Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Horizon Technology Finance’s Corporation Fourth Quarter 2018 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder this call will be recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference Ms. Megan Bacon. You may begin.

Thank you. And welcome to the Horizon Technology Finance Fourth Quarter 2018 Conference Call. Representing the company today are Rob Pomeroy, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Gerry Michaud, President; and Dan Trolio, Chief Financial Officer. I would like to point out that the Q4 earnings press release and Form 10-K are available on the company’s website at horizontechfinance.com. Before we begin our formal remarks, I need to remind everyone that during this conference call Horizon Technology Finance will make certain forward-looking statements, including statements with regard to the future performance of the company. Words such as believes, expects, anticipates, intends, or similar expressions are used to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to the inherent uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions. Certain factors could cause actual results to differ on a material basis from those projected in these forward-looking statements. And some of these factors are detailed in the Risk Factor discussion in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. The company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Rob Pomeroy.

Good morning and thank you all for joining us. The fourth quarter kept off a very successful year at Horizon on many fronts. We grew our portfolio for the third consecutive quarter and ended the year with a total portfolio of $248 million, including $216 million in ventured debt investments. We recorded net investment income per share in the fourth quarter of $0.34, and importantly fully covered our $1.20 per share distributions for 2018. We finished the year with no new non-accruals, the sixth consecutive quarter we have accomplished this, and a testament to our focus on credit quality. We had a weighted average debt investment yields for the fourth quarter of 16.7% and our average weighted debt investment yield for 2018 was 15.3%, which takes into account regularly scheduled interest and fee income as well as income from liquidity events. We continue to maintain a quality premium yield floating rate portfolio that mirrors our strategic objective of obtaining premium pricing on each investment we make through our predicted pricing strategy. Our NAV at the end of the year was $11.64, down slightly from the prior quarter, impacted by the end of year volatility in the stock market. The fair value of our investments in public stock and warrants has already recovered from the mark-to-market loss we incurred in Q4. And significantly, we upsized our credit facility with KeyBanc, and build our joint venture to allow us to begin accessing the JV's $100 million senior secured debt facility, providing us with ample capacity from which to continue growing Horizon. All in, we exited 2018 in a strong position, and we are poised to build upon that strength in 2019 and beyond. We have been able to significantly enhance results over the past couple of years by utilizing our predictive pricing…

Thanks, Rob. Good morning, everyone. Our fourth quarter closed-out a strong year for Horizon as we added six new floating rate transactions to our portfolio totaling $47 million, and have now grown the size of our portfolio by 28% since the end of 2016. We continue to focus on disciplined underwriting before entering into all of our investments. Our on-boarding yields have remained strong, evidenced by the 12.1% on-boarding yields in the fourth quarter of 2018. We had three loan portfolio exits during the quarter totaling $24.5 million. The prepayment and accelerated income from these events resulted in a loan portfolio yield for the quarter of 16.7%. In addition, as Rob mentioned, we transferred portions of three portfolio investments totaling $16.8 million into our joint venture. We continue to maintain a premium yielding debt portfolio as reflected by our leading yield position in the BDC industry, which generates a predictable income stream while we continue to add new investments with higher ETPs and prepayment opportunities. We closed $53.5 million in new loan commitments and approvals, and ended the fourth quarter with a committed backlog of $41.5 million compared to a backlog of $47 million at the end of the third quarter. Our committed, approved and awarded backlog as of December 31 was $59 million to eight companies and a pipeline of new opportunities of over $400 million. With a continued solid committed backlog and a robust pipeline, we are optimistic for another solid year of performance. Our ultimate strategy remains unchanged "grow our portfolio and predictable income stream while enhancing NII with prepayment and accelerated income". At year end, we held warrant and equity positions in 76 portfolio companies with a fair value of $11.2 million. In Q4, one of our warrant portfolio companies, Ekahau, closed an M&A transaction, and…

Thanks, Gerry, and good morning, everyone. Let's turn to our financial results for the fourth quarter and full year 2018. Horizon earned total investment income of $8.8 million for the fourth quarter of '18, a 43% increase compared to $6.2 million in the prior year period, which was primarily due to higher interest income on investments given the larger average size of our loan portfolio. At the end of 2018, our debt investment portfolio had grown to $216 million, a 6% increase from the prior year end. We have a strong base of debt investment and are well positioned to succeed in 2019. For the year ended 2018, total investment income grew 21% to $31 million compared to $26 million in the prior year. This increase was driven by the larger size of our investment portfolio and increase in LIBOR over the course of the year. For the fourth quarter, we achieved on-boarding yield of 12.1% compared to 13.3% in the third quarter of '18. Our loan portfolio yield was 16.7% for the fourth quarter of '18 compared to 14.8% in the third quarter and 14.1% in the last year's fourth quarter. For full year 2018, we achieved the loan portfolio yield of 15.3% and an on-boarding yield of 12.4%, an improvement compared to a loan portfolio yield of 15.1% and on-boarding yield of 11.8% for 2017. As we previously mentioned, the primary changes period-to-period to our portfolio yield are driven by the timing of new loan originations and the timing and exit of loan prepayments and the related fee income from those prepayments, including prepayment fees, an acceleration of previously unamortized end-of-term payments. Turning to our expenses. Total net expenses for the fourth quarter were $4.8 million compared to $3.8 million in the fourth quarter of '17. Our net…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Robert Dodd with Raymond James. Your line is open.

First -- a question on the JV disclosure, obviously, you have given us really helpful disclosure in the quarter on the -- on balance sheet new investments, repayments et cetera, et cetera. Will you give us any kind of detail at that level? Or at the same time, to track the JV, because, obviously, that moves dynamics depending where the assets reside if you transfer assets into the JV? So just what's the plan on disclosing lack of visibility for shareholders?

This is Dan. We did talk about that. And since the majority of the activity this quarter were new additional fundings. I think you are referring to kind of the portfolio roll-forward that -- yes, we are planning to add that as more investments that are populated in the JV, and there is principle repayment and more activity.

And then the other one sort of a bigger picture. You talked about the probability pricing book. As we know, it's really hard to predict the timing of prepayments et cetera. So what's the balance you strike there in terms of -- I mean, obviously, it make sense, you might be willing to trade off a little bit of coupons of higher probability waging of getting prepaid early, for example. But that to a degree requires you to call the prepayment cycle, the IPO cycle, the M&A cycle two years from now, which is very difficult to project. So can you give us a little bit more color on how you balance those dynamics and how much weight you give to prepayments versus cash coupon today?

This is Gerry. So we actually do a probability analysis. You are right. There are variables that we have to take into account. And you are correct market timing at the time of an exit is probably the one that is we have the most volatility to it. But on the other hand, if we were to take a medical device company that was just FDA-approved and they are launching their product into the market, I can probably pull five or six portfolio companies out of our historic portfolio and look at what those transactions did. We obviously spend a lot of time talking to the management teams and the investors in these companies. And so we will have a sense from their projections of this. And so, if you think of it is kind of a bell-shaped curve, you are right. We may end up on either side of the curve. In other words, we may think it's going to pay. And we don’t like try to pick a month. We will say somewhere between month 28 and month 34. This would be kind of a normal place for this company to exit. And it may happen soon and end up on the left side of the curve. It may end up going full turn and end up on the right side of the bell-shaped curve. But the probability of it falling within that range, as we have looked at our -- of the information we have in our portfolio and all the data, actually it's a reasonable model to follow.

Yes. I presume as your portfolio gets bigger the stack get more meaningful as well right. So that’s it for my questions.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Leslie Vandegrift with Raymond James. Your line is open.

Sorry. Rob and I are in different locations today. So I got a few questions to add on to his. On the investment -- on your income statement, you had an increase in G&A and professional fees in the quarter bit higher than expected. Was that due to the JV? And if so, what's kind of the run rate there?

No. The JV gets reported as a net income through the dividend income line on the top line. So it has its own P&L and expenses run through there. The G&A, we did look at pretty closely. Quarter-over-quarter, its slightly higher. One of the additional expenses we did incur this year were some of the shareholder expenses basically related to the below [indiscernible].

And then on the JV ramp, there you had a good quarter where you made an investment into that and getting it to that threshold. What is that portfolio size, and pace of ramp look like over the next 12 to 18 months?

So the -- we ended the year with the JV has $25 million. We added one additional investment in the fourth -- first quarter, excuse me. We expect that to grow probably double or more during 2019.

Okay. And then, my last question is on the investment schedule and the portfolio remarks. You mentioned in your prepared remarks the unrealized depreciation in the quarter $0.05 per share. So when you look at the investments, there is only three portfolio companies that have debt investments marks below cost, and some of them were actually marks up a little bit from where they were last quarter [indiscernible] So where are those marks? And why is it that only three on the portfolio are not right at cost?

So, two-part question. The biggest variant in NAV fair value was markdowns of public warrants in specific the largest was [indiscernible] that stock -- that value of that warrant actually increased fairly rapidly as the stock market rebound. And in fact, we have -- as we've mentioned in the script, we sold those shares and realized that gain as of the end of February. The other question you asked which is -- we used discounted cash flow method to fair value our loans and we did not increase the value of the loans above PAR -- above cost. And so it's the two-rated loans that are reviewed and assigned discount rates relative to -- the relative level of risk. Yes, I'm sorry. The other aspect is that during the quarter some of the two-rated loans, we actually were receiving both principle and interest payments. So that will change the value.

And our next question comes from Christopher Testa with National Securities. Your line is open.

You guys have mentioned transferring several loans with roughly $17 million into the JV. Should we expect this via the strategy for the JV going forward where upon you are making a loan when transferring them effectively have a 100% overlap? Or they are going to inevitably do things that are going to be in the JV that don’t make sense on balance sheet?

Actually, just the opposite. We will continue to most likely fund the loans at Horizon and then transfer them at some point during the quarter. But it's more likely that their loans that are on Horizon's balance sheet that are not in the JV rather than the other way. It's not contemplated that there will be loans in the JV that are not also on the balance sheet of Horizon.

And just curious to what your debt to equity target is for the JV, especially given the ramp that you had just mentioned went roll your question. And also just wondering to just as a quick follow-up to that, how you are looking at your debt-to-equity target on balance sheet and the total economic leverage with the fully ramped JV?

So -- that’s a really good question about the JV. I think our targets there will be similar to the targets for Horizon, in general. We will, of course, work with our JV partner on that, and we do have on a 2:1 leverage facility inside the JV from New York Life. So we might end up with a little bit higher leverage overall there, but not at 2:1, certainly something conservatively below that. We want to operate inside on the balance sheet at Horizon, including our equity investment in the JV in total at a target ratio of leverage of 0.8:1.2:1. And that's our stated goal.

And I know you guys have mentioned the total yield of 16.7 in the 12.1 on-boarding yield. I guess, is the delta between those simply just the ETP and other fees?

That will be correct.

Yes, buying large.

And I know you had taken down some of the equity valuations with the volatility in the market. Does any of the volatility in the -- cash flow lending market have any impact on how you mark the venture loans and spreads on the venture loans?

No. As Rob mentioned, we have an evaluation policy here. We do look at kind of the macro economics in the economy. But buying large, we -- they are very specific to the underlying companies, their performance and the risk rating related to that and the cash flows.

And the next question comes from Casey Alexander with Compass Point. Your line is open.

Your extension of not recapturing the previous income fee waiver, is it your estimation that in 2019 by not recapturing that amount, you would completely wipeout the balance of previously waived fees? Or does that number just push out to the future?

You can't -- it’s not -- they are not further differed, they are waived. And so to the extent, there is an income enough to recoup that we in fact will waive those fees.

And do you think the 2019 will wipe out the remaining balance of those fees that you've previously deferred?

Well, without giving guidance. But if we continue on the path we have been, that is the possibility.

Secondly, can you -- I think, if I remember from the previous schedule, there are five. Can you review the names of the two-rated credits in the portfolio, please?

We don’t do that. We haven’t done that. They are listed as -- I mean, you can determine the ones that are valued below PAR on a two-rated PAR.

The economics of your JV, are they -- I mean, most of these special purpose JVs are 87.5% and 12.5% with the JV partner. If I recall, is yours 50-50?

The economics are 50-50. And the voting rate, just like every other JV is 50-50.

Next, you are certainly trading kind of at the best evaluation that you've been at a while. So are we at levels where the company might consider raising equity? I realized that you have authorized the increased leverage ratio, but then again the market doesn't always offer that opportunity to raise equity. Is raising additional equity is something that you have in your quiver with the stock at levels that have a bit at for a while?

Yes. So as we noted in our remarks, we have capacity to grow our portfolio within our target leverage with the benefit of our increased -- the KeyBanc facility, we also are constantly monitoring the capital markets, reviewing the overall capital structure with our Board, looking at leverage opportunities as well as the possibility of raising equity. But we will only do that. We are looking for the best possible price on leverage. And we have only raised additional capital. The equity was appropriately accretive to the company.

Thank you. There are no further questions in the queue. I would like to turn the call back to Mr. Robert Pomeroy, Chairman and CEO for closing comments.

Thank you all for joining us this morning. We appreciate your continued interest and support in Horizon. And we look forward to speaking with you again in May. This concludes our call.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes today's program. You may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.