Jeff Dayno
Analyst · Chris Howerton with Jefferies. Your line is now open
Thank you, Jeff. And good morning everyone. At Harmony, the second pillar of our growth strategy is to expand the clinical utility of pitolisant by pursuing new indications in additional orphan rare neurological disorders, with unmet medical needs, and by expanding the label in narcolepsy to include pediatric patients. Our current development programs are shown on our pipeline chart as seen on Slide number 9. With regard to pursuing new indications in additional orphan rare neurological disorders, all sites have been activated and are currently enrolling patients in our Phase 2 trial in patients with Prader-Willi Syndrome or PWS. This trial is evaluating pitolisant for excessive daytime sleepiness or EDS, behavioral symptoms and impaired cognitive function. PWS effects approximately 15,000 to 20,000 patients in the United States and represents an unmet medical need for which Harmony is committed to pursuing a new treatment option for this patient community. A potential larger market opportunity is highlighted by another one of our development programs. That being in patients with myotonic dystrophy or DM, which is the most common form of adult onset muscular dystrophy. And one that is a genetic disorder inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Latest estimate suggests a prevalence of about five per 10,000 people with a genetic defect for myotonic dystrophy Type 1, or DM1, which is the most common form of this disorder. This equates to about 160,000 people in the U.S. with a genetic defect for DM1. Based on the clinical presentation, with 50% of this population likely being symptomatic, and of those about 50% being diagnosed. The current number of people diagnosed with DM1 in the U.S. is approximately 40,000. Of these, 80% to 90% experience excessive daytime sleepiness and over 90% also report fatigue. So EDS and fatigue are the two most common non-muscular symptoms in patients with DM1 and they also have a high impact on their daily functioning. There are currently no approved treatments for patients with myotonic dystrophy. As you heard from john, and so on today's press release, we are on track to initiate a Phase 2 trial in patients with DM1 this quarter. Now, let me comment on our program in pediatric narcolepsy. Our strategy with respect to pediatric narcolepsy has always been to achieve pediatric indications for both EDS and cataplexy and to obtain pediatric exclusivity. As you are aware, our strategic partner Bioprojet has been conducting a Phase 3 clinical trial evaluating pitolisant in pediatric patients with narcolepsy. Bioprojet amended the protocol and increase the number of patients in the trial, which has pushed out the timeline for trial completion and readout of the data. Together, Bioprojet and Harmony have decided to wait for the readout of the data to inform how best to advance the pediatric narcolepsy program. We believe that our strategic decision to wait for this data before advancing the pediatric program is the most prudent and thoughtful path forward from a development and financial perspective. In the meantime, we are continuing to evaluate regulatory strategies with regard to obtaining pediatric exclusivity. We remain committed to pediatric patients with narcolepsy and to continue to pursue this indication, as well as seek pediatric exclusivity for WAKIX. We look forward to providing an update on the status of this clinical program in the coming months. Lastly, I would like to highlight a few key points from data we recently presented at the American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting last month, and other data that was published in the journal Sleep Medicine earlier this year. The data from post-hoc analyses of the pivotal data for WAKIX that address clinically relevant endpoints and help to enhance the understanding of the product profile of WAKIX, specifically related to its efficacy and onset of action. We conducted post-hoc analyses from the HARMONY 1 and HARMONY CTP pivotal trials that examined the efficacy of WAKIX in patients with a high burden of narcolepsy symptoms, both EDS and cataplexy. And looked at the time to onset of response in patients on WAKIX compared with placebo. I will first comment on the high burden analysis, which was published in the journal Sleep Medicine earlier this year. The results from which are seen on Slide number 10. High symptom burden for EDS was defined as patients with an Epworth Sleepiness Scale or ESS score greater than or equal to 16 at baseline. This analysis included 118 patients. The results showed that patients on WAKIX went from an ESS score of 19 at baseline to 13.1 at end of the study, compared to patients on placebo, who went from 19.4 at baseline to 16.9 at end of study. This finding was both statistically significant and represents a clinically meaningful improvement. High symptom burden for cataplexy was defined as patients with greater or equal to 15 cataplexy attacks per week at baseline. This analysis included 31 patients. The results show that patients on WAKIX went from a weekly rate of cataplexy of 23.9 at baseline to 9.4. At end of this study, compared to patients on placebo, who went from 23.1 at baseline to 23 at end of study. Again resulting in a statistically significant and a clinically meaningful improvement in patients with high symptom burden. This analysis demonstrates that in adult patients with narcolepsy, pitolisant is efficacious for improving EDS and reducing cataplexy, even in patients with high symptom burden and severe disease. Moving to Slide number 11, and the time to onset of response analysis for WAKIX. These data were recently presented at the American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting last month. Onset of clinical response was defined as the first time point at which there was a statistically significant difference between pitolisant and placebo. This analysis showed that improvement in EDS and reduction in cataplexy begins that we to after the start of dosing, which is when WAKIX demonstrated a statistically significant separation from placebo, on both the ESS score and the weekly rate of cataplexy. Then continue to improve throughout the duration of the trials. While the prescribing information for WAKIX states that it may take up to eight weeks for some patients to experience a clinical response. This analysis shows that the effect of pitolisant may be experienced prior to week eight, and as early as week two after the start of treatment. I believe these analyses that we have shared with the medical community focused on clinically relevant outcomes, add to the body of evidence in support of the efficacy profile of pitolisant. These data along with the safety and tolerability profile, as well as its non-scheduled status, results in WAKIX being a differentiated treatment option for both improving EDS and reducing attacks of cataplexy in adult patients living with narcolepsy. In closing, we remain committed to advancing our clinical development programs for pitolisant. Based on its unique mechanism of action, we view pitolisant as a portfolio and a product opportunity. And our goal is to optimize the lifecycle management plan for pitolisant in the pursuit of new indications in additional orphan rare neurological disease patient populations, who are living with unmet medical needs. Thank you. And I will now turn the call over to our CFO Sandip Kapadia, who will provide an update on our financial performance, Sandip?