Good morning. My name is Kayla, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Horace Mann Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the call over to Mr. Ryan Greenier. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Kayla, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Horace Mann's discussion of our third quarter results. Yesterday we issued our earnings release and investor financial supplement. Copies are available on the Investors page of our website. Our speakers today are Marita Zuraitis, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Dwayne Hallman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Steve Cardinal, Executive Vice President of Marketing; Matt Sharpe, Executive Vice President of Annuity and Life; and Tom Wilkinson, Executive Vice President of Property and Casualty, are also available for the question-and-answer session that follows our prepared comments. Before turning it over to Marita, I want to note that our presentation today includes forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Legislation Reform Act of 1995. The company cautions investors that any forward-looking statements include risks and uncertainties and are not a guarantee of future performance. These forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations and we assume no obligation to update them. Actual results may differ materially due to a variety of factors, which are described in our press release and SEC filings. In our prepared remarks, we may use some non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measures are available on the supplemental sections of our press release. I'll now turn the call over to Marita Zuraitis.

Thanks, Ryan. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our call. After yesterday's market close, Horace Mann reported third quarter operating income of $0.59 a share. Third quarter results were strong across all 3 segments of our business and we continue to see healthy top line growth. P&C results benefited from lower-than-expected catastrophes in the quarter and continued favorable prior year reserve development. Excluding DAC unlocking, annuity earnings are trending better than we expected, with strong growth in assets under management more than offsetting a modest degree of spread compression; life earnings benefited from favorable mortality in the quarter. Importantly, this quarter's strong earnings resulted in a 1.6% sequential increase in book value per share, excluding the fair value adjustment for investments, to $23.15. On a year-over-year basis, that increase was 9%. Before turning the call over to Dwayne to provide more details on the quarter, I want to discuss our vision for Horace Mann. As a senior management team, we spent a fair amount of time over the last few months thinking about our go-forward strategy. Horace Mann is a company that is focused on protecting the short-term risks and securing the long-term financial future of educators. The cornerstone of Horace Mann's experience is a personalized relationship with the educator combined with the convenience of working with an agent right at the work site. We provide multiple products that fit many, but not all, of an educator's protection and accumulation needs. In school districts where we have high-performing agents, we have strong brand recognition, better overall customer experience and good penetration, particularly with middle-aged educators. Our P&C retention and annuity and life persistency illustrate that, when we have a relationship with an educator customer, we tend to keep them. And our customer base is receptive to purchasing multiple products from…

Thanks, Marita, and good morning, everyone. Third quarter operating income of $0.59 per share was a strong result, largely due to annuity and life earnings that exceeded our expectations, as well as weather trends that were favorable but not quite as favorable as last year's third quarter. Catastrophe losses of 6.4 points were below our expectations but still above last year. P&C after-tax net income of $11.1 million was $2.4 million lower than the prior-year quarter. On a reported basis, the combined ratio of 97.6% was 4.6 points higher than the prior year quarter. Two primary factors drove the change, with more than half or 2.4 points related to higher cats when compared to prior year. Although we didn't have any hurricane activity in the third quarter, there were some sizable catastrophes that occurred in August, particularly wind and hail events in the upper Midwest. The second driver was an increase in the expense ratio of 1.5 points, reflecting infrastructure and technology investments, as well as updated benefit accruals, all planned and within expectations. The underlying combined ratio of 94% was 2.8 points higher than the prior year quarter. In addition to the expense ratio increase that I just mentioned, we also saw slight increases in comprehensive and collision severity and frequency and less favorable weather trends in the current year. Non-cat property loss results in the third quarter of last year were particularly good, given a relatively benign weather quarter. That said, the non-cat property loss ratio for this quarter was 50.4 points, a good result but slightly above last year's result of 49.3 points. As we've said before, given the size of our P&C book, our quarterly results can be somewhat volatile, therefore generally, we look to our year-to-date results as a measure of the progress we're making…

Thanks, Dwayne. Kayla, please open up the line to begin the Q&A portion of the call.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Vincent DeAugustino with KBW. Vincent M. DeAugustino - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division: If I could just start by talking about the P&C core loss ratio in the quarter. If I'm thinking about this right, I think third quarter 2012 was your best third quarter since at least 2004. So in part what we're seeing is a pretty good result this quarter comparing to, I guess, a really just great weather environment in third quarter 2012. So understanding that in terms of how the comparisons shake out, if there was anything that I could nitpick on would be the auto core loss ratio. So I'm just curious if we could maybe dive into some of the underlying trends there and anything that was unique that maybe contributed to some of the volatility. I'm not sure if maybe non-cat flooding or anything like that was an issue for the auto line this quarter?

This is Tom Wilkinson. Probably the most unique thing was the trend that Dwayne pointed out with the increase in physical damage losses in the quarter. We had noticed this earlier in the year. The industry has been talking about some pressure on severities there. I'm fairly certain that the hail -- some of the weather probably contributed to some of the pressure there, too. So we see those same trends that the industry is seeing there. We're taking some action on it. We are working on initiatives to lower the amount, to lower our reliance on independent adjusters. We're trying to funnel more of our estimates to our own appraisers, as well as our preferred shops, and we think that we've seen a pretty significant increase in that activity already and we think, over time, that's going to work to mitigate that elevation of the physical damage loss trends that we're seeing. That's probably the high point, or low point actually, of the underlying auto combined ratio for the quarter. Vincent M. DeAugustino - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division: Okay. And then with a switch to independent adjusters, I'm assuming that using your own -- or pardon me, a switch from -- using your own people, I guess, would lower the cost. Is there any type of parameters around what a typical claim cost would come in at lower relative between the two?

I would be just guessing in giving you ranges on that.

I don't think there's a specific number that we're shooting at, Vincent, but I am pretty impressed with the claims initiatives that we've put in place to date and our claim leadership. And I think they're addressing the right things in our auto book to get those numbers down. When you originally asked the question about loss ratio, you used the word unique, and I wouldn't say there's anything particularly unique in the quarter. Our auto results are clearly solid. But I do think there is some areas of improvement that we can look to and I mentioned those in my script. We have a fair amount of data. Obtaining that data is something that we do well, retaining it and using it more robustly is something that we're going to be moving towards. I think that's going to lead to improved analytics, improved pricing segmentation, improved pricing methodology, all the things that I mentioned in the script. Vincent M. DeAugustino - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division: Okay. And that's a perfect segue into the next question I was going to hit on. Looking out, how should we think about the combined ratio targets? And so not guidance per se, but with the margin improvement initiatives that you kind of touched on. Just looking at what you're shooting for, in the past, the target was mid-90s total, with a high-90s auto and low-90s property. And so, would we say that, that range is still appropriate but there's just increased confidence in hitting it? Or is something like a mid 90s auto and high 80s property attainable after we work through some of these initiatives over the next, call it, maybe 2 years?

Yes, I would say the targets that we gave you are still what we're shooting at and that we have confidence in hitting those targets. And I think that's the right way to think about it. I think the rest of it, Vincent, really takes some time. There's no magic here. This is good old-fashioned understanding the numbers, rolling up your sleeves and driving some pretty specific analytics. The good news is we have segments and geography in our business that are performing better than the average. As I mentioned, we have agents that have better penetration and therefore are pushing some pretty strong profitability numbers in auto and then we have some that aren't quite as strong. So I do think there's plenty of opportunity for us to continue to push. I think the targets that we've set are the right targets. But I think longer-term, there's more that we can do here. Vincent M. DeAugustino - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division: Okay, and then one last one if I can sneak it in and then I'll requeue. Matt, just looking at annuity sales, the agency force increase was really strong, I think the number was about 21%. And the supplemental independent agency sales were down. Now the auto -- or pardon me, the agency force less of that is a much bigger piece of the pie as far as your pipeline, so that's clearly the bigger positive. I'm just curious if you're seeing any different sales appetite through the 2 different channels that would be driving the disparate trends?

Well, let me start -- first of all, thanks for the question, Vincent. Let me start by restating the operating thesis that we have around the fixed annuity block. That's about 2/3 of our book and our strategy is layer on new business at or better than our pricing targets to soften the spread compression over time. And our Exclusive Agent force continues to demonstrate their ability to raise assets even in a lower rate environment. And that's really been the focus of our strategy, is to deliver the additional layers of new business on to our book to help mitigate that spread compression. Now we've seen a separation between the clear [indiscernible] force and the independent force, which is not unusual based on the interest rate scenario that we're currently in, and the strategy continues to play out. And I would expect over time that the independent channel will recover as interest rates move back into a higher range or we bring additional products to market that might have more appeal to that group.

Your next question is from the line of Robert Glasspiegel with the Janney Capital Markets.

Just a question, Marita, when you think you want to articulate financial goals that we should be sort of evaluating how you're doing as a CEO? And specifically, what are the numbers we should look at to see whether you're meeting your objectives?

Yes, Bob, I don't think there's anything magic here. I think they're already what we put in front of you as far as our financial goal. I do think, as we think about taking this very specific niche segment using the data that we have, using the knowledge that we have of teachers, not only to improve the profitability but also to improve the penetration, improve the organic growth -- I think I stated it all upfront in the scripted comments as to what we're looking to and how we're thinking about it. And I think we've put in front of you our current targets and as those targets change and as we think about the business as this strategy evolves, we'll certainly let you know if any of those specific numbers change.

And do you think about capital any differently than your predecessors? I mean, you worked at firms that were more aggressive at returning excess capital than Horace Mann has been of late. And you have RBC ratios and excess capital positions that are substantial. How do think about that leverage?

Yes, the way I think about it, Bob, is I think Horace Mann has had a very appropriate capital management strategy. And I don't see any reason to change that capital management strategy going forward. I think it includes all the right elements of an appropriate capital management strategy. So I'm pretty comfortable with it.

So I mean, RBC ratios of 500% are sort of what we should think in terms of the foreseeable future?

Glass, this is Dwayne. If I could just add a couple of comments on that. You're right, we do run the higher RBC ratios and, I guess, compared to some of the larger companies that you cover, I would say we certainly get the small company penalty and would be required to somewhat carry a bit higher RBC ratio. That said, obviously with the stock price, we haven't been in the market buying shares very much. It was just a negligible amount in the third quarter. But as you might recall from previous conversations, we moved our annual discussion of capital levels, dividends, buyback opportunities to our March board meeting. So I would expect at our March board meeting we'll be, obviously, discussing our alternatives, our target levels. But more importantly is, as we start to weigh our strategy, Marita's views of our future, we want to make sure that we do have the capital so we can grow organically. Given our size company, if we were to push too much capital out and we did see our growth opportunities and wanted to take the advantage of it, given our size it would be quite expensive to raise capital to do that. But we'll manage this probably still somewhat in a conservative manner but recognizing the fact that we do have excess capital and we want to put it to work. And ultimately if we can't, we'll certainly return it to shareholders.

Yes, Bob, Dwayne is absolutely right. We're very bullish on organic growth. I mentioned in the script how we feel about that going forward, where it might come from, and it's certainly nice to have the capital to be able to contemplate that.

I hear you. Last question, expense ratio is elevated for "investments". What -- when you look out 3 to 5 years, Marita, what sort of expense ratio target do you think we should think in terms of being appropriate?

Yes, I think 3 to 5 years is too far for anybody to think out and certainly for me to think out. What I would say, Bob, though is the expense ratio, the way it stands today, doesn't include anything that we haven't already talked about going forward. And that clearly would be our path. As we look at what we might need to invest in to push some of that organic growth, we'll be very transparent as to what those chunks might look like and what effect they might have on the expense ratio. I would say, today our expense ratio looks fairly appropriate for the company. If that changes, we'll make sure we're very transparent laying out an investment strategy going forward.

So we shouldn't think in terms of the investments you're making today as being -- elevating the expense ratio? This is a new run rate going forward? Is that what you're saying? Just want to make sure I followed.

Glass, this is Dwayne. Yes, the year-to-date expense ratio, I think that would be an appropriate level that you could assume on a go-forward basis. Obviously, we have to be careful that we invest in growth. We'll pay for it, but once again, with our organic growth opportunities that will help the opportunity to continue to make investments without elevating the expense ratio.

Yes, and just like we've done in the past, when we have something that's outside of the normal run rate, we'll let you know about it and make sure that, that's transparent.

You have a follow-up question from the line of Vincent DeAugustino with KBW. Vincent M. DeAugustino - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division: I just wanted to follow-up on Bob's question on capital, and I appreciate the color that you've kind of already given there. So I just wanted to ask the question maybe in a different way. So with share repurchase activity being less economical, to your point, and earlier this year increasing the dividend quite nicely, I'm curious if something like a variable dividend on top of the stated ordinary, if something like that would make sense given, A, the potential weather volatility in your results, and then, B, you having the flexibility to respond to earnings as well as having the capital on hand to respond to organic growth opportunities. I'm just curious if something like that would cover all the bases as far as having the capital plans in place to your point of about giving back excess capital but still having -- let's say not getting into the situation where you have an overly burdensome dividend in the context of share repos not being that economic?

Vincent, this is Dwayne. That's a great question and it's exactly one of the scenarios that we build in our capital plan as we visit with the Board. Layout that base dividend, as you call it, a variable dividend or some refer to it as a special dividend. And that's one reason why we moved our whole capital management discussion, not that we don't talk about it at every board meeting, but kind of the more formal, deeper dive analysis, we moved that from December to our March board meeting so we can, in fact, have the year-end results, understand where we ended, reconfirm what our plans are for the following 2 years and then make some call to that. So you're exactly right, it's one of the conversations that we have, but once again, just being focused on what our strategic plan is going to fall out and look like. Want to make sure we're well-positioned there and not overextend ourselves. Vincent M. DeAugustino - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division: Okay. Perfect. And then just on one of the points on the longer-term strategy of kind of expanding the educator net and as far as looking at some of the larger school districts. I've kind of always thought about those as being a little bit tougher to penetrate, maybe a little bit more formal as far as processes to get in and just more competitors. So how should we think about Horace Mann's traction and kind of expanding into that arena? And what type of market share gains would be considered a success? And then I'm also just curious from an investment standpoint, if it would take any type of personnel investments or basically if you can kind of attack that part of the strategy with the current team that's on the field?

Yes, Vincent, I'll let Steve jump in, in a minute. But putting that into context, I think first and foremost, the growth strategy starts with filling in the educator lifecycle portrait, filling in the product, filling in the services and the gaps that we have today in the existing K–12 public space, whether we take the risk or not. Then next, we look to what I've called some natural adjacencies, and those natural adjacencies include K-12 private and they include larger school districts. Maybe not necessarily the mega school districts and you're absolutely right that, when you think about that adjacency, you have to put the product and the distribution and the infrastructure ahead of going in that space because although we're not talking mega districts, the larger districts are different. And the access is a little bit different. We might need institutional support for those districts to supplement our current distribution and you have to think about putting the cart before the horse, if you will, as you think about those. Vincent M. DeAugustino - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division: Okay, perfect, and then just one numbers question. As far as the P&C tax rate, that's been somewhat better than I've been looking for in the last couple of quarters. So I was just curious if I've just been missing something or if there's anything, I mean, kind of under the hood, moving around there?

No, Vincent, this is Dwayne. You didn't miss anything. In the third quarter, as we finalize our tax return for the previous year, we do have some true-ups to our provision. That was a favorable item that came through in the quarter. And then as you've noticed, we had a number of incentive stock options being exercised under certain plans that were filed. And as a result of that, as those are exercised it triggers a tax benefit. So that's come through the quarter, as well. Then we had a bit more tax exempt and DRD [ph] increases that you're seeing in P&C. So a little low on the effective tax rate for the quarter, but looking at the year-to-date number, probably a little bit more representative of what you can expect.

Thank you. At this time, there are no further questions.

Thank you for joining us this morning on Horace Mann's third quarter earnings call. If anyone has any further questions, don't hesitate to reach out to me. Thanks.

Thank you. This does conclude today's conference call. You may now disconnect.