Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Hyster-Yale Materials Handling 2015 second-quarter earnings conference call. At this all participants are in a listen only mode. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference call, Christina Kmetko. Ma'am, you may begin.

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our 2015 second-quarter earnings call. I am Christina Kmetko, and I am responsible for Investor Relations at Hyster-Yale. Joining me on today's call are Al Rankin, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer of Hyster-Yale Materials Handling; Colin Wilson, President and Chief Executive Officer of NACCO Materials Handling Group; and Ken Schilling, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Yesterday, we published our second-quarter 2015 results and filed our second-quarter 10-Q for the three months three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Copies of the earnings release and 10-Q are available on our website at Hyster-Yale.com. For anyone who is not able to listen to today's entire call, an archived version of this webcast will be on our website later this afternoon and available for approximately 12 months. I would also like to remind participants that this conference call may contain certain forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements made here today, in either our prepared remarks or during the following question-and-answer session. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements, which may not be updated until our next quarterly earnings conference call, if at all. Additional information regarding these risks and uncertainties was set forth in our earnings release and in our 10-Q. Also, certain amounts discussed during this call are considered non-GAAP. The non-GAAP reconciliations of these amounts are included in our earnings release and available on our website. Let's turn to the results. Where our results declined from the prior year, they exceeded our expectations for the quarter. Our consolidated second-quarter 2015 revenues were down 3.8% to $658.7 million from $684.7 million the prior year. And our net income…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Mike Shlisky from Global Hunter. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning, guys. This is Leigh Pressman on the line for Mike Shlisky. I just have a few quick questions for you guys. So, do you experience a seasonal shutdown in Europe during Q3? A few other manufacturing companies we've heard from this quarter are expecting that. Is that something in a normal course of business for you?

There is certainly vacation time in Europe in the summer, yes.

So that seasonally affects every year the Q3 results for your Europe segment?

Generally, yes.

Okay. Great. Have you been getting any orders yet for your PowerEdge batteries, or do you have a sense of what the demand for the product is like this point?

I think what we've said is we want to have about 250 bookings by the end of the year. We still feel that that's a very reasonable target. We have a number of customers that are extremely interested in it. We will have some working fuel cell battery substitutes available toward the end of the third quarter. And the customers we are working with, generally speaking, we want to demonstrate what those fuel cells with them. So from our point of view, we are on track for what we've said in the release, and we are working very closely with those customers and feel good about the situation at this point.

Okay. Great. And then one more, if I could. You spoke about the Americas in general, which includes Brazil. What are you seeing domestically just in the U.S. alone for the back half of the year? There has been definitely positive macro data points that have been coming out, so just curious what you see in the U.S. specifically for the lift truck market.

Well, let me answer the question the other way around for a second.

Okay.

Brazil is a big drag on the Americas at the moment. And if you think about it this way -- I think it's helpful to think about this way. In Brazil, we have dealers who have significant inventory. And as they -- as a steep downturn occurs in the economy, which is what's happening now, their retail sales rate from their inventory goes down. And they want to lower their inventory to an appropriate level for the current level of activities. So even though they are continuing sales at the retail level of lift trucks, from the point of view of our shipments we get an exaggerated downturn in our shipments because the dealers are not reordering. And indeed, we don't want them to reorder because we want them to be economically healthy. And if they have too much invested in inventory in a downturn, they can become economically stressed. So the net result is that, for a period of time, our dealers are bleeding down inventory, and that may take six months or so depending on how far down lift truck orders go in Brazil. We are forecasting currently on a pretty pessimistic basis. And maybe it won't turn out that way, but we feel it is more prudent to manage the business on the basis of a sharp downturn. We can always respond and turn up relatively quickly, but it's really tough to work out of an over-inventoried situation. So Brazil, as a result, has as a full-service profit center has some significant losses that are a drag a big drag on the Americas in the second half. The flip side of it is, really, we have North America and Latin America. Orders are really pretty robust in Latin America, and it's too early to tell in the…

And our next question comes from the line of Mig Dobre from Robert W. Baird. Please proceed.

Hi, good morning. This is Brian Brophy on for Mig. I have a few questions, and I'll start up in the lift truck business, kind of piggybacking off your last answer. The destocking situation that you described in Brazil, is that something that you saw happen in the second quarter, or is that something you are expecting in the back half of this year?

It's very much happening now. Christina, in her overview remarks, indicated that the plant is up and operating in a very good fashion, but it is not operating at the level that we had hoped. That's what I think she was communicating, and that's because of the beginning of the process that I just described to you.

Got it. Got it. Okay. And then switching to.

Let me add that the same thing, to some degree, is going on in Russia, which has been a good market for us. But as you can imagine, the financial conditions for our dealers are very, very tight in Russia. And so new orders -- they are destocking in the same way that I described for Brazil maybe it's not quite as brutal and its impact on us is not as significant because we don't have the cost structure there that's associated with just Russia. But nevertheless the same thing is happening there. And in Turkey we changed some dealers, so it's a little bit the opposite direction now; they are starting to order stock and starting to move up. And we have the problem I described in Turkey in the main -- probably last year. So these things happen, but the fact is the end markets in Russia, Turkey and Brazil are all pretty weak at this stage of the game. And they were good markets for us so we have to be -- we have to wait until they come back. So maybe that's some additional perspective on that.

Yes, I appreciate the extra color. So switching to one of your other comments in the press release you talked about a substantial increase in the mix of large trucks in North America that helped drive demand in this quarter yet you are talking about a shift to lower-mix trucks in the back half of year. Was there something in particular that drove that? Was there a big order that you guys delivered in the second quarter? I guess I'm just trying to figure out if there was something specific that is driving these changes in mix from this quarter to the back half.

I don't think so. What really happens is that you get some pretty long lead times on big trucks. And the market is small in units and bigger in dollars, and so it can get very lumpy. But I would more broadly say we think our prospects in big trucks in the Americas are very good. We are ramping up our efforts in that area, and we feel very positive about what's going on and the opportunities to do well in the big-truck market, both in the ports and in the industries that use very large lift trucks. So -- and we have had great progress in our efforts in Brazil. Presumably, that may moderate for a bit until the economy stabilizes but, again we are moving that very much in the right direction.

Got it, I guess that begs the question as to why then you have the expectation for the lower mix. Is it something specifically you are seeing in your backlog?

Well, there's probably some in the backlog and some of what we expect from the customer order patterns that we expect in the second half of the year that we can respond to but I don't think there's anything major there.

Got it, Okay, and looking at your results in the Americas this quarter you posted a very strong incremental margin, one of the strongest we have going back quite a few years. I'm guessing -- at least directionally if you could help us parse out what were the drivers of the strong incremental margin? How much was mix? How much was lower cost-- lower material cost? How much was any benefit from currency and what was just normal volume?

I'm not going to get too much into the how-muches, but let me make a few comments. First, the quarter could've been better. Brazil, as I described was a big drag from more narrow point of view we had some product liability charges that were unusual that wouldn't normally be repeating in any way. So those are booked in that period, and so it was strong from that point of view. Now, what's making it strong? Number one currency is a benefit to the Americas but coupled with that is it's a big adverse impact on Europe, so for us net especially with the pound stronger than the euro, currency is net for the Company a drag but it's a big drag for Europe and a benefit for the Americas so it's a complicated and interwoven situation. And from a long-term point of view, our view is that the dollar is overvalued, the euro is undervalued and this is a great time to lock in forward currency exchange on what we view as a very favorable rate in terms of dollar purchases of euros to cover or to protect future flows from Europe into the United States. Conversely, is not a time when we would hedge euro purchases of dollars because eventually we think that we’d just be locking in a bad situation and giving us no upturn. So we try not to be too greedy on foreign exchange in the Americas versus Europe, but there are a lot of moving parts here. So that's one comment; that's the currency. And the rest, I'd say, is just we've got a very efficient business in the Americas. It's moving forward in a good way, and we feel pretty comfortable about the overall situation. As you point out, it did perform very strongly.

Got it. Okay. And then switching to Nuvera, it sounded like in the press release and the opening comments you are pretty confident with the progression of commercializing that product. I was hoping there was -- any other color you can provide from those comments?

Well, a couple of things. Number one, yes, we have seen nothing unexpected. The product development -- the product commercialization process is going essentially as we anticipated. In terms of timing, in terms of our expected ultimate costs, the whole process seems to us to be very much on track. So that's point number one. As we've said, we expect bookings this year and consequent shipments either toward the end of this year or the beginning of next year just depending on what works from a customer installation point of view and from an order pattern and production pattern point of view. And then we expect to continue to build a volume quarter by quarter over the course of 2016 and will have increasing perspective on that as we get toward the end of the year this year. But as you know, there is a broader comment I would make about Nuvera, and it just sort of illustrates how we here at the Company think about the business. What we think about is the forklift truck business as the core business. And as we think about valuation, we tend to think about it in terms of EBITDA multiples on a net debt basis. That is, debt less cash and then cash being -- we're cash positive, so it adds back value over and above the value of the business. And then we think that the best way to think about Nuvera is not by integrating the P&L with the forklift truck business because those multiples get very distorted. But rather, to think about what's the Nuvera business worth on a stand-alone basis given the nature of that business as, if you will, much more of a venture business that's losing money today and that's going to make money tomorrow. We…

Yes. I appreciate that. Sticking with that, you talked about breaking even in 2017. Is there any sort of particular unit number that you need to get to break even here?

We'll say more about all that as we move toward the end of the year and we complete the commercialization cycle for the particular initial set of battery replacement units. And we will have more specificity on the number of units and the number of those things. So we'll try to provide those, but we don't think it's quite timely to do that yet. We'd like to wait until something towards the end of the year. But, certainly, our acquisition business model, which we haven't deflected from in anyway, shows that the volume is adequate and the price margin structure is adequate to get us to that situation as we move through 2017. So we don't really have at this point anything any reason to deviate from what we said about the acquisition. And when we get into this a little deeper and complete some of the cycles, we'll update all that stuff. More information.

[Operator Instructions] And the next question comes from the line of Joe Mondillo from Sidoti. Please proceed.

So my first question just on so it seems like the lift truck industry has been growing around 10% over the last year, and it seems like you guys have fallen a bit short to that given maybe some issues in Brazil your particular footprint. It sounds like in your commentary you feel like the industry itself may actually slow and maybe weaken a little bit in the back half of the year, but it sounds like you are going to actually outperform. So I was just wondering how you see that sort of transition from the last 12 months to actually outperforming over the next six months.

Well, the currencies affect a lot of these things, and they're for a whole variety of perspectives. But let me just comment more generally. We do see the industry growth rate slowing. We see pretty moderate growth, and we see some areas of the world actually contracting, the obvious ones being the obvious one being Brazil. But China is currently contracting and, of course, there are unsettled markets like Russia that had already contracted and Turkey and so on and so forth. But the bottom line is that we see pretty moderate growth in the markets around the world, and there are really not any big outliers from that. Now, let me say in the first half we saw more moderate growth than occurred. So if we have any bias in our thinking in this area at all, it's to be conservative in our assumptions because we don't use different assumptions here in our discussions than we use in managing the business. And we feel that it's better in uncertain times to run the risk of building backlog than to run the risk of not being able to fill our plants and having to unwind a supply chain, which is very inefficient. So that's one set of comments in terms of the market. On the booking side, I indicated that we feel that our customer base is likely to be stronger in the second half and has a traditional ordering pattern in the second half. But, perhaps more important, we continue to believe that our share gain programs will have increasing impact over the rest of this year, over next year and over 2017. And that's really the key from our point of view is that effort that we put in to create a set of capabilities that we think make it reasonable to increase our market position above what it has been historically, so that's about the best way, I think, to answer your question.

Okay. The second question that I had regarding gross margin-- so in the quarter it sounds like you sort of pointed out two things that drove the gross margin being material costs and sort of higher margin type products. Is that-- if you had to split those would it be sort of a 50-50 type thing or is the margin on the product side more of a benefit than materials?

Well, currency comes into it. Certainly materials are a significant impact for us without any question. But currency comes into this and this is one aspect of currency we haven't talked a lot about but we had some hedges that are pretty favorable in protecting Europe. Now, it's disadvantaged, but some of those hedges are going to run off and that's going to hurt Europe. On the other hand, we had some hedges that are going to run off that are going to help the Americas. So there's a big currency piece that is sort of flowing through this in an unusual kind of way. But material cost was certainly a very significant benefit. And sort of on the other side of things were a variety of considerations in the second quarter that had a more negative effect. I think that's the way I would put it: biggest single impact is the material cost and then the variety of others that are pluses or minuses.

Okay. So you guys realized some gains on some hedges in the Americas segment in the second quarter?

No, it would be the other way around, Joe. We saw gains in Europe that protected the unfavorable currency position we are experiencing in Europe. And we would have had some losses on contracts in the Americas that is moderating the improvement we are seeing in the Americas. And of course, as we are entering the new contracts those rates are closer to the current market rates for currencies. And, as Al has pointed out, we won't get the same contract protection in Europe because the rates changed out.

But we really won't hedge in Europe --

Right.

Much because it's pretty unattractive to hedge.

Right. Understandable. So just staying on sort of the gross margin, you pointed out in the release that you anticipate Asia in the back half of the year to sort of deal with lower-margin type products that may weigh on the overall segment's margins. But in terms of the Americas and Europe, how does this sort of mix look like that you have in the backlog going into the back half of those two regions?

I don't think there is anything I would usually call out at this point, to be honest.

Okay. And also, regarding sort of the overall outlook, I think you mentioned that your sort of overall outlook for the back half of the year should be operating income of the lift truck business should be comparable to the year-ago period. However, you sort of state that the third quarter is going to be worse than the fourth quarter. Just wondering what gives you the confidence that there will be a rebound in the fourth quarter? Is it timing on the backlog?

I think it's more related to some of those seasonal factors: the vacations and the general slowdown of activity more than anything else.

Okay. So it's not a year over year -- the third quarter is always worse, but it's not a --

And there's also some impact of more days in the fourth quarter than the third quarter.

Right, okay and then just lastly regarding Nuvera, I'm wondering how has the feedback from customers been or is it too early to tell regarding how this business is progressing on the commercial side of things? Or is it just too early to tell?

Well, let me give you a careful answer. It's too early to tell for sure. But the customers we're working with are very -- at this point are very pleased with what they see and what we can do for them and so we certainly have as I suggested earlier no reason to deflect from the perspective that we have had earlier.

Right. I guess one of the things that I was trying to think about is if we are going into a softer time period in the industry overall lower oil prices, energy prices overall, just wondering what your thinking is or what the customer feedback is given the larger upfront costs of some of the products out of Nuvera.

Well, let we go back to some of the focus that we will have with this product. Initially, we expect the uptake to be among heavy-duty, high-productivity users. And this is where the greatest benefit comes in comparison to a lead acid battery truck. And so we think it will stand on its own merits, and I don't see it being hugely affected by the kind of moderation of the growth rate that we see -- or not affected at all, particularly. Secondly, the customers who are involved in the initial uptake on this kind of a problem are generally -- for this kind of a product are generally large, sophisticated companies with large orders. And so they will open a new warehouse and they will put the sky the product in. Or they will replace a facility's trucks with this type of product. They don't go across the board; they are looking at it as a way to improve their performance. And if you get these high-productivity environments, lead acid batteries require multiple batteries, and there is plenty of upfront cost associated with those lead acid battery applications. And one key advantage that we have is we do bring along a device that produces the hydrogen and permits piping it into, if you will, filling stations in the plant. So we have a hydrogen generator that we sell, which we discussed in the press release. So we have a total package that can be very attractive to these kinds of customers. Now, in addition, there are some number of customers -- certainly a smaller subset -- that are interested in this product because of its green implications as well. And those people are not going to be hugely deflected by the level of the market and so on and so forth. So if we saw a big downturn in the U.S. market, that would affect everything. But that's not the kind of -- we are talking about a moderation here, not in any way a downturn.

Right. Okay.

Joe, the energy comparison is really the price of electricity to charge batteries versus the price of natural gas to convert into hydrogen.

But it's a complex equation because a battery truck will have its energy supply degrade over the charge of that battery, so it isn't as productive at the end of a shift as it is at the beginning. A fuel cell doesn't operate that way; it's like an automobile -- it goes full tilt until it runs out of gas.

Our next question comes from the line of John Rocoto from Claret Asset Management.

Thanks for taking my questions. So my first one regarding Nuvera. I was wondering if you can give us a sense of how big is the market opportunity for Nuvera's products, dollar-wise?

I'm not sure I can give you a good answer to that because it's going to be on an evolutionary basis, and it is fundamentally a displacement market. In other words, the lift truck market itself is not going to grow any faster or slower because there are fuel cells available as an energy source. So what happens here is that increasingly we think certain kinds of electric trucks will have an uptake of fuel cells, and it will start in these heavy-duty, high-intensity applications, which is only a portion of the market. Colin, you are on the phone here -- my recollection is that that sort of high-intensity application market might be on the order of 25% or 30%. Is that your recollection?

Yes, that would be a good proxy. The other thing about the market for fuel cells is it obviously extends way beyond lift trucks. The primary aim of buying Nuvera is to integrate it as a package into our trucks to replace for battery electric -- supplement battery electric as well as in the next generation to start using it in equipment that cannot be used as engines. Because really it is a fuel-cell engine that we are providing. It happens to be clean and operates very, very efficiently. But the market is really limitless when you think about the other potential applications of fuel cells.

But our focus, of course, is strictly on the forklift truck market. So, as Colin indicated, we kind of started in the battery substitute side. But we expect that there will be a type of truck developed in the future which will allow this truck to participate in the interim what is now the internal combustion engine market. Now, that is a way away; that's out in the 2017-time frame. And so I think the answer to your question really has to be that we expect that the potential market will grow as the technology is commercialized in different segments of the business. And number two, as the cost of the fuel cell and the hydrogen generator are driven down over the next two or three years through our cost reduction programs. So all those things will come together and create a larger market opportunity down the track. And we think there's just an awful lot of people just commenting more generally on the battery side for a minute. As the costs come down, I think there's going to be a desire on the part of a great many applications to avoid the problems of a lead acid battery the recharging capabilities that are needed, dealing with the chemicals that are involved. And if there's a good substitute on an economic basis, we think there will be more and more applications there. And then, as I said, you may see some even hybrid type applications of fuel cells that compete more directly for the internal combustion engine portion of the market.

Okay. Okay. Thank you. I've got it. Thanks. And then switching to the lift truck business, at the time of this [Indiscernible] you led a long-term operating margin target of in the 7%. So I was wondering is that still in the plan?

Absolutely. But let me go back to the foundation of the 7%. The 7%, we believe, can come about, come to pass. Not because of cost reduction, not because of new products, but basically because we sell more lift trucks and enough lift trucks to fill up our manufacturing plants. And so we have said that we need a specific set of a specific number of trucks in the 2017-time frame, and that will come through continued growth of the market, which has been moderating, or we think it is going to be moderating more. Although, by then, places like Brazil may be coming back. And by the very broad gauge set of efforts that we have underway to lead to market share gains. So it's strictly a volume story. And the answer to your question is, yes, we continue to believe that we can reach a level that will fill up our plants at about the peak of this cycle in the time frame that we previously outlined.

Okay. Okay. Thanks. That's helpful. And lastly, this is a very broad question it's just me, I guess, trying to better understand the dynamics of the lift truck industry. I noticed that some of your European peers, mainly German manufacturers, have achieved quite a stronger growth than you. So I was wondering if you can comment about the situation how to do that and what's different [Indiscernible] in those data?

Well, the two German manufacturers are completely dependent on Europe, essentially. Certainly KION has some business they don't have much business in the United States or in the Americas particularly. They have some business in China, but they are fundamentally a European business. And I think there are a couple of things that happened as the market turned up for them. One, you have -- they are much stronger in Germany than they are in other countries, so that's a piece of it. Second, they are filling up their manufacturing plants and getting the benefit of the leverage and their narrow geographies and if you look at our numbers our operating profits in the Americas are a lot higher than they are in Europe and they are really already in the range of 7% but we think we will be driving them up well above those numbers, so you can get a lot of leverage. The other thing that's a little different about our competitors-- and those two companies that you called out in Germany are very good competitors and they are really excellent companies but they have a broader footprint than we do, so they own a lot of their distribution. We do not. So they are also benefiting from the growth of the service and parts business that is the dealer portion which 100% of the service business but a portion of the parts business-- the OEMs gets. And in an upturn typically you get higher utilization of lift trucks and service and parts turn up, so probably those are some of the factors that are at work more generally.

We are now at the top of the hour. I would now like to turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks.

Thank you very much for joining us today. We appreciate your interest. And if you do have any additional questions, please call me. My phone number is 440-229-5168. Thanks again.