgage and we had the large charge-offs. So, we kind of started the year in a loss and reaped kind of a tax benefit throughout the year. And fourth quarter had some additional state tax adjustments in it as well. So, I think as we forecast and we're forecasting obviously quite a significant increase in net income, but net income for the year. So, the way that we're modeling it right now internally is about a 12% tax rate, effective tax rate. And then, on the provision side, historically, our quarterly provision has kind of been in the $1 million to $1.5 million a quarter. Back out one unusual events in the first quarter of last year. But we've kind of seen that charge-offs creep up a little bit at least relative to what we've done historically. So, we're modeling more like a $2 million to $2.5 million provision a quarter versus which is higher than our historical average. But trying to be kind of in line with what we've done over the last few quarters.

Yes, makes sense. So, but probably not as high as you saw in the fourth quarter, Ken, on the provision?

No, no.

Okay. Okay. One other question on the balance sheet, just can the size of the securities portfolio, all things equal, continuing to see decent deposit growth. Will those securities portfolio be flattish or maybe trend down some?

It would probably -- I would look at it as maybe the percentage of the balance sheet that's in security should remain consistent over the course of the year. I mean, it is the securities portfolio is a source of liquidity. So, I would just view it in terms of being a consistent percentage.

Okay. Thank you, guys.

Appreciate it, John.

Thanks, John.

Thank you. Your next question is from Nathan Race from Piper Sandler. Please ask your question.

Yes. Hi, guys. Good afternoon.

Hey, Nate.

Just a question on kind of the outlook for deposit growth and the sources there and kind of what are you seeing in terms of the blended rate on deposits coming in the door across the various channels that you guys are generating deposit growth across?

As I said earlier, right now we're seeing on the CD side, we're seeing new volume come in around a 4.8% range. And on the other side too like the fintech deposits that we talked about a little bit earlier, I mean those can range anywhere from say a Fed Funds minus 100 to a Fed Funds minus 50. We are still having success on small business checking, that we can grow that business. That would be fantastic, because we're paying 50 or I think maybe 80 basis points on that. That's very low cost funding. In the money market side, we have different tiers and the heaviest side of that. The two-thirds of that is we're kind of paying a rate anywhere from 3.4% to 3.6%. So, money that's coming in the door is that kind of yield. So, we prefer the lower cost sources that we can, but the CD side is certainly very consistent.

Okay, got it. So, it still sounds like if you're putting new loans on the portfolio around 8% versus those blended rates, I mean it's definitely margin accretive even if you don't use some of the cash on hand to fund loan growth going forward?

Yes, absolutely. Yes.

Got you. Okay. Shifting gears a little bit on credit, I'm curious, outside of the handful of loans that you guys called out within the franchise and SBA portfolio, just curious more broadly what you're seeing in terms of credit migration to criticize classified across those two portfolios in particular lately?

Actually, we had credit committee meeting this morning, so fresh off the list here. In the non-performing asset side of things, as we mentioned a couple minutes ago, we kind of bumped up reserves in the fourth quarter. Everything that's sitting in the NPA today is fully reserved. If we have a loss or a write-down, we've got a couple SBA loans in there. We have five residential properties. Two of those are from mortgage portfolios we've purchased in the past. Three are locally originated by us. So, we're in good shape coming through the pipeline. We had a little tick up in the actual delinquency during the fourth quarter. That was primarily due to a one -- loan. It's an Urban Air organization, one of our franchise loans, and that's current. It was supposed to be paid by quarter-end, didn't make it. And out of credit committee this morning, we're not seeing any significant bump ups. We'll probably have somewhere in the range of a $0.5 million in specific reserves on SBA this quarter, but that's as bad as it is. And right now, we don't see anything else in the franchise. So, a little bit was timing. One thing that, where we have looked at, obviously, we've grown SBA phenomenally fast, the quality is great. For us, it is a different asset class than we've had in the past, and we've kind of resigned ourselves. We're getting phenomenal yield off of it and phenomenal income, but delinquency and some of those issues are going to run a little higher than we have in the past. Losses might be attend a bit higher, but compared to the national figures in about all categories, we're below national averages on delinquencies, on losses, on reserves, whatever. So, we think we're in good shape there. Part of the growth side of things, though, that obviously impacts our upfront reserving because of the amount and the volume, and it is a higher percentage than most of our loan categories today. So, it's bumping reserves, and that will continue, as Ken said, a little higher in 2024 than we did in 2023, but it's more over the growth factor than the loss factor.

Okay, got it. And then, just thinking about the drive reserve, I think you said, 5% to 6% loan growth this year, Ken. Just in terms of the drivers to get there, I mean, obviously, you guys had tremendous growth in the franchise book this year. How do you guys' kind of think about where that growth is going to come from, and does that type of growth incrementally require higher levels of provisioning or reserving needs relative to what we saw during 2023 just on standalone production?

Yes. I think David just commented that some of the provision increase is going to come from growth in portfolios with kind of higher coverage ratios. We look about growth. A lot of it, it's very similar to what we did in 2023. For some of our verticals that are longer-term fixed rate, it's just right now the market is still competitive and pricing deals low that doesn't make any sense for us. So, it's kind of just continued remixing of you're going to see balances down, certainly in healthcare where we're not originating new loans anymore. You'll probably see a net decline in public finance. We still will do deals in public finance on the shorter end of the curve. There are some good opportunities that our team looks at, but net-net, it'll probably be down year-over-year. Kind of hard to predict what the long end of the curve is doing right now, but it makes the single-tenant business very, very competitive. You have folks out there who are doing stuff at rates that don't make sense to us, so you'll probably see a net decline there. You have runoff there, but you expect to see growth in construction as some of the commitments, the unfunded commitments become funded. Our team had a tremendous year last year on the origination side and now those balances need to be drawn. SBA is forecasted to have a fantastic year and you will see balances up in franchise, although probably not nearly as much as you saw last year. We pulled forward a little bit of our volume from our partner in the fourth quarter that was budgeted for first-half of this year. And just in terms of again just kind of allocating where we're allocating capital it's -- you'll see lower growth in franchise compared to what you saw last year.

Got it. Very helpful. And just a clarification question, lastly, I was scribbling down your guidance, Ken, in terms of kind of SBA gain on sale revenue for this year and I think you also provide some guidance around Banking-as-a-Service as well, revenue?

Well, on the total -- what we talked about in terms of total non-interest income, we expect that to be up in excess of 30%. And one of the other folks on the call asked about the components of that. I mean, the biggest component is going to be SBA. We expect growth in the 23%, 24% range there as well as growth in the Banking-as-a-Service. We're probably on the fee income side about maybe a million to a million and a half of growth there year-over-year. And then, the other pieces of it are we expect to get some distributions from some of the funds, SBIC funds and the like that we've invested in.

Understood. And just trying to understand kind of that significant ramp in SBA revenue, can you just remind us in terms of how large that team is today versus maybe a year or so ago?

I think on the staffing side, we're up probably in the range of 20% to 25% on a year-over-year basis. We added a number of folks at the end of the year and it's going to go up and it's in the earnings release or the numbers from Ken about the biggest expense we're going to have in costs next year is still going to be in the employee queue. And a big chunk of that is going to be for SBA and compliance issues within the BaaS world. So, that's where most of the employee growth is coming from through 2024. And I think that's going to put us somewhere in the 68% bump in salaries and/or employee expense.

We gave total non-interest income in the range of 8% to 10%.

Total non-interest income of 8% to 10%.

I'm sorry, non-interest expense. Sorry. Non-interest income is going to go up higher then.

It's going up 30.

Right. Yes. That's what I thought. Okay, great. I appreciate you guys taking the questions and all the colors. Thank you.

Great. Thanks, Nate.

Thank you.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I will now hand the call back to Mr. Becker for the closing remarks.

Great. Thank you, Jenny. I thank all of you for joining us on today's call. The anniversary gives us an opportunity to reflect, and it is really remarkable. The storms we've weathered in our first 25 years from the dot-com bubble burst in the early days. The mortgage meltdown of '07 and '08, a global pandemic followed by the steepest, fastest rate increase in history. We have survived them all. We have lived to find another day. And as we look forward to 2024 and our next 25 years, we're extremely optimistic about our outlook. The strong performance of our commercial and consumer lending team, including our growth in small business and construction lending, can drive greater revenue growth, throw in the stabilized deposit costs, and it paints a real favorable picture for earnings. As fellow shareholders, we remain committed to driving improved profitability and enhanced shareholder value. We thank you for all your support and wish you a good afternoon. Thanks, everyone.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, the conference has now ended. Thank you all for joining. You may all disconnect.