Paul Edgecliffe-Johnson
Analyst · Steven Kent from Goldman Sachs
Thanks, Richard, and good morning, everyone. We’re pleased to report another strong trading performance in the half-year with solid growth despite the short term noise from hotel sales and liquidated damages received so they are in our reported numbers. I will therefore focus my commentary on the underlying results. On that basis, we increased both our fee revenues and operating profit by 6%. Higher interest and tax charges were offset by the 4% reduction in weighted average shares as we completed our share buyback program and underlying earnings per share increased 7% year-on-year. Our 6% growth in fee revenue was a result of continued increases in RevPAR and net system size in each of our four regions, which grew, in aggregate by 5.8% and 2.2% respectively. To give you some more color as to where and how we drove this growth, I will now talk through the performance of each of our regions in more details. Starting with the Americas, where demand is particularly strong in the first half. The $22 million of fee revenue growth we delivered was almost all RevPAR driven. Occupancy of 68% was 220 basis points higher year-on-year and 2 percentage points above the 2007 prior peak. Effective yield management of the strong demand allowed us to increase average rates in the U.S. by 2.7%. This took them to a record level on a nominal basis, but still 4% below the prior peak after adjusting for inflation. In aggregate, this generated Americas RevPAR growth for the half of 6.7%. From a competitive standpoint, Holiday Inn outperformed its industry segment by just over one percentage point on a total RevPAR basis. InterContinental and Crowne Plaza also performed well, but were held back a bit by their higher distribution waiting towards major East Coast cities like Philadelphia and Washington DC which saw a lower overall demand growth, and in New York, by the upcoming closure of InterContinental Barclays and high levels of supply growth in the Time Square market. Signings of 19,000 rooms are up significantly year-on-year, reflecting the strength of our preferred brands and supported by the continued improvement in the hotel debt financing environment. Moving on now to Europe, which drove $6 million of our fee revenue growth. Our key markets continue to perform well with strong growth in the U.K. where RevPAR is up nearly 9% and solid trading in Germany. In France, however, RevPAR decreased 3.5%, although 2.5 percentage points of this was driven by double-digit RevPAR declines at InterContinental Paris Le Grand where the Salon Opera ballroom refurbishment was completed in the first half. The region’s underlying profit was held back by this refurbishment reducing by 3% in the first half despite the 8% growth in fee revenue. Moving now to our Asia, Middle East and Africa regions where fee revenues increased by $1 million. Comparable RevPAR grew 5.4% excluding Thailand and Egypt, which continued to be impacted by political unrest. Total RevPAR grew 1.7%, reflecting the continued increase in mix of rooms from lower RevPAR developing markets. The core business in Asia, Middle East and Africa is performing well. A combination of sale one-off items trading disruption and investment for growth is holding back the region’s profit. Moving on now to Greater China where we drove a $3 million increase in fee revenue through new openings and significant RevPAR out-performance, despite the ongoing challenges from the austerity measures that are affecting the whole industry. This is testament to our strong brand and the market-leading position that we have built up in this region over the past 30 years. Although, comparable RevPAR increased 4.3%, total RevPAR declined 1.4%, as we continue to drive new openings and start developing tier two and tier three cities. Underlying revenue and profit was flat, despite good growth in our fee business impacted by $3 million of lower revenue and profit from our owned hotel InterContinental, Hong Kong. This is due to the short-term disruption from the redevelopment of the land adjacent to the hotel which long-term will greatly benefit the area. Our broad portfolio of brands put us at a competitive advantage and continuing to grow our scale in China. This was demonstrated by 13% net system growth and very strong signings once again, with 7,000 rooms added to the pipeline. Overall, this takes our total number of hotels opened and in the pipeline in China to over 400. I’ll return now to the Group as a whole. Sustainable fee margin progression over the medium term remains a key priority for us, and we have again delivered this with 1 percentage points year-on-year increase in the period. However, for the full year, margin growth is likely to be less stronger than in the first half, reflecting the timing of costs and continued investment for longer-term growth. Moving now on to our capital allocation strategy. We’ve been very clear, I think, that we are committed to an efficient balance sheet and an investment-grade credit rating, which equates to net debt to EBITDA of 2 to 2.5 times. Following the payment of the special dividend in July, we’re now at the top end of our stated range – a level we are comfortable with in the current favorable economic condition. Our approach to capital investment remains unchanged. We will continue to invest to position our business for optimal long-term success. However, I want to provide further clarity today on how I look at the way we invest and why I have decided to increase our disclosure in this area. You can see some slides on this in results presentation posted on our website today. Our medium-term growth capital expenditure guidance of up to $350 million a year remains unchanged, but some of this expenditure is recoverable over time resulting in a lower net amount. I think of our capital expenditure falling into three distinct categories. Firstly, expenditure on maintenance CapEx and key money to support the business; secondly, on strategic recyclable capital investments to drive the growth of our brands and priority markets expansion; and, thirdly, system-funded capital investments, primarily to strengthen our technology platforms to ensure we remain competitive in the evolving digital world. Recyclable and system-funded capital investments account for a significant portion of our gross capital expenditure. Whilst there will be ups and downs in these investments, over time, they are expected to self-fund effectively and have a broadly neutral cash impact on IHG’s net debt position, leaving us with a normalized net capital expenditure of somewhere between $100 million and $150 million a year on maintenance CapEx and key money. To give some more context, I will now talk through each of these three CapEx categories in more detail. Looking first at maintenance CapEx and key money, this is the investment we need to support the business day-to-day. Maintenance CapEx is the amount needed on basic hotel maintenance and investments in our infrastructure such as our regional offices and corporate IT. Key money or contract acquisition costs is an important lever that we already use selectively to access strategic growth, particularly into the highest-quality and most sought after opportunities. As the development environment in the U.S. picks up with the increased availability of debt capital, more of these opportunities are becoming available. So you should expect to see our investment to increase in the medium term to around $25 million to $75 million per annum, partly offset by a reduction in hotel maintenance, as we continue to sell owned assets. Moving on to recyclables investments. This is the investment we make when required to support our brand development and for priority markets growth. As of today, we have around 40 investments comprising approximately $450 million on the balance sheet excluding the remaining big owned InterContinental Hotels. This capital is intended to support brand development and although the amount invested will fluctuate year-by-year, over time the relative capital intensity of the business will reduce. Over the last three years, our gross CapEx on investment in this area has been around $65 million per annum, but after receipts and disposals the net amount has been flat. Looking now at system funded capital investments. Our system funded is a key scale differentiator and creates a significant barrier to entry for new competitors. The accounting treatment is explained in the Annual Report but for those of you that perhaps aren’t as familiar with it I’ll start with a quick recap of how it works. IHG collects cash from hotels to support system fund activities in 2013 this amounted to $1.3 billion. Unlike royalty fees these are not recognized as IHG revenue but instead, are held off P&L in the system funds. These funds paper marketing and reservation channels costs and for the costs of operating IHG Rewards Club all of which drive direct benefits to the hotels. The system funds does not have its own balance sheet or cash flow per se so any capital expenditure and assets related to it are included in the Group financial statements. Although IHG finances capital investment on behalf of the system fund, depreciation relating to this is charged to the fund and not to the Group’s P&L. As a result, this depreciation charge is a cash surplus and so becomes a cash inflow for IHG over the useful life of the assets. To-date, gross system funded capital investments have been around $30 million per year, paying for the development of tools and systems that hotels used to drive performance. This is expected to remain broadly stable in the medium-term with net investment over time being flat after taking the system funds and cash surplus into account. However, increasingly there are opportunities to invest in technology to drive innovative solutions and enhance the experience right across our guest’s journey with us. Earlier this year, we announced a strategic relationship with Amadeus to explore these opportunities. Whilst this work is still in its initial stages, it could result in an increase in this type of capital expenditure in the future. That would take our gross investment above current levels, but overtime the dynamic of system funded capital investment would mean that the majority of this spend would be recovered. I’ll now hand over to Richard to provide you with some more details of how we’re driving our strategy.