Theodore Wahl
President and CEO
Sure, Andrew, and good morning to you. I think just to frame out your question and then the response a bit, I think overall the fundamentals, and I know I mentioned this in the prepared remarks, but the underlying industry fundamentals continue to gain strength just when you think about and consider the multi-decade demographic tailwind that has been trickling into the system that's becoming more notable, and that's only going to amplify the strength of the industry in the months and years ahead. So that's a real positive. I do think the key, aside from a lot of the noise you may hear out of DC, the big key you would hear from most of our customers and the provider community at large is that link between staffing availability and census. Because more than any other factor, labor availability is the key to occupancy growth, and occupancy is the key to consistent financial outcomes as well as predictable financial outcomes. And the most recent occupancy data continues to be very positive and growing across all geographies, whether it be urban, suburban, rural, and facility types as well. So that's foundational when you think about industry stability. On the reimbursement side, CMS recently proposed a 2.8% increase for Medicare rates for fiscal year 2026. That's been generally well received. There continues to be positive reimbursement news at the state level as well. And then from a regulatory perspective, I know I mentioned this as well, but I want to emphasize the clarity this provides for the provider community is, you know, that Texas ruling that came out, which is applied nationwide, that all but eliminates the minimum staffing or the key provisions of the minimum staffing rule, which I believe has been an overhang for the industry since it was announced, even if the likelihood of it ultimately being implemented was low. I think specific to the things coming out of DC, I know, for instance, provider taxes are getting some attention recently, specifically for hospitals, and I do want to differentiate between hospitals, SNFs, behavioral health, other types of facilities or communities that more fit our business model. I would still include that in the too early to tell category in terms of what, if any, changes will be proposed or ultimately implemented. And even when you unpack a provider tax, the mechanics of that program vary depending on the type of provider as I just outlined. The rates vary state to state. The effect on operators and facilities within those states is different depending on a variety of factors, occupancy, patient mix, etc. So that's too early to tell. If there were changes, that's the one that you hear whispers about. But I think if you poll the provider community, at least within the SNF market, they would still say it's more likely than not that that is not impacted. And to the extent it is in any way impacted, it would likely be more modest. It would be phased in over a period of years and manageable. And then just to bring it back to us ultimately, which is time-tested, it would have the effect of only increasing the demand for the types of services we offer when you think about the central theme of our value proposition, which is certainty, financial, regulatory, and otherwise.