Bryan Lewis
Analyst · Oppenheimer
Good afternoon, everyone and thank you for joining us for the Q1 2019 Intellicheck Earnings Call. We continue to make progress towards the goals we've set for ourselves and I continue to be excited every day that I walk through the door to our office. I would like to start with some general comments about our growth. Our SaaS revenue continues to grow. SaaS revenue was up 45% quarter-over-quarter and 4% sequentially. We are off to a solid start after our first month of the second quarter and we will believe – we believe we will see our sequential SaaS revenue growth accelerate leading into the third quarter. Notwithstanding the non-cash expenses in Q1, operating expenses were up slightly over Q4, but as we have previously explained, it is largely driven by investments we have made in the business. We needed to expand our implementation team to make sure we had the right number of people with the right skill set to be able to capitalize on the opportunities presented to us. We believe that we are well-positioned to drive solid growth numbers throughout the remainder of the year, which will become clear when I discuss the onboarding process and our current status with a number of key accounts. Although we do not typically onboard new retail customers in Q4, because of the holiday shopping season, the shift to the per-scan revenue model will bake in a bit of seasonality moving forward, given the high volume scans retailers experienced during Q4. Also, we discussed on several of our earnings calls that we no longer do custom development for free. We are in the process of developing a systems integration with a large financial institution that we signed in Q3 and recognized the first of two $185,000 development payments last quarter. We expect the second payment, reflective of our completion of developments by early Q3. I have spoken many times about the numerous and significant recent data breaches with good reason. There has been an unrelenting recurrence of these incidents. The Identity Theft Resource Center reported a 120% increase in personally identifiable information breached in 2018 versus 2017. In the six weeks since our last earnings call, a quick Google search reveals seven major breaches and a report by Symantec that two out of every three hotel sites exposed people's names, addresses, e-mail addresses, passport numbers and payment info. On April 29th, an online unprotected database storing the names, addresses, marital status, dates of birth, income brackets, homeownership status and more data for 80 million American households was discovered. To put the size of this open data cache in context, it represents 65% of all households in America. The scariest part, the researchers could not determine who the database belongs to and it's just sitting there for identity thieves to access for free. The problem of identity theft is not going away. It is growing. There are a few topics I would like to discuss today to help everyone understand the opportunity in the financial services space and how we are capitalizing on it. To give you an idea of the addressable market and provide a better understanding of the onboarding process and its timing, we will first look at the specific use cases where we stop fraud and the size of the opportunity that a single credit card issuer represents. Then I will discuss the progress on implementations and some recent wins. I will also provide some of the usual metrics on scans and fraudulent transactions stuff. So let's move to the opportunities starting with the use cases. I often get asked by people how we stop stolen credit cards from being used or why do people need authentication if the EMV chip and the credit card ensures that the card is real. Simply put, we don't. That's not our market. There are three main areas for retail in addition to retail branch banking, where we stop fraud. The first is new account openings. This is where a criminal uses a stolen or synthetically-created identity to open a new charge account. Fraud involving new accounts opened with the victims' stolen personal data in 2018 accounted for an estimated $3.4 billion in losses. This loss is actually greater when you look beyond the initial theft. The bank loses the money on the transaction. The customer loses an average of 300 hours of their time to clear up their name and studies show the consumer blames the retailer. Interesting and significant is that 69% of consumers change their shopping habits and reduce their spend with the retailer where the trouble occurred. So we have the initial loss, the loss of time and the loss of future revenue. The simple solution that is frictionless to the consumer, and I would say actually makes it easier for the consumer is to authenticate the license at the beginning of the transaction. I recently went to one of our retail clients and opened a private-label credit card account. This was on a busy Saturday morning. This retailer is typical with a line to checkout funneling you to a bank of registers. A sign behind the register said save 10% when you open a charge account. When asked, I said sure, and the clerk asked for my driver's license. She scanned it, Intellicheck authenticated it and pre-populated the application. All I had to do was enter in my Social Security Number and income on the debit card pin pad. In seconds, I was approved. That's all it takes to protect consumers. Authenticate; don't just scan. A crook can easily buy my Social Security Number for $1 and a fake license for $100 with my address and his photo on it. He'd walk into a store, open a charge account at a retailer who only scans, make a huge purchase and walk out just as quickly as I did leaving me a 300 hour headache and a retailer or bank on the hook for the money. You’ve heard me talk about private-label credit cards versus non-private-label. On the last call, I told you we were working with a new bank authenticating new account applications for their non-private-label cards. A private-label card is one with the retailer's logo, like the one I applied for in the previous example. It has the retailer's branding on it but it's backed by the bank funding the program. Non-private label is the bank's card, with its own branding. The second use case is referred to as card not present. Retailers are expected to lose about $130 billion in revenue between now and 2023 in fraudulent card not present transactions. Given all the data breaches, criminals know where you have charge accounts. All they need is a standard credit report that is used like a roadmap. So instead of opening an account, they charge to your existing account. I am sure many of you at one time or another have forgotten your charge card for a particular retailer. When you go to check out, you let them know you forgot your card. They will ask you for your license and the last four digits of your Social Security number. The clerk visually inspects the license, enters in the four digits and as quickly the perp impersonating you successfully makes the purchase and their getaway. Given that trained law enforcement officers will say these fakes are so good they can't detect them with the naked eye, the sales clerk doesn't stand a chance. The third area in which we help retailers are non-receipted returns. In a recent study, receiptless return fraud was costing the retail industry $9.7 billion a year. Most often, this is perpetrated by organized retail crime rings who return stolen goods for a gift receipt or loaded gift card. These are easily turned into cash. The National Retail Federation recently released a study in which retailers said their average loss under this crime was over $1,700 per incident. In retail branch banks, we help authenticate people for everything from Anti-Money Laundering Know Your Customer or AML KYC requirements for things like account opening and check-cashing. When we look at market sizing, I think it's best explained with an example. So let's talk about one credit card issuer we are currently working with. We reviewed all the private-label credit card programs they run and took a very conservative approach to determine their clients who we thought would benefit from our services. For example, we didn't consider dental practices or gas stations as a viable target. This very conservative list totaled 55 companies. You’ve heard us say that a small client be worth $250,000 per year, and a large client, $800,000 to over $1 million annually. We researched the number of locations for each of these 55 retailers and put them in three buckets, below 500 locations, 500 to 1,500 locations and greater than 1,500 locations. So basically, small, medium and large. The number was 28, 20 and 7 respectively. If we take a conservative average revenue from the three buckets it is say, $200,000 per year, $500,000 per year and $900,000 per year, this would represent almost $22 million in annual SaaS revenue from this credit card issuer alone. The market is very large and we believe that we are just scratching the surface with the banks we have contracts with. As we have reported, we have been working with 16 retailers in various stages of the onboarding process and several have asked for clarity on the process and the length of time it takes to onboard these customers. The simple answer is, it depends, but I will give some guidance around the process. We have made the customer required coding to incorporate our authentication system very simple by providing integration tools and sample code. The actual time it takes simply depends on the resources available at the retailer and/or the bank. Generally, the coding can be done in anywhere from one to three months. Once the coding is done and approved in the retailer's tech systems, they will do a limited rollout to their stores to ensure it works in production and that they have their training on the new process in order. This limited rollout generally lasts between one and two months and then they rollout system-wide. The speed of the system-wide deployment generally depends on the training resources available. Remember, they need to train all full and part-time staff. We have had clients rollout to thousands of stores in six weeks and some that do that same number over a period of months. In all cases, rollouts typically stop in early October. No retailer wants to change systems and procedures during the holiday shopping season. They generally pick up the rollouts again in mid-January after the returns season is over or in early February, often the beginning of their fiscal year. Most of our retailers are pushing to get as many stores up and running by the October cut-off, so that they are well prepared for the high volume holiday season. Given this cycle, you can see that some retailers will be potentially fully implemented in 2019 and others won't be fully implemented at every location until 2020. Given the retailers push to get as many stores live by October, coupled with more of our customers being charged under our per-scan model, we expect Q4 to continue to reflect some positive seasonality, moving forward. We continue to be on track with our implementation schedules and dates at this time. Beginning in late Q1 through the end of April, we began the widespread deployment of four retailers totaling 2,900 stores, ranging in size from just under 300 stores to just over 1,500. Later this month, we will begin the deployment of another large retailer with 1,300 stores. The development for the large banks that we signed last year has been completed and turned over to them, so we expect the second half of the development fees to be paid in late Q2 or early Q3. We are on schedule to begin SaaS revenue collection in late Q2 with the anticipated continued rollout of retailers throughout Q3. Last call, I spoke about the four banks we are working with and specifically, about piloting Retail ID for the issuance of their own non-private-label credit cards. One of these banks was a new relationship and after a successful 60-day pilot, they committed to the service and Retail ID is now deployed to every user in their callcenters. It's about 1,600 users. This is an important pilot as it was viewed as a test of the Retail ID solution for their retail branches and retail partners. They have already begun the introductions to their retail partners to begin implementations and we are negotiating a statement of work for their retail branches. The large retailer that was using us for parsing only, not authentication, began their post-holiday season rollout to the last of their three brands. That final brand has over 1,000 locations. More importantly, they have asked for a meeting to discuss their fraud rates and moving to authentication in addition to parsing. We said on previous calls that the reason we offer them a parsing solution is that it would lead us to an upsell for authentication and introductions to their credit card issuer who did not work with us and it did. There are 3,000 locations moving from a parsing to an authentication solution would be a significant additional revenue stream for us. New markets are opening up as well. Hospital groups get hit with insurance fraud and we have begun contracting with hospital groups for authentication. The same for auto dealerships. We are up to six dealer groups that have contracted for Retail ID and have signed an agreement with one of the providers of dealer management software to incorporate Retail ID in their suite of products. I believe this serves as a great indicator of all the markets where authentication is needed and that we are just now tapping into. Retail ID scan volumes were up 7.5% year-over-year and attempted fraud was up 3%. We believe that the increase in fraud did not go up in lockstep with scans because of the delay between the time of a breach and when the data is used to perpetrate fraud. The Accenture study found it takes 18 months from breach-to-fraud, so the major breaches like the Experian data breach are just beginning to become ripe. In addition, organized criminals learned which stores have our Retail ID authentication system and we see fraud attempts migrate away from stores where Retail ID has been in place over time to unprotected establishments. Moving to Age ID. The continued focus by the press, state and local governments including the FDA on vaping is helping to fuel interest in Age ID. We continue to lobby the FDA and other legislators to call for authentication before selling any age-restricted product. And recently commented on the FDA's proposed guideline on the sale of vaping products, specifically calling for authentication as the only sure way to make sure you are not selling to the underage. Our partnerships with the Smoke Free Alternatives Trade Association and the New York Vaping Association are generating great leads. Age ID sales for Q1 2019 were almost double Q1 2018. As we have said, this is a very large market where the law has not kept up with technology. The law states that a visual inspection of a license is all that's needed to sell an age-restricted product. Thankfully, the growing pressure on businesses to do the socially responsible thing and go beyond a visual inspection is making up for the lack of a legal change. More and more retailers are doing the right thing, significantly reducing their liability and buying Age ID. Age ID continues to prove to be much easier to sell to law enforcement than Law ID since it does not requires the time and budget associated with the additional training and security that an officer and associated mobile device are required to have to use Law ID. Three new law enforcement agencies signed up to use Age ID in Q1. Overall, I will reiterate what I said on the call in March. The changes we put in place in how we sell and implement our solutions are generating success. We will continue to focus our efforts on financial services/retail, as we believe it is a massive undertapped market where we are generating great momentum with the fastest path to growth and revenue. It is an over $14 billion pain point for banks, retailers and consumers annually. A pain point that large requires that businesses do something about the problem. ID identification is proving to be the best way to stop identity theft. The problem isn't going away and our clients and prospects are seeing us as the best solution to this massive and growing problem. Our implementation plan is on schedule and we are bringing clients on when we said we would. As long as we execute on the opportunities our clients have set in front of us, we believe that we are well-positioned to have a banner year. In addition, to what is already in front of us, we have new prospects calling us and these prospects are household names and we are winning those deals. I am very much looking forward to the rest of 2019. I will now turn the call over to our Chief Financial Officer, Bill White to discuss the financial results.