Good day, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Q4 and Year End 2015 Hecla Mining Company Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Mr. Mike Westerlund. Sir, you may begin.

Thank you very much, operator. This is Mike Westerlund, Hecla's Vice President of Investor Relations. Welcome everyone and thank you for joining us for Hecla's fourth quarter and year end 2015 financial and operations results conference call. Our exploration news release that was issued last week and the financial news release that was issued this morning before market opened along with today's presentation are available on Hecla's website. On today's call, we have Phil Baker, Hecla's President and CEO; Jim Sabala, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Larry Radford, Hecla's Senior Vice President, Operations; and Dean McDonald, Senior Vice President, Exploration. Any forward-looking statements made today by the management team come under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act and constitute forward-looking information under Canadian Securities Law as shown on slide 2. Such statements include projections and goals which are likely to involve risks detailed in our Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and in the forward-looking disclaimer included in the earnings release and exploration releases and at the beginning of this presentation. These risks could cause results to differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. In addition, in our filings with the SEC, we are only allowed to disclose mineral deposits that we can economically or legally extract or produce. Investors are cautioned about our use of terms such as measured, indicated and inferred resources and we urge you to consider the disclosures that we make in our SEC filings. With that, I will pass the call to Phil Baker.

Thanks, Mike. Hello everyone. When I look back over 2015, I'm proud of what we've achieved in a challenging price environment which is a direct reflection of the quality of our team, and projects and our decisions to continue making capital investments during what we believe was a temporary malaise in the precious metals market. In short, we did what we said we would do. During the year we said we were working to optimize our mines and Casa had its highest quarterly gold production since we acquired the asset. Greens Creek set a record for annual silver production and since we've owned it, we've upgraded the ventilation system at Lucky Friday with only a slight decrease in annual production. Our goal now is to further grow silver production by more than 15% in 2016 and gold production by about 10%, and to continue to work to make our mine production more consistent. We also said we would start up our fourth mine, San Sebastian, by year end and we did that ahead of schedule. The veins are extraordinarily high grade as we thought and it will start kicking off cash this quarter. In January, the feed grade averaged 0.23 ounces per ton gold and 29.4 ounces per ton silver. And I'm pleased to note that the mill is handling the high grade just fine and we ship the first doré in January. I was in Mexico with Larry three weeks ago and saw firsthand how well things are going down there and on the slide you can see a photo of me with some doré bars. We set a record with silver production of 11.6 million ounces and also produced a 189,000 ounces of gold, and our silver equivalent production totaled 37.5 million ounces which is also a record.…

Thanks, Phil. As you can see on slide 6, in the fourth quarter we had a very strong production and that will soften the impact of weaker metals prices. In fact, the results are quite remarkable when you consider the fact that silver, gold, lead and zinc were down 11%, 9%, 17% and 31% respectively compared to 2014 first quarter. All of our mines performed exceptionally well during the period leading to an increase in silver production of 13% to 3.6 million ounces, and our gold production also increased 10% to just over 60,000 ounces. No doubt it was a record quarter for us. As mentioned earlier, the improving production helped to offset the weakness in metals prices as allowing us to report good financial results. On slide 6 we summarize the key financial statistics for the fourth quarter of 2015, compared to last year's comparable quarter. Revenue was down just 5% due to lower metals prices, operating cash flow increased 13% while cash cost per ounce after byproduct credits for silver increased 21% due to lower byproduct credits. Our gold per ounce cost decreased 7% due to the weaker Canadian dollar and also a solid performance. And on slide 7 you can see this trend continues with silver production of 11.6 million ounces, up 5% over last year and gold production of 189,000, up 1%. Phil has given estimates for 2016 which shows additional growth and expected silver production to 13.5 million to 14 million ounces and 207,000 ounces of gold, increases of around 15% and 10% respectively. The 2015 financial results echo the fourth quarter results with lower metals prices leading to annual revenue decreasing 11% to $443.6 million, adjusted EBITDA decreasing 33% to $116.8 million, operating cash flow increasing 13% to $106.4 million, and cash costs after…

Thanks Jim. On slide 15, Greens Creek had another excellent quarter producing 2.6 million ounces at a cash cost after byproduct credits per silver ounce of $4.18. The increase in silver ounces produced as a result of higher recovery and of higher silver grades due to mine sequencing while cost per ounce is up due to lower byproduct values. The cost continued to be helped by the availability of hydropower which lasted throughout the year. Expansion of the Greens Creek tailings facility continues and 2015 capital spend on the project was $20.7 million. This is an investment in the future of Greens Creek providing another ten years of tailings storage capacity. Production at Lucky Friday for the quarter was at 32% improvement over the prior year period as you can see on slide 16. The higher volume of 986,000 ounces of silver for the quarter led to cash cost after byproduct credits per ounce that were 15% lower than Q4 of 2014. Regarding our primary growth initiative for the #4 Shaft Project on slide 17, we are on the 8500 level and the shaft project is more than 90% complete. We are on track for completion of this $225 million budgeted project in the fourth quarter with about $20 million left to be spent this year. The #4 Shaft Project is designed to give us access to higher grade horizons once the associated development is completed. On slide 18 you can see that Casa Berardi produced 42,282 ounces of gold in the fourth quarter at a cash cost after byproduct credits of $591 per gold ounce. The projection increase in the fourth quarter was due to the higher grades with higher grades still being mined in December and higher recoveries due to lower build encapsulation. The 45% increase in production…

Thanks, Larry. On February 16 we announced year end contained proven and probable reserves of 175 million silver ounces which is the tenth year in a row that we've had increased silver reserves. Measured and indicated silver resources of 161 million ounces and inferred resources of 362 million ounces include the acquisition of the Rock Creek Mine and are the largest in our history. Gold reserves essentially stayed constant. Our explorations are driven by the discovery of high grade deposits near our existing operations and I urge you to really read that press release. As you can see from slide 23, Hecla reserved price assumptions at $14.50 per silver ounce and $1,100 per gold ounce, are some of the lowest commodity prices used in the industry. These prices represent a 16% and 10% decrease for silver and gold respectively from year end 2014 reserve price assumptions. In contrast, our silver peers use an average of $16.25 per ounce at year end 2015 for their calculations and generally announced silver reserve reduction. It's also noteworthy that we have basically maintained our level of gold reserves at 2.1 million ounces using $1,100 per ounce gold. What makes this achievement even more significant was it happened during a period of declining exploration budgets. Why use such conservative prices? Because our projects are higher grade than our peers and can withstand a lower price environment. Let's take a look. As shown in the left in slide 24, the increase in silver reserves at Hecla using our lower silver price assumption stands out in our industry in comparison to silver reserves decreases at Pan-American, Newmont and Core to name a few, and they are still using higher silver price assumptions than we are. The same goes for gold. In slide 25, you can see how…

Thanks, Dean. This is our 125th anniversary but we are not looking backwards, we are looking forwards. We have mines that have demonstrated they can survive low prices but we are adding production that's going to allow us to take advantage of higher prices. So we think this is exciting time for Hecla. With that operator we'll open the line for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Matthew Fields of Bank of America, Merrill Lynch. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Hi, Matthew.

Hey guys, just wanted to sort of -- before asking a question, just say the announcement about compensation cuts is not one that the analyst community takes lightly and I know that it's not an easy decision for you, so hopefully your stakeholders take notice.

Thanks.

But going on to the shelf registration that was filed about 45 minutes ago, is that more of a housekeeping of keeping it up-to-date or has there been a sort of change of view with regards to potential equity proceeds?

There has not been a change of views, we want to maintain our flexibility to be able to do anything that can make sense so we have done various filings to put us in a position to do that. Our plans do not include any particular path in terms of raising new capital.

Okay. And then the $25 million of non-payroll related cost reductions, can you discuss what those are and how do you add upto $25 million?

Yes, it's really simple. It's the non-wage cost that we have in the company both in terms of operating cost as well as capital and it's just 5% of those cost and we’ve just made a concerted effort to focus on vendors and focus on equipment suppliers to find ways of reducing 5% of the cost. We think that's pretty reasonable if you look at our sector and you look at other sectors that are similar to ours, you have seen even greater cost reductions than that. So we think it is something we can achieve.

And that's OpEx and CapEx?

Correct.

Okay. And then, can you just remind us again about the economics behind the number 4 shaft once that comes into play. Is there supposed to be some level of production growth from 3 million to some new level of production, from 3 million ounces to some new level at Lucky Friday…?

Yes, so what happens is we get into higher grade material, you might remember a quarter or two ago we showed the sort of material and at that level there was I think like 50 feet or 60 feet of it and as we go deeper we will see 500 feet to 600 feet of that higher grade material. So when we hit that higher grade material then we would expect to see the production rate go up, the number of ounces, not tons, and with that cost will come down and it will be someplace in the 4 million to 5 million ounce range that you will see production move to over the course of next few years as we develop to those deeper levels.

And you had said cost could come down towards where Greens Creek is now, that type of level?

Yes, I think certainly lower than where we are today. I don't have a number in my -- that I guess I’m willing to say we would be at, but certainly significantly lower than where we are today.

Okay, and then last question. Greens Creek cost were 3.91 for the year and guidance is $6 per ounce. Can you give us some guidance as to what is making that change, is it grade, is it some kind of movement there? I know the production is a little lower. But is that really all it is?

That's all it is. It's just really production and as a result of lower grades. We had higher than expected grades in 2015, I don't remember what our original guidance was but it would not have been dissimilar to what our guidance is for 2016, so when we get these pleasant increases in grade it just goes to the bottom line.

Okay, I think that's all my questions. Thank you guys so much.

Thanks, Matt.

Thank you and our next question comes from the line of Jorge Beristain of Deutsche Bank. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Good afternoon guys, Jorge Beristain, Deutsche Bank. My first question is just for Jim, I just wanted to re-clarify about that equity raise. I understand it's the normal course, sounds like a re-filing of something that has lapsed but there is something coming across the wires that says Bank of Montreal has a $75 million equity distribution agreement with you guy so I just wanted to verify this an erroneous news article.

No, that's not erroneous. That's just an ATM that gives us the ability to have all of our options open to us. We have no commitment to do anything.

So this just gives you the ability to bleed stock into the market at your choosing if you saw the opportunity?

That's correct. So it's a bit like the reverse of a stock buyback right?

Okay. So it's a little more specific than your earlier release which was indicating it could be debt or equity.

Correct.

Okay.

I think the key is, we have seen tremendous volatility in all commodities. You look at what's happening to oil, gas, coal, base metals markets and while we are confident we have more than enough liquidity to do what we have on our plate today, we may choose to have some insurance against this downside volatility that we see or we may have some acquisition opportunity. So, it gives us the flexibility as Phil indicated to do something without doing some huge underwriting without the immediate use of proceeds.

Understood, my second question was for Phil. I do laud the idea of executive management and the Board sharing in a little bit of the pain, I guess that the shareholders have suffered in the last few years in the metals and mining sector. I just wanted to understand how that came about and would there be any sort of claw backs, in other words, if silver or gold prices went up in the future, does the pay immediately go up or do you view this as more of a structural reset that is occurring? So if you could just talk about how the idea came to be and if it would be again a variable to go up in the future. Thanks.

Yes, I guess two comments. First, management, a large portion of our pay and it varies based upon the position you're in is in equity and tied to equity. So we were already participating in the down side with our shareholders, so we know exactly what they're experiencing. But we decided that it was important to show our employees, our vendors, our shareholders, that we take seriously reducing cost and so we elected to make these reductions for this limited group of people. It's a one year arrangement or if the Board should decide to do something different, it's at their discretion. We've not even talked about unwinding it earlier than that, but obviously that's something they could decide to do. So that's really the extent of it, it was something that we talked about in the budgeting process and we made the determination to do it effective January 1.

But without further extension by the Board, this would just automatically reset back to the prior levels in 2017?

Correct.

Okay, thanks very much.

Thank you, and our next question comes from the line of Dan Rollins of RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Hi, Dan. How is it going?

Good. I was wondering if you might just focus on the surface reserves at Casa. I see five and a half years within the East Mine Crown Pillar. You also have the principal pit, I was wondering if you could just give a rough idea of how many ounces or in tons were sitting on surface right now at Casa?

So I'll look to Larry and Dean if you guys can remember what that is off hand.

I'm looking now.

So do you have another question?

Yes, maybe while we're waiting, do you guys see the ability to bring in the principal pit post the East Mine Crown Pillar being exhausted in five and a half years, or is there something…

Yes, it will -- in fact the ultimate plan is to dig four pits.

Okay.

So yes, we will do these in sequence.

And what other pits are out there. I see on this schematic and what I've know from being the site last two years, there is only really, two major pits that's been developed.

Certainly those are the two major ones and then there is two smaller ones.

Okay.

And the answer to the question, the surface ore is going to deliver about $6.8 million short tons, all pits. And there is a small one called the 160 that's included in that.

And what's that running about, gram a ton, gram and a half?

The East Mine Crown Pillar will be a little under three grams.

Okay, perfect. That's very helpful. And then just on the Lucky Friday, obviously last year you had some challenges with the fans, you never really got a study state on your unit cost. I think last year including your refining cost you did around 266 a ton. It looks like you have a pretty big drop there this year. What are you thinking at a mine site the unit cost structure should be going forward now that you have a study state?

So, the cost per ton?

Yes.

A little north of 150 [Cross Talks].

Okay, so it's year?

Yes.

Okay. And then, could you give us an update on how your negotiations with the union currently are proceeding or if they started?

Nothing has started.

And then, all right not too familiar, when was the last time the contract was renewed?

Six years ago.

Six years ago? Okay. And are you looking to put something similar in place regarding term?

We've not made any sort of decisions on how to proceed, where that's all being considered as we speak.

Okay, perfect. That's all the questions I have. Thanks very much.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Trevor Turnbull of Scotiabank. Your line is now open, please go ahead.

Hi, Trevor.

Hi, Phil. How are you?

Good.

I just wanted to follow up on some of the stuff that Dan was asking. So for the East Mine Crown Pillar study, that is just for the one pit, that doesn't encompass all four pits that you are talking about?

That's correct.

Okay. You're talking on the slide, it says $39 million in total capital. The majority of that getting spent in 2016. Is the rest of it fairly spread out or is there a big chunk in 2017 for additional stripping or anything like that?

Go ahead.

Trevor, it does fit out over a couple of years. The actual funding that we will have during 2016 is about $19 million. It's one of the real benefits, we've been looking at it for over a year and we found ways to stage the capital to match it with the cash flow. So the big lump this year is $19 million and it will feed out over a couple of years.

And then 2017 and 2018, do you remember what those...

I don't have those at the top of my head

Okay. And then, just respect, and thank you for that Jim. With respect to the assumptions, it was mentioned I think the gold price -- what kind of Canadian dollar are you looking at for the study?

About 1.33 if I recall.

Okay. And then I had a quick question about San Sebastian, in the reporting you gave some detail on what happened in January. I was just curious, is San Sebastian essentially ramped up or is it still getting to the throughput that you're looking for there?

It's essentially ramped up, I mean there is maybe another 10% in the throughput, but we're really close.

Okay. And looking kind of extrapolation from what you had there, it looks like the grades are really good. And kind of looking at the guidance and what you achieved in January, does that mean that things are a bit running ahead of plan and we should expect things maybe to come down a bit from what we saw in January or is guidance somewhere on the conservative side?

We would expect to see things come down, I mean the East Mine Crown Pillar is the highest grade portion of -- I'm sorry, East Francine -- sorry, it's the highest grade pit of the three pits. And, so we would expect to see that come down but we think we'll achieve the 3 million ounces at San Sebastian and we'll be looking at it closely at the end of the first quarter and see if there is the opportunity to raise guidance.

Okay, great. And then just one last kind of a housekeeping question. You talked about the non-wage cost savings and all that, when it comes to things like G&A, do you have any guidance for that, what we should look for in the year?

It's going to be very similar to last year, maybe there is a small percentage that's going to go down but it's not going to be material.

Okay, great. Thank you very much guys.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Garrett Nelson of BB&T Capital Markets. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Hi, everyone. You had a really great quarter at Casa Berardi. It looks like it operated close to 170,000 ounce annual run rate in the fourth quarter driven by the higher ore grades and a mill throughput. Could you help us with how to think about the production guidance for 2016, the 135,000 ounces in terms of the quarterly output and how we should be thinking about grade and throughput this year?

Well, I think if you look at the last two years, we've always, three years in fact, the fourth quarters always seems to have had the higher production. But I don't have that right in front of me, do you remember?

No, the annual production for the last two years has been in 130,000 ounce range. So I think we're guiding basically where we've finished in. It was a bit unique in the fourth quarter that we took five very high grade slopes, and for reference in the first quarter this year we only have one of those.

And the other we'll have is the gold from the pit in the fourth quarter of this year. So in terms of waiting, and I would certainly wait in the second half of the year and more in the fourth quarter from that 135,000 ounces. Jim, is there something you want to add?

No.

Okay.

Okay. And on the pit in the 30,000 additional ounces of production that you're expecting in 2017, can you give us a better idea of the expected cash cost on this incremental ounces?

We don't have the guidance out for 2017. I think let us get the mine up and running. And we'll provide information on that as we move along.

Okay. Is it safe to assume, with the additional ounces the per ounce cost would probably come down a bit versus 2016?

Well, the interesting thing is that although it's not the highest grade it will be roughly half the grade coming out of the underground. The recovery is going to be quite good because it's all off side, and then the other consideration is that in the mill it's just a variable cost that we're going to see the fixtures costs are already covered obviously. So I think it's going to be a good project.

All right, great. Thanks.

Thank you, and our next question comes from the line of Lucas Pipes of FBR Capital Markets. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon everybody.

Hi there.

So good job on '15 and I wanted to zero in a little bit on the CapEx side. So you came in quite a bit lower than originally guided. Could you remind us what growth is that performance and then could this have any wait through for '16?

Well the hundred, where were we at the original guidance for...

Last year, 115.

Yes, and so there was some things that got deferred in the 2016 and those are reflected in our guidance for 2016. So I wouldn't sort of read anymore into it than that.

Got it. So it wasn't equipment or FX that drove that?

I guess there was probably a little bit of savings in Canada, but that wasn't a big driver.

Total budget there, if I recall, is about $50 million for the year, and so you take the delta in FX, it had some impact on it but it bled out over the entire year. I think one of things that we do tend to find more than anything is while we budget lean and tight you don't always get everything done that you want to get done. And over the course of the year, I think if you look at it historically the last three or four years, we've come to understand the capital by about a similar percentage.

Got it, thank you. And then, follow up on the announcement regarding the equity. On the M&A side, any changes to your thoughts there, could you remind us what you think could be interesting in this environment in terms of size, geography, any updated thoughts on that?

Well, nothing has changed at this point. We are still looking at projects that are in the Americas. Primarily there's the occasional thing that we will consider in other parts of the world, but it's not the focus of our efforts. We are open to both gold and silver, ideally silver, but there aren't a lot of quality silver opportunities so gold gets more attention than silver does because there is an inventory of opportunities in gold. And certainly we think we have the capacity to bring some operating expertise to a variety of assets. So we're very much focused on, okay, how can we leverage what we already do.

Got it. And you have a very strong reserve profile that you highlighted again today, especially under your conservative assumption. Is that a metric that we should be thinking about as we think about potential targets for you that they have a long reserve life, or how important is that to you relative to some of the other metrics you could be looking at?

Yes, I think reserve life and cost structure is the two top criteria for us. We think you need to have the long live reserves so you can take advantage of price cycles. Otherwise, you just sometimes end up in kind of wrong place at the wrong time. So get a long mine life and you going to have a loan cost structure where you can survive the down turns. So it's really those two things that are more important than anything else, but you got to consider all the other metrics at the same time.

Got it. Well I appreciate the color and good luck.

Thanks.

Thank you, and our next question comes from the line of Chris Terry of Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Hi guys, I just got a question on San Sebastian. I think when you did the original feasibility it was over 18 months, so now that you've started mining, how you're thinking about extensions into 2018 and beyond? Are you more confident or how are things planning out?

No we're still 2016 and 2017.

Yes, have you thought further into 2018 or some of the drawing you've done there indicated that there might be some further extensions?

No I mean as you said the original plan was 18 months which probably slightly longer than that at this point, but we're certainly not in the 2018.

Okay. So just keep as is for the feasibility study.

Yes.

Same question I had, just when you give guidance I guess it's quite unusual not to give a range as such. Do we think about your guidance for 2016, is that your best expectation or is that something that you're aiming to beat in terms of the overall numbers?

Well, you always hope you can beat the stuff, but yes it's our best estimate at this point. We've given you a bit of a range in the total, because what tends to happen is one tends to be a bit better and another tends to fall off. It's hard to get all the mines going at the same time.

Okay, thanks very much.

Thank you, and our next question comes from the line of John Bridges of JPMorgan. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Hi, good day everybody. Congratulations on the results. And I was just wondering, Jim, with your announced retirement how many more of these quarters are you going to be doing?

How many, what -- as long as Phil wants me to talk I'll be talking, John. I've always had a problem shutting up and never talking.

But he has one more quarter. He'll do the first quarter and then...

Okay.

His plan is to retire at the annual meeting.

Okay. I just didn't want to miss your last one, so I'll be here in three months' time.

Okay, Lord willing.

Yes, absolutely for all of us.

Any other, any question, John?

No, just wanted to -- I didn't want to miss Jim's last quarterly.

Okay, very good. Thanks.

And I'm showing no further questions. At this time, I'd like to turn the call back over to Mr. Phil Baker for any closing remarks.

Okay. Well thanks very much for people's participation in the call. I do hope you consider the reserve position that Hecla has, I do think that it makes us standout in many ways with our low price assumptions and the fact that we're able to grow slightly silver and maintain gold and use so much lower prices than other companies. The other thing that seems to standout to me is the fact that we're growing production. And that has been our view all along is let's invest and see our production grow. We're willing to use our balance sheet to do that. And if we continue to have these nice prices that we've seen over the first few weeks, and we see that for the year that we'll really see a benefit for that additional production growth. We're happy to answer any questions that you might have that you didn't get answered. Feel free to get Mike a call or me, and with that we'll end the call. Thanks so much.