Dan Mathewes
Analyst · David Katz with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question
Thank you, Mark, and good morning, everyone. Before we start, please note that our reported results for this quarter included $86 million of sales, recognitions that added to reported GAAP revenue due to the opening of the second phase of our Maui project. We also recorded an associated $43 million of direct expense recognitions from those sales, resulting in a net benefit of $43 million to our reported EBITDA for the quarter. In my prepared remarks, I'll only refer to metrics excluding the impact of deferrals, which more accurately reflects the cash flow dynamics of our financial performance during the period. Now let's review the results for the quarter. Total revenue in the third quarter was just over $1 billion. We saw sequential revenue growth during the quarter led by gains in our Real Estate segment, building upon the strong improvement in Q2. Q3 reported adjusted EBITDA was $295 million with margins of 29%. It is important to point out that during the quarter, we released $16 million of reserves that had been built ahead of the recent exploration of several government stimulus programs. I'll get into those details shortly, but those would be considered a one-time benefit that dropped straight through to EBITDA. We reached cost synergy run rate of $150 million during the quarter, which met our recently increased target several quarters ahead of schedule. I'm really proud of the team for the efforts they have made during the integration to reach that milestone and we intend to maintain our cost discipline as we move forward. Despite the macroeconomic noise, we saw a solid performance across Q3 with September being the strongest month of the quarter. We think this speaks to the strength of our offering, as well as the advantages of our direct sales model, which enables us to engage with existing and prospective owners in any environment. Now let's walk through the segment details. Within real estate, total contract sales were $621 million. The strong improvement in new buyer tour flow continued this quarter with sequential and year-over-year tour growth again outpacing that of our owner channel. The strength of owner VPGs this quarter led owner contract sales mix to increase slightly to 71%, but we're very happy with the improvement that we've seen in our new buyer metrics as well. We'll continue to invest in our new buyer channel through the rest of this year and remain focused on driving toward our steady state goal of 40% new buyer mix. VPG was just over 4,200 for the quarter, as we've discussed before, as new buyer tour flow continues to recover towards 2019 levels, we've seen an expected normalization of our VPGs from the historic highs we've seen over the past 24-months, but we continue to expect that VPGs will stabilize roughly 10% to 15% ahead of 2019 levels, due to our new product offering and efficiency initiatives. Cost of product was 17% of net VOI sales for the quarter below our target of roughly 20%. Real estate S&F expense of $233 million for the quarter was 38% of gross contract sales as we made investments in our new buyer channel to drive additional force. Real estate profit was $234 million for the quarter, with margins of 43%, as I mentioned earlier, we benefited from a lower provision for bad debt this quarter, which boosted our margins by roughly 300 basis points. In our financing business, third quarter segment profit was $43 million with margins of 63% combined gross receivables for the quarter were $2.5 billion or $1.75 billion net of allowance and our interest income was $61 million. Our originated portfolio weighted average interest rate was 14.2%, while our acquired portfolio had a weighted average interest rate of 15.7% and includes a $7 million contra revenue for the amortization of a non-cash premium associated with the portfolio of receivables that we acquired from Diamond during the acquisition. Our allowance for bad debt was $762 million on that $2.5 billion receivables balance. Both these amounts, the acquired Diamond portfolio which used their underwriting standards was $388 million on a portfolio balance of $803 million. Our annualized default and delinquency rates for our originated portfolio has continued to outperform levels achieved in 2019, and remain lower than our expectations for normalization of credit trends as we head into 2023. Our provision for bad debt was $32 million or 7% of owned contract sales, adjusting for the one-time reserve release that I mentioned earlier, this ratio was in double-digits, which is up sequentially from Q2, but still below our steady state expectation of a normalized provision in the mid to high-teens. In our resort and club business, our consolidated member count was 515,000. Looking at HGV's legacy business, NOG was 3.8% at the end of the quarter. Diamond also added 1,900 net new members during the quarter. Revenue was $130 million for the quarter and segment profit was $85 million with margins up 65%. It's worth noting, Q3 was the first quarter close where we fully integrated Diamond into HGV's general ledger system. In conjunction with this, we've finalized the detailed mapping of Diamond's chartered accounts resulting in certain one-time year-to-date true-ups impacting our resort and club business for the quarter. Excluding these true-ups, resort and club showed operational growth both on the top line and profit basis with margins approximately historical norms of roughly 70%. Rental and ancillary revenues were $159 million in the quarter with segment profit of $16 million. Our ancillary revenues and expenses were similarly impacted by the previously mentioned true-ups, resulting in certain one-time impacts that reduced our margins for the quarter. For the full-year, we still anticipate rental and ancillary margins to be in the low double-digits and we still expect that rental and ancillary margins will continue to gradually improve each year as we sell through our inventory pipeline, lowering our developer maintenance fees and continuing to rebrand Diamond properties bringing both revenue and cost synergies as the rooms are rented out. Bridging the GAAP between segment adjusted EBITDA and total adjusted EBITDA, corporate G&A was $41 million, license fees were $33 million and JV income was $5 million. Our adjusted free cash flow in the quarter was $393 million, which included inventory spending of $23 million and excludes acquisition-related costs of $34 million. Our adjusted free cash flow conversion rate in Q3 was well over 100% in the quarter, owing to the timing of cash flows from our August securitization. In Q4, you will see the impact of higher contracted inventory spend, cash tax payments and regular seasonality of our business driving negative adjusted free cash flow in the quarter. So our year-to-date EBITDA to cash flow conversion rate is 82%. We still feel confident with being well within our guidance of 50% to 60% conversion for the year. During the quarter, it's something we've repurchased 2.3 million shares of common stock for $89 million through November 9, the company has repurchased an additional 1.1 million shares for $38 million and currently has $290 million remaining of the $500 million repurchase plan approved by the Board in May of 2022. Turning to our outlook, we are raising our guidance again for the year, this time to $1.25 billion to a $1.45 billion. As of September 30, our liquidity position consisted of $319 million of unrestricted cash, $218 million of escrow deposits on VOI sales and $1 billion of availability under our revolving credit facility. Our debt balance at quarter end was comprised of corporate debt of $2.6 billion and nonrecourse debt balance of $1.2 billion. At quarter-end, we had $750 million of remaining capacity in our warehouse facility, of which we had a $178 million of notes available to securitize and another $324 million of mortgage notes, we anticipate being eligible following certain customary milestones such as first payment deeding and recording. Turning to our credit metrics, at the end of Q3, the company's total net leverage on a pro forma TTM basis was 2.1 times. We will now turn the call over to the operator and look forward to your questions. Operator?