Hello and welcome to the Hamilton Lane Q1 Fiscal 2020 Earnings Call. Today, the call will be hosted by Mario Giannini, CEO; Erik Hirsch, Vice Chairman; and Randy Stilman, CFO.Before the Hamilton Lane team discusses the quarter's results, we want to remind you that they will be making forward-looking statements based on their current expectations for the business. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual results to differ materially.For a discussion of these risks, please review the risk factors included in Hamilton Lane's fiscal 2019 10-K and subsequent reports the Company files with the SEC. Management will also be referring to non-GAAP measures that they view as important in assessing the performance of the business. Reconciliation of those non-GAAP measures to GAAP can be found in the earnings presentation materials, which are available on the IR section of the Hamilton Lane website.Please note that nothing on this call represents an offer to sell or a solicitation to purchase interest in any of Hamilton Lane's products. The Company's detailed financial results will be made available when the 10-Q is filed. Finally, for the call this morning, we will be referencing pages in the earnings release presentation available on the Hamilton Lane IR website and shown on the webcast version of this call.With that let me turn the call over to Erik Hirsch.

Thank you, Julian. Beginning on Slide 3, it was another strong quarter for us. Let me go through some quick highlights and then we'll provide some additional detail and color. For the first fiscal quarter our revenue from management and advisory fees grew 19% versus the prior year fiscal first quarter. This resulted in non-GAAP EPS of $0.45 based on approximately $24 million of adjusted net income.Our GAAP net income was over $11 million, which translated into GAAP EPS of $0.42. In our previous earnings call, we announced that our Board approved a 29% increase in our dividend. This increase reflects both Management's and the Board's view that the business is growing strong and remains well positioned.In keeping with this, we have declared a dividend of $0.275 this quarter, which keeps us on track for the $1.10 for fiscal year 2020. Also on April 16, we officially announced our expanded presence in North America by opening an office in Toronto, Canada. The Toronto office represents our 16 location worldwide and positions us well to further expand into a large and growing market.Turning to Slide 4. You have heard us state in prior earnings calls, the growth continues to come from a wide range of sources and this quarter was no different. Our growth remains diversified by geography type of investor and size of investor. Our total asset footprint of approximately $473 billion remained significant and as we stated before our scale as a competitive advantage in this asset class and we believe our clients continue to benefit from our growing footprint.AUA for the quarter decreased slightly by $6 billion or 1% compared to the prior year period. However our advisory and reporting revenue categories were up 3% compared to the prior year period. We will continue to caution that AUA…

Thanks, Eric, and good morning. Before providing an update on our existing specialized funds, I wanted to take a moment and announce a new product that we're very excited about, a semi-liquid evergreen fund. This fund introduces a new structure into our lineup of specialized products and represents our entrance into the evergreen fund market.With this product we are offering an innovative alternative for investors providing access to the private markets outside of traditional closed-end fund structures. This fund represents a globally diversified pool of assets. It is primarily targeting the high net worth individual space and geographies where evergreen funds are already offered and have an established market presence such as Australia and throughout Europe.While an evergreen fund structure is a new foray for Hamilton Lane. This type of product and structure have been in existence for some time and a select number of firms such as Partners Group in Switzerland managed somewhat similar offerings.We believe that we are well positioned to successfully deliver on this strategy for clients, and while very early days we see the potential for strong demand across the target audience. You've heard us speak in the past regarding strategically addressing and capitalizing on opportunities where we see a path to growth and scale and this evergreen product is a great example of that.Let me quickly touch upon some key differentiating features of our evergreen fund for the benefit of those who are less familiar with open-end structures. Unlike our products that generally follow a defined raise and deploy strategy, our evergreen product is effectively always open.Taking in capital from investors on a monthly basis. Similarly, the fund also provides a monthly liquidity option for investors. We expect to see the majority of the capital coming from individuals and coming via wealth management platforms with…

Thank you, Mario. Before we move on, we want to discuss a new line item that due to a change in accounting principles around revenue recognition. We've now begun to include in the management and advisory fee breakout section during the last fiscal year.The line item is titled fund reimbursement revenue. And last fiscal year that amounted to approximately $2 million and represented less than 1% of our management and advisory fee total revenue. What this figure represents is simply a reimbursement of cost that we bear in connection with the creation of specialized funds.That more specifically we incurred certain cost related to the organization and distribution of a fund and these costs generally include professional fees, legal fees, and other related items. This is an industry standard concept and that you would find us in the vast majority of private market fund vehicles.The reimbursable amount is negotiated with the LPs and is usually based on the fund size and generally allows for full reimbursement. We expense these costs as they are incurred, which has an immediate and direct impact on our G&A expenses, but once the fund is successfully formed and has fund its first closing. The fund is then able to reimbursed us for these costs and we are able to recognize that is revenue.What you can tell however is that there will be a timing mismatch before the first close. We are incurring expenses early to create the fund and then ultimately getting them reimbursed later once the closings begin. These costs caused G&A to look like it is raising and subsequently causes revenues to raise. We would encourage investors to realize this is simply offsetting with a built-in timing mismatch.The key takeaway is that while these costs may have a short-term impact on our operating margins.…

Thank you, Erik. Slide 8 of our presentation shows the financial highlights for the first quarter of fiscal 2020. We continue to see very solid growth in our business with management and advisory fees of 19% versus the prior-year period driven by strong results across each of our core products and services. Revenue from our customized separate accounts increased over $1.6 million or 8% compared to the prior-year period due to the addition of several new accounts and additional allocations from existing clients.For our advisory revenue we experienced 3% growth compared to the prior-year period driven by new client adds in our advisory back-office reporting and technology and analytics offerings. Our specialized funds revenue increased $5.9 million or 28% compared to the prior-year period driven by $700 million raised in our latest secondary funds in the current year period and $800 million raised between periods for our latest co-investment fund.We recognized $2.8 million in retro fees from this co-investment fund compared to $500,000 in the prior year period. As many of you are likely aware, investors that come into later closes of the fund rated for many of our products, they retroactive fees dating back to the fund's first close. Therefore, you typically see a spike in management fees related to that fund for the quarter in which subsequent closes occur. The final component of our revenue is incentive fees. Incentive fees for the period were $4.1 million or approximately 6% of total revenue.Moving to Slide 9, we provide some additional detail on our unrealized carry balance. We saw strong growth this quarter with the balance up 25% from the prior year even as we recognized $26.2 million of incentive fees over the last 12 months. As you can see from this slide the growth came from both adding new…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Ken Worthington from JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning. Thank you for taking my question. Maybe just a little more on the evergreen fund, can you just talk about how you're managing the inflows in liquidity offered in the new product? So on the inflows, are you limiting the monthly inflows based on your ability to deploy the capital or do you adjust inflows just sort of sit in cash until their deployed?And then on the other side, when you're giving monthly liquidity, how are you accessing that liquidity, and I guess what I'm hoping to hear is to what extent is Hamilton Lane either lending or taking any risk there?

Hi, Ken. It's Mario. I'll take each of those. On the inflow side, we are not limiting the inflow, but we are certainly very careful in terms of growing that product and managing the inflow because you're right as the inflow comes in, it goes into cash, cash has a lower return than private equity returns, and so you manage that very carefully in terms of the deal flow that you have compared to the amount of cash.You can see the amount of cash coming in to some extent because you're having discussions with people that are interested in investing. So, it is a balance as you figure out what is the deal flow versus what is the cash coming in and it's why as we said in our comments, we are really looking at this on a long-term basis in terms of managing it, having a good result for investors and being careful not to take in too much capital, where you can invest it reasonably in a monthly timeframe.On the outflow side, the liquidity – there is a certain amount of liquidity that investors can have on a monthly basis and so that is also managed. And there is no Hamilton Lane guarantee. There is no Hamilton Lane balance sheet commitment behind the liquidity. And there is liquidity as you note from the amount of money coming in on any period of time.So, you have some liquidity there, and then you're also managing the investments you make. As we talked about these investments cover a wide variety of assets. Some of which provide liquidity on a monthly basis. So, you're managing it that way and there is a credit line that the fund has in order to provide liquidity.

Okay, great. That makes sense. And then on the customized separate account side, what types of investments are your clients building funds around these days. Are you seeing any changes in interest in private equity versus private credit versus infrastructure or any of the other idiosyncratic sort of investments you're looking at? And then any help on pipeline both from the gross sales perspective here as well as the gross outflows? Thanks.

Ken, it's Mario again. I would say on the separate account, I would divide it in some ways. I think on new separate accounts, I would say, the interest is what it's always been primarily private equity, but with people increasingly want private credit and infrastructure as part of it. And looking to build, I'll call it a diversified private markets portfolio. But private equity generally still the largest part of it.On existing clients since many of them have already built a more seasoned private equity portfolio, you probably see at the margin more demand for credit and infrastructure real assets as they look to grow that and for many of them not have quite as seasoned portfolio as they may have had on the private equity side.But I would say in general not – no big changes in trends over the last year. It is what it has been for the last few years. I would not say that we're seeing something dramatically different happening in the market. In terms of the question on pipeline, and what we're seeing there, I would say, it's been what it has been for the last period of time in the last few years.I think the pipeline you see people increasingly interested in separate accounts whether to do their entire portfolio or its branch into pieces of it. So I want a separate account for Europe investing or Asian investing. I would say the appetite for separate accounts across all of the different categories, private equity, private credit real assets remain strong. It is a way people want to access the private markets in their portfolios.

Okay, great. Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from Michael Cyprys from Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning. This is Peter Kaloostian standing in for Michael Cyprys. Could you just talk about any new costs associated with the evergreen strategy and how this could impact expenses going forward? Thank you.

It's Erik. Thanks for the question. I think as Mario pointed out; this is about building this over time. I think some of the infrastructure in place particularly around the distribution. We've already put in place. We had announced a couple of quarters ago that we have made a couple of significant senior hires on our business development team that we're particularly focused on targeting distribution relationships with wealth management platforms around the globe.The investment activity as Mario also noted is very much in line with what we're already doing across separate accounts and across our specialized funds, so no change too. There is no different or unique investment activity today around this product that we're not already doing some place else. So, we think this is a great addition to the stable of products that we have without the need today to go off and build significant new infrastructure that doesn't already exist.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from Alex Blostein from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Hey, thanks guys, good morning. So just building on the evergreen strategy, could you guys help us think longer-term kind of how you would define success for that part of the model either kind of your kind of near-term goals. Maybe over the next kind of 12 months and longer-term maybe as a percentage of total assets or something like that. I'm just trying to think get a feel of how meaningful of our business contributed. You envision this type of business to be for Hamilton Lane?

This is Mario. Thanks. No, we're clearly not going to give specific numbers in terms of we expect X or Y, but look you've seen how we've built products before and we've built them very carefully in terms of what we've said earlier being able to deploy the capital and doing it in a way that makes sense for us and for our investors.So, we don't – I don't think we look at it as having specific targets. I think we look at it as you see our platform, you see how much capital we can invest. And so as we look at that, we think the product can continue to grow.We think there is demand for it because people want this kind of a product with some of the features. So, I'm not going to get pinned down on giving a specific target or a specific number, but we think this is a product that has some legs and that the market will react positively to and we can invest.

Yeah, fair enough. Shifting gears a little bit. Just want to get you guys a thought on the current realization opportunity. You said obviously accrued carry for Hamilton Lane continues to grow pretty nicely. This has been a bit of a lighter quarter for realizations and that's something similar we've seen for many of your private equity alternative asset management peers, but anything on the horizon that you guys see that could expedite the realization. Some of that carry or anything kind of structural in the marketplace that you see today that's just kind of prolonging the realization cycle this time around.

Sure, Alex. It's Eric. I'll take that. I would say we sort of think about the carry in pieces really into two sort of sections. One that we can control and second that we cannot. On the can't-control piece, we can't control the timing of the exit that's up for the fund manager and we can't control what's happening in the public markets that will certainly have some impact on our unrealized marks.The pieces that we can control, we feel like we're doing a very good job on. One, we can raise more assets and have more carry generating dollars and we're doing just that. And secondly, we can control investment results by making good investment selections and finding the right partners and that certainly drives both realized carry as well as unrealized gains and we think we're doing a good job at that.I think your point on the market is right. I think we're seeing two features at play here. One you're seeing across the asset class that whole periods for underlying private equity owned companies are simply getting longer. We would say that not surprising data in a market where you people are paying fairly fulsome prices in order to generate the great returns that we're continuing to see they're going to need to work those assets for longer periods of time.Thus driving out the whole periods, and the second thing we see as we look back over history is that times of market volatility, which we're certainly experiencing, most fund managers don't find that the most opportune time to decide to sell an asset. So I think both of those are also clearly at play.As we look out, I think our view is pretty simple. Every day that goes by considering the quality of the assets we have puts us closer and closer to generating realized carry. And so we think that as on an annualized basis the numbers continue to be strong and continues to be a solid contributor to revenue.

Great. Thanks very much.

Your next question comes from Chris Harris from Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

Thanks. You guys announced a new office in Toronto, Canada. So with that in mind just wondering bigger picture, can you guys give us an update on where you stand with respect to your non-U.S. growth initiatives?

Yes, Chris. It's Erik. I'll happily take that. I think what you've seen is that the mix has been pretty steady, which is we are basically generating about 60% of our revenue coming from kind of North American based clients and about 40% from non, that ratio has stayed relatively steady for several years.And I think that's sort of telling you a couple of things. One, despite just simply bigger growth outside of the U.S. and some of these emerging markets we're actually continuing to find an awful lot of growth in the North American market to kind of keep pace with that.I think our geographic footprint expansion continues and that will likely continue. You saw that we've opened up offices over the last couple of years in Australia, in Germany and now in Toronto. We mostly already have a presence i.e. client relationships in these markets before we go in and open up an office.But we find once the office itself opens, deal flow accelerates, additional client connections accelerate, our brand and presence in that space accelerates. All hopefully making it easier for us to raise assets and make new relationships.So, we think we've got a great footprint today. We will continue to look opportunistically about marketplaces where it makes sense over time for us to have bigger presence and we'll follow through on that.

Okay. And on the evergreen fund, are there any specific eligibility requirements for investors to be able to access that fund or is it going to be open for pretty much anybody wants to participate?

It's Mario. No, I mean, there are – it depends on the jurisdiction. But there are, as you might imagine, a number of regulatory requirements and compliance. No, it's not one of those things where you just walk in and put a sign up and say come invest in Hamilton Lane's GPA product. So yes, there are requirements, but they vary by jurisdiction and fairly detailed around that.

Okay, thank you.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from Chris Kotowski from Oppenheimer & Company. Your line is open.

Yes. Good morning. Just curious on the evergreen funds were these kinds of products around in 2007 and 2008 were they tested in that market?

It's Mario. Yes, they were around in that period. I mean they were starting to form where they were around. So I think they were around in the real estate side more than on the private equity side, but they were small in that market period. So they were around, but would you call it a test of that market period. I don't know, I think they were small relative to where they are today.

So, presumably that's the test you have in mind when you're setting the gates for the liquidity, right?

Well, I think, the gates are set for a number of reasons you're setting it for that you're setting it in order to for the benefit of all investors manage cash balances and the liquidity around the product itself. I mean it's not just for market environments. I think the goal of the product is to provide investors not with something that they can get out off when things are bad, but for something that they can use to rebalance portfolios or whatever they need to do. But I think in this case again a key feature of that requirement or of the gating if you will is to protect all of the investors whether it's a good or a bad environment.

Okay. And then you mentioned the $91 million in inflows. Did you tell us what period of time that you've been marketing this?

That's probably been – I would say, two months, three months over that period of time.

Okay. That's it from me. Thank you.

We have no further questions at this time. I turn the call back over to the presenters.

Great. We want to thank everyone as always for your time and support and have a good day.

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.