Mark Harmsworth
Analyst · JMP. Please proceed with your question
Thanks, Paresh. On a GAAP basis, net income for the quarter was just to $500,000 or $0.07 per share. On an adjusted basis, net income was $4.2 million or $0.54 per share, up from $2.8 million or $0.35 per share in the first quarter last year. Before getting to the numbers, I wanted to turn the clock back a year. On our first earnings call in 2019, we talked about growth. We laid out three phases of growth, how they would show up in the numbers and ultimately, how they would start to positively impact our results. 12 months later, it all played out, as we described. In Q2 last year, gross premiums written were up over the same quarter of the previous year. And Q4, gross premiums earned were up and this quarter is where it really starts to impact our financial results. In Q1, gross premiums earned were up 12%. This growth, as well as the growth in written premiums, was driven by our technology-enabled insurance company, TypTap. While gross premiums earned were up 12%, net premiums earned were up 20% or about $10.5 million over the same quarter last year. The growth in net earned premiums helped to drive our consolidated combined ratio down to 88% for the quarter, and we think this is the most important indicator of what happened operationally this quarter. So with all that positive momentum, why was GAAP net income only about $500,000? First, investment income, which is normally about $3 million or so per quarter was negative, which was very unusual for us. This was largely related to investments in limited partnerships. As we know, the capital markets had one of their worst quarters in history, and this impacted our limited partnerships. In Q1, we recorded a loss of $3 million for limited partnerships, which, combined with lower rates on cash dragged investment income negative. Also in the quarter, we recognized a $2.2 million realized investment loss as we made some changes to our portfolio to rebalance it and in the process, triggered a few realized losses. Lastly, and this was the biggest impact, we recorded an unrealized investment loss of just over $4.8 million as equity investments dropped along with the decline in the overall financial markets. When the new accounting standards came into effect for equity securities, we commented that equity market volatility could translate into earnings volatility in some quarters, and this was one of them. Investment volatility, most of which is not cash related, had a dampening effect on what was otherwise a very strong quarter. Again, the most important result for the quarter is the combined ratio of 88%. While on the income statement, a quick update on loss expenses, which are up slightly, this increase was driven by the increase in gross premiums earned, offset by a reduction in weather-related losses. You may recall that we have a significant hail storm in the first quarter last year. Now let's turn to the balance sheet for a minute. As mentioned, most of the investment related items were noncash. Cash flow from operations in the first quarter was $25 million, more than double the $11 million of operational cash flow in the first quarter last year. Cash flow is important. If you look all the way back to the beginning of 2017, the ratio of cash flow from operations to dividends paid has steadily increased. So that's our cash flow. What about cash position? At the end of Q1, we had just over $317 million in cash, an increase of about $88 million for the quarter. That increase is somewhat higher than the cash flow from operations of $25 million I just discussed. Because in addition to that, we also received $30 million in advanced premiums from Anchor. Further, we had a net reduction in fixed-term securities as some investments insured. As we know, there is considerable uncertainty with respect to the COVID-19 outbreak. And in times like this, our strong financial position bears mentioning again. We have two well capitalized insurance companies with significant excess surplus under a holding company with excess liquidity. At the end of last year, Homeowners Choice had an RBC ratio of 625% and TypTap had an RBC ratio of 432%, and both insurance companies made money in the first quarter of this year. So we do not need to put money into either of the insurance companies. Having said that, should we ever need to, we have $58 million of cash and investments at the holding company level as well as $40 million available on our revolving credit facility. A quick update on the buyback program. At the end of 2019, we had about $1.2 million left available on the 2019 buyback program, and we executed purchases in the first two months of 2020 to close out that program. In March, the Board approved a new buyback program for 2020, and we began execution on that program as well. During the quarter, under the two plans combined, we bought back a total of 76,850 shares at an average price of $39.55. As I mentioned before, the buyback program has a significant cumulative effect. Basic share count is now 7,735,000 shares, down by 625,000 shares from 12 months ago. As a result, total cash dividends paid this quarter were $250,000 less than Q1 last year despite paying the same amount per share. Just one other note on the balance sheet, book value per share of $23.17 is down $0.72 from the end of last year as it was impacted by the investment adjustments we discussed, most notably the unrealized losses on equity securities. So in summary, net income this quarter was adversely impacted by some adjustments to our investment portfolio as part of the general decline in the capital markets. But operationally, this was another good quarter for us. Premiums are growing, the combined ratio was down, cash flow and liquidity are strong and getting stronger, we are bringing on a new book of business in the second quarter, and we look forward to the balance of the year. And with that, I'll turn it back to Paresh.