Welcome to the Fourth quarter and Full Year 2020 ICF Earnings Conference Call. My name is Vanessa and I will be your operator for today's call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Afterwards, you will be invited to participate in a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please note this conference is being recorded on Thursday, February 25, 2021, and cannot be reproduced or rebroadcast without permission from the company. And now, I would like to turn the program over to Lynn Morgen of AdvisIRy Partners.

Thank you, Vanessa. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us to review ICF's fourth quarter and full year 2020 performance. With us today from ICF are John Wasson, President and CEO; and Bettina Welsh, CFO. Joining them is James Morgan, Chief of Business Operations. During this conference call, we will make forward-looking statements to assist you in understanding ICF management's expectations about our future performance. These statements are subject to a number of risks that could cause actual events and results to differ materially. And I refer you to our February 25, 2021, press release and our SEC filings for discussions of those risks. In addition, our statements during this call are based on our views as of today. We anticipate that future developments will cause our view to change. Please consider the information presented in that light. We may, at some point, elect to update the forward-looking statements made today, but specifically disclaim any obligation to do so. I will now turn over the call to ICF's CEO, John Wasson, to discuss fourth quarter and full year 2020 performance. John?

Thank you, Lynn, and thank you all for participating in today's call to review our fourth quarter and full-year 2020 results and discuss our business outlook and guidance for 2021. First, I would like to recognize the outstanding way that ICF employees adapted to 2020's challenging business conditions. Our people immediately responded to pandemic-related limitations by staying fully engaged with clients and each other, delivering on programs and winning new business while working remotely, which is a great example. Our ICF's collaborative culture enabled us to effectively deliver on existing programs and make 2020 a record year for new contract awards. We ended 2020 with very strong fourth quarter revenue performance that drove total revenue and non-GAAP EPS above the high end of our guidance ranges and replicated the positive service revenue trends that have continued throughout the year. To summarize a few highlights, first, revenue growth in the fourth quarter was led by our federal government and commercial energy businesses. The exceptional increase in revenues from commercial marketing clients was onetime in nature, tied to the completion of a large contract that primarily involved pass-through revenue associated with media buys. Second, service revenue, which represents the work done by ICF employees, increased 4.1% for both the fourth quarter and full year. Approximately 55% of our total 2020 service revenue represented work in key growth areas, namely IT modernization, public health, disaster management, energy efficiency and utility consulting, along with climate, environment and infrastructure consulting, all of which are closely aligned with the priorities of the new administration. Taken together, we expect the growth rate in these areas to be 10% or more over the next several years. Third, adjusted EBITDA to service revenue for both the fourth quarter and full year benefited from favorable business mix, higher utilization and…

Thank you, John. Good afternoon, everyone. I'm pleased to share more details of ICF's fourth quarter and full year 2020 financial performance and provide our expectations for certain 2021 financial metrics. Total revenue for the fourth quarter of 2020 increased 9.5% to $434.3 million, which is, as John mentioned, reflected higher revenue from federal government and commercial energy clients and a significant increase in pass-through revenue associated with media buys for a single commercial marketing client. This increased fourth quarter pass-through revenue to 39.6% of total revenue compared to 36.5% in last year's fourth quarter. Service revenue, a better indicator of our underlying performance, was up 4.1% to $262.2 million year-over-year. Our gross profit increased 5% to $139.2 million in the fourth quarter, benefiting from a more profitable business mix and higher utilization. Gross margin on service revenue increased 50 basis points year-on-year, while gross margin on total revenue declined by 130 basis points to 32.1% due to the higher percentage of pass-through revenues, which yield lower margins. Indirect selling expenses of $109 million included $13.6 million in one-time expenses associated with the retirement of our Executive Chairman, and the early termination and our discontinued use of 16 office leases. Adjusting for these 2 items, indirect selling expenses were 36.4% of service revenue compared to 38.8% in last year's fourth quarter. We have earmarked a large portion of these cost savings for reinvestment in people and technology to support our ability to capture the substantial growth opportunities we see ahead. Excluding all special charges, adjusted EBITDA was $44.9 million compared to $37.4 million in last year's fourth quarter. Adjusted EBITDA margin on service revenue expanded 220 basis points to 17.1% as we benefited from lower SG&A and fringe benefit related costs, particularly lower travel, healthcare, and paid lead costs. Operating…

Thank you, Bettina. Based on our year-end backlog and robust business development pipeline, we are looking ahead to considerable organic growth in service revenue for 2021, guiding to a range of $1.095 billion to $1.13 billion, which represents year-on-year growth of 6.6% at the midpoint compared to the 4.1% growth we achieved in 2020. Pass-through revenues are anticipated at approximately 28% of total revenue in 2021 compared to 31% in 2020. This implies total revenue of $1.525 billion to $1.575 billion. EBITDA is expected to range from $145 million to $155 million, equivalent to an EBITDA margin on service revenue of 13.5% at the midpoint of the range. GAAP EPS is projected to be $3.90 to $4.20, and non-GAAP EPS is expected to range from $4.35 to $4.65. Operating cash flow for 2021 is expected to be approximately $100 million. As we look ahead, we see significant organic growth opportunities on the horizon beyond 2021, and we are making the requisite investments to capture that growth. Additionally, we have the financial resources to pursue acquisitions that can further expand our addressable market. Finally, ICF has prioritized being a good corporate citizen. And as such, we have attracted like-minded people who are passionate about their work. In the fourth quarter, our annualized personal turnover rate was 11.7%, remaining below the industry average and reflecting the relevance of our work and its positive impact on society. Please be sure to access our 2020 corporate citizen report, which is available on our website, to learn more about how we address our ESG responsibilities. With that, operator, I'd like to now open the call to questions.

And thank you. We will now begin our question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And we have our first question from Joseph Vafi with Canaccord.

Hey, John, Bettina, James, great way to end the year. Congratulations. Maybe kind of talk about the bookings strength here. I mean, I think, John, you noted that for the year only 20% was renewal. And I see we've got some acceleration to the business coming here in 2021, which is great to see. I was wondering, is there any kind of change in kind of duration in the kind of bookings that you've seen this year versus other years that may reflect perhaps more or less acceleration in backlog conversion versus other years? And then, second, just with the Biden administration coming in, I was wondering if that at all changes your kind of strategic view on potential areas where you could do some acquisitions. Thanks.

Sure. So I think, as you know, Joe, we had quite robust awards for the quarter and for the year. We ended with a trailing 12-month book-to-bill ratio of 1.3. We're quite pleased with that. I think it's been driven certainly across the key growth drivers we've been emphasizing. In terms of the translation of that into backlog, I think we'd expect it to be consistent with what we've seen in the past. I'm not sure I would assume there'll be a great acceleration there. I would also note that in some of these markets, there is a trend to winning larger and longer-term contracts, so 5- to 7-year contracts in IT modernization and in some of the disaster recovery work. But I think given the strong awards and actually the record awards, it certainly sets us up quite nicely for growth as for 2021 and beyond, given the length of those contracts. In terms of the Biden administration, what I would say to you is we've been talking over the last several years about the 4 key growth drivers in front of us, IT modernization, public health, disaster recovery and utilities. And I think those growth drivers, I think, will remain strong in a Biden administration. I think, as I said in my opening remarks, certainly, I think we see additional growth catalysts opening up here in the areas of climate, environment and infrastructure. And so, I think several new growth catalysts have been added to the list. So I think it gives us greater confidence for growth as we go forward. I think as we talked at the end of our third quarter call, I think we had indicated at that time, given the 4 growth drivers, we saw at least mid-single-digit service revenue growth going forward. Obviously, we've now guided to at the midpoint, 6.6% or 6.7% service revenue growth. And I think given some of these priorities that I just mentioned with the Biden administration, there's certainly upside for growth as we look down the road and for 2021 and beyond certainly.

Sure. That's great. And then, just maybe one quick follow-up on kind of current stimulus bill out there. Is there anything notable to call out there that could be an opportunity for you? It's a quite large and broad bill, I believe.

I think that to the extent that there's public health funding, I think that's a potential area of upside for us. I think - so I think that would be the primary area. I think there's also some funding in there for some amount of IT modernization. And so, I think there's potential upside there. There's also talk about a second stimulus bill at some point that would focus on infrastructure. Obviously, if that came along, that would be probably positive for us, too.

Great. Thanks a lot for the color. Congrats again, John.

Thank you.

And we have our next question from Tobey Sommer with Truist Securities.

Thanks. I'd like to build on the last question. Within an infrastructure bill, what sort of composition or focus could we read about in a bill like that, when that eventually comes, that would make it more or less favorable for the company? Thanks.

Yeah. I mean, I think that from an infrastructure perspective, I mean, to the extent that it's focused on clean energy technology, I think that's a source of strength for us. I think, as you know, we've done a lot of front-end planning for energy projects, transmission lines, moving electricity generated from renewable assets, out west, we've done work on. And so, I think that the clean technology is also an area we have significant expertise in distributed energy, as I say around the front-end environmental permitting and monitoring of clean tech, clean energy projects. So that would be positive. And then, I think more traditional high-speed rail, sustainable infrastructure, again, another area, where we have significant environmental capabilities that would be beneficial for us. And then, obviously, electrification, again, I think just given the capabilities in our energy business and our environmental practices would be quite good. And obviously, we do a significant amount of transportation work, so the activities around electric vehicles, things of that nature, would be quite positive too.

Thanks. And then, kind of stepping back from thinking about newly appropriated funds, but thinking about what the - just simply a change in administration can be - can bureaucratically and administratively the new administration implement changes and pursue policies that are constructive for revenue growth at the firm? So I'm trying to get a sense for it like ex new dollars entering the marketplace, does the change manifest itself in a change in the outlook for growth of the company?

I would say a couple of things in response to that, Tobey. I mean, first of all, I think there are things the administration has done and can do quickly to accelerate spending of already appropriated dollars in areas that we work in that are in some of our key growth drivers. I mean think around disaster recovery, as I said in my operating remarks, I think the new administration could certainly - and I would expect would accelerate the spending of mitigation funding to address in the disaster recovery area, which we've talked about. There's significant funding there to be $15 billion to $20 billion that the prior administration had not spent in any significant way. I would also say on the public health front that some of the stimulus bills that occurred when the pandemic first happened, I think they're still funding there potentially for some of the public health agencies that could be spent quickly. And so, I don't think there's any question that there's opportunities for this administration given their policy focus, [and in] [ph] the public health focus on having a plan following the science, that there could be opportunities there. And I do think, as the - obviously, as the new administration looks at putting new policies in place, putting new rules in place, I mean, that's our bread and butter. We've done policy and regulatory analysis in the environmental and energy and transportation arenas for decades. And so, I think to the extent that there's a shift and a focus to go there, we could certainly see a pickup in our advisory work here pretty quickly in those areas, for sure.

Thanks. I'd like to touch on the commercial energy and energy efficiency side of the business. You mentioned a nice contract win that you're still negotiating. Can you discuss your win rates in pursuing the new work emanating out of California and where we sit today relative to the total opportunity? Is it still early innings? Or are we kind of midway through this opportunity?

I think as we said, I mean, I think we've been informed we've won $60 million of California energy efficiency opportunities to date, which we're quite pleased on. I think it's - we - they do require - it's a mix of CPUC approval and finish negotiating the contract. I would say we're halfway through, I think, there is still material opportunity for us out there to be awarded. We remain busy on proposals. And so, I think we feel pretty good about the initial set of awards, and the opportunity is still in front of us. And I think it can be a material growth driver for us here over the next 12 to 24 months. And so I think we generally feel good. I guess I'd better not get into the win rates and the details of that. But I think we feel pretty good about where we are with what we've accomplished.

Thank you.

Thank you. We have our next question from Sam England with Berenberg.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. The first one, can you give us a sense of how strong the bid or RFP pipeline looking at the moment on the government side? And particularly, are you seeing any variation between the strength of the pipeline on the federal, state and local sides?

I think the pipeline is certainly quite robust on the - in the federal government market. I think, we continue to see significant opportunities in the areas we've talked about, IT modernization, public health and across our key civilian clients. We really haven't seen a significant slowdown or a pause here with the new administration coming in the federal space. State and local, I think our disaster recovery pipeline remains robust. We're waiting on some awards there, Board decisions. And in Puerto Rico, as I said in my remarks, we've won contracts last year. At the Gulf states, we won a significant mitigation contract for us in the fourth quarter, $40 million contract. And so I think, we're still awaiting the release of the very significant Puerto Rican mitigation opportunity, which I think will come in the first quarter here for bid. So we feel good about that market. And so generally, I mean, our commercial pipeline remains robust. And so I think - generally, I think we feel good about the pipeline. We really haven't felt - we haven't seen an - as I said, we haven't seen a pause or any falloff in our - the opportunities in front of us in our key markets.

Okay. Great. And you touched on the freeing up of some of the disaster mitigation dollars. Is that something you're expecting to happen in the first half of this year? Can you just give us an idea of the sort of scale of dollars that you're talking about?

I mean I think we'd expect it to happen. I think from my perspective, I mean, it could benefit on some of our traditional disaster recovery work. We haven't assumed a significant pickup in that this year from that. I think where I would be more optimistic on with the change in administration and the change in policy is that, as I said, the mitigation opportunities will - that money will be spent, and those opportunities that we're - certainly, the opportunities we were waiting on, I think, will play out here in the first half of the year. I would also note, one of the early things the Biden administration has done is, with FEMA, they have - they did make a decision that FEMA mitigation dollars under the BRIC program can support climate-related projects. And so that's another example where the Biden administration is connecting dots, using a FEMA mitigation bucket of money that's available to 50 states to bring a climate focus to those activities. And that's an example where we benefit from the administration connecting those dots, using a new bucket that - a bucket of money of FEMA to address mitigation to climate.

Okay. Great. Thanks. And then maybe just one more before I pass it over. I just wondered with the margin improvement, how much of it is coming from pandemic related cost savings, that travel and entertainment and things like that? And how much will reverse next year or over the next year as we return to normal?

I think it's a mix. I mean, I think - I mean, as you saw, we delivered 13.7% adjusted EBITDA to service revenue. We're guiding to 13.5% for this year. And so I think part of the reason that's come down is because there was one-time benefits related to COVID that we won't be able to sustain going into next year. But - so it's a mix of both savings that are not sustainable in the long run. And then part of the margin improvement is also the mix of our business. In terms of kind of how much of the savings we're not - I don't know, Bettina, do you want to add anything on that?

Sure. So we've seen a lot of reduction in travel and meals and entertainment. And when we look ahead in the future, we see that maybe the $10 million year-over-year savings in travel-related savings this year, we see a large portion of it is not sustainable, but we think maybe about 25% of it going forward makes sense. We've learned how to work remotely and how to interact with our customers remotely as well. I mean, I think that there's an acknowledgment, though, that there's also on the medical and the leave savings that we experienced this year that that will return to normal at some point in time. So that's not something that we see - we'll continue to see on a sustainable savings perspective. We have also, though, appreciated some - taken some measures for our facility expenses. And so we'll take some of that on an ongoing basis in the future too.

Okay. Great. Thanks very much, guys.

Thank you. Our next question is from Andrew Nicholas with William Blair.

Hi, it's actually Trevor Romeo in for Andrew. Thank you for taking the call. First, just wondering if I could ask another one on the energy efficiency market? I was just wondering if you could give us an update on the competitive landscape there kind of given that energy and climate are obviously increasingly important topics, in addition to the tailwinds from the new administration. Just curious if you're seeing any sort of new entrants there or changes in the competitive dynamics, either on the public or the commercial side?

I wouldn't say we haven't seen any significant changes in the competitive landscape in energy efficiency to climate. I mean, I think, there's the same handful of firms at scale that we compete with on the energy efficiency side. On climate, it tends to be a much more diversified market. I mean we're certainly a market leader there. And we've done our fair share of climate rate of work in California. And so, I mean, it's a competitive market. There's a lot of interest in those markets, climate, energy efficiency. I mean those are 2 markets where we have significant scale, significant capabilities, and so it is competitive. But I wouldn't say there's been a significant shift, that there's a lot more interest in those markets, but I'd say there's been a significant shift in the competitive landscape.

Okay. Great. Understood. And then just given the change in administration, I was wondering if you could talk about how the staffing levels at your key agency customers are kind of trending. If I remember correctly, I think you guys had talked about some delays during the last administration change 4 years ago. I know it hasn't been all that long since the change this time, but just curious if you'd expect to see anything like that this time around.

I would expect that the Biden administration will fill the key political positions quickly, much more quickly than the Trump administration did. And I think - and they'll work to get people confirmed. I mean I think - I just think that will be done more quickly and more efficiently. And so which will be positive to the extent that that transition can happen quickly and efficiently, and we can get people confirmed in those roles permanently. So I don't - I think it should be an improvement from the prior administration.

Okay. Good to hear. Well, thank you very much for the color.

Thank you. We have our next question from Kevin Steinke with Barrington Research.

Good afternoon. I wanted to ask about some of the COVID-related contract wins. You mentioned a total of about $40 million in 2020. Do you see any larger opportunities coming up in the pipeline here? As you mentioned, maybe moving to the next phase, the recovery phase, what's in the pipeline that might be larger that you could specifically tie to the pandemic?

I would say, Kevin, as we've talked about, I think the federal government, I think is still in the response phase here and very focused on kind of the prices in front of them from the - everything you read in the headlines, obviously, very focused on vaccine at the moment. So I would say our clients, by and large, the opportunities we're seeing are shorter-term kind of immediate response under existing contracts. So we're winning work under existing contracts, getting new task orders under existing contracts. And so I think, by and large, I still think it's a bit early to point to significant COVID opportunities that are kind of with the recovery phase focus. I think we do expect those to materialize. But I think it's still a bit early for that. I mean, obviously, HHS is our largest client. I think it's 16% or 17% of our revenues. We have a robust pipeline of opportunities there. I think we've talked in prior quarters about contracts we've won in IT modernization apart from with ITG and HHS. But I think in some of the broader areas around disease surveillance, analytics and broader issues around how to better prepare for future pandemics, I think it's still a little early. We have seen some larger opportunities on the survey front around COVID response and - but I think, it's still a little early to - still early for those opportunities to materialize and become RFPs and bids.

Yeah. Of course. No, that makes a lot of sense. Now in the earnings release, you mentioned approximately 55% of your 2020 service revenue coming from work in key growth areas where you expect growth rates in aggregate of approximately 10% over the next several years. I just - I think, I have all the buckets here, but I just want to make sure everything that you're including in there, just so we have that as clear as possible in our minds.

Yeah. Sure. So I think it's - we had climate consulting. We had disaster management. We had our environmental water and transportation business, IT modernization, public health and our utility and energy efficiency business.

Okay. Perfect. Thanks. And I believe it was mentioned when you talked about the cadence in 2021, a similar cadence except for a larger sequential increase in the second quarter. Can you talk about what would drive that second quarter bump?

I mean, I think, typically, it's - typically, our quarterly phasing in our business and the seasonality is Q1 tends to be the weakest quarter of the year as we come into the new year, takes a little bit longer to ramp up, particularly on the commercial business side. And then, we go into the second quarter and we're building certainly in commercial land, I would say, in the government business and the third quarter is just the busiest quarter of the year. So I think it's typical seasonality. I think the only point we wanted to make is as folks looked at the year, I think it's a similar kind of results from 1H to 2H as prior year. But we would expect Q1 to - a ramp-up from Q1 to Q2 this year when you look at 1H.

Okay, great. Thanks. That's helpful. That's all I have for now. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] We have our next question from Marc Riddick with Sidoti & Company.

Hi, good evening.

Hey, Mark.

I wanted to touch a little bit on the office situation. And I guess, speaking in broad how we should be thinking about the, with the leases and how that might continue to play through, and if there's sort of a bigger, broader message around post-pandemic thoughts of office space needs or how should we kind of think about that particular part of the process and the journey that we're going through right now?

Right. So I think as we said in our remarks and our release, I think it's early termination or discontinuing use of 16 offices, office-to-office leases. Generally, the offices that we took the step on had remaining leases of 2 to 3 years remaining. And they were also often areas where we had more than 1 lease in the city. I think with the pandemic, we certainly learned some lessons around how folks will work remotely. And I think given that, I think we - while, certainly, we expect people to return to the office, and that will be an important part of the future of the business in terms of ensuring collaboration and brainstorming and those types of things, I think given what we've learned in the pandemic, we felt we could shut these offices down, manage the use of the space. And in doing so, we've - I think we save about $2.5 million a year going forward. And I think our intent with that is to largely reinvest that in business development, given all the opportunities in front of us in terms of growth to take full advantage of them. But I would expect, as future leases expire, that we're going to take a hard look at our footprint. And I would expect that over time, the footprint is certainly going to come down, given I think we'll end up in some kind of hybrid, people who work from the office and also - but also continue to work remotely at some level, so you won't need it. You'll need collaborative space where people can sign up for an office for a day or work in a collaborative environment. But we'll be able to use the space much more efficiently. So I think we're - so I would hope we could - 20%, 25% savings on our facilities footprint going forward. I mean, it's not a bad goal. I think Bettina mentioned that, as we look at travel and entertainment going forward that I think we'll need to return to that and we'll begin to at some point this year. But, again, I would hope we could save 20%, 25% on that. And again, I think we'll look to either reinvest that or have it help drive our profitability. I think those are the - but certainly, we're taking a hard look at the facilities as we go forward. And that will be an ongoing thing. I mean as the leases come up for renewal, certainly take a hard look.

Okay, great. And it was nice to hear about the wins in California. I just want to touch a little bit. You made mention as to - I think that's more of a - expecting there to be more of 2022 contributor, which makes perfect sense. Is it reasonable to say that that's probably more back-half 2022 related, given there is the timing expectation?

No, I think we'll begin work on that. That work will begin in the second half of this year, but it will take a bit to ramp up. There's also - so no, I think it's going to be at 2022, it will begin - I think it will be ramping up and ramped up, I think as we go into 2022. I think it's just going to take some - it's not going to be a quick burn here in 2021, partly because we still need PUC approval. We have to negotiate the contracts. There's also - some of the work we are doing in California. The utilities have pushed it back to late in the year, because we're going to be leveraging their IT systems, and several of these utilities are upgrading their IT systems, so they don't want us coming in and doing our work until they've got their system upgrades done. But it certainly will be a 2022 opportunity. It's not going to be the second half of the year.

Okay, makes sense. Thank you very for the color.

And thank you. We have no further questions in queue. I will now turn the call over to management for closing remarks.

Okay. Well, thank you for participating in today's call. We look forward to engaging with you at upcoming virtual conferences and meetings. Thanks again.

And, thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.