Rob Shuster
Analyst · Sandler O'Neil and Partners. Please go ahead
Thanks Brad and good morning everyone. I am starting at page 13 of our presentation. Brad discussed the year-over-year increase in our net interest income during his remarks. So I will focus on our net interest margin. Our tax equivalent net interest margin was 3.87%, during the second quarter of 2019, which is down six basis points from the year ago period, but down just one basis point from the first quarter of 2019. I will have some more detailed comments on this topic in a moment. Average interest-earning assets were $3.19 billion in the second quarter of 2019 compared to $2.96 billion in the year ago quarter and $3.15 billion in the first quarter of 2019. Page 14 contains a more detailed analysis of the linked quarter increase in net interest income. There is a lot of data on this slide, but to summarize a few key points. Overall, we felt that the net interest margin held up very well in the second quarter despite a rather challenging environment. The amount of average loans increased $77.8 million and average loans represented 84.6% of total earning assets in the second quarter of 2019 as compared to 83.2% in the first quarter of 2019. This change in mix helped push our average yield on earning assets up by three basis points. The average cost of funds was up four basis points to 0.86% in the second quarter of 2019 from 0.82% in the first quarter of 2019. We experienced a $7.7 million decline in average non-interest-bearing deposit balances in the second quarter of 2019. However, this compares to a $27 million decline in the first quarter of 2019. Finally, one more day in the second quarter of 2019 increased net interest income by $159,000 compared to the first quarter. We'll comment more specifically on our outlook for net interest income for the balance of 2019 later in the presentation. Page 15 compares our quarterly average cost of funds to the monthly average effective federal funds rate during the quarter and the spot federal funds rate during the quarter. As you all know, there has been an amazing change in sentiment as we have moved from considering the impact of additional fed funds rate increases on cost of funds to now considering the impact of lower interest rates on our net interest margin. Moving on to Page 16. Non-interest income totaled $9.9 million in the second quarter of 2019, as compared to $12.3 million in the year ago quarter and $10 million in the first quarter of 2019. Mortgage loan servicing caused most of the quarterly comparative and year-over-year variability in non-interest income and Brad covered these numbers in his remarks. Second quarter net gains on mortgage loans increased to $4.3 million compared to $3.3 million in the second quarter of 2018. The increase in these gains was due to increases in mortgage loan sales volume and in the mortgage loan pipeline. Mortgage loan application volume was very strong in the second quarter of 2019 and continues to be very strong at the start of the third quarter as we have both a healthy purchase market and refinanced volumes have been increasing due to lower interest rates. As detailed on Page 17, our non-interest expenses totaled $26.6 million in the second quarter of 2019 as compared to $29.8 million in the year ago quarter and $28 million in the first quarter of 2019. The second quarter of 2018 included $3.1 million of merger-related expenses. The decrease from the first quarter of 2019 is primarily concentrated in the compensation and employee benefits, occupancy and other real estate line items. We will have more comments on our outlook for non-interest expenses later in the presentation. Investment securities available for sale decreased $31.2 million during the second quarter of 2019. Page 18 provides an overview of our investment portfolio at June 30, 2019. Approximately 31% of the portfolio was variable rate and much of the fixed rate portion of the portfolio is in maturities or average lives five years or less. The estimated average duration of the portfolio is about 2.7 years with a weighted average tax equivalent yield of 3.12%, which is down five basis points from March 31, 2019. Page 19 provides data on non-performing loans, other real estate, non-performing assets and early-stage delinquencies. Total non-performing assets were $9.4 million, or just 0.27% of total assets at June 30, 2019. Non-performing loans decreased by $0.9 million during the second quarter of 2019. You may have noticed that we began to deduct government-guaranteed loans from total non-accrual loans to arrive at total non-performing loans. This is a common practice. And as our Ginnie Mae mortgage loan servicing portfolio has grown, we may elect to purchase defaulted mortgage loans out of pools during the pendency of the claims process. At June 30, 2019, 30 to 89-day commercial loan delinquencies were just 0.02% for commercial loans, and mortgage and consumer loan delinquencies were just 0.43%. Moving on to page 20, we recorded a provision for loan losses of $652,000 and $650,000 in the second quarters' 2019 and 2018 respectively. We recorded loan net charge-offs of just $3,000 in the second quarter of 2019 compared to loan net charge-offs of $217,000 in the second quarter of 2018. The allowance for loan losses totaled $25.9 million or 0.96% of portfolio loans at June 30 2019. Page 21 provides some additional asset quality data, including the information on new loan defaults and unclassified assets. New loan defaults were just $2.5 million during the first half of 2019. Page 22 provides information on our TDR portfolio that totaled $52.1 million at June 30, 2019, which is a decline of $1.2 million during the second quarter. This portfolio continues to perform very well with nearly 95% of these loans performing and 93.1% of these loans being current at June 30, 2019. Page 23 provides a detailed time line for our implementation of the CECL accounting standard. We are on track to publicly disclose the estimated impact of CECL on our allowance for loan losses when we file our second quarter 2019 Form 10-Q on or about August 2, 2019. Page 24 is our update for 2019, where we compare our actual performance during the year to our original outlook that we provided back in January 2019. Overall, we believe that our actual performance in the second quarter of 2019, when factoring out the negative fair value adjustment due to price on capitalized MSRs was better than our original outlook. We achieved actual annualized loan growth of 13.4% in the second quarter of 2019. Typically our second and third quarter loan growth is the strongest due to seasonal factors. We remain comfortable with our full year expectation of 8% to 9% or slightly better loan growth. With the current shape of the yield curve and the now expected cuts in the federal funds rate, we do expect some downward pressure on our net interest margin. As a result, we reduced our original forecasted growth rate of 10% to 11% for net interest income for all of 2019, down to 8% to 9%. This updated forecast assumes 25 basis point cuts in the federal funds rate in July, September and December. We had a loan loss provision, as mentioned earlier, of $652,000 in the second quarter. This was below our anticipated level, because of better than expected asset quality metrics. We expect generally stable asset quality metrics during the remainder of 2019, so loan growth is anticipated to be the main driver of our loan loss provision. Excluding, again, the negative fair value adjustment due to price on MSRs, our adjusted second quarter 2019 non-interest income would have been a bit above the high end of our forecasted range, due primarily to higher net gains on mortgage loans. We continue to expect non-interest income to be within our forecasted range in the next two quarters, excluding any volatility associated with changes due to price and the fair value of the MSRs. As I discussed last quarter, we expected actual second quarter 2019 non-interest expenses to move back within our forecasted range, due primarily for lower expenses and compensation and employee benefits, occupancy and credit-related items, which are comprised of ORE, costs related to unfunded lending commitments, and the provision for loss reimbursement on sold loans. These declines resulted in actual second quarter total non-interest income being a bit below the lower end of our range. We expect to generally be within our forecasted range in the last half of 2019. Finally, our effective income tax rate was 20% in the second quarter of 2019, which is exactly in line with our forecasts. Just a couple of supplemental comments probably the two areas where I believe we could do a bit better than my comments that I just made would be in the provision for loan loss area particularly in the third quarter and in non-interest income if our mortgage loan pipeline holds up at September 30. That concludes my prepared remarks and I would now like to turn the call back over to Brad.