Thank you for standing by and welcome to Hyperfine’s Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2022 Conference Call. At this time all participants are in listen-only mode. After the speakers presentation there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, today’s call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference to your host Marissa Bych, of the Gilmartin Group. Please go ahead.

Great! Thank you for joining today’s call. Earlier today Hyperfine Inc. released financial results for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2022. A copy of the press release is available on the company’s website as well as sec.gov. Before we begin, I’d like to remind you that management will make statements during this call that includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Federal Securities Laws, which are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements contained in this call that relate to expectations or predictions of future events, results or performance are forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements, including without limitation, those relating to our operating trends and future financial performance, expense management, expectations for hiring, training and adoption, growth in our organization, market opportunity, commercial and international expansion, regulatory approvals, and product development are based upon our current estimates and various assumptions. These statements involve material risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to materially differ from those anticipated or implied by these forward-looking statements. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these statements. For a list and description of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business, please refer to the Risk Factors section of our latest periodic filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This conference call contains time-sensitive information and is accurate only as of the live broadcast today, March 21, 2023. Hyperfine, Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation, except as required by law to update or revise any financial projections or forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise. And with that, I will turn the call over to Maria Sainz, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. On the call with me is our Chief Administrative Officer and Incoming Chief Financial Officer, Brett Hale. 2022 was a year of significant technological, clinical and commercial progress for Hyperfine. I am pleased to share that we recognize $6.8 million in revenue for the full year, driven by the sale of 35 commercial Swoop systems. We also received multiple clearances for next generation hardware and software upgrades, saw our technology highlighted in 15 clinical publications and 50 peer-reviewed presentations at neurology and imaging meetings, and strengthened our existing partnerships while establishing new relationships with several types and hospital systems. In addition to these initiatives, we have right-sized our business and implemented spending discipline to extend our cash runway through 2025, including the cessation of the Liminal brain sensing program and associated position. I am very proud of what the Hyperfine team has accomplished in its first full year as a public company, a year of dynamic change internally and in the marketing. Before turning to our 2023 priorities, I would like to provide greater detail on a few of these recent achievements. First, on the R&D side, we continue to advance the field of ultra-low-field MRI and have strengthened image quality through multiple FDA cleared, AI powered software upgrades. These software upgrades enable improved image quality, greater consistency and robustness to motion across key brain imaging sequences for neurocritical care applications. In mid-2022 we also launched a partnership with Viz.ai, a leading AI-powered disease detection and intelligent care coordination platform, to continue enhancing our diagnostic imaging capabilities as we advance our mission to provide transformational, accessible and clinically relevant diagnostic imaging. This partnership will take us to pilot evaluations in a small number of key sites in 2023. Turning to our…

Thank you, Maria. Turning to our financial results for the fourth quarter of 2022, revenue for the quarter ended December 31, 2022 was $1.4 million, compared to $0.4 million in the fourth quarter 2021. Gross margin for the fourth quarter of 2022 was $0.3 million, compared to a negative $0.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2021. R&D expenses for the fourth quarter of 2022 were $5.2 million, compared to $8.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2021. Sales, general and administrative expenses for the fourth quarter of 2022 were $8.7 million compared to $16.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2021. Net loss for the fourth quarter was $13.1 million, equating to a net loss of $0.19 per share as compared to a net loss of $26.1 million or a net loss of $13.79 per share for the same period the prior year. Now turning to the results for the full year 2022. Revenue for the full year 2022 was $6.8 million, compared to $1.5 million in 2021. Gross margin for the full year 2022 was $0.9 million compared to negative $1.2 million in 2021. R&D expenses for the full year 2022 were $28.2 million compared to $25.8 million in 2021. Sales, general and administrative expenses for the full year 2022 were $46.6 million, compared to $37.9 million in 2021. Net loss for the full year was $73.2 million equating to a net loss of $1.04 per share as compared to a net loss of $64.9 million or a net loss of $17.57 per share for the prior year. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $117.5 million as of December 31, 2022. Turning to our 2023 outlook, based on our progress and current trends of the business, we are initiating full year expectations for revenue to be in the range…

Thank you, Brad. I am immensely excited to be leading Hyperfine into the year ahead. Before wrapping up, I would like to highlight the positive feedback received from one of our customers during the recent educational webinar hosted for our commercial sites and prospects. This customer noted increased operational efficiency and improved workflow with Swoop, as the system is alleviating the challenge of limited MR capacity and reducing turnaround times at their hospital. He also noted an expectation for the hospital to recognize a positive return on investment in Swoop in a shorter time period that they had anticipated at the time of device acquisition and commented on an improved patient experience. This commentary supports the immense value of our differentiated technology in improving patient and provider experiences and expanding access to diagnostics for hospital systems by complementing their conventional MRI workflow. With our early success marked by a total global installed base of over hundred systems to-date, we are setting the stage for accessible and affordable point of care imaging to transform care delivery and continue enhancing healthcare around the world. With that, I want to thank you for your time and open it up to any questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Larry Biegelsen of Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. Maria and Brett, can you hear me okay?

Yes, we can. Hi Larry!

Oh good. Hi! So let's start with Q4. It’s usually the strongest quarter for cap – in capital businesses, but you came in a little bit below, at least on the revenue side, the low end of your guidance range. I think you're at the low end of the capital, the placement guidance. So you talked a little bit about disruption Maria, from the sales force organization changes. Could you just talk a little bit more about the trends you saw in Q4 and why you know we saw you come in a little bit below the revenue guidance?

Sure. So as I said, I think there was a little bit of distraction, because we made a very significant number of changes in our sales leadership and really our sales team. Overall, we have about two-thirds of all sales and quota bearing people now that have either a new role or are brand new to the company, and most of those transitions started in Q4 and that provided some distraction. I'm also very pleased to say that deals were not lost, deals were just pushed out. So maybe we took our focus a little bit out of just getting the deal closed in the fourth quarter, and things have continued to play out over the course of the subsequent weeks. I also would say Larry, that although it is true that there is a strong push for capital to wrap up the year strong, I'm not sure that I would put us in the same bucket as all other big capital purchases and that we are a brand new category to most of the administrators and the budgets. We're not a budget line per se, so I think we follow a little bit of our own rhythm in a way, and didn't see that need to really get things into the finish line from the hospital perspective before the end of the year. But I would say, organically I think we – not purposefully, but we created some transition and some disruption to make sure that we were starting the year with the right people in the right seats, and the right seats on the bus.

That’s helpful and then transitioning to 2023 and the guidance, help us you know – give us you know and tell us why you're confident in the $10 million to $14 million, given that the Q4 run rate is below that. What needs to happen for you to hit the guidance? What are you assuming for the two large orders that you announced, that you talked about on this call. And just lastly on the guidance, is my math Brett right that OpEx is going to be about $50 million for 2023 to get to that burn rate, which would be a pretty steep decline from ’22. Thanks guys.

Sure. So let me take the confidence part of the question and I'll turn it over to Brett for the OpEx commentary. As I said, it started with making sure that we had the right sales structure with the right people in place. Those people very quickly put in the right processes to make sure that the quality of our pipeline of deals, the breadth of our pipeline of deals, and then the scrutiny around the deals as they progressed with the different gates, any of these deals progresses through is very strong. We do have all positions filled now with what I believe is the right profile of people, and I'm starting to see the green shoots of really the amount of deals that are in the pipeline, the distribution of those deals across all of the geographies, the discipline around the execution on the deals. So that gives me the right confidence around how I see this year panning out. It is also true that it does take about six months or so for any one of our brand new people to come up on the learning curve and to hit their stride. So that is why we expect the second half to be stronger than the first half, but I have a lot of confidence with the leadership was put in place, both at the national level, at the regional level, the quality of the individuals we hired and what I'm seeing in terms of the quality, the breadth and the depth of the pipeline that is progressing here as the weeks go on and I'm going to let Brett comment on the OpEx.

Hi Larry! This is Brett. So in regards to the guidance we're giving, we gave guidance regarding the cash burn, which will have $40 million to $45 million. We're going to be managing to our cash burn. Obviously there's some elements of variable spending depending on the range of revenue. But you are correct, the OpEx is going to step down significantly from our Q3 2022 basis into 2023, and that's a direct reduction from the reorganization that we've done as well as our prioritized spending.

Just lately – go ahead, I’m sorry.

No go – I was going to just comment that, that prioritized spending is an important commentary, because I believe we have been able to reduce spending without compromising the must-have spending. So the critical projects around innovation, the critical projects like the Action PMR clinical evaluation and the customer facing and quota bearing headcount that are really critical to feed those three pillars that I feel strongly are the right balance of priorities for our business this year.

And Brett, any color – I know you're not giving placement guidance. Any color on device versus service split in that $10 million to $14 million?

We're not providing specific guidance, but there is obviously components of our revenue that split between the device and servers portion. We do have different ASPs for different geographies, so we're not breaking that out into detail at this point in time.

Alright, thanks for taking the questions. I'll let others jump in.

Thank you.

Thank you. One moment, please. Our next question comes from the line of Kevin Joaquin of Evercore ISI. Your line is opens.

Hi! This is Kevin on for Vijay. Just first on, you know gross margin guidance for the year, and just generally your long term target for gross margin improvement. Can you provide more colors there? How much of this improvement will be driven by the cost savings initiatives versus increase in ASP?

I think I'm going to let Brett take that.

Yes, so there are – as reflected in our earnings call, we are going to see a gradual increase in pricing throughout 2023. So we are going to get a lift in benefit from the pricing benefit that we're seeing. Cost is obviously a laser focused for the organization, including the manufacturing cost of our product. I would say the third piece that's going to be a variable is just the increase in volumes over time. Obviously, we get efficiency as we scale the business. So those are the three levers, but we don't have an exact breakdown of the contribution of that, but those are the three things that will lead to the 40% gross margin guidance, and then as we continue to grow the business thereafter.

Got it. And on your cash flow for the year, are the savings primarily on the R&D front or SG&A?

So we've commented on our OpEx that we are actually continuing to invest significantly in our R&D. Maria mentioned the clinical evidence, the innovation that continues to be a priority and focus. Most of our focus, most of our cost savings has been about running an organization that's very efficient and lean, and that cuts across the whole organization, but a majority of the savings price come disproportionately from SG&A side versus R&D given the increased investment we're making in terms of our percentage of OpEx to R&D.

Got it. Thank you.

Thank you. One moment please. Our next question comes from a line is Neil Chatterji with B. Riley. Your line is open.

Hey guys, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. Just curious, just in terms of the kind of I guess sequential drop here on the installs, just curious on how much of that was potentially related to that. You mentioned the kind of the higher ASP being a potential barrier. So just kind of curious you know how much of a role that played, and then also, if there's potentially any sort of a bonus from potential installs in 4Q into the first quarter.

Sure. Hi Neil! So, pricing is not a barrier to adoption. I think we've said it a number of times, and I realize that I've been in the job now five months and I'm still convinced that I haven't really heard it at all by now. That is a reason why we decided to start moving pricing up and have started to do that. Although of course, the deals do take a long time. So it will take some transition time until that is fully baked into our actual ASP, but that was not the reason for the software Q4. I really think that part of the reason was that disruption that we created by the significant reorganization that we cramped into Q4 so that we could get it all done and start the year with the right team in place, the right processes and the right leadership. So I feel it was definitely not pricing. The new pricing is something that we have started to roll out actually at the beginning of this year. So it didn't really even factor in that much into Q4, although of course internally the team knew that that was the direction we were heading as we were looking into implementing it. And then as we go forward, so in terms of the volumes, I mean things continue to progress and I think I've said it. We don't really – we have not lost deals. Deals get more complicated or just a little bit longer with different paperwork. I can give you some examples where we had a contract in place, and all of a sudden the buying group wanted to be the acquiring organization, and that had a total restart on a contract at an institution where we're going to ultimately create multiple placements as well. So on the other two deals that we have spoken about, the order from KCL, the King's College London, as well as the DJC, we continue to expect a fairly steady deployment and shipment of those devices over the quarters ahead. So I don't – there is no [inaudible] associated with that either.

Got it. Thank you for that, and I might have misheard on the pricing aspect. And maybe just on the FDA clearances you've had recently, just curious if you've had any initial feedback on those updates and the enhanced capabilities on Swoop. And then secondly, what other updates we could expect kind of through the balance of ‘23.

Sure. So yes, we have had feedback. Don't know if you know, but usually we do a data release and get about two or three dozen cases done before we actually submit our 510(k). So we have some inputs from the data runs and then we have now a little bit of run time. Clearly, a lot of positive as to where we've taken DWI. There is a general field of immense progress in the last two years on that level of imaging. As you think forward, continue to do – to improve our DWI, also because we have that appetite to get into stroke, and that's going to be critical. There's some other things that we can do to continue to strengthen the robustness to motion, the correction for noise through more DL and then some other features around usability. We're looking at software helping with the patient position, which is also important and other things like that. What I would say is that these improvements are getting us closer and closer to feeling really ready to take on the ischemic stroke setting and as such is probably going to be after the next software release, probably when we feel ready to start that Action PMR study that we have discussed.

Great! Thanks. That’s it from me.

Thank you. I'm showing no further questions at this time. I'll turn the call back over to Maria Sainz, Chief Executive Officer for any closing remarks.

Thank you. We remain very bullish about the Hyperfine opportunity, and we feel we have taken the measures necessary to establish a strong foundation to deliver on the three pillars that I have outlined. I want to thank you for your interest in Hyperfine and look forward to updating all of you again in May. Thank you.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today’s conference. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect. Have a great day!