Greetings. And welcome to The Home Depot’s First Quarter 2021 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Isabel Janci. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Christine, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Home Depot’s first quarter 2021 Earnings Call. Joining us on our call today are Craig Menear, Chairman and CEO; Ted Decker, President and Chief Operating Officer; and Richard McPhail, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Following our prepared remarks, the call will be open for questions. Questions will be limited to analyst and investors, and as a reminder, please limit yourself to one question with one follow-up. If we are unable to get to your question during the call, please call our Investor Relations department at 770-384-2387. Before I turn the call over to Craig, let me remind you that today’s press release and the presentations made by our executives include forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations and projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the factors identified in the release and in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Today’s presentations will also include certain non-GAAP measures. Reconciliation of these measures is provided on our website. Now let me turn the call over to Craig.

Thank you, Isabel, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us on our call this morning. Fiscal 2021 is off to a strong start, as we grew the business by over $9 billion compared to the first quarter of last year. Sales for the first quarter were $37.5 billion, up 32.7% from last year. Comp sales were up 31% from last year and our U.S. stores had a positive comp of 29.9%. Diluted earnings per share were $3.86 in the first quarter, up from $2.08 in the first quarter last year. Our results this quarter were once again driven by broad-based strength across the business and geographies. All of our top 40 markets posted double-digit comps, while Canada posted comps above the company average and Mexico posted double-digit comps. Both ticket and transactions were up double digits in the quarter, and as Ted will detail, we saw strong double-digit growth from both our Pro and DIY customers. We continue to effectively manage the outsized demand for home improvement products seen throughout most of the last year despite disruptions in global supply chains that were further exasperated by port congestion during the quarter. We leveraged the scale of our supply chain and partnered with our vendors to maintain our in-stock positions and prioritized key SKUs in high demand categories. While we continue to see strong level of engagement across our digital platforms we saw more of our customers return to our stores. Sales leveraging our digital platforms increased approximately 27% versus the first quarter last year and approximately 55% of online orders were fulfilled through a store. We continue to rollout new capabilities, such as mixed cart selling from store that remove friction for both our customers and associates. The mix cart feature enables associates to more efficiently and effectively…

Thanks, Craig, and good morning, everyone. I want to start by also thanking all of our associates and supplier partners for their commitment to serving our customers and communities. We continue to experience unprecedented levels of demand during the first quarter, with comps accelerating to more than 30% when compared to the first quarter of last year. This elevated demand and transportation headwinds are pressuring parts of the supply chain. But our teams continue to work together with their supplier partners to manage through these pressures. Moving to our comp performance during the first quarter, 13 of our 14 merchandising departments posted comps at or above 20%, led by our lumber and kitchen and bath departments. Our comp average ticket increased 10.3% and comp transactions increased 19.1%. Similar to what we reported in our previous three quarters, the growth in our comp average ticket was driven by elevated project demand, customers trading up to new and innovative products, and continued inflation in many product categories, including lumber. This was another record setting quarter for lumber prices. Let me give you an example of what that means for one of our core lumber SKUs. At the end of the first quarter last year, a sheet of 7/16 OSB was approximately $9.55. As we exited the first quarter this year, that same sheet of OSB more than quadrupled in price to $39.76. Inflation from core commodity categories positively impacted our average ticket growth by approximately 375 basis points during the first quarter. Our interconnected retail strategy is resonating with our customers, as evidenced by strong growth from both in-store and online transactions, and we are pleased with our ability to meet widespread demand across our selling platforms. As you heard from Craig, sales from our digital channels grew by 27% during the…

Thank you, Ted, and good morning, everyone. In the first quarter, total sales were $37.5 billion, an increase of $9.2 billion or 32.7% from last year. During the first quarter, our total company comps were positive 31%, with positive comps of 19.8% in February, 36.2% in March and 34.3% in April. Comps in the U.S. were positive 29.9% for the quarter, with positive comps of 19.9% in February, 35.6% in March and 32% in April. During the first quarter, all 19 of our U.S. regions, as well as Canada and Mexico posted strong double-digit comps. In the first quarter, our gross margin was 34%, a decrease of approximately 10 basis points from last year. Mixed pressure from higher lumber sales alone negatively impacted our gross margin by approximately 35 basis points. During the first quarter, operating expense as a percent of sales decreased approximately 390 basis points to 18.6%. We were pleased with our operating leverage during the first quarter, as it reflects disciplined expense control, along with a couple of other expense items that I’d like to highlight. First, our operating leverage in the first quarter of this year reflects the impact of several one-time expenses that we incurred in the first quarter of 2020, including additional compensation and benefits to support our associates. These expenses were partially offset by under spend in other expense items in the first quarter of last year, notably payroll as we work to staff up labor to meet the surge in demand. Together, the net impact of these factors resulted in approximately 240 basis points of operating expense leverage during the first quarter of 2021. Second, during the first quarter of 2021, we incurred approximately $80 million of COVID-related expenses, which created approximately 20 basis points of operating expense deleverage. And lastly, our…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Simeon Gutman with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, everyone. My first question is, is there anything that changes your view on housing more or less constructive compared to the underlying assumptions that you built through 2021 plan against?

No. Simeon, I’d say, yeah, the housing environment continues to remain very strong. So, it’s only strengthened I think from last year and the current shortage of new housing clearly is helping to drive improvements in the home values, which is a good thing for spending in the home.

Okay. And then my follow-up is actually more on operating profit and margin. And I think your message is very clear that you’re focused on growing faster than the market, and I think Richard told us last quarter, you’re managing operating profit dollars and margins fall where they fall. Can I ask about the two, I think, about the incremental drivers going forward, it’s about interconnected retail and then somewhat in MRO and Pro, because some of the investments and acquisitions you’ve made? Is there anything about the margin structure of those businesses and incremental growth that would hold back margins?

No. I mean, when we look at the business overall, we interconnected, we manage as a portfolio approach and 55% of the orders are flowing through our stores. And then as it relates to the structure in Pro, we’ve shared in the past and you look at Pro in total, Pro is a very similar margin profile to the DIY customer, when you’re looking at a complete project and so that’s -- yeah, really nothing there that’s dramatically different.

Okay. Thank you.

Our next question comes from line of Michael Baker with D.A. Davidson. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Thanks, guys. And I appreciate the fact that, you didn’t really update your outlook and your press release talk to it too much. But I guess, let me ask this, are you -- it seems respected from volume, probably, ahead of where you thought you would be at this point. So is there any update to that idea of if trends continue will be, I think, was what flat to up slightly in margins at about 14%? Can you update that comment that you gave in the first quarter? And I guess related to that, is the right way to think about comps for the quarter and I guess the year somewhere in that 30% to your stacked rate, would that be a fair sort of assumption to model for the rest of the year?

Let me share with you. I mean, clearly, the first quarter performance was stronger than what we anticipated. We did not think that we would deliver a 30% comps. And as it relates to the framework that we provided, Richard, you might want to speak to the framework.

Sure. And just to remind everyone, we actually, at the end of the fourth quarter last year, we felt unable to provide an outlook due to level of uncertainty in the environment. So we did not provide an outlook. We did feel that given the significance of non-recurring expenses in 2020, we could provide our view on our margin profile at a hypothetical level of sales. So, looking forward, we continue to believe that the environment and the consumer response to it is difficult to predict. With respect to Q1, we’re very pleased with the operating expense leverage and earnings flow through that we drove. And we’re going to keep operating the business with discipline and keep a focus on driving operating expense leverage.

Okay. Thank you. I appreciate the commentary.

Our next question comes from the line of Michael Lasser with UBS. Please proceed with your question.

If we look at your month of May and April, your two-year stacks were running around or even better than 40%, and now you mentioned, May so far is up about 30%. So do you think that we’re starting to see the stimulus impact to your comps dissipate and such that and I know was asked a couple of different ways, but 30% run rate and a two-year stack that could ways to move forward or is it better for us to expect that that 30% two-stack run rate on an arithmetic basis should flow from here?

Well, Michael, we just -- we can’t extrapolate results to future periods. It’s just too difficult to predict how the environment might evolve and how the consumer’s response to that might evolve. When you look at the progression from March and April, and you just -- you think about stimulus impact, it’s very difficult to quantify the impact from stimulus. What we do know is that of the $402 billion that the government announced would be paid directly to individuals as part of the American Rescue Plan. Of that $402 billion, $325 billion of it hit bank accounts in March. And so while we can’t quantify the exact impact, it probably did have some sort of impact on that March to April progression.

Michael, I’d say, why we really can’t extrapolate to future periods. The one thing that we’re very encouraged about is when you look at the overall kind of backdrop for home improvement on a longer term basis, we feel very good about that.

If anything do you want to point these specifically, Craig, from a longer term basis that you…

Well, when you…

…expect?

Mike, when you think about we’re at post-World War II housing availability. So two months of supply versus historical average of six that that situation won’t be resolved in near-term, it’s going to take time for that to be resolved. So I think that supports home values and the continued growth in home values, which we know. As home values grow, people feel good about investing in their home overall. So that alone is, I think, a very positive outlook for home improvement as you move forward.

Okay. My follow up question is, how do you think your market share unfolded in the first quarter from an online perspective, recognizing that you had a very difficult comparison? Do you think you’ve kept pace with the overall market and is this the right run rate for the online growth to think about moving forward?

I mean, we -- again, we look at this as a total and run this as a portfolio, because it’s so interconnected. And if you look at the data, it appears that we’ve picked up about 170 points in share overall based on the March data that was put out by the government.

And just to kind of talk about e-commerce. E-commerce is a capability. It is not a business. And so I think it’s very important to always look at the top level demand in the environment and what we’ve delivered. So we don’t break the business down like that. We intend to be there for the customer. However they’d like to shop. There’s been a lot of a dynamism in that as we work to the last 12 months, but we are satisfied that we’ve been there for them and it’s -- as Craig said, it’s because of the investments we made in interconnected retail over the last few years.

And Michael, as you think of last year in the first quarter, the interest in buy online pickup in store and we stood up curbside again our customers chose to shop that way in a contactless or is least contact as possible in the early days of the pandemic. So that’s returning to some more natural run rates.

Got it. Thank you very much and good luck.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Chuck Grom with Gordon Haskett. Please proceed with your question.

Hey. Good morning. I’m curious if you guys are surprised that your basket trend is holding so strong even as your traffic has improved so much?

Yeah. I mean, we are seeing customer engagement in all segments of our business, and when you -- we shared that through the progression of the last four quarters. Our Pro business has been strengthening as customers get more comfortable having folks in their home. Our services business has been strengthening for three quarters consecutively in a row now. Those are all big ticket drivers. And then as Ted called out, innovation has been a driver of expansion in our ticket, as well as inflation. And Ted, I don’t know if you have any other comment.

Yeah. I think it also speaks to projects. Again, people are engaged in projects and they’re engaged in projects across the whole store. So with projects comes basket and ticket and we’re certainly enjoying that.

Got it. And then just a quick follow-up for me would be, we talk about the big increase in lumber prices, curious what you’re seeing on the demand side unit volume if it’s starting to compress a little bit as those prices rise?

Well, the lumber environment is certainly unique and in the way we’re thinking about it right now. Chuck, it’s really a storm environment. It’s very tough to look at traditional elasticities. Certainly prices are up, as I referenced in the call, sheet of OSB is quadrupled in price and it’s up even more since the end of our fiscal quarter. But at the same time, demand has kept pace. And when we bring the product into the store itself and the mills are at capacity. We have plenty of wood fiber in the supply chain. The relative bottleneck is in the sawmill cutting capacity. We don’t see a lot of capacity coming online. So we’re probably not going to see a lot of finished lumber product in distribution. So as soon as that product hits our stores, it sells, certainly prices up and you would think there’d be a supply and demand in our traditional elasticity equation there, but it’s hard to determine the impact given the storm nature of the demand.

Thanks a lot.

Our next question comes from the line of Scot Ciccarelli with RBC. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning. So we know that you’re working on your Home Depot supply chain almost for a couple of months [ph] now. Obviously, the overall industry is extremely strong. But I’m curious, are there any examples you can share regarding how these new capabilities may be enabling you to either increase penetration rates and existing markets, will penetrate new markets where maybe you couldn’t compete as well in the past?

I’d say a couple of things and I’ll turn it over to Mark. So, first of all, the ability to meet the kind of demand we’ve seen on direct fulfilment. I think has been a direct result of the investments that we’ve made in the business and the customer satisfaction and efficiency that we’re seeing through our new flatbed distribution centers indicates to us that we’re making real progress with the customer there. And Mark, I don’t know if you want to add to that?

Sure, Craig. Yeah. We had a great first quarter in our supply chain development and we’re on track based on that to continue to increase our fulfilment square footage over 70% this year. Specific to the results we’re getting, in terms of the flatbed delivery centers, maybe I’ll highlight that, that was really designed to provide store relief, increase our customer satisfaction and service to customers, expand our available assortment and delivery capabilities. And we now have four flatbed DCs open now in various stages of ramping. Dallas is the furthest along. It’s ahead of our plans in terms of the flatbed sales comp, which are very strong and not just in dollars, but also in units and in number of deliveries. Our customer satisfaction has improved by 11 percentage points. We’ve improved that on time and complete. And notably our Pro penetration is very strong, in fact, the preponderance of sales out of that facility are in fact Pro. So, really helping us to capture the Pro there in Dallas.

And I guess a follow-up would just be my -- I guess my understanding at least historically has been the new HD Supply capability -- supply chain capabilities should enable you to penetrate markets where you really couldn’t play before, you just didn’t have that capability to be competitive. Are there any examples of where you’re making progress on that front?

Yeah. I mean, the focus of the capabilities that we’re building out is to be able to expand our reach into the pool of customer. We’ve been very strong over the years with the smaller Pro and the unplanned purchase with a larger Pro. And what we’re building is capabilities to actually extend into that planned purchase and we’re seeing that beginning to play out. So we’re very -- we are pleased with what we’re seeing in the early stages.

Got it. Thanks guys.

Our next question comes from the line of Karen Short with Barclays. Please proceed with your question. Ms. Short your line is live.

Oh! Sorry. Hi. Can you hear me?

Yeah, Karen.

All right. Just wanted to ask a couple of questions on the market in general, I’m wondering if you could frame how big you think the DIY market is versus the Pro market during -- I guess post-pandemic versus pre-pandemic. And then I had another slightly different angle on a different question.

Yeah. I mean, we really don’t have data as it relates to what we think the growth in the market is, that’s a pretty tough number to come by at this point.

Okay.

I mean, obviously, we play in a big market straight out of the blocks. It’s a $600 plus billion market in the MRO space that we play in, which is largely focused on multi-family as another $55 billion. So, but I have no way of knowing how much that’s expanded as a result of pandemic.

Okay. And then, Richard, I am going to ask a question on the actual that 14% framework that you had given and I realized that was just an attempt to give a framework. But when you look at your sales growth this quarter versus your EBIT growth, EBIT grew more than double sales growth, whereas when I look at prior quarters even if I add back COVID costs you won’t be kind of had it like 10% spread. So I’m wondering if that is the right relationship to think about going forward, especially because even in 1Q, as you noted, you had higher bonus accruals.

Well, what I’d say, as you know, the reason that we laid out the 14% was because we knew that we were coming to a year where COVID expenses were rolling off and investment expenses were rolling off. And so that was going to be -- and is the first year where we said look we’re returning back to operating expense leverage that you can see in the P&L. We feel like we delivered that in Q1. We’re very happy with the operating expense leverage and the flow-through relative to sales. And like we said, we’re going to keep operating with discipline and we’re going to drive operating expense leverage just as we intended. Margin will be a function of sales volume, obviously, but we’re pleased with the relationship in Q1.

Like we…

Okay.

… naturally leverage with volume.

Sorry, say that one more time?

We naturally leverage with volume.

Oh! No. Oh! No.

There is absolute leverage still tend to the business with volume.

Yeah. I understand that. I mean it’s all a function of sales, but it just -- it is definitely a much wider gap on the two, because it would imply full year numbers are way too low depending on however that -- how that relationship continues.

Well, just I think you, one of the other reasons that we laid out a hypothetical was because it is harder to read through on a one year or a two-year comparison in operating expense because of the fact that we were still in the middle of an investment program in 2019 and exiting it at the end of 2020. So, again, the best comment I can give is we were very happy with Q1 and how we drove operating expense leverage and flow-through.

Great. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Christopher Horvers with JP Morgan. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks. Good morning, everybody. So my first question is, do you think stimulus helps the DIY side of the business more than the Pro? And not sure if you looked at it this way, but on a two-year basis, did Pro accelerate more than the DIY side of the business?

Yeah. I’d say, Chris, on the stimulus situation, it’s all consumer demand, whether it is the Pro buying for the consumer, because the consumer is doing something or the consumer buying for the Pro. So we kind of look at it as total demand.

And then, I guess, anything on a two-year. I guess, my thought on that is, Pro you got to get them in your house and there’s a lot of backlog. So it seems like there could be a near-term bump on DIY versus Pro. So, and you also had some Pro comparisons last year where the Pro was not essential. So I was just curious if you add teased out what it was done on a two-year basis?

Well, the two-year stack plainly is the consumer is outgrew the Pro modestly on a two-year basis. But I don’t know that that provides information that’s more helpful than saying that the Pro has come back to the job site, demand seems to be in a potentially more easily fulfilled through the Pro than it was a year ago. But like Craig said, I think you have to look at topline demand. Ultimately, this is all or almost all consumer demand that is being fulfilled in different ways. So if anything we’re happy with the fact that the Pro seems to be -- it seems to have easier access to the job site and is getting to the job site easier.

Got it. Makes sense. And then May was a funny month last month, you had sort of stimulus spill-over into the first half, you had Pro restrictions and you talked about on a two-year basis, north of 30%. But can you maybe tease out how that month played out relative to the 27% total and/or even talk about one year comp trends quarter-to-date?

I’m not sure I understand your question.

You talked about in May being north of 30% on a two-year basis, last year you did a 27% in May, but there was a lot of noise. So boiling it down, can you talk about on a one year basis, what the business looks like so far in May?

No. We’re two weeks in. It’s just too early. But as we said, demand remains strong.

Got it. Understood. Have a great rest of spring.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Zach Fadem with Wells Fargo. Please proceed with your question.

Hey. Good morning. Richard, could you talk about performance at the gross margin line versus your initial plan and to what extent was lumber an incremental headwind. And when you think about the other moving parts around promo underlying comp leverage maybe mixing in HD Supply, is there anything in Q1 that changes your thinking for the full year gross margin framework?

Well, so versus last year, again, just to recap, we were -- we saw a decrease of approximately 10 basis points in gross margin, 35 of which were from the increased penetration of lumber in our sales and so the net of that obviously shows margins up. There is no doubt there is cost pressure in the economy and in our environment, but hats off to our merchants and our supply chain for managing through that. And Ted, maybe I’ll turn to you for a little bit of color.

No. The merchants in the supply chain team did a fantastic job. Over the years we’ve built tools and processes that give us some terrific visibility in great partnership with our finance teams. And as Craig has always said, we run the business as a portfolio and we’re a project business and we’re always looking to provide the best value to our customers on a project basis. Having said that, we certainly saw transportation pressure shrink on a relative basis was slightly improved, but we are still seeing shrink pressure. And then we’re seeing some commodity as in lumber in non-commodity cost pressures, but the team has worked through that. Believe it or not, there is still cost out in the portfolio, so we still work on cost out and optimization of supply chain flows. And given the strong demand, we were -- our promotional cadence was slightly higher than last year, there were some early spring participation that we had completely canceled last year. And so we were up in some activity on promotions. The overall level of promotions in any required clearance activity was down meaningfully. So that is what gave the balance of the offset of the cost and mix pressures.

Got it. That’s helpful color Ted. Another one for you, and also, Craig, as you think about all the drivers of home improvement spending today. Could you comment on how much of the industry you would quantify as repair and maintenance spending. How much is being driven by housing turnover and then what would you call discretionary?

Yeah. I -- honestly we have not taken the time to try to break that out in this demand environment. So, I really couldn’t give you a breakdown on that. We know that repair and remodel is the essence of what our business is all about. And then, of course, we’re there to help customers fulfill their dreams in terms of updating their homes. And clearly over the last year as customers who spend more time in their homes, they’ve told us that our home has never more important than it is today. And many of those customers like myself, we have to see a whole lot of things that needed to be done around the home and they’ve been going after that. When times got difficult in 2007and 2008, repair became more important than remodel. But we’re certainly not in that kind of environment today. So I just don’t have any way of knowing that expansion by those breakdowns at this point.

Got it. Appreciate the time.

Our next question comes from the line of Liz Suzuki with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thank you. Can you just talk about new customer growth and whether you’re seeing a greater degree of growth in new Pros versus new DIYers?

Yes. We are very happy with our overall customer portfolio both DIY, Pro and aging in capabilities. While I won’t give any specific numbers in breakouts, I can tell you that our customer files of both Pro and consumer have grown to help those file are very strong with a repurchase rate of developed customers growing faster than the new customers. So the new customers gain last year, we’ve been able to keep package in our media with that terrific rates. In our Pro customers, I will let Bill Lennie comment on the activity we’re seeing and engagement with our Pro customers with our B2B website, delivery capabilities, our new loyalty program, all of those are also adding to the stickiness of the Pro customer.

Great. And just on the services side. I mean how big is that now as a percent of sales. I know it’s probably relatively small. But, I mean, are there areas where you think you can expand into services without competing with your Pro customers?

Yeah. That business is in the 4% to 5% range of [Technical Difficulty] We are very pleased with the results that we have seen in that business and we think we can do that without getting...

Great. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Steven Forbes with Guggenheim. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning. Maybe just start with a quick follow-up on the broader supply chain initiatives. Ted, I think you mentioned, 70% increase in distribution footage this year. So, maybe if you can update us on how many facilities that correlates to and any color on the cadence or the planned cadence of openings?

Mark, do you want to take that?

Sure. We were on our way to 35 FDCs flatbed delivery centers. We have four open today. We’re opening several more through the end of the year. We’ve got a very solid pipeline there. Our MDOs we ended 2020 with 39, we opened eight in Q1 and we’re opening more there on our way to a roughly 100. And then MDCs were -- we’ve got two of those open, we open Houston during Q1. We have a healthy pipeline there, opening several more through the year as well and on our way to 20th or so on our MDCs.

Thank you. And then maybe just a quick follow-up for Richard, I think, I don’t believe you called out the incremental strategic investment spend impact when you walk through the expense line items. So maybe if you can just remind us on where we are right in terms of the trajectory of that strategic investment spend that’s captive within the model.

Well, at the end of Q4 last year, we announced that our strategic investment program that stretch from 2018 to 2020 was materially complete. And so going forward, our stance is that we will look to invest approximately 2% of sales every year in the form of CapEx. There’ll be associated expense with that, but I would just consider that part of our expense structure going forward.

Thank you. Best of luck.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Dennis McGill with Zelman. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Thank you. Ted, on the lumber side, when we think about, I guess, that’s the biggest driver of the commodity inflation. Is it fair to assume that impact accelerated through the quarter and was largest in April? And then as we think about that impact so far in May, it would be similarly above what you experienced in the first quarter?

Yes. It literally week-on-week, it’s gone up and as we sit last week framing and panel are effectively quadrupled in the market index pricing, and again, each of those went up last week.

Okay. Perfect. And then anything else to learn from the category performance, as you look at passing the April comp of last year and looking at that on a two-year basis. Any category is actually accelerating on two-year basis versus decelerating? And I guess, just on the quarter itself, the one category that wasn’t 20%. Just curious on what that was?

So the category that was not 20% was paint. We are very pleased with the performance in paint, but last year I think everyone stayed home and painted. So we had incredibly tough compares. So we didn’t quite hit the 20% mark. Overall on what’s accelerating, I would say, continued outdoor living has been very strong. So if all of you are interested in things like grills in patio sets, those are going to be in shorter supply as we get into the spring, because the demand is incredibly strong and things like patio. We do a fixed buy because most of that is important and we had to make the decision on the buy level quite some time ago. So that’s been particularly strong.

Anything else on the other side, besides paint that you can call out as being a decelerating trend?

No.

All right. Much appreciate it. Thank you, guys.

Our next question comes from the line of Greg Melich with Evercore. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Thanks. Richard, if we think about that operating leverage and compare it to 2019, you’re up 180 basis points. Is that -- is it -- as we think about it going forward, is it fair to say that, now where we want to be going forward. In other words, in the second quarter you normally are a few billion more sales and usually your operating margins a little higher than the first quarter, if you look over the last five years, is that or any reason why we shouldn’t assume that sort of flow through now?

Well, with respect to sales, we’re not going to extrapolate what we’ve seen into the future. Obviously, there is a degree of uncertainty on how the consumer is going to respond this year. I’ll just say it again, Greg, when you compare the first quarter of this year to the first quarter of last year and you adjust for non-recurring expenses, we feel very pleased with the operating expense leverage that we drove and the flow-through that we drove at this level of volume.

Got it. And then -- and if I could follow-up on inflation and mix, if the commodity part of it, that’s just wasn’t just lumber right, that 7 -- 375 bps was lumber and maybe copper and other commodities or was it specifically lumber. And then as part of that if you -- that was just lumber?

Lumber and copper primarily, yes.

Got it. And so then if we look at that average basket up 10%, is it fair to say that overall inflation or average AUR was 500 bps, 600 bps of that basket increase?

No.

Outdoor?

No.

It was also driven by project nature of the business. The innovation that the merchants have brought to the market.

Yeah.

You’ve got as a percentage of basket, I mean, it’s a…

Yeah. We are not…

Got it. Okay.

… giving it by lumber.

So inflation hasn’t widespread across the store, across the store it’s more mix.

If you think about it from a ticket standpoint, the ticket is being driven by multitude of things. Yes, there is inflation and we’ve been able to pass-through. But again, it’s also driven by the fact that our Pro business strength drives a higher average ticket. Our service business drives a higher average ticket and so there is a number of factors that drove the ticket strength overall in the business, innovation within categories. So as you continue to expand and grow in cordless capability and outdoor power equipment, for example. The average price in a lawnmower that is a cordless versus gas is significantly higher. All of that contributes to driving the growth in ticket.

Got it. Thanks a lot. Good luck guys. Great job.

Thanks, Greg.

Christine, we have time for one more question.

Thank you. Our final question comes from the line of Scott Mushkin with R5 Capital. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, guys. Thanks. Thanks for taking my question. So I was just wondering if you could talk about labor inflation and just the overall installation as you guys think about the back half of the year. So that’s number one question?

Yeah. I mean, as you know, we converted part of our COVID expense into permanent labor cost in the November timeframe of 2020, and so obviously, all of that is in the performance that we just delivered. As it relates to labor in total, we’re -- this is spring, we’re hiring up, we’ve been able to hire more folks this year than last year, even though we were ramping last year to cover the demand and so that’s something that we work on a week-to-week basis to be flexible and agile right now is incredibly important. And the two areas that we’re focused on, not knowing exactly how all this will play out is, inventory flow and labor. Those are the two things that we’re focused on. Both the relatively short cycle planning and so that’s really what we’re trying to make sure we can cover the demand that’s out there.

And do you guys having any trouble getting labor and having wage rates or labor rates a lot in certain markets or is that really not an issue for you guys at this stage?

I mean, there is always variances by market and some markets are more challenging than others in any given year. But as I said, we’ve actually hire more folks this year than we did last year.

That’s great, guys. That’s all my questions. I appreciate the answer.

Thank you, Ms. Janci, I would now like to turn the floor back over to you for closing comments.

Thank you all for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you on our second quarter earnings call in August.

This concludes today’s teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation and have a wonderful day.