Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the First Quarter 2021 Hess Midstream Conference Call. My name is Andrew, and I will be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jennifer Gordon, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Thank you, Andrew. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for participating in our first quarter earnings conference call. Our earnings release was issued this morning and appears on our website, www.hessmidstream.com. Today's conference call contains projections and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied in such statements. These risks include those set forth in the Risk Factors section of Hess Midstream's filings with the SEC. Also on today's conference call, we may discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the differences between these non-GAAP financial measures and the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in the earnings release. With me today are John Gatling, President and Chief Operating Officer; and Jonathan Stein, Chief Financial Officer. In compliance with social distancing protocols as a result of COVID-19, we are conducting the call remotely, so please bear with us. In case there are audio issues, we will be posting transcripts of each speaker's prepared remarks on www.hessmidstream.com following their presentations. I'll now turn the call over to John Gatling.

Thanks, Jennifer. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to Hess Midstream's First Quarter 2021 Conference Call. Today, I'll review our operating performance and highlights as we continue to deliver our strategy and discuss Hess Corporation's latest results and outlook for the Bakken. Jonathan will then review our financial results. We're pleased with the progress we're making on executing our strategy, and we're excited about the stable and visible earnings growth ahead of us. Over the past 24 months, Hess Midstream has undertaken a strategic effort to increase our gas capture capability by expanding our gas compression and processing capacity. This year, we expect to progress construction of 2 new greenfield compressor stations, which went online in 2022, will meaningfully expand our gas compression capacity by another 20%. In addition, the final tie-ins of the Tioga Gas Plant expansion will increase our processing capacity and solidly position us to capture incremental volumes as we support Hess and third-party customers meet North Dakota's tightening flare reduction targets. Our contract complements our strategic asset base and provides resilience and stability to our financial performance, as demonstrated by the strong financial results we delivered in the first quarter despite the challenges of the last year and further supports our 2021 adjusted EBITDA guidance, which is underpinned by 95% revenue protection. Now turning to Hess Midstream's first quarter 2021 performance. Throughputs and operating results in the first quarter were in line with expectations, though adverse weather did impact operations in February resulting in some planned maintenance activities pushing into the second quarter. First quarter gas processing volumes averaged 302 million cubic foot per day, crude terminaling volumes were 125,000 barrels of oil per day and water gathering volumes averaged 70,000 barrels of water per day. Third-parties contributed approximately 10% of our gas and 15% of our…

Thanks, John, and good afternoon, everyone. As John described, we continued to make good progress in executing our strategy and are pleased to have delivered another strong quarter to start 2021 that demonstrates how both our contract structure and financial strength differentiate our business model. For the first quarter of 2021, net income was $160 million compared to $132 million for the fourth quarter of 2020. Adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of 2021 was $227 million compared to $199 million for the fourth quarter of 2020. The change in adjusted EBITDA relative to the fourth quarter of 2020 was primarily attributable to the following. Total revenues increased by $26 million, primarily driven by higher tariff rates resulting from our annual rate redetermination process, partially offset by lower throughput volume resulting in segment revenue changes as follows: an increase in gathering revenues of approximately $13 million, an increase in processing revenues of approximately $8 million and the increase in terminaling revenues of approximately $5 million. Total operating expenses, including G&A, but excluding depreciation and amortization and pass-through costs were lower, increasing adjusted EBITDA by approximately $2 million, including lower seasonal maintenance activity in our processing segment of approximately $3 million, partially offset by higher G&A expenses of approximately $1 million, primarily related to our equity offering, resulting in adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of 2021 of $227 million, modestly above our guidance, primarily due to lower operating costs as adverse weather conditions resulted in certain planned maintenance activities being deferred to the second quarter, as John described. First quarter 2021 maintenance capital expenditures were approximately $1 million. And net interest, excluding amortization of deferred finance costs, was approximately $21 million. Result was that distributable cash flow was approximately $205 million for the first quarter of 2021, covering our distribution…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Brian Reynolds with UBS.

Just to start off on capital allocation comments around return of capital to shareholders. Could you just provide a little bit more color on how we should think about return of cash just given the 5% distribution growth target and leverage below the stated target of 3-point times? Are there any other uses of cash that we should be thinking about over the next near or medium term?

Sure. So in terms of -- we're in a fortunate position where we have significant financial flexibility, which, as I mentioned in my comments, could include the opportunity for accretive opportunities like return on capital. We have multiple options available to us, including potential buybacks from our sponsors and increased dividends of some form. Each of these options certainly have their strength. We're just at the point now, we're turning free cash flow positive after distribution. This is our first quarter, actually, that we're free cash flow positive after distribution since our IPO, so a real inflection point. And we're just starting to have declining leverage relative to our conservative 3x EBITDA leverage target. So as we continue to build our flexibility, we'll continue to evaluate these options and that will provide opportunities for potential return on capital. And in that, we'll continue to be disciplined in terms of our financial strategy and protecting our balance sheet.

Great. I appreciate the feedback. Second question here is a little bit more operational focused as it relates to the Bakken. Are you seeing higher GPM on your footprint today and going forward? And if so, could you provide color on whether it's more from reduced flaring or whether the wells are just getting gassier in nature?

Yes. So Brian, I'll take that question. This is John. So yes, we're definitely seeing higher gas rates. It's primarily a function of gas capture. We're not really seeing the GOR substantially changing at the well. The wells are very stable, really strong producing wells, both on the oil and gas side. And it's really just more of a function of continuing to capture more gas. We've installed a lot of compression and processing capacity over the last several years, and that's really kind of opened it up to help Hess reduce flaring and get the gas into pipe.

Great. And just as a quick follow-up on northern border. Should we expect any incremental ethane recovery on your footprint due to high BTU content concerns? And just any commentary around how the Hess, Hess-some relationship looks to solve the issue long term?

Yes, sure. So obviously, the Hess and Hess-some relationship is outstanding. I mean we work very close together with our upstream partner. We're pretty much in any and all development decision-making processes and participating in that, and the system is fully integrated. And to your point on ethane, again, one of kind of our unique strategic advantages is our gas plant at Tioga. It has full ethane extraction capability, and we actually deliver that ethane to Canada up through the Vantage pipeline to Nova. Overall, that capacity has really been great for us, and it's provided an outlet for our ethane through the Tioga Gas Plant. So from our perspective, we really don't see any constraints going into northern border. In fact, with our BTU content of our residue gas going in, northern border is able to use our lower BTU content gas to blend in some of the higher BTU content gas they've got in the basin. So overall, we're actually very well positioned to support Hess.

Your next question comes from the line of Jeremy Tonet with JPMorgan.

This is Vinay on for Jeremy. I just wanted to clarify a bit on Hess [indiscernible] especially 2022 EBITDA guidance there. So if you can maybe step down [indiscernible] volume. But just want to understand how the [indiscernible].

Yes. Sorry to interrupt you here, but you're breaking up really bad. We could not understand your question at all. Do you mind repeating the question again, please?

Sorry, I just [indiscernible] Hess adding new rig activity to help any upside in 2022?

Sure. Yes, I think I understand your question. So you're asking about Hess bringing on the second rig and potentially adding additional rigs and upside into 2022? So just a reminder, for 2021 and a good portion of 2022, we're kind of -- we're at our MVC levels. So from that perspective, it's very predictable. As we roll into 2023 and as Hess continues to evaluate the opportunity to bring additional rigs on, just as a reminder, Hess brought on the second rig in February, so we're going to start to see additional wells coming out of that rig line later this year. And that's -- and as Greg mentioned in the earnings call earlier, they're expecting the exit rate to be between 170,000 and 175,000 barrel of oil equivalent per day. And then there was some discussion depending on oil price, the potential to add a third rig in the fourth quarter and then potentially add additional rigs later on depending on oil price. And again, the way Hess is focusing on the Bakken is really kind of leveraging it as a cash engine to generate cash for the company. So from our perspective, we're well positioned to support Hess' growth. That's part of the reason why we're making the further investment in gas capture and water gathering and disposal systems to help Hess as it looks forward to growing. So we're well positioned to support the growth. We see some increased activity coming on from the second rig. And hopefully, prices stabilize and continue up, and we'll continue to see additional opportunity to bring a third and potentially a fourth rig on. But again, we're fully integrated with the upstream and working with them on the development activity.

Got you. Just one question [indiscernible] here. Have they gained any third-party business in the [indiscernible] insurance for DAPL shutdown? [indiscernible]

Sorry. I heard you say something about third-party and DAPL. Can you repeat the question again?

Sorry. My question is just given [indiscernible] so just want to understand if there is any incremental activity around the [indiscernible]?

Okay. I'm still having trouble hearing you, but I think you were asking about third-party activity. And I will just make a general comment about third-parties that similar to Hess' perspective, we are seeing some additional activities from third-parties. And again, as we've talked about previously, we're piped-up to support those third-party activities. As we built our forecast and as we saw in the first quarter of 2021, we're expecting gas to be at about 10% of total throughput volumes and oil to be approximately 15%. Now again, there's opportunity for upside there as we continue to evaluate and look at growth from third-parties, but that's what our kind of -- that's what our long-term forecast is based on. And then I think you asked a question about DAPL. I'll just make another general comment on DAPL for everybody on the call. Overall, Hess has long-term contracts in place and will have no problem operating even in an environment where DAPL is constrained or shut down. And then just a reminder, we have our rail terminal as well that's continued to operate throughout the duration of the downturn. It's both the crude oil terminal, but also NGL terminal for us as well. And we're well positioned to support Hess on whatever it needs. We can get Hess access to pipe, but we can also get access -- we can get Hess and third-parties access to our rail terminal as well.

Your next question comes from the line of Spiro Dounis with Crédit Suisse.

It's Doug Irwin on for Spiro. Just one for me. I wanted to ask about the recent secondary from the sponsors. Just curious if there's been any indication that could be part of a broader strategy of moving forward where maybe we see some additional offerings, adding some liquidity to the Class A shares? And then you mentioned the potential for buybacks from -- directly from the sponsors. Just curious if that was something that was discussed when this offering was announced?

Sure. Yes. I mean Hess and GIP have been very disciplined. This is the first secondary offering, offering any kind since the IPO in 2017. As you know, the proceeds relative to Hess and GIP were relatively small for them, but the objective was to increase the public float. Certainly, we did that by increasing the public float by about 40%. Really beyond that, I would say, in terms of offerings, Hess and GIP remains disciplined investors and really see the long-term value of Hess Midstream. In terms of buybacks, it's, I would say, similar in that sense, of course, buyback from the sponsors only, which is what we would do and that we've talked about. That would, again, be based on Hess and GIP seeing a value proposition for that.

Thank you very much. This concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect. Have a great day.