Yes, great. Thanks Sam. So, two thoughts. One, just sort of clarifying where we put out as market projections. So, we have long felt the market we compete and at the calf level, against two or three big companies is around 17 million in total sales, and that’s where 90% of our sales today are. So, then with Tri-Shield, we get into this dam vaccine market. There is about double that. There is about 34 million of these dam vaccines sold. So, a much bigger market that we access with Tri-Shield. So, that production capacity being able to take 10 today is 10 million or trailing 12 months, 11 million, up to that 16 million, 17 million capacity will be the result of Tri-Shield, but it will be a net. So, Tri-Shield will get some new customers and just brand-new business, someone that’s never tried a calf level product before, maybe someone that’s never even tried a dam-level product before or somebody that is using a dam-level product and switches or somebody that uses a calf-level product and switches. So, it’s going to be a net growth factor to some cannibalization of the – what we call Dual-Force, the bivalent First Defense. Again, some new market. I don't really care, where it comes from, as long as we’re growing and that’s kind of our reporting plan going forward is not to focus on how much of each product line, but just the entire First Defense product line bivalent and trivalent. And as to Gustavo, I think really the answer is no. And we cannot afford to have him distracted by the USDA business. He is really focused on the FDA side, working through the remaining objectives with the CMC in getting the plan, the batches made and all the quality documentations. So, he’ll be focused on Nisin and really, indirectly I mean we’re all one team, indirectly there’s benefit to having his thinking on the team, but his day-to-day focus is Nisin and the FDA operation.