Doug Wetmore
Analyst · Key Banc
Good morning everyone. As Rob mentioned earlier, Flavors continued to lead our sales growth in the fourth quarter growing 16% in dollars on a 10% local currency increase. The Fragrance sales increased 2% in Dollars on a 3% decline in local currency. The difference between the local currency growth and the Dollar performance was mainly attributable to the strength of the Euro and the Pound sterling compared to the Dollar. The Euro was 13% stronger than the 2006 fourth quarter while the Pound was 8% stronger. A basket of other currencies accounted for the remainder of the exchange effect. For the full year, Flavor sales grew 9% in local currency while fragrances achieved a 2% local currency increase. Now, I'll discuss the sales performance of the business units in a little more detail later. This chart depicts the percentage of growth in our consolidated sales in both local currency and reported Dollars since the first quarter of 2005. As is apparent from the graph, we went up against some challenging comparisons from a growth perspective in the third and fourth quarters of this year having grown 7% in local currency in a comparable 2006 periods. Turning to sales performance by geography, our growth was led by strong performances in the developing markets in greater Asia and Latin America. Latin American sales were particularly strong in Flavors increasing 42% in the quarter and increasing 27% for the full year. This Flavors performance follows an 11% increase in 2006 and a 21% increase in 2005. LATAM Fine Fragrance continued its strong growth increasing 4% in the quarter and 11% for the full year. In LATAM functional fragrance and ingredients were impacted by volume declines and ingredients were also impacted by some pricing pressure as we talked about in the past. Greater Asia growth was driven by new wins and improved volumes in Flavors, which increased 12% in local currency. Fine Fragrance performed extremely well increasing 19% in local currency driven mainly by new wins. Functional Fragrance and Ingredients performance was mainly volume related. North America sales declined 5% weighed down by volume decreases in both Fine and Functional Fragrances of 12%. Flavor sales increased 1% in the quarter while growing 4% for the full year. Growth in Europe, Africa and the Middle East, EAME was mixed with Flavors growing 8% for the quarter and 5% for the full year, both in local currency. Fragrance sales in EAME declined 5% of local currency with volume declines in Fine Fragrances and Ingredients offsetting 4% local currency growth and Functional Fragrance. Local currency sales to our top 30 customers, which currently account for about 57% of our sales, grew 5% for the full year 2007 consistent with our overall growth. Looking a little bit more at Flavors, as is evident from this graph, the local currency sales performance for Flavors continues to improve driven by increased wins and improving volumes. Flavors has now grown ten consecutive quarters in local currency, and as Rob mentioned, we are confident that that growth will continue into 2008. Flavor sales growth has led to equally strong improvements in Flavors profitability. For the full year 2007, Flavors profit improved significantly as you can see. The sales performance and sales growth drove the improved gross margin performance and product mix and expense absorption also contributed to the improved profitability. Operating profit depicted on this slide is adjusted to exclude the $3 million insurance recovery related to the product contamination issue from the 2006 results, that recovery reduced selling and admin expenses by $3 million. On the same basis excluding that recovery for the full year 2007, Flavor's profit increased 25% on a 12% sales increase. Turning to Fragrances, the local currency sales performance had been quite strong for the last several quarters driven by new wins and sustained and success of existing creations. As I mentioned, comparison to last the year third and fourth quarters was particularly difficult. The strength over the last several years has been most evident in Fine Fragrance and Beauty Care. However, we show a sharp slow down in Q4 in Fine Fragrance most notably in North America and EAME and that slowdown is reflective of a fairly slow holiday performance in fine fragrance. As we previously mentioned on calls, Functional Fragrances had been weak, most notably in Fabric Care. However, we began to see improvement in Functional when 2007 came to a close, enabled mainly by the next commercialization of an encapsulation product. We remain confident that we are growing at or faster than the market overall, and in so doing, continue to maintain or grow our market share. Now looking at Fragrance profitability for the full year 2007, the Fragrance operating environment has been more challenging than Flavors, and Fragrance profitability has not grown in the same manner as Flavors. As I mentioned before it's fair to note that Fragrance does have the most difficult comparisons with the prior year periods. The Fragrance margins continued to be impacted by lower selling prices on Fragrance ingredients as Rob mentioned but having said that, selling price stabilized albeit lower levels. Profitability was also impacted by the weak Functional Fragrance sales as well as some increases in raw material costs. The raw material increases were in line with our expectations, about 3% to 4% year over year. The full year results were also impacted by the cost of scaling up the new ingredient facility in China, which I mentioned in earlier calls this year. That impact diminished as the year progressed and that plant is now close to operating at normal capacity levels. Turning to the consolidated operating results, the sales increased 8% on the underlying 2% local currency growth and gross margin continued the trend seen in the first three quarters of the year, namely the impact of the lower selling prices for Fragrance ingredients. We continue to tightly control expenses in both R&D and selling and admin expenses. Currency translation added about 5% to the increase in each expense category compared to the prior year quarter. As a percent of sales, R&D came in about 40 basis points above the prior year quarter although R&D spend ended to full year down about 20 basis points compared to full year '06. The fourth quarter of '06 was also significantly lower than normal. Selling and admin expenses increased 20 basis points in the 2007 quarter compared to the prior year. Selling and admin expense in the current quarter included about $2 million of expense incurred in connection with initiatives under way to transform certain business processes along the lines that we've talked about in prior calls. The full year results include about $4 million of such costs. The principal enabler of this transformation of these processes is our single global instance of SAP and we'll begin to see the benefits of these initiatives in the second half of 2008. It’s still premature to share details with you on this call but we will discuss them during the first half of 2008. Turning to earnings per share, this fourth quarter of 2006 slide you've seen before, I just want to set the table for comparison with 2007. You can see the elements that run usual or otherwise nonrecurring in arriving at the reported GAAP EPS of $0.53 per share and how we arrived at an adjusted earnings per share of $0.45 which is our baseline to measure Q4 2007 earnings growth. Starting at this base of $0.45 per share you can see the elements that contributed into the growth. The sales adding 4%, our margin erosion taking $0.03 away, interest expense and other income net adding $0.04 per share. Interest expense increased $9 million in connection with the debt taken on to implement the accelerated share repurchase program, and partially offsetting this increase was a $0.05 per share gain on the sale of land. The pre-tax gain on that land was just under $6 million. We also had more favorable exchange results in the current quarter compared to the fourth quarter of 2006 which accounts for much of the remaining difference. Taxes favorably impacted the current quarter's results mainly due to the drop in the effective rate. There are no unusual adjustments in the current quarter. We reduced the number of shares outstanding adding $0.06 per share to our result and that's how we arrive at the reported EPS of $0.58 for the quarter. Looking at adjusting that we would back out the $0.05 of gains on the sale of land in the fourth quarter and arrive at an adjusted EPS of $0.53 per share. Now, let's look briefly at the full year 2007. The results are in front of you that 9% sales growth was built on an underlying 5% local currency growth, margin increased by 8%. Gross margin was impacted by the Fragrance ingredient pricing, but notwithstanding the gross margin decline, we delivered a 10% increase in operating profit enabled by the strong sales and good cost discipline. Currency translation added about 3% for both R&D expense and selling and admin expense, had currencies remained constant, both R&D and selling and admin would have increased about 4% each compared to the reported 7%. The 2006 figure includes the insurance recovery of $3 million and excluding that settlement from 2006 results, selling and admin expense in '07 would have increased 6% reported instead of the 7% you see or 3% in local currency. In 2007 operating profit would have increased 11% compared to the prior year rather than the reported 10%. Turning to our earnings per share and as with the fourth quarter, it's important to look at the adjusted '06 for just a moment. We reported $2.48 per share but as we reviewed with you during the last year's call eliminating the unusual nonrecurring items, the adjusted earnings per share was $2.32 and we said at that time that was the baseline against which to measure us in terms of our performance in 2007. Looking at 2007 and as in all cases in the past, we have not attempted to isolate currency effects, so the impact of the weaker dollar is embedded in each of the items on the slide, except the shares outstanding. The sales growth added $0.22 per share and operating efficiency and margin improvement added $0.04 per share. Other income and interest expense after taking into account the adjustments I reviewed on the previous page, accounted for a net increase of $0.02 per share with interest expense increasing $16 million over 2006 levels driven by slightly higher cost to borrowings and a higher level of debt attributable to the accelerated share repurchase program. Offsetting the higher interest were gains on sale of land totaling $0.09 per share and favorable exchange results compared to the full year 2006. Taxes also benefited the result, overall, the effective tax rate was 24.8% compared to 27.7% in the prior year adding $0.14 per share. For that amount included the $10 million benefit recorded in the second quarter, and as we noted in our press release today excluding the non-recurring tax ruling in both 2007 and 2006, the '07 effective rate would have been 27.8%, 27.9% compared to 28.8% in 2006. The share repurchase added the $0.12 per share and the pension curtailment that we announced in the third quarter took $0.04 away and that's how we arrived at the $2.82. To normalized that and adjust it for comparison in future years we've eliminated the affect of the curtailment as well as eliminated to the gains on sale and the one time tax benefit arriving for the adjusted earnings per share for the sake of growth in 2008 of $2.66 per share. Cash flows from operations improved 12% in comparison to the prior year driven by the 9% improvement in net income. Operating cash flow represents 127% of net income an improvement over the 125% in the prior year. Day sales and trade receivables in an inventory remained comparable with the prior year at 68 and 133 respectively. We remain pretty tight on capital spending through the full year spending $66 million. Having said that capital spending is expected to scale up in 2008 and we currently expect to spend in the range of $90 million for the full year. Gross debt was $1.2 billion at the end of the year compared to just over $800 million last year and net debt increased in connection with the share repurchase activities. I'll touch on those activities in just a moment. Net debt after deducting cash on hand stood at a $1.06 billion. The increased use of cash for dividends reflects the effect of the increases announced in October 2006 and July of this year partially offset by the lower shares outstanding. Since October 2006, we've increased the dividend by just under 25%. Shares declined mainly as the result of the ASR entered into September and speaking of the share repurchase activity, as you aware we executed the ASR in September and prior to that, during the third quarter, we had repurchased just under one million shares in the open market. For the full year, we've accounted for the repurchase of about 10.2 million shares. Currently the ASR remains in progress and we expect completion of that program in the second quarter of 2008. Based on current prices and the shares held back at the time we entered into the ASR, I would expect to acquire upwards of one million more shares sometime in the second quarter 2008. We won't know the final number until the ASR is complete. As you can see, our average shares outstanding for 2000, the full year, are down 4% compared to the average for 2006. For the fourth quarter this year, average shares declined 10% compared to 2006. Shares outstanding at December 31, '07 stand at $81 million. That's not taking into account dilution of equity comp, but that's the shares outstanding down 10% from the $89 million last year. In conclusion, before I turn the call back over to Rob for some closing comments, here is the summary of 2007, we continue to see very strong growth in our industry and we are encouraged by what we've achieved so far. We continue to grow sales, improve profitability and deliver on our near term goals all while focusing on the initiatives to strengthen our business for the long term.