Greetings, and welcome to the Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] And as a reminder, this conference is being recorded, Thursday August 22nd -- sorry, Thursday October 22, 2020. And I'd now like to turn it over to Mr. Erik Staffeldt, CFO. Please go ahead, sir.

Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us today on our conference call, our third quarter 2020 earnings release. Participating on this call for Helix today are Owen Kratz, our CEO; Scotty Sparks, our COO; Ken Neikirk, our General Counsel and myself. Hopefully, you've had an opportunity to review our press release and the related slide presentation released last night. If you do not have a copy of these materials, both can be accessed through our Investors page on our website at www.helixesg.com. The press release can be accessed under the Press Releases tab and the slide presentation can be accessed by clicking on today's webcast icon. Before we begin our prepared remarks, Ken Neikirk will make a statement regarding forward-looking information. Ken?

During this conference call, we anticipate making certain projections and forward-looking statements based on our current expectations. All statements in this conference call or in the associated presentation, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements and are made under the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our actual future results may differ materially from our projections and forward-looking statements due to a number and variety of factors, including those set forth in Slide 2, in our most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K and in our other filings with the SEC. Also during this call, certain non-GAAP financial disclosures may be made. In accordance with SEC rules, the final slide of our presentation provides reconciliations of certain non-GAAP measures to comparable GAAP financial measures. These reconciliations along with this presentation, the earnings press release, our annual report and a replay of this broadcast are available under the For the Investor section of our website at www.helixesg.com. Owen?

Good morning, everyone. We hope everyone out there and their families are doing well and staying safe. This morning, we will review our Q3 performance, our operations in this challenging environment, our view of the current market dynamics and provide our outlook for the fourth quarter. Moving to the presentation slides 5 through 7 provide a high level summary of our results. The third quarter typically represents the peak activity period for our operations with operators taking advantage of the summer weather to complete key projects, but this is not a normal year. Our operations continue to be impacted by the depressed OFS market, largely resulting from COVID-19. We are incurring incremental cost for the additional logistics and safety protocols and controls required to operate in this environment. This difficult market and the operational challenges will continue until the pandemic is behind us and perhaps longer during the recovery period thereafter, but our team continues to address these issues head-on. We've implemented strict cost controls. We warm-stacked the Seawell and the Q7000 in Q2, significantly reducing their costs. In Robotics, we have expanded our renewables offering and are benefiting from our first site clearance project. Revenues in Q3 were reported $193 million with the net income of $25 million and EBITDA of $53 million. Our gross profit increased to $35 million from $30 million the previous quarter. For our year-to-date results, our revenues were $574 million with the net income of $18 million compared to $581 million of revenues and net income of $50 million through the same period in 2019. We generated EBITDA of $120 million through the first three quarters of 2020 compared to $147 million in the same period in 2019. On to Slide 8. From a balance sheet perspective, our cash balance at the end of the quarter was $259 million compared to $178 million in Q2. During the quarter, $42 million of restricted cash was released. We generated $53 million of operating cash flow and spent $2 million on CapEx. During the quarter, we issued $200 million of 6.75% convertible senior notes due 2026 to refinance $90 million of 2022 notes and $95 million of 2023 notes. This refinancing provides us a longer liquidity runway, while allowing us to continue our goals of reducing our long-term debt. Our net debt at the end of the quarter was $98 million. I'll now turn the call over to Scotty for an in-depth discussion of our operating results.

Thanks, Owen, and good morning, everyone. Moving on to Slide 10. We continued to operate in a different and challenging environment presented to us by the COVID-19 pandemic, with our teams and partners, both offshore and onshore, continued to respond well, doing a fantastic job. In the third quarter, we had 13 vessels working and on hire globally in four countries. We have enhanced our proactive control measures designed to keep our vessels operating. We have tested over 6,500 of our employees and third-party personnel prior to joining the vessels and have experienced very little exposure on our vessels since testing protocols were adopted. We continue to take appropriate steps to protect our employees, clients and third-parties, including holding abundant surplus PPE supplies for the offshore teams, mandating that all personnel wear masks whilst on the vessels and in our offices and facilities. We've continue to enhance regular deep cleaning and social distancing measures. In the North Sea and West Africa, two vessels remained warm-stacked with considerably reduced operating cost of those vessels and we've also reduced targeted SG&A spending. Over to Slide 11. Even in this COVID-19 environment, during the third quarter, we produced reasonably strong results with revenues of $193 million resulting in increased profit margin of 18%, producing the profits of $35 million compared to $199 million revenue and $30 million gross profits in the second quarter. Considering the effects of the virus and the continued warm-stacking of two vessels, we attained good levels of utilization. The Well Intervention fleet achieved utilization of 68% globally and Robotics chartered vessel fleets achieved utilization of 95% globally. This year continues to be our best performing period in relation to safety statistics and operational uptime and the third quarter was no exception. Our fleets operated with 99% uptime efficiency in…

Thanks, Scotty. Moving to Slide 18, it outlines our debt instrument and the maturity profile, September 30th. Our total funded debt was $415 million. During the third quarter, we issued a new $200 million convertible senior notes due 2026, with the 6.75% coupon. This was done to extinguish $90 million of our 2022 convertible notes and $95 million of our 2023 convertible notes. This transaction effectively refinanced $185 million of our convertible senior notes, maturing in '22 and '23 into 2026. A lot of the strength in our liquidity position providing greater flexibility to manage near-term maturities during these challenging times. Slide 19, this provides an update on key balance sheet metrics, including long-term debt and net debt levels at September 30th. Our net debt approximated $98 million. Cash position at the end of Q3 was $259 million. Our quarter-end, net debt to book capitalization was 5%. Moving over to Slide 21 for a discussion on our 2020 outlook. We are refining our guidance for 2020 as follows; revenue in the $710 million to $735 million range; EBITDA $135 million to $145 million; and free cash flow in the $50 million to $85 million. Our year-to-date results are in line with our previous guidance and represent an upward adjustment to nearly all metrics. The expected activity levels in our markets for the fourth quarter support our guidance. This range includes some key assumptions, expectations and estimates as follows. We're assuming the full quarter to Siem Helix 1 and 2 in Brazil. We expect the Q4000, Q5000 will have good utilization in the fourth quarter, although the Q4 has gaps to fill in the second half of the fourth quarter. Well Enhancer has been warm-stacked, although we are pursuing small projects later in the quarter. Robotics activity will decrease commensurate with…

Thanks, Erik. Well, you've heard the Helix and other companies say the market outlook is challenging. This morning, I'd like to try and fill in a little color on what that means for Helix specifically. Most other companies may be referring to their balance sheets. Fortunately, we took action earlier in this year to manage our balance sheet to minimize this as one of our challenges and extend the runway of debt maturities out to 2026. As we've said for a while now, we feel that we have sufficient cash on hand and forecasted cash flow to meet our debt obligations with the ultimate goal of achieving gross debt zero position with our balance sheet. Our intention will be to pay down another $101 million of our debt by the end of 2021 and continue to operate with low leverage going forward. We all know what happened to commodity prices in the early part of this year and the pandemic is still obviously ongoing with no end date that anyone can reliably predict. During this time, it's become clear, the OFS market has fallen out of favor with the investing community and banks and investors and some producers have begun to pivot to alternative energy and renewables. Expectations of supply and demand have evolved to a forecast of a longer than expected recovery. For the past few reporting cycles, we have predicted the slow and gradual recovery in demand with balanced supply and demand as early as sometime in 2022, where commodity prices do depends on the extent of recovery in the unconventional market as a successful conclusion of the COVID reaction and/or timing of successful vaccines and therapeutics, it also depends on opaque discipline. It's less clear as to what the effect of negative investor sentiment and banks will…

Thanks, Owen. Operator, at this time, we'll take questions.

[Operator instructions] The first question is from the line of Ian Macpherson. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning, everyone. Owen, I was interested to hear that you -- even though, we're moving into more of a spot-dominated contracting environment, you seem optimistic about redeploying the Seawell next year in addition to mobilizing the Q7000 in early Q1. Is the Q7000 already contract secured for that work or you just have a good lead on it at this point? And then, as we look into next year, how do you think about total fleet utilization shaping up, given the drop-off in term secured work for the Q5000 and some -- I think, some roll-overs commencing in Brazil as well?

Good morning, Ian. I'll take that one to start and then pass it over to Owen. That's...

Thanks, Scotty.

We do see visibility in the North Sea right now that will reactivate both monohulls into 2021. It's still early days, there's a lot of budget discussions but the visibility is there, but we need the operators to get their budgets approved and -- but if they do so, there's been a lot of work that's been put off from this year into next year. If those budgets are approved, we feel that we're well placed. Regarding the Q7000, we have two contracts already in place and we're close to having a third one, very close to having that one executed. So we plan to start stepping up the vessel in Q4. We will transit late Q4 to Nigeria and then we plan to be operational sometime early Q1. And now also, logistics have improved in Nigeria. We can get guys in and out of the country, whereas over the last few months, it was totally closed down to us. Overall, globally, we are seeing high visibility because of work that was put off for this year, but need to caveat that with the fact that budgets aren't approved yet and it's still early days in this process.

Yeah, I'll just add a general overview comment. The work out there, we see the work that needs to be done and as I said in my color comments, the number of fields maturing, which increases the amount of work that needs to be done is occurring. The amount of abandonment work building up is real, but when that happens, we don't know. The uncertainty for us is not visibility of the work, it's just what is the corporate stance of the producers going to be going into this next budgeting year. I think, we've already seen that long-term contracts are not being led to rigs. So I think, producers are a little adverse to taking on multiyear committed days in a market that's obviously oversupplied. I think they could -- I think the work will be there. I think that it may return to more of a spot market work and then on top of that, I'm not sure what the corporate budgets are going to be relevant -- relative to the announced pivoting of the -- some of the majors towards the renewable market. Does that mean that they're going to cut back on their budgets in the oil and gas sector, but then again, they're going to need the cash flow from the oil and gas sector to fund the renewables. So it's a little bit uncertain and I don't know that we'll have a clearer picture until we see some of the budgets that's get finalized by the producers.

That's helpful. Thank you both. Owen, also on -- or Scotty, on the Robotics side, I think -- I, as from a modeling perspective have been probably positively surprised by the resilience of Robotics. I think, about half of that revenue stream now is coming from the wind space, right? So as you look out into next year, is that half of the revenues for Robotics still something with good year-on-year growth visibility out to next year regardless of what happens on the oil and gas side?

Yeah, I'll start that one. I mean, Owen can jump in. We've had a very good year with Robotics as we said. Globally, we've expanded the service lines on the renewable sector. We won our first trenching project in the East Coast USA and we expect more wind farms to be coming out to be licensed on the East Coast. We've had a very good year in Taiwan, providing installation and accommodation support on a large wind farm and we expect that to continue for this quarter. We did commence our first site clearance project and that has gone far longer than we expected. So it's hard to say to that that could be repeated next year, but we are chasing two to three projects next year of similar size and scale, but they are in the later part of next year. And we're also seeing more increased activity in Taiwan and just recently been awarded our first project in Japan. So the visibility is there, where it leads to increased growth or whether it normalizes this -- towards this year is yet to be seen, but it's certainly a service line we're chasing and we're executing very well.

Well done. Thanks, Scotty. I'll pass it over.

Thank you, Ian.

The next question is from line of Michael Sabella. Please go ahead.

I was wondering if you could kind of go back to the, I guess the re-contracting and appreciate the commentary around just kind of shorter-term work. And I know, it's sensitive as we kind of think of rate for where these things get re-contracted. I mean, you guys are talking to clients right now, but when we look out and see kind of where floater rates are today, can you just kind of help us think about where you think the proper rate for your vessels are kind of relative to what we see in the market?

Well, that's a tough one. I'll start, Scotty and you can...

The rates certainly are not anywhere near what they were pre-2015. They're probably at or just a little better than where they were in 2016, right now. We're not seeing the rigs being as aggressive as they were in 2016, which is a good thing for us. But then again, we are not necessarily competing against the rigs at this point so much as we are competing against the commerciality of the projects that we're working on. We need to be able to offer a value proposition to the producers that makes it -- that incentivizes them to go after the incremental additional production that's possible. How successful and how -- what that means going forward again gets back to the budgets and how much spending they allocate toward this. I think, over the next few years, you're going to see a greater reliance on intervention across the board, which is a good thing, but I think, the rig overhang is going to continue to weigh on the pricing potential as -- and as long as the commodity prices are perceived to stagnate in the $40 range, I think it's going to be hard to see a meaningful price increase. So I think we have to get into 2022 with the balancing of the supply and demand before you start seeing an upward movement in commodity pricing before you see a significant ability on our part to increase our pricing. Utilization is really not our major issue right now, it is the pricing.

I think, I'll add to that as well. You have to remember that it's regionally based as well, so the Seawell and Well Enhancer are not compared to rig rates in the North Sea, because of the unique offerings they have. Our world-class assets are not drill rigs, they burn about 50% less fuel than drill rigs. So we have efficiencies that we can add into the piece that are there to help us win work and win utilization, not necessarily increase the rates battling more but there's efficiencies that our assets offer against rigs, mobilizing time, demobilizing time, fuel burn. The way we run our work is far more efficient than using the drill rig, but the procurement thing is for sure, they used the drilling rates against us.

Yeah. Appreciate that. And then as we think about kind of the potential for renewables growth to continue next year. From your perspective, is there any meaningful capital that you need to invest to realize that growth? And if we think about where kind of chartering some of these vessels are today, just talk about that market and the ability for you all to get -- to charter rigs perhaps chartered vessels as you need them.

Yeah, we've been looking at the renewables market for quite some time as to how we could leverage our current foothold into a larger presence. The issue with the renewables market right now is every time, you think you found a niche, where there is an opening that needs a solution, if you identify that on Monday by Thursday, it's oversupplied. I mean, everybody is taking them. Giving you an example, we recently signed up to participate in a tender for providing service vessels to a wind farm. There turned out to be almost -- there were 35 tendering company for that all offering new builds. So from my perspective and that's what I was alluding to in the color comments that a lot of companies are just for the sake of being able to announce an ESG component are making big capital commitments. Personally, I think it's going to be challenging for them to see a sustainable return. We are more focused on trying to manage and protect our balance sheet. So the way we plan to play the renewables would be to look at the incremental services that we could provide either through alliances, contracting, but contracting them on a more integrated basis with what we already add, expanding our geographic footprint and taking a more modest approach as the renewables market grows and evolves and matures a little bit. And we'll follow the market where the competitors go and we'll watch that, but we're not going -- you won't see us stepping out and investing large sums of capital on a flyer in renewables. Hello?

Yeah, that's great. Thank you.

I'll just add one thing though to what Scotty said, we did benefit this year from a pretty large site clearance project that may or may not repeat at that level, but I think the expansion that we are already showing in Taiwan and now, Japan. The incremental additional areas that we are adding in renewables would probably offset any failure to replicate the site clearance work, although it is possible that the site clearance work does replicate.

Thanks all.

The next question is from the line of George O'Leary. Please go ahead.

An extension of few questions asked already, just curious with the assets you have in hand today and given the prior comment about you are not necessarily wanting to jump headlong or get overly aggressive on the renewables front, but given the assets you have and the work you've done already in the wind space is -- are there any kind of natural extensions of the trenching and the site clearance work that you can do today that you just haven't pursued as of yet? We know where you don't have to go out and invest a bunch of capital to get into that -- into the market and what types of opportunities are there to the extent those exist?

I'll take that George. We feel like we have the best-in-class assets for trenching and we've been a independent market leader for some time. We've been trenching in the wind farm space for over 10 years and we have contracted wind farm trenching works out until 2024. We've -- like we said, we just completed our first U.S. wind farm trenching projects and we believe that the wind farms that will be licensed in the U.S. will require trenching, so there is an expansion there. We also note that next year we are tendering a couple of projects in Taiwan. So we're seeing an expansion into the APAC region for wind farms or renewables trenching. And we're seeing an expansion in Europe. The other side of that is the trenching assets or a leased asset, they're quite expensive to build and timely to build to get into. So we feel we're in a good place. On the trenching side, we have a very good track record and we are seeing that expand globally. So I think, that's a good market for us.

Great. The rest of my questions have been asked and answered. Thank you, guys.

[Operator Instructions] And the next question is from the line of James Schumm. Please go ahead.

I just wanted to try to understand the $7 million increase in EBIT in Well Intervention off of $5 million decline in revenues from the second quarter. Is it reasonable to think that may -- obviously you pointed out the Q5000 better utilization. I was thinking maybe that gave you a $5 million benefit and then the balance maybe came from cost cuts. Does that make sense or is there some other one-time benefit in the quarter?

Yeah, I think there -- Jim, I think there were few items that benefited us. I think we have aggressively moved towards stacking the Q7 and the Seawell in Q2 and reducing the additional, you can say, operation support cost associated with that. And there was probably some additional cost that were incurred in Q2 associated with the stacking of those vessels. And so Q3 reflects a really -- you could say stable daily cost of stacking of those vessels. Also in Q2, the Q5000 did have some downtime and some testing time, where it was incurring additional cost and so I think, that was a one-time also in the second quarter. And so those are some of the moving parts that have really driven the improvement.

Okay. Thanks, Erik. And then just after the refinancing of the convert, what do you think the -- your cash interest payments are going to be next year and then what do you think the cash taxes will be next year?

From a cash tax standpoint, the cash taxes that we'll be paying will really be associated with our withholding taxes on our foreign work, I don't foresee us being a pure cash tax payer in this environment. So it'll be for work in Brazil and West Africa, the withholding taxes. As far as our interest, I think it's -- you're probably looking, I think in the less than $20 million range for cash taxes and going down as we continue to pay-off our debt.

Okay, and then just lastly on capex. So you have $33 million sort of maintenance capex this year, and I think, I recall you guys saying that you had heavier vessel maintenance cost this year, but I could be wrong. So I'm just wondering, if next year's capex is more like a $25 million number?

Still early in the process, Jim. This year, it was a heavy year for us for vessels. We did have five in the first quarter and so from that standpoint, still early in the process. I think at this point, I would probably caveat in the $20 million to $40 million range for next year, but I think there is a possibility to drive that down.

Yeah, I'll just add. This was a big maintenance year, but we're still under $40 million. Looking next year, the maintenance cost is down, but going back to the discussions on renewables, for instance, we said that we're not going to invest large amounts of capital to increase our footprint in renewables, but that doesn't mean no capex. So until we have those plans purely, truly identified, we can't really say what it is, but I would expect next year's capex to be consistent with this year's.

Okay, great. Thank you guys.

The next question is from the line of David Smith. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, and congratulations on a great quarter.

Thanks.

Owen, in your opening remarks regarding your ability to compete in a Well Intervention spot market, you mentioned the ability to adapt and improve offerings. I was hoping you might give some more color on that.

Yeah. One, you saw us last year step out and acquired the Droshky Field from Marathon, that essentially build backlog for our abandonment. I think, we're uniquely placed. When you see the majors pivoting towards renewables then there is a divestment that's going on reservoirs. They're going into the hands of smaller producers, they're more aggressive. So we can partner with them, we can take payment in kind. We can offer lump sum contracting, which I don't believe any other company can or would be willing to do, but based on our track record and our history, it's something we can offer. Other means -- there is -- we have a whole page of different contracting models that we can employ. It's a matter of now getting out and trying to market all of those in a manner that retains our competitive advantage and so we are probably be going, identifying producer-by-producer who is likely to like that or not. So we'll keep you posted on that, but I don't want to get into too much detail about the specifics of what we can do.

Sure.

I will take that. We're also in a unique position that we have our alliance with Schlumberger and they are in a position where they can help with the reservoir management and the well optimization that can lead to them helping us work out where to contract and who to contract with. And with that alliance, we're in a good position where we can take different contracting mechanisms, so that gives us an added benefit that others don't have.

Appreciate that. And compared to six months ago, wanted to ask, if there is any change in discussions or your outlook regarding the potential to take on P&A obligation similar to the Droshky deal.

Following Droshky that made a little splash with the producers, and we had a number of producers that were engaged in dialog with us that had an interest in pursuing similar models. When the commodity price sort of blew up at the beginning of this year, that left uncertainty in how to value those deals, so therefore all of the discussion sort of ended. Just recently, I think there is enough stability that's returned to the market, that the interest is being expressed again and there are a number of dialogs that are starting back up. So it's a matter of being patient and waiting for the right deal.

Great, appreciate it. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] The next question is from the line of Samantha Hoh. Please go ahead.

Hey guys. Thanks for taking my question. So we've covered a lot of grounds today, but I was wondering, if we could spend some time talking about the pricing on the Robotics side specifically, are there really much variations in terms of your profitability between like the renewables work and this traditional oil and gas?

Well, I'll take that. Typical oil and gas ROV operations is in vast decline as I'm sure everybody knows, but a niche place such as trenching, we've managed to hold the rates for the last few years and the work that we've been awarded recently holds those good rates and they're better than the traditional sort of oil and gas rates. So on the renewables side and even on the oil and gas trenching side, because we have that niche, we may not able to hold rates at a good level and have work contracted out for 2024, like I said previously. The other renewable services that we're looking at, there's plenty of spot vessels available. So I feel that we won't have to commit to long-term charters ourselves as we go forward and we'll be able to be opportunistic and pickup spot charters to take on project works that should lead to us having less cost and therefore, keep our margins in line.

And just in terms of the renewable work that you're picking up globally here, are there variations in just sort of rules with local standards, having them being employed by people in country, for example, where you need to establish like an office in the region or I'm just kind of wondering, if there is any sort of increase in capital that is required for just -- that's going to flow into the OpEx side as you expand globally for renewables?

I don't think so. I mean, we've established working in Taiwan right now. We obviously can work in the U.S., and the large expansion is in Europe and we've been covering that for the last 10 years, so I think we're well placed with that.

There is a follow up from the line of James Schumm. Please go ahead.

Hey guys, thanks for putting me back in and sorry, if you already covered this, but on the Q7000, you mentioned two contracts in place and potentially close to the third one. Did you say, what kind of contract duration are we talking about for these? I'm just trying to get a sense of maybe what utilization might look like early next year.

Right now, I would say, this is -- we probably are looking at 120 days minimum, which could -- this is not contracted. The two -- it's sort of hard because there's a lot of lead in times and there's a final details to worked out on the contracts. But in general, our expectations are that we're looking at something like a 100 and 120 days of base work to begin with, with a follow on potential of that expanding to 200 plus days.

All of the contracts that we have currently have a fixed base period and then options and so we are obviously in discussions regarding those options and that is what gives the guidance there. On top of that, we're also in discussions for other works, so it's not just these three contracts we're chasing. And we've also been awarded some work in Australia, but that has a final go decision in March of next year. So this -- we're seeing a lot more visibility for Q7000. We've got some firm work and then there's options on that firm work. We would have imagined...

Okay, thanks and just...

Sorry, we would have imagined...

Sorry, just to be...

Okay, after you.

Sorry, just to be clear, it's a 100, 120 days per contract, not for both of the two contracts, right?

Right, that's our base across the two and then like we said, we hope to add to that and in discussions with others.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

There are no other questions.

Okay. Thanks for joining us today. We very much appreciate your interest and participation, and look forward to having you on our fourth quarter 2020 call in February of 2021. Thank you.

That does conclude the conference call for today. We thank you for your participation and you can now disconnect your lines.