Michael Brigham
Analyst · SER Asset Management. Please go ahead
Okay. Great. We have a very good roster assembled here. So thank you all for taking the time to join today's call. I do appreciate that. We have spent a fair amount of time preparing our quarterly report on Form 10-Q. I think it is worth a read. I'm not going to repeat a lot of those important details on this call. But I do want to highlight three important milestones to look for going forward, and then mention what I see as the two most important financial results from last night's filings. So let me start with the three important milestones to watch for. I think, as previously disclosed, you may know we have a $3 million project to expand production capacity for First Defense. That project's underway at the early stages, going well so far, just getting started here. The goal and the end result of this project will be to increase our liquid processing capacity by 100%, increase our freeze-drying capacity by 50%. And what that means to us is that we expect this investment to increase the annual sales value of our production capacity from approximately $18 million to $27 million. So we will keep you updated on that progress. Number two, we also have a $4 million project to create our own aseptic filling capability for Re-Tain. This investment is necessary to give us the needed control over the production process for Re-Tain from start to finish. So at the same time we continue -- at the same time we're building this production capacity, the filling capacity, we continue to progress a short-term contract with our current aseptic filling CMO. And as you should anticipate, we will issue a press release when we have this matter resolved up or down. Thirdly, we do expect the FDA to complete its review of our first phased drug substance submission of the CMC Technical Section, still here in the third quarter. This will be announced in a press release. So, with that let me turn to the two important financial disclosures. So, I think it's really important to look at the non-GAAP disclosures in our press release. Of course, we don't put those in our Q, so I would point you to the press release when we look at such expense items, noncash expense items like, depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation expense, income taxes. All these expenses are noncash to us. So, at times our reported losses could have been income had not been for these large noncash charges. And we've laid that out pretty directly in the press release for your consideration. And then, let's talk about the sales results. So we had a very strong increase in total sales during the first half of the year, first half of 2019, ended June 30. We don't focus too much on the quarterly results. With our relatively small numbers, a small dollar swing can result in a pretty large percentage change, plus the timing of order backlogs can distort the results. So, in my opinion, longer periods are better. Six months being up 21%, is what I look at. That's an additional $1.2 million in revenue. That brings the trailing 12-month sales to $12.2 million. So that's a great result for us in this very difficult dairy economy. It's a great work by our sales team. Tri-Shield is creating most of this growth for us. Tri-Shield First Defense has created a new opportunity for us. The new market opportunity for us is about quality over quantity and beyond vaccination. I have asked our VP of Sales and Marketing, Bobbi Jo Brockmann to join this morning's call to talk a bit about what this means to customers, after which I'll be happy to take your questions. Bobbi? Bobbi Jo Brockmann Thank you, Michael. So, there is a significant change we are seeing in the dairy industry and in fact it's a positive one. A quality revolution is going on right now. So now, more than ever raising replacement heifers, those female calves that are destined for the milking stream, it's about making the best ones and not necessarily keeping every one. So, in my 20 years since graduating from Iowa State, I've been focused nearly 100% on newborn calves, not just as a manufacturer rep selling calf products, but also actually raising calves, as I managed a dairy for seven years. I've witnessed this evolution very closely and it's fascinating to me. Our industry has gone from a low-cost mindset, where many producers strategically avoided making investments in newborn calves which big surprise led to a relatively high death loss in that enterprise. The industry then moved into what I like to call the zombie apocalypse. This is where we sharply reduced death loss, but we've swung the pendulum in the opposite direction, where we started nursing calves back from the dead. So this is reactive health strategy rather than a preventative approach. Met farms had a lot of costs, wrapped up in replacements that simply never met their genetic potential. And then sexed semen became mainstream and we experienced a heifer baby boom like no other. The industry tried raising all of these females with the same facilities without increasing staff much if at all and farms went from lines of hutches sitting for a week or two between fields to moving calves out before they were really ready just because more newborns were coming and hutch space was needed. So pathogen load surged and we were still ending up with mediocre replacement heifers coming into the milking streams. But now we are hitting a quality revolution as many farms tighten up their calf operations. So, genomic testing, crossing dairy cows with these semen to increase the value of old calves, those are at all-time highs as folks are being more strategic in how they use such semen. Producers are indeed raising fewer replacements than before, but they want these replacements to be quality right from the start. They need them to be quality and are willing to invest more in preventative health programs. And since variability degrades the performance of our production system, this movement is pretty important, especially considering the last 15 years, half of the U.S. dairy farms have disappeared. What's really exciting for us is those that are still in this game and poised to thrive are focusing on heifer return on investment by reducing the variability which widens the gap between genetic potential and field performance. Those producers are looking for a guarantee when it comes to newborn calf immunity and we are the only product that can do that for both bacterial and viral scours. So, the competition, these scour vaccines, they date back to the 1970s. These are vaccines given to the cow for no other reason, but to protect the calf. They've been around forever, but the protection they provide is highly variable. It is biologically impossible for a 100% vaccine response rate. It's generally assumed 70% to 80% of cows may be responding. Well, this leaves 20% to 30% of the calf crop unprotected. We are the only tool that can take the market beyond vaccination and protect every calf equally. So, it takes time to change a tradition that is going green, but the quality revolution we are seeing regarding replacement heifers aligns very well with our goal to replace the variable vaccine response with our verified antibodies. We're on the front end of this market disruption. It's exciting. And the investment we're making in production expansion is important, so more producers can go beyond vaccination with guaranteed levels of immunity. I have to say it's really nice to have the opportunity to share some market insights with you folks. I appreciate that and I hope you found it interesting. With that, I'll turn it back over to Mike.