Good morning. My name is Mary, and I will be your conference operator for today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Fiscal Year 2018 Full Year and Fourth Quarter Earnings Results Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks there will be a question and answer session. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host for today, Laurans Mendelson. Certain statements in this conference call will constitute forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks, uncertainties and contingencies. HEICO's actual results may differ materially from those expressed in or implied by those forward-looking statements as a result of factors including lower demand for commercial air travel or airline fleet changes or airline purchasing decisions, which could cause lower demand for goods and services; product specification costs and requirements, which could cause an increase to our cost and complete contracts; governmental and regulatory demands, export policies and restrictions, reductions in defense, space or homeland security spending by U.S. and/or foreign customers or competition from existing and new competitors, which could reduce our sales, our ability to introduce new products and services at profitable pricing levels, which could reduce our sales or sales growth, product development or manufacturing difficulties, which could increase our product developmental costs and delay in sales, our ability to make acquisitions and achieve operating synergies from acquired businesses, customer credits risks, interest, foreign currency exchange and income tax rates; economic conditions within and outside of aviation, defence, space, medical, telecommunications and electronics industries, which could negatively impact our cost and revenues; and defense spending or budget cuts, which could reduce our defense-related revenue. Parties listening to or reading a transcript of this call are encouraged to review all of HEICO’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission including, but not limited to, filings on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent required by the applicable law.

Good morning to everybody on the call. This is Larry Mendelson. We thank you for joining us and we welcome you to the HEICO fourth quarter and full year of fiscal 2018 earnings announcement teleconference. I'm Chairman of HEICO Corporation and I'm joined here this morning by Eric Mendelson, HEICO's Co-President and President of HEICO’s Flight Support Group; Victor Mendelson, HEICO’s Co-President and President of HEICO’s Electronic Technologies Group; and Carlos Macau, our Executive Vice President and CFO. Before reviewing our record fourth quarter and annual results, I'd like to take a moment and thank all of HEICO’s team members. We are proud to lead some of the hardest working and most successful professionals in our industry. These are people who consistently surpass our targets and milestones without compromising our transparency, our values and our trust. I take great pride in saying that the combination of exceptional work force and the entrepreneurial culture has been a winning formula for HEIKO and has undoubtedly enabled us to achieve a 28-year compound annual growth rate of 16% in net sales, 19% in net income and a 23% in stock price. Now, I'd like to summarize some of the highlights of our record fourth quarter and full fiscal year results. Consolidated fourth quarter fiscal 2018 net sales of $476.9 million, the operating income $103.7 million and net income of $67.4 million represent record results driven principally by double-digit organic growth within flight support, as well as the acquisition of profitable well-managed businesses within ETG, and as well as continued organic growth from our existing ETG businesses. Consolidated fiscal year 2018 net sales of $1.78 billion, operating income of $376.2 million, and net income of $259.2 million, represent record results driven principally by our fiscal 2017 and 2018 acquisitions, as well as the mid-to-high…

Thank you very much. The Flight Support Group's net sales increased 13% to a record $290.3 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, up from $256.9 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The Flight Support Group's net sales increased 13% to a record $1.0979 billion in fiscal year 2018, up from $967.5 million in fiscal year 2017. The increase in the fourth quarter and fiscal year of 2018 reflects organic growth of 13% and 8% respectively mainly resulting from increased demand within all of the Flight Support Group's product lines and our fiscal 2017 and 2018 acquisitions. The Flight Support Group's operating income increased 17% to $54.6 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, up from $46.5 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The increase in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 is principally attributable to the previously mentioned net sales growth and an improved gross profit margin mainly reflecting a more favorable product mix within our specialty products product line, partially offset by changes in the estimated fair value of accrued contingent consideration associated with a prior year acquisition resulting from an improved outlook and better than previously estimated operating performance. The Flight Support Group's operating income increased 15% to a record $206.6 million in fiscal year 2018, up from $179.3 million in fiscal year 2017. The increase in fiscal year 2018 is principally attributable to the previously mentioned net sales growth and an improved gross profit margin mainly reflecting higher net sales within our aftermarket replacement parts product line. The Flight Support Group's operating margin increased to 18.8% in both the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2018, up from 18.1% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 and from 18.5% in fiscal year of 2017. The increase in the fourth quarter and fiscal year of 2018 principally reflects the previously mentioned improved gross profit margin. Additionally, the increased operating margin in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 was partially moderated by the previously mentioned unfavorable impact from changes in the estimated fair value of accrued contingent consideration. With respect to fiscal '19, we are estimating net sales growth of approximately 7% to 8% over the prior year and the full year Flight Support Group operating margin to approximate 19%. Further, we estimate mid-to-high single-digit organic growth in fiscal '19. These estimates exclude additional acquired businesses, if any. Now I would like to introduce Victor Mendelson, Co-President of HEICO and President of HEICO's Electronic Technologies Group to discuss the results of the Electronic Technologies Group.

Thank you, Eric. The Electronic Technologies Group's net sales increased 13% to a record $191.1 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, up from $169.1 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The increase in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 resulted from our fiscal 2017 and 2018 acquisitions as well as organic growth of 3%. The organic growth in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 principally reflects increased demand for certain aerospace and other electronic products partially moderated by lower demand for certain space products and I should further mention that organic growth in the fourth quarter of 2017 was over 14%. So despite a difficult comp, I am very proud that our team continued to win in the markets they serve and performed at a very high level. The Electronic Technologies Group's net sales increased 22% to a record $701.8 million in the fiscal 2018, up from $574.3 million in the fiscal 2017. The increase in fiscal year 2018 principally resulted from our fiscal 2017 and 2018 acquisitions as well as organic growth of 6%. The organic growth in fiscal 2018 principally reflects increased demand for certain defense products. The Electronic Technologies Group's operating income increased 12% to a record $57.1 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, up from $51 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The increase in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 principally reflects the previously mentioned net sales growth and an improved gross profit margin mainly from increased net sales for certain other electronics and aerospace products as well as a more favorable product mix for certain defense products, partially offset by a decrease in net sales and less favorable product mix for certain space products. Further, the increase in operating income in the fourth quarter of fiscal…

Thank you, Victor and Eric. Moving on to further information, diluted earnings per share, consolidated net income per diluted share increased 26% to $0.49 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 and that was up from $0.39 in the fourth quarter fiscal 2017 and it increased 39% to $1.90 in fiscal 2018, up from $1.37 in fiscal 2017. Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $19.7 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 and that was up from $17.9 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. For the year, it totaled $77.2 million and that was up from $64.8 million in fiscal 2017.The increase in the fourth quarter and fiscal year 2018 reflects the incremental impact of higher amortization expense of intangible assets from our 2017 and 2018 acquisitions. Research and development expense totaled $16.8 million and $12.6 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 and 2017 respectively and for the year totaled $57.5 million and $46.5 million in fiscal 2018 and 2017 respectively. Significant ongoing new product development efforts are continuing at both Flight Support and ETG as we continue to invest approximately 3% of each sales dollar in new product development. SG&A expense increased to $82.8 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 and that was up from $70.6 million in fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. For the year, it increased to $314.5 million in 2018, up from $268.1 million in fiscal 2017. The increase in fourth quarter and fiscal year 2018 principally reflects our fiscal 2018 and 2017 acquisitions as well as higher performance-based compensation expense. The increase in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 also reflects an unfavorable impact from changes in the estimated fair value of accrued contingent consideration associated with a prior year acquisition resulting from an improved outlook and better than…

Yes sir.

Yes, would you please open the floor for questions. I'm finished with my prepared remarks and I'd like - we have a number of people I believe waiting to ask questions. So would you please handle that?

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Robert Spingarn from Credit Suisse. Your line is now open.

The first question is a high level and it's for all of you. Are you seeing any headwinds forming in the business that would indicate a macro slowdown, anywhere across your business and I ask that because I know the growth rates are moving around a little bit and that sounds like that's just specific to the business, but do you see any macro issues?

Rob, the answer is absolutely not, we don't. I think our business - we've given guidance. We feel very confident hopefully. We start out as you know with a bottoms up projection based upon what our subsidiaries are telling us. I don't like to say they sandbag us, but they are conservative and historically we've been able to move the guidance up as the year progresses and as we digest additional acquisitions and they see - get more visibility into their operating results, but the answer to your question is no, we - as a matter of fact, we see things as pretty strong and the big issue that we have coming from some of the subs is their ability to access material to fill the orders. I mean, meaning by that, we've had to increase inventory, if you look at the balance sheet, you'll see the increased inventories and we've had to increase inventories in order to be confident that we have enough materials on hand to supply the demand of our customers. So we have not seen the slowdown.

Rob, this is…

So Larry that's…

I'll just add to that…

Yes, go ahead.

I've spent roughly the last seven, eight weeks on the road in our budget process visiting our subsidiaries or up to about a week or so or 10 days ago I was doing that and generally, I would say almost across the board, almost universally people see - our businesses see very strong conditions. I mean, there is always in the best of times, in the worst of times, there's always a business out there that's struggling with something and there's always, whether it's a customer or a market or a product and that will always be the case, again best of times, worst of times and we have those and I expect that will always be the case, but notwithstanding that, the general tenor was strength across the board and in the end markets and the difficulty as my father said is in getting material, supplies, components and people and that seems to be the greatest challenge that we're dealing with. Now whether the media talks the economy into a slowdown more broadly, well, time will tell. Hopefully, they don't, but our businesses aren't seeing it.

Larry something you said, and Victor expanded on was the increase in inventory. I actually had a question for Carlos on this. You're growing your net income 10% in 2019, if I remember correctly, your operating cash flow at $360 million also represents about 10% growth. There was a use of cash in 2018, so you'll - seems like you'll have a similar use of cash for working capital I should say in 2019. So on working capital, if you could talk to the moving pieces and what seems like a continued I suppose spending on inventory.

Yes Rob, this year as the guys mentioned, we did see situations where we had to, if you would, pre-buy material to keep our folks with enough material to meet demand. So do I see that continuing into next year, well, we sort of budgeted in our thought process in how we're going about the cash flow estimates a slight increase, but not much more than what we had this year as far as the overall change in inventory between years. I think our - at the levels we're at right now, the turnover rate was 135 days principally works for us. So I don't see a huge use of cash outside of what you saw this year, next year for inventory. The rest of the working capital receivables are days sales are very good, we tend to see the large players dragging out payments, but we're very aggressive on the collections side and our guys have been able to maintain our days sales down. So I don't see, you know, I see normal growth in receivables and inventory commensurate with the sales growth and we treat our vendors very well, our - a lot of that is a function of timing whether it's payables or accruals and things like that, but the one thing that we are good to not only our customers, but the folks that allow us to be good to our customers, the vendors, we treat them very well also. So I would say similar movement as you've seen historically there, so no real big changes in working capital from our perspective.

Your next question comes from the line of Louis Raffetto from UBS. Your line is now open.

So we're just going to stick with the cash flow for now, the CapEx you finally came closer to spending where you thought you'd spend and it looks like next year, it's going to be another high year. So is there anything going on or is it's just the business growing, anything specifically under the - to base that $48 million?

Yes Louis, how are you doing? This is Carlos. We actually do, our Board approves the CapEx budget every year and we go through and we ask our subsidiaries to come up with what they call critical capital spend required and then nice to have, sort of three columns and as you can imagine that the number that in total of those three columns would be much larger than what we reported on what we think we'll spend. The $48 million is nothing more than what we call critical and nice to have right now. We tend, I mean sorry critical and required, we tend to under-spend those budgets, but coming out of the box, it's hard for me to, I don't want to underestimate if you would the CapEx. So right now we think it's around $48 million, I think if you look back historically as time passes, we'll buy used equipment, we'll buy equipment at auction as opposed to going out and spending for new and sometimes we have to ratchet that number down. So let's see how the year progresses, but there's nothing unusual. It's principally growth capital in that budget and I think that will be sufficient for our upcoming year.

And so you think that's more of a sustainable rate going forward I guess as well.

I think the way I have looked at, if you're looking at a sustainable rate 2% to 2.5% of our sales is generally where the CapEx budget falls out. Sometimes a little more, sometimes a little less, but that's a good barometer.

And then any contingent consideration payments for 2019, I know, usually it's in the K, but jump ahead here.

We'll have one in - we'll have one payment in Q1. Sorry, it will either go out at the end of Q1 or early in Q2, but that's it.

And then also go forward tax rate, I know, usually you guys will give a combination of tax and the minority interest expense, I don't think I saw one, so, I just don't know is the 24% sort of average we saw over the final three quarters sort of the area to think about.

No, I wouldn't think of it that way. The best way to look at it, I think Larry mentioned it earlier was we think that the rate will be on a combined basis 26% to 28% and that roughly breaks out 2019-2020 tax 7% to 8% NCI. That's kind of how we're looking at it right now.

So the, sorry, the 26% to 28% is the combined NCI and tax.

That's correct.

Okay, sorry, I missed him say that earlier. All right and then last one, any guidance or any info you can give us on the deals from November from a size, I mean 170 employees based on the organic growth going to guess around $50 million in sales. I know the leverage is way down again, I guess it will go up a little bit, but any size you can add to that.

We actually, we haven't - in the acquisitions that we made in November, we haven't disclosed sales and size other than employees. I think you can, you could probably do some math, we give you the number of employees and if you look at the revenue per employee in each segment, you can get kind of close, they were good acquisitions, normal size, single, double type acquisitions for HEICO that will be accretive to us in 2019.

Your next question comes from the line of Peter Arment from Baird. Your line is now open.

Maybe this is a question for Eric on FSG just 13% organic growth really impressive and I know you guys aren't pushing price, so you know, volume that you're seeing, can you give us a little more color on whether this is all the benefits of new products or is there new customers maybe any color there would be helpful. Thanks.

Hi, Peter, this is Eric. You're right that the 13% organic growth I think was even somewhat more exceptional considering we only get roughly 1% pricing. So it is all volume, 12% of it is volume-related and I would say that it's strength across the board in all of our product lines and it's a combination of basically new parts getting sold to our existing customer base as well as some increase in sales on some older parts that we've had. We pretty much sell to everybody in the world. So in terms of picking up new customers, there is not really a lot if you will, new names out there because we are already doing business with everybody, but it is just increased penetration and I think it shows basically the support that HEICO has got at our customer base because we provide very good value at a reasonable price.

Could you and just related to that, Eric, if you could just how about on the introduction of new products? I mean, I think you guys have been continuing to develop you know 400 to 500 parts a year, is that still look like an achievable plan for 2019?

It does, yes, we're running consistent with past practice and we've got the development pipeline running really wide open right now and there is a lot of great products in there.

Your next question comes from the line of Ken Herbert from Canaccord. Your line is now open.

I first, Eric, just wanted to ask you regarding or Carlos regarding the guidance within FSG, I mean you've got the first half of 2019 with again relatively easy comps, but then obviously much more difficult comps after the sort of the inflection you've seen here in the fiscal third quarter of 2018. Do we - how should we think about the full year? I mean is it fair to assume that you continue to see double-digit growth organically through the first half and then maybe a step down in the second half to get you to the full year number or maybe just a little bit of color around the cadence within FSG in 2019 would be helpful.

Ken, this is Carlos. As you know, within the FSG, we principally get the majority of the orders in the month of shipment. So we have a pretty good sense for what, let's say, Q1 is going to look like based on backlog and sort of what we got in the pipes right now, but it is difficult and which is one of the reasons why we don't give quarterly guidance outside of ETG's fluctuations is the FSG's lack of if you would visibility too far out in the future, so I would say for right now to try and guess at that cadence, it would not be in our best interest. I think our guys are projecting at the moment, at least within our budgets, linear growth and that sort of looks like in the budget and of course, we can adjust as we move forward, but we're not prepared and I don't think it would be wise for us to give quarterly guidance or any type of cadence at this point.

That's helpful. I guess then fair to say and based on earlier comments you haven't seen here heading just from the calendar third to the fourth quarter, you haven't seen any change or inflection one way or another I guess in the FSG customer buying habits or patterns?

No, I think from my perspective, Ken and I think I've - I may have mentioned to you and others before, I find this environment, particularly in the FSG, to be really a special one. We had the benefit of all the new builds coming in and we've got all the older equipment still running, we see the airlines purchasing and a high need for materials. We offer a great value proposition to our customers. We are always there for them and that pattern hasn't stopped. It's been a pretty robust environment for us in that regard. Inevitably, trees don't grow to the sky, but for fiscal 2019, what we're seeing right now is a continuation of that fantastic environment.

And if I could, Eric, can you just level set us, I know as fleet growth really on the commercial aerospace side accelerates in emerging markets in China and Asia in particular and it's probably a few years off before a lot of these aircraft maybe hit some of the sweet spot for your business, but can you just talk about what you're seeing from customers in China and the Middle East in areas that have maybe typically not been as big a customers as legacy airlines, but over time, as those fleets evolve could potentially be much larger depending upon penetration. I mean, how are you thinking about these markets today and maybe what you're doing to better position to access those markets down the road.

I'd be happy to speak to that. We are doing nicely I would say in the, if you want to call them the emerging markets. I think there is still very great potential for us in those markets. We're very much focused on them and I think we're continuing to do nicely. There's no question that the majority of our business comes out of the Americas and Europe and we expect to that continue for quite some time, but we are picking up a nice chunk of business in the emerging markets as well. There's a lot of interest in our products and I anticipate further growth there.

Is there any reason to think that structurally those airlines wouldn't have the same opportunity as a legacy airline in the United States or Europe?

No, I think as things mature, they're going to have a lot of demand coming out of those areas.

And just one final one for Carlos within ETG, can you give us what the fiscal 2019 guidance implies for the intangible amortization expense?

Yes, for ETG, amortization expense is roughly 5% of sales. It's a pretty big slug with it. I think it's ran historically between 4% and 5%. We are getting closer to 5% right now.

Your next question comes from the line of Sheila Kahyaoglu from Jefferies. Your line is now open.

Maybe you my first one for any of you. You've seen just bigger deals in the space, a lot of consolidation. How do you guys think about maybe a potentially bigger transaction and your capacity to do such a deal?

Well, that's a good question. Other people have asked that question. We are very disciplined in what we buy and we want to make sure that it makes sense. We don't want to grow for the sake of growing and saying that we are a bigger company and we don't grow because the CEO and the executive office gets its compensation based on gross revenue, which so many corporate players do. We own, as you know, Sheila, we own equity, probably the largest shareholders individually and so, our compensation, our benefit is on the bottom line cash flow, earnings per share, and growth. So to grow the top line so we gain a couple of million dollars in compensation is not what motivates us. So we're going to focus on something that comes down to the bottom line. We have been shown many opportunities to acquire, merge whatever you want to call it with other entities, but unfortunately corporate America generally runs on a 7% to 11% operating margin. To us, that's not very tempting because our all-in operating margin before amortization or eliminating amortization is around 25%. So we're not going to go for that kind of thing just to get bigger for the sake of getting bigger. So we have to be careful on what we buy. Now, we have looked at larger companies where we could make an acquisition, possibly trim some expense, possibly consolidate and gain some - additional sales, but a lot of these companies, these bigger companies or companies our size don't have the bottom line cash flow, operating margins that we like to have. So we certainly have the firepower, we can buy companies, we probably could spend $4 billion, maybe more because we are not a capital constrained company. You know our…

And I guess on that note, Victor, maybe if you could talk about two of your bigger deals, AeroAntenna and Robertson, how they're going and as you look at your organic growth, what you are seeing in defense and space into 2019?

Yes, this is Victor. Both of those companies AeroAntenna and Robertson had excellent years. We're very pleased with them. We're excited about 2019 for both of them. They've so far proven to be great acquisitions. As you know, they occupy very important market spaces, market positions in what they do, they're very well regarded by their customers, which is critical and there are also product developers, meaning that they continue to develop new product, they stay out there and they stay ahead of the curve that way. They're not in harvest mode or anything like that they are sharp, they are very focused on staying competitive and so I'm optimistic beyond just the short-term and beyond 2019 for both of those businesses. And in terms of what we see in defense for 2019, our budgets internally are for growth in our defense businesses overall in fiscal 2019. We are very careful, we all read the same newspapers so to speak and the same reports out of Washington on what might happen with the budgets. I think you've known us well that we don't get too excited and we run the company very conservatively and very cautiously so that we kind of base our assumptions on the fact that - we always assume that even when there is going to be defense budget growth that in the long term, there has to be normalization to that and so we want to keep our cost structure to that line and enjoy ourselves when the times are good, but at the same time, we really want to do an excellent job for our customers and to deliver for them and to deliver competitively. So we take all of that into the mix.

Shelia, this is Larry, just want to add one thing, which is really critical to the mix and that is the ability and the quality of the managers that operate those companies, U.S. specifically have two companies in AeroAntenna and Robertson, but this applies to many of our subsidiaries. It's really in the brilliance and the dedication, the focus, and capability of those managers. They're fantastic and they don't appear on the balance sheet and the financial statements, but they are the guys that make it happen. They are fantastic.

Your next question comes from the line of Michael Ciarmoli from SunTrust. Your line is now open.

Carlos, just maybe a quick housekeeping first, can you give us the value, the change in fair value of contingent consideration in the quarter that was the little bit of the headwind for FSG?

Yes, it is just a - it's a tick over a couple million dollars that we took a charge for in Q4, but that was based upon as we mentioned earlier, a little rosier outlook and you also got some FX things going back and forth between periods, but that was roughly the charge that went through.

And then you've given us a lot of line by line detail for 2019 interest expense, should we kind of assume this $20 million run rate, is that a good barometer for 2019?

Yes, I think, if you're - it just depends. I mean look, it depends what the Fed does and how that impacts LIBOR we tied to. I'm estimating somewhere between $20 million to $22 million in interest and we'll see how that ferrets out. If we're able to generate the cash that I think, you're probably going to be right at $20 million and if we find further investments, we're both going to be wrong, but right now that's in the guidance and that's what we're estimating.

And then maybe, Eric just on FSG, I mean you've kind of hit this multi-year high here in organic growth. I mean is there - obviously, if we look at the planes coming off warranty, the fleet growing, is there any correlation there with the 787s, I guess there have been 100 or so that were delivered before and during 2013. Are you getting growth on some new platforms that you haven't seen before? And then maybe can you just - any other color on, it seems like there is broad-based strength, but any noticeable differences between parts, repair or distribution?

Yes, Mike, I would say the strength is really very broad based, it's all over the business. It's in parts, repair, distribution, specialty manufacturing, all of those businesses are doing quite well. In terms of any specific programs, I would say we're doing nicely on the new platforms and we're also doing well on all of the historical platforms. I think it speaks to the value proposition that HEICO creates in any of our businesses and since, of course, we have all of our competitors on the telephone call, I would rather not go into specifics on which businesses are seeing what kind of strength, but I would just say that it's very, very broad based. And as you know, the way HEICO was structured with operating with these smaller businesses that have the authority and the responsibility, we've always said that over time, they are able to drive above average sales and earnings growth because of their structure and because they are very close to the customers and if you look at it, I'm even more proud than the 13% organic growth, I'm proud of the, whatever it was roughly 15% operating income growth that we had in these businesses, all organic, but again, it's very broad based.

And then maybe just one last one, can you give us any update or changes or developments on the IATA and CFM sort of competitive agreement that they've come up with.

Sure, there's been a lot of buzz and talk in the industry about this. That agreement takes effect at the end of February, I believe, and airlines have really taken notice of what's happened here and I think that there should be decent opportunity for independents to grow in the marketplace and decent opportunity for HEICO to cover some lost ground.

Your next question comes from the line of Joshua Sullivan from Seaport Global. Your line is now open.

I just - what's in that bottoms-up approach in your guidance, any way you can parse out some of the specifics for us. I know you said you're seeing continuation of the attractive trends here, but just interested to hear your thoughts on air traffic growth expectations for 2019 and maybe beyond.

This is Eric. I mean we read frankly the same analyst reports that everybody looks at and that's where we get our information. We believe that it to be consistent and we believe that it to be supportable. I mean clearly we're seeing the sales growth in our various businesses and I think it's very believable. Rob asked the question upfront about do we see any changes in the marketplace and no I mean we see continued strength. So I think everything is pointing in a positive direction.

A few of the analysts, Wall Street analysts over the past few weeks and days pointed out the strength in airline seat miles growth and it's growing somewhere, it depends on which month, but it's growing anywhere from 5% to 7%, that's an enormous growth, it's like double GDP and if you go back 10 years, HEICO has been talking about the growth of the aerospace industry in those terms and Boeing has been putting out those kind of figures too and its coming true and so we believe - and that's why we're in the business, we believe that this particular area of business, this industry is a very strong growth industry because of the shrinking of the world and world trade and we can only see a continuation of this kind of growth. Now, if the economy is pulled back, yes, we'll see a little slow down and so forth, but as a general trend over the next - our outlook over the next 10 years or more is a very strong growth industry and that's why we're in this business.

And then just on the M&A front, given the recent market volatility here, it had any impact on M&A conversations with targets, are valuation expectations, getting more reasonable, any change in behavior there?

I think that we probably are normalized, which is good. I think we're seeing lots of opportunities. We're doing due diligence on a number of companies at the moment. We can't predict that we'll make these deals, but last year, and we did I think four acquisitions, in November, we closed two. I think pricing is getting a little higher. I think private equity has a lot of money in their pocket and they're competitive. So that makes it a little more difficult, but to answer your question, I think we can make our normal number of acquisitions, we see good opportunities. Companies that want to sell to us normally want to sell because of our culture and so we differentiate ourselves that we tell people at the outset, we are not going to be the highest price and we back out of different types of options and things because we won't pay a price that private equity can pay. We intend to keep the company essentially forever and build it. Private equity likes to keep it for one to five years, but lipstick on the pig, cut expenses, do all kinds of things and financial engineering and then dump it to somebody else and we're just the opposite. So what we look for is a company and a management that wants to be in it for the longer term, that wants to continue running the company with minimal interference and pressures to get immediate profits today and tomorrow. So it's a long answer, but I think we see our number of acquisitions and that's fine, it's fine.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Colin Ducharme from Sterling Capital. Your line is now open.

Just a quick question for Eric, more of a clarification, again on that IATA, CFM rolling over the summer. Could you remind us of the - you said it's coming in force, I believe you said in February. Can you remind us of the broader implications that, that ruling might have, in particular in other geos and for other OEMs. Just curious there.

Well, just as - a little bit of history. The airlines got upset, they complained through their worldwide trade association IATA to the European Commission. European Commission started looking at practices of a number of OEMs, they decided to launch an informal investigation into General Electric and CFMI and in the, I would say at the end of that informal investigation before it was going to become - what we believe was a formal investigation, there was the settlement between IATA and GE, CFMI. That agreement has a number of specific clauses, I don't have it in front of me. So I don't have the details, but basically, it prohibits the manufacturer from doing certain things that they were doing and I want to be careful to not miss-speak, I think you can get it online, but there were all sorts of behavior that is now not permitted. So that I think is what the airlines are interested in. With regard to how it impacts other manufacturers, I think everybody in the industry is taking note at this and they want to make sure that they behave consistent with whatever was in that agreement because presumably if other companies go outside of what's in that agreement, they may have issues down the road. So that's sort of what we are hearing, but if you want to see the specifics, I think you can get that online.

And then just a follow-up on the FSG guidance out of the box here, trying to just triangulate various comments thus far in the call, but clearly an exit rate from Q4 with a fantastic top line trend, you got higher CapEx expectations going in on a consolidated basis for 2019, yet if memory serves, kind of the out of the box guide versus last year just a little bit lower. So making sure I understand, is it primarily the larger base now because your color comments through the windshield there was that you're not seeing material weakness and I just want to be sure I'm properly putting context around that.

This is Carlos. I think our out of the box guidance 7% to 8% growth is pretty consistent with where we came out last year, maybe just a tick under, but this is all for the most part, organic growth, so we're actually very happy with the guidance that we put out and are excited about it. As we've mentioned earlier on the call, we would prefer to under-promise and over-deliver and I think that the, at least the attitude in the industry dynamics that we see suggest that we're going to have a fantastic year in that space, but for right now from a bottoms-up budgeting perspective, if you would, the 7% to 8% top line growth is kind of what we're seeing and we'll adjust that as we go through the year and as we get more visibility. We don't give quarterly guidance as I mentioned earlier. So the cadence to that growth is going to be hard to articulate. We won't be able to articulate that to you, but from my perspective, that's robust growth and that's indicative of mid-to-high single-digit organic growth, which is kind of what we expect out of the Company right now.

And then final question I guess for Victor, you talked about slightly lower sales of space products, but we're starting to see some of the larger private space companies begin to get traction with launch vehicles et cetera and I just wanted kind of broader - kind of higher-level comments here on where you think ETG is currently positioned, how it's positioned for the private commercial space trend. Is more of the kind of chipset exposure on the payload side or on the launch vehicle side or both? How are the relationships trending there and what you're seeing? Thanks.

This is Victor. Most of the overwhelming majority of what we do in the ETG that is space related is on the payload side, it is not on launch vehicles. We do very little actually on launch vehicles. So our focus tends to be on - let's say what stays up in space and our business there is heavily weighted to the commercial sector and has really always been more weighted toward the commercial sector. Although we have a pretty good defense business there as well. Where the weakness has been, has be in the large in the geosynchronous earth orbit satellite segment. The rest of the space business has been very strong for us and continues to be very strong. So that does offset it. I wouldn't call it very weak, but it's been - we had to identify where there has been some weakness that offset the strength and that was it and - but overall, the space business is a very good business for us. Thank you. Operator, it sounds like we're ready for our next question.

Your next question comes from the line of George Godfrey from CL King. Your line is now open.

If I roll and I've heard all the comments and business is great, the organic growth rate is great here in Q4, and I know it actually accelerated through the year. If we roll back the clock to say the 2008, 2009 time frame and with the benefit of hindsight, 2009 revenue was down about 8%. Were there any leading indicators or signs that you looked back and say, that was a good foreteller of what was coming ahead perhaps in '08 or were things more coincidental that it kind of all went south simultaneously? Thanks and nice job.

Yes, George. I would say it became pretty clear that when the financial crisis hit, immediately the whole world went into concern mode and panic mode and spending went down and it was a totally different situation than we are seeing right now, just completely different. And so we saw back then immediate action being taken by everybody. If you recall back then there was concern that the OEMs wouldn't be able to deliver the backlogs because airlines wouldn't be able to get money. I mean the situation today couldn't be any more different than it is. We continue to see strength in our end market, strength with our customers. So I would say that we would have to see a major market dislocation and panic in order to see something like we saw back then and right now we're seeing quite the contrary.

But, George. This is Victor. Having said that, it's all the more reason we always have to be careful within our Company and stay lean and cautious and it's why we run the business the way we do because we never know what will happen with the broader economy and we want to be prepared for all seasons.

Understood. Thank you very much.

You're welcome. Operator, I don't think there are any more questions. Are there?

There are no further questions at this time. Presenters, you may continue.

So, this is Larry Mendelson again. We thank you all for your interest in HEICO. We appreciate it. We are available if you have further questions, give us a call, Carlos, Eric, Victor, myself and we wish you all a very happy holiday, a healthy and wonderful New Year and unless we hear from you, we will speak to you first quarter next year around February when we release first quarter results. So that is all and we are signing off right now. Operator, we're done.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.